Bitcoin Hits Record High of $120,000 as Bullish Momentum Builds
Why Did Cars Get So Hard to See Out Of?
How German Cities Are Rethinking Women's Safety — With Taxis
Philadelphia Reaches Pact With Workers to End Garbage Strike
After surging on the election of Donald Trump to a second US presidential term, Bitcoin had settled into a pattern of fluctuating on either side of $100,000 for several months. Concern about Trump's political and economic policies had helped to temper optimism over the pro-crypto agenda of his administration. Now with other risk assets such as stocks back around record highs, Bitcoin has also resumed its push higher.
'This shift signals a maturing perspective on Bitcoin — not merely a speculative asset, but a macro hedge and a structurally scarce store of value,' said George Mandres, senior trader at XBTO Trading LLC. 'A surge in risk-on sentiment across equities, coupled with significant institutional inflows into spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, has fueled this steady ascent, notably absent the sharp volatility of previous bull runs.'
The crypto market bellwether rose as much as 1.9% to $121,344, and is now up about 30% since December. Bitcoin more than doubled last year. Bitcoin's renewed momentum has also spilled over to smaller tokens — second-ranked Ether rose 1.5%, while XRP and Solana both increased about 2.7% around noon in Singapore on Monday.
'Bitcoin's cleared $120,000, but the real test is $125,000,' said Rachael Lucas, a crypto analyst at BTC Markets. While short-term profit booking can be expected, 'the uptrend has fuel' driven by strong demand from exchange traded funds, she added. 'Support at $112,000 and any dip looks like a buying opportunity, not a reversal.'
Helping to fuel the latest rally was the liquidation of bearish crypto bets at the end of the week. Traders who shorted Bitcoin bore the brunt of the rapid damage, with over $1 billion in positions wiped out, according to data from Coinglass.
The token rose on the back of anticipation for what a Congressional committee dubbed 'Crypto Week,' where lawmakers in the US Congress are expected to debate and possibly vote on key cryptocurrency legislation.
Some analysts aren't totally sold on the token's continued rise.
'In my view, this isn't a macro-driven rally, but rather an isolated event,' said Nicolai Sondergaard, a research analyst at Nansen. 'That said, recent US policy developments such as fiscal expansion and expectations of further monetary easing have created a backdrop that is undeniably favorable for Bitcoin.'
(Updates with price moves and comments)
'Our Goal Is to Get Their Money': Inside a Firm Charged With Scamming Writers for Millions
Trump's Cuts Are Making Federal Data Disappear
Trade War? No Problem—If You Run a Trade School
Soccer Players Are Being Seriously Overworked
Will Trade War Make South India the Next Manufacturing Hub?
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tucker Carlson Spits Out 2-Word Response To Trump's Claim That He Called The President To Apologize
Tucker Carlson is disputing Donald Trump's claim that he apologized for accusing the president of being 'complicit' in Israel's military attacks on Iran last month. Just days after the former Fox News host made the comments in a June 13 newsletter posted on his website, the POTUS alleged to reporters in the Oval Office that the conservative pundit reached out to him to bury the hatchet. 'He called and apologized the other day because he thought he had said things that were a little bit too strong, and I appreciate that,' Trump said on June 18. Trump also referred to Carlson as 'kooky' in a pointed June 16 post on his social platform Truth Social. 'Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!'' he wrote. In a new interview with German newspaper Bild, Carlson denied that the call ever took place. After the outlet's editor-in-chief, Paul Ronzheimer, asked Carlson if Trump's claims about the phone call were true, he replied, 'Okay... no.' 'No? It's not true?' Ronzheimer questioned again. 'No, I will say this … I don't care. I really like Trump. I campaigned for Trump. I just, to say it again, I agree with Trump, I have agreed with Trump on the issues,' Carlson said in the interview released Sunday. The political commentator went on to say that despite Trump's statement about the call not being factual, he would be 'happy to apologize' to the president. 'I'd be happy … I am the first to apologize because I am most mindful of my limits, and my own absurdities and the nonsense that I have spouted over the years,' Carlson said. 