N.S. moves forward with plan to force municipalities to protect coastlines
The Nova Scotia government is offering municipalities a blueprint on how they can protect the province's 13,000 kilometres of coastline.
Environment Minister Tim Halman on Tuesday announced a new website link with examples of bylaws and other regulations municipalities can use to prevent coastal erosion.
It's a controversial measure — the Progressive Conservatives have refused to put into force a 2019 law adopted by the previous Liberal government that would have required the provincial government to manage coastal protection.
Instead, the Tories want the province's municipalities to draft their own bylaws that define where coastal regulations would apply, set minimum building elevations, and create buffer zones to protect infrastructure from erosion.
Halman also announced more than $1.3 million for the Nova Scotia Federation of Municipalities to hire a climate change policy analyst and help its 49 members create their own bylaws.
The Progressive Conservatives promised to offer examples of bylaws when they announced their coastal protection strategy in February 2024 and confirmed they would not proclaim the Liberals' 2019 Coastal Protection Act.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
13 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Bell: 'It's lunacy' — Alberta pushes Carney to drop Liberal electric vehicle fantasy
Article content Freeland was in Calgary this week and, as my last column pointed out, she said the Carney Liberals love Alberta. We will see how that works out and we will get to that letter in a minute. 'The reason why the Liberals don't reverse this policy is unfathomable. I just don't understand it.' says Dreeshen. 'For ridiculous things like this, where's there is no obvious logic behind it, I think it would have to be just pure partisan Liberal politics where they think this somehow appeals to their base, where they can score political points with their base.
Toronto Sun
13 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
GOLDSTEIN: What happened to Mark Carney's art of the deal?
Since becoming prime minister, his strategy for dealing with Donald Trump has been mostly one of appeasement rather than confrontation Get the latest from Lorrie Goldstein straight to your inbox Prime Minister Mark Carney holds a closing press conference following the NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands on Wednesday, June 25, 2025. Photo by Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS Prime Minister Mark Carney was elected because he said he was the best leader to deal with Donald Trump in a tariff war. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Now would be a good time for him to prove it. When he was running for the Liberal leadership, Carney's approach to dealing with the U.S. President was all 'elbows up' rhetoric. In January, he said Trump's threat of imposing an illegal 25% tariff on Canadian imports was 'a blatant violation of our trade agreements, and will demand the most serious trade response in our history … 'Dollar-for-dollar retaliatory tariffs by Canada should be a given and they should be aimed where their impacts in the United States will be felt the hardest.' But as prime minister, Carney's strategy for dealing with Trump has been mostly one of appeasement rather than confrontation. The question, given Trump suspending all trade and security negotiations with Canada on Friday because of U.S. anger over Canada's digital services tax, which has been widely criticized by business groups in Canada and the U.S., is whether Carney's strategy is working. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. (The digital services tax was passed a year ago by the Justin Trudeau government and is poised to extract billions of dollars in tax revenue from a number of U.S. tech giants operating in Canada, starting Monday.) Read More In March, Carey abandoned 'dollar for dollar' tariffs, saying it was unrealistic given that the U.S. economy is ten times the size of Canada's. While Carney has imposed selective tariffs on U.S. goods in response to Trump's tariffs on Canadian goods, in April he removed some Canadian counter-tariffs on automakers as long as they maintained production and investment levels in Canada. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. He also announced the suspension of counter-tariffs for six months on goods imported from the U.S. used in Canadian manufacturing, processing and food and beverage packaging, as well as on goods used to support public health, health care, public safety and national security. In June, the Carney government introduced the 'Strong Borders Act' to 'keep our borders secure, combat transnational organized crime, stop the flow of illegal fentanyl, and crack down on money laundering' in deference to Trump's demands about border security. Also in June, Carney announced Canada would meet its long-neglected NATO target of spending 2% of annual GDP on defence by March 31, 2026, another Trump demand. RECOMMENDED VIDEO This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Last week, Carney said Canada would comply with Trump's demand to increase spending on defence to 5% of GDP by 2035, carrying a $150-billion a year price tag. The Carney government didn't respond to Trump's decision earlier this month to double U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50%. He called them 'unlawful, unjustified and illogical' and said Canada was preparing a response but would hold off imposing counter-tariffs pending the outcome of ongoing negotiations between Canada and the U.S. (Since then, the federal government has announced tariff-rate quotas on steel mill products imported into Canada but the Canadian steel industry has called them insufficient.) On June 16, following a meeting with Trump at the G7, Carney announced Canada and the U.S. had agreed to a 30-day deadline to reach a deal on trade and security. