Von der Leyen's EU Commission faces judgement in Strasbourg Parliament
The far-right-led motion of no-confidence will go to a roll call vote around midday on Thursday, with von der Leyen's and the entire Commission's future put to the test in the confidence vote.
Ursula von der Leyen appeared to secure more votes protecting her from censure on Wednesday, as Socialists pledged support for the Commission President in exchange for assurances on the EU budget, including the European Social Fund.
But how many MEPs will support the motion, and how many will abstain?
Follow the vote and reactions with our reporters on the ground in Strasbourg and throughout Europe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
14 hours ago
- France 24
Can the EU's Clean Industrial Deal deliver for Europeans? Juggling competitiveness and green goals
One of your browser extensions seems to be blocking the video player from loading. To watch this content, you may need to disable it on this site. To display this content from YouTube, you must enable advertisement tracking and audience measurement. The Green Deal is often seen as the flagship project of the previous EU mandate. But after last year's European elections, in which right-wing parties performed well, the Green Deal was rebranded as the Clean Industrial Deal. There is now more emphasis on industrial revival and competitiveness. MEPs and members of the European Commission say the EU should not have to choose between re-industrialisation and meeting climate objectives, but rather do both. Officially, the goal of becoming climate-neutral by 2050 remains. In practice, though, how to strike that balance is a bone of contention between competing political forces in the European Union. We dive into what's at stake with two MEPs. Programme prepared by Perrine Desplats and Isabelle Romero
France 24
15 hours ago
- France 24
EU orders AI companies to clean up their act, stop using pirated data
On Thursday, the European Commission released a highly anticipated set of guidelines for companies developing advanced artificial intelligence chatbots to do so in a responsible way. The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice is voluntarily, but seen as a handbook for companies to abide by the EU's landmark regulation, the AI Act. The guidelines cover AI safety, copyright and transparency, and apply to the companies making advanced, generalist AI apps like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Le Chat, developed by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Mistral respectively. Tech lobbies say it goes too far, and civil society groups say it's been watered down by the very same tech lobbies. Industry lobby CCIA Europe said in a statement that the Code of Practice "imposes a disproportionate burden on AI providers". Meanwhile, The Future Society think tank said the guide "means that potentially dangerous models get to European users without receiving any meaningful scrutiny from the AI Office (responsible for enforcing the AI Act)." The Future Society argues that the EU wants to look innovation-friendly and not annoy US President Donald Trump, who's criticised the AI Act. They say tech lobbyists were given exclusive access to the final version of the Code of Practice, because the EU was keen to make sure that as many of these companies as possible sign up to the Code. Indeed, the European Commission might well argue there's not much point in a Code of Practice if no one signs up to it. Data drama Data is the lifeblood of these AI models. What you feed into them is crucial for how they work. Up to now, most AI companies don't make it very clear what data they're using, and how. This is about to change. Signatories will have to report on their training method and data – how they got their data, what kind of data it is and evidence of how they obtained the rights to third-party data. They'll also need to let independent external evaluators inspect their models, including letting them look at relevant training data. One particularly thorny issue is copyrighted data. Web crawlers have picked up everything online – even copyrighted content – and fed it into the machine, and many artists and authors feel their work has been stolen for profit. Recent court documents show Anthropic has attempted to compile a library of every book in the world, going so far as to order second hand books en masse and scan them page by page. That's not all: vast swathes of deliberately pirated material have also been used to train these models. The Code of Practice asks companies for the first time to commit not to using databases of pirated content to train their models, and asks them to allow rights holders to opt out of their work being used for training. This comes hot on the heels of some important rulings in the United States, which provide the first pieces of legal precedent on the use of copyrighted material. Three decisions from judges in California in the last few weeks have tended towards the use of copyrighted material to train models being "fair use," without giving a free pass on pirated content. But given that copyright trials are by nature case-by-case, expect a lot more lawsuits still to come. Top dollar for top data Meanwhile, the market for high-quality, proprietary data has exploded overnight. This is not just to avoid copyright lawsuits, but also for AI companies to push their models to be competitive and give the best answers possible. Last month, Meta invested more than $14 billion in Scale AI. The startup provides bespoke training data to several AI companies, but the deal has some of them flocking to Scale AI's rivals. Turing is one of these data providers. CEO Jonathan Siddharth told FRANCE 24 that business has been booming in the last couple of weeks. His business model is based on millions of freelance software engineers and experts in poor countries – a massive new gig economy for the AI age. "Decent pay, no micromanagement, flexible hours," said one of these workers from India, who was recently laid off and to whom we granted anonymity. He added: "Only problem was zero job security, no paid leaves, often not enough work which led to less pay." We asked Siddharth about the data and piracy issue earlier this week. "Our clients pay for data which they basically own, which is different from scraping content from the internet," he said. "I do think we have to figure out new models. What does the world look like when you are creating content that would be ingested by an agent or an LLM in the future? I think we're still figuring that out."
LeMonde
16 hours ago
- LeMonde
EU Commission will 'assess' UK–France deal on Channel migrant return
The European Commission said on Friday, July 11, that it would examine a deal between Paris and London on returning migrants arriving in the United Kingdom, as other European Union countries fret over the impact. Commission spokesman Markus Lammert said the rising number of migrants smuggled across the English Channel was "alarming" and a "robust response" was required to deter the dangerous journeys. "On the specific envisaged cooperation between France and the United Kingdom, the commission will assess the concrete modalities of this cooperation," Lammert told reporters in Brussels. Under the so-called "one in, one out" agreement announced Thursday, migrants would be sent back to France in return for the UK accepting a similar number of migrants with strong asylum cases. The commission has to examine it before it can come into force, and the deal has sparked "serious concerns" among some other European nations. Their worry is that France would return migrants to the first EU country they arrived in. More than 21,000 migrants have made the Channel crossing in rudimentary vessels this year alone.
