logo
Abortion, assisted dying and Britain's dangerous new politics

Abortion, assisted dying and Britain's dangerous new politics

Spectator23-06-2025
'Now, splendidly, everything had become clear. The enemy at last was plain in view, huge and hateful, all disguise cast off. It was the Modern Age in arms.' After this week I feel like Evelyn Waugh at the time of the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939. The politics of 'progress' has found its fulfilment in the union of two total malignancies: the campaigns to abort babies at full term and to kill old people before their time. Here is our enemy, all disguise cast off.
It's the revenge of the middle-aged against their dependents
I've been accused of disguising something myself: my Christian faith. And it's true that while I've never hidden it (see my maiden speech) I didn't parade my faith as the basis of my objection to assisted suicide. You don't need religious arguments to show this Bill is bad, and many atheists have been brilliant in the battle against it. You just need to actually read the Bill, and the statements of all the professional bodies who work with the elderly and dying. I'm appalled that so many MPs – judging by their asinine speeches – have plainly not done this.
But now that the Bill has passed the Commons I guess I can come out of the closet and say to the militant anti-Christians who were pushing it: you're not wrong. I do also object to euthanasia on religious grounds – because the case for euthanasia is itself a religious one. Nothing else explains the failure of its supporters to engage with the detail of the Bill, or the practicalities of implementing it. Support for assisted suicide is an article of faith – faith in the capacity of individual human beings to play the role of God, towards themselves and others.
Christians by contrast think human beings are fallen – weak, selfish, dangerous – so we don't trust them with absolute power. That's why over the centuries, especially in England, the idea developed that the law should protect us from each other, and even from ourselves, and certainly from the state.
In objecting to assisted suicide, I was trying to defend this old fashioned idea that the law should protect the vulnerable. And in abandoning this idea we are opening the door to a terrible dystopia.
Not just in the moral sphere. The things our country needs more than anything are more children, and more care for our aging population. The Commons voted this week for the opposite: death to both groups. It's the revenge of the middle-aged against their dependents. We are ushering in a dangerous new politics, a sort of hedonic utilitarianism in which the convenience of adults is paramount even over the lives of the young and old. This is the pagan philosophy, with its cult of strength, which Christianity banished but is now returning.
Maybe I'm exaggerating, but these are apocalyptic times. As the world beyond Britain blows up, as technology rewrites everything, and as our own security, economy and society are increasingly, desperately, precarious, how do we feel about junking the ideas that created and sustained the peace and prosperity of these islands for 1500 years? What's the alternative story we're going to tell ourselves, in place of the one about us being individually, uniquely valuable but also chronically prone to wrongdoing?
The opposite story – that we're perfect moral beings but that if we're weak or unwanted we will be killed – feels less appealing to me, and certainly less useful to the challenges of the times.
If we are to withstand our enemies, bring our society together, and tame the technium (somehow ensure that human values govern the new age of machines), we are going to need values that are up to the job. I don't think humanist atheism or progressive liberalism or whatever the new religion should be called, is up to it. Christianity is. Only Christianity is.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Council introduces anti-terror gates to town park
Council introduces anti-terror gates to town park

BBC News

time40 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Council introduces anti-terror gates to town park

A local council says it is in the process of installing two new gates on the entrances to a town park, to comply with a newly-enacted anti-terrorism Town Park has been identified as a site that meets the criteria for the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill, also known as Martyn's legislation is named after Martyn Hett, who was among 22 people killed in the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing in May leader Ian Thorn said "We have been preparing for the new legislation known as Martyn's Law and have been reviewing how we will ensure that we are prepared to meet the future legal requirements." Martyn's Law, requires venues with a capacity of 200 or more to have a plan in place in case of an attack on their Home Office said that "through the Act, qualifying premises and events should be better prepared and protected, ready to respond in the event of a terrorist attack." Local Councillor Mel Jacob said that with the park regularly used for music and other events, the town council had to respond to the new legislation."We're all aware of those various incidents where vehicles have driven into people. We haven't had an incident of that type. We're just making sure we don't have one."The new gates will cost £3,000, a burden that will fall on local ratepayers."We didn't have a Martin's law pot of money. It's the same with any health and safety legislation. You've got to make sure you're compliant and obviously making sure people are safe is a key responsibility," Ms Jacob added.