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. While Trump suggested a deal was possible, the announcement of the deadline – subsequently set at July 21 – came only from Carney. As the Prime Minister's Office described it: 'Prime Minister Carney and President Trump discussed immediate trade pressures and priorities for each country's workers and businesses, and shared updates on key issues raised in negotiations on a new economic and security relationship between Canada and the U.S. 'To that end, the leaders agreed to pursue negotiations toward a deal within the coming 30 days.' RECOMMENDED VIDEO But within a week, Carney was downplaying that announcement, saying there was no assurance a deal would be reached by July 21. And on Friday, Trump suspended all negotiations because of the digital services tax. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. It may be that there is no effective strategy – either confrontation or appeasement – to deal with Trump given the size of the U.S. economy compared to ours and the fact Trump thinks nothing of breaking existing trade agreements while demanding new ones and changes his positions on issues within days of making them. His negotiating style is to make enormous demands, then delay their implementation to see how much he can get, with the threat he will cause economic chaos if negotiations fail. That said, Carney told Canadians he could handle Trump. So far, the jury is out. lgoldstein@ Columnists NHL Sunshine Girls Toronto Raptors Toronto Raptors
Global News
15 hours ago
- Global News
Protest bubble zone laws coming for schools, places of worship: Fraser
Justice Minister Sean Fraser says the Liberal government will press ahead with plans for new criminal provisions against blocking access to places or worship, schools and community centres. The measures, promised during the recent federal election campaign, would also create a criminal offence of wilfully intimidating or threatening people attending events at these venues. The minister's statement comes as civil libertarians point to existing provisions intended to curb such behaviour and push back against the idea of new measures that could infringe on freedom of expression and assembly. 2:50 Divided Toronto city council on 'bubble zone' by-law proposal Tensions have risen in Canadian communities over public protests, many prompted by the ongoing hostilities in the Middle East. Story continues below advertisement Several Canadian municipalities have taken steps recently to mandate 'bubble zones' that restrict protest activity near such places as religious institutions, schools and child care centres. 'It's not lost on me that there will be different levels of government that try to address this challenge in different ways,' Fraser said, adding that the federal government has an opportunity — where behaviour crosses a criminal threshold — to legislate in that space. 'We clearly have seen challenges when it comes to certain religious communities in Canada who are facing extraordinary discrimination — antisemitism, Islamophobia, and other forms of hate,' Fraser said in a recent interview. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'People need to know that in Canada they are free to pray to the God of their choice and to, at the same time, freely express themselves, but not to the point where you threaten the protected Charter rights of a religious minority.' James Turk, director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University, said he questions the need for new provisions and suggests politicians are proposing penalties simply to appear to be doing something. 1:09 Clarington to consider bubble zone bylaw He said existing laws against mischief, nuisance and interfering with religious celebrations can be used to deal with the kinds of behaviour the federal government wants to address. Story continues below advertisement 'I haven't heard a single thing that isn't already illegal, so it's a waste of time. It adds confusion to the Criminal Code and it suggests that they're only engaged in performative activity,' Turk said. 'They want to be seen to be doing something about this pressure they're under.' Anaïs Bussières McNicoll, director of the fundamental freedoms program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, also said she wonders about the scope of the proposed new federal provisions 'and if they are necessary or simply duplicative of existing criminal offences.' Bussières McNicoll said it's important to remember that a protest might be disruptive but also protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of peaceful assembly. 2:10 B.C. government introduces legislation to establish 'bubble zones' to prevent COVID-19 protests 'As a parent myself, I know that any protest can be sometimes scary for a child. We're talking about loud voices, huge crowds, emotions are running high,' she said. Story continues below advertisement 'So I believe it's part of my role as a parent to teach my child about what living in a democracy means, why we need protests, why we need space in our society for strong language — including language that we disagree with — and to teach my child about what we can do if we personally disagree with speech that we hear.' Richard Robertson, director of research and advocacy at B'nai Brith Canada, said that while the organization welcomes the planned new federal provisions, additional federal measures are needed. B'nai Brith wants national 'vulnerable infrastructure legislation' that would prohibit protests within a certain distance of a place of worship or school, or perhaps during specific time periods, if they interfere with someone's ability to attend the institutions, Robertson said. 'That would remove the need for municipalities and provinces to adopt legislation, and it would send a clear message that across Canada, individuals do not have the right to prevent others from accessing their houses of worship and their community centres and cultural institutions.' — With files from Anja Karadeglija