Trump says Gaza children 'look very hungry' after Israel denies any starvation
Trump says Gaza children 'look very hungry' after Israel denies any starvation

Metro

time2 hours ago

  • Metro

Trump says Gaza children 'look very hungry' after Israel denies any starvation

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Donald Trump has pushed against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the issue of starvation in Gaza, saying children in the region 'look very hungry'. Yesterday, Netanyahu flatly denied there were any such problems in Gaza after his government was accused of deliberately blocking off food. He told a Christian conference in Jerusalem this is a 'bold-faced lie', adding: 'There is no policy of starvation in Gaza and there is no starvation in Gaza.' Despite the status of the US as Israel's biggest international supporter, President Trump appeared to disagree with this assessment while answering questions ahead of a meeting with Keir Starmer today. Asked by a reporter if he agreed with Netanyahu's comment, Trump replied: 'I don't know. 'Based on television, I would say not particularly, cause those children look very hungry. 'But we're giving a lot of money and a lot of food, and other nations are now stepping up. I know this nation [the UK] is, right here.' Attention has been drawn to the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza in recent days, as images of malnourished children circulate widely on TV and in print. Philippe Lazzarini, the Commissioner-General for the UN's Palestine refugee agency UNRWA, said last week his health workers were surviving on 'one small meal a day, often just lentils, if at all'. UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher has accused the Israeli government of forcing starvation on the people of Gaza, which is classified as a war crime. Israel, in turn, has accused the UN of failing to distribute aid properly, saying Hamas has been allowed to siphon it off. Netanyahu's government announced at the weekend that secure routes would be opened in Gaza for aid delivery, while the UK is preparing to airdrop aid as part of plans led by Jordan. Starmer described the situation as a 'humanitarian crisis' and an 'absolute catastrophe' as he stood beside Trump, adding: 'I think people in Britain are revolted at what they're seeing on their screens.' More Trending The crisis in Gaza is among the top priorities as the two leaders talk at Trump's Turnberry golf resort in Ayrshire, with the PM pushing for a ceasefire. He has come under pressure in recent days to announce the UK will formally recognise Palestinian statehood, but has held off, with government figures saying the move should come when it would have the maximum impact. A No 10 spokesperson today repeated Starmer's recent comment that Palestinians have an 'inalienable right to statehood', adding it is a 'question of when, not if' the UK would recognise it. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Joey Barton branded 'bitter and twisted' after vile posts about England's Euro 2025 win MORE: Donald Trump labelled 'Commander in Cheat' after caddie drops golf ball next to bunker MORE: Gaza becomes 'most expensive place to eat in the world'

More than 250 MPs call on Keir Starmer to recognise Palestine
More than 250 MPs call on Keir Starmer to recognise Palestine

The National

time4 hours ago

  • The National

More than 250 MPs call on Keir Starmer to recognise Palestine

Spearheaded by Labour MP Sarah Champion, the letter has now gathered signatures from MPs across nine parties, with almost 40% of the Commons now behind the move. Starmer is coming under severe pressure to recognise the state of Palestine after France pledged to do so in September. The letter has been put together ahead of a UN conference this week in New York, with signatories stating their expectation is "the UK Government outlining when and how it will act on its long-standing commitment on a two-state solution". READ MORE: John Swinney to raise Gaza humanitarian crisis in Donald Trump meeting It adds the UK recognising Palestinian statehood "would have a significant impact" due to historic connections and the UK's membership of the UN Security Council. The majority of those who have signed are Labour MPs. BREAKING: 255 MPs, from 9 parties, have sent a joint letter to the Prime Minister & Foreign Secretary urging them to recognise Palestine as a state now 1/2 — Sarah Champion (@SarahChampionMP) July 28, 2025 Champion posted on Twitter/X: "255 MPs, from 9 parties, have sent a joint letter to the Prime Minister & Foreign Secretary urging them to recognise Palestine as a state now." The state of Palestine is recognised by 147 of the 193 members of the United Nations, but the UK is not one of them. On Monday, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds squirmed around questions about when the UK would recognise a Palestinian state. Reynolds said Labour would, 'if it delivers the breakthrough that we need', which has long been the party's position. READ MORE: LIVE: Updates as Donald Trump meets Keir Starmer in Ayrshire He told Sky News that ministers "want to" and "will" recognise [[Palestine]]. But he then said: "The question is, how can we use that in a way that gives a genuine breakthrough to a real peaceful process? 'I know many countries around the world have already done this. To be frank, to be candid, it hasn't stopped the appalling scenes that we're talking about this morning." Asked whether Palestine would be recognised in this parliament, Reynolds appeared to skirt around the question saying: "In this parliament, yes. I mean, if it delivers the breakthrough that we need. 'But don't forget, we can only do this once. If we do it in a way which is tokenistic, doesn't produce the end to this conflict, where do we go to next?"

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store