'Like, I don't think I'm God, and so I'm happy to apologize. And you can ask anyone who knows me, I'm an apologizer.' Ronzheimer then doubled down, asking Carlson, 'So you're apologizing now, publicly? Do I understand right?' Carlson responded: 'I don't know what I'd apologize for. I didn't attack Trump then. I disagreed with him … I don't think anything [was said] that would warrant an apology.' White House officials didn't immediately respond to HuffPost's requests for comment. The day after Carlson's newsletter published, Trump denied the U.S. had any involvement in Israel's attack on Iran in a June 13 post on Truth Social. 'The U.S. had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight,' Trump wrote. 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' On June 21, U.S. forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites in a 'very successful attack,' Trump said in a televised Oval Office address. He added that Tehran's nuclear program had been wiped out. Watch Carlson's interview below. Related... Tucker Carlson Says These Companies Are Creating 'Race Hate' — And It's Not What You'd Expect Tucker Carlson Just Made A Shocking Claim About Fox News Tucker Carlson Unleashes Bizarre Theories On Why Pam Bondi Is Hiding Epstein List
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Washington D.C. mayor doesn't expect President Trump to block Commanders stadium deal after calling for name change
Even after President Donald Trump weighed in with multiple social media posts on Sunday threatening to block the deal, Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser isn't worried about the Commanders' return to the city. Bowser, speaking Monday after Trump called for the Commanders to revert back to their old nickname that was widely seen as offensive, doesn't expect they'll have to worry about Trump or Congress intervening in the Commanders' new stadium deal. While the D.C. Council still needs to approve the deal officially, that could be done in a matter of weeks. 'I don't think that's an eventuality we have to plan for,' Bowser told ESPN of Trump blocking the deal. 'What we have to do as a city is do our part. And so our part is we've come up with a great deal, we have a great plan, we've done the community outreach, now is the time for the council to approve it.' Trump made multiple posts Sunday calling on both the Commanders and the Cleveland Guardians to revert back to their old team nicknames. The Commanders rebranded from the 'Washington Redskins' in 2020, and the Guardians retired their old 'Indians' moniker and the 'Chief Wahoo' logo ahead of the 2022 season. Both team names and the old Cleveland logo drew plenty of criticism in the years leading up to the change. The Commanders have not yet addressed Trump's posts, though new team owner Josh Harris has been clear that the team won't be going back to their old name. The Guardians shut the idea down on Sunday. Though he didn't get into specifics, Trump threatened to block the Commanders' new stadium deal if they didn't change their name. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted Monday that Trump's threat was real, though it's unclear what he could realistically do on that front. The Commanders announced plans earlier this year for a $3.7 billion deal to build a stadium on the old Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium site in Washington. The team is set to contribute $2.7 billion of that deal, and is looking for the rest to come from the city, along with retail shops, housing and more on the property. The goal is to open for the 2030 season. "Let me be clear, we're on the 1-yard line and it's time to get over the line," Bowser said, via ESPN. "I can't even imagine having to start all over on this. There's nobody waiting in the wings with $2.7 billion. And so this stadium is a catalyst and it will attract other investments. Any impediment to it getting done should be discouraged. 'When you're on the 1-yard line, you want to carry it over, right? That's all you want. No fumbles, no interceptions, let's just get it over the line. And that's what we're focused on." As for the stadium deal itself, Bowser insists that she thinks Trump knows it is a good one for everyone involved. 'This is what I believe,' she said. "I've had the opportunity to speak on a couple of different occasions with the President about this site and about our team. And I can say this without equivocation, he is a Jayden Daniels fan and he said himself and the presser we were at, that this is probably the best site of any site he's seen for a stadium. I have to think that that's what I've heard him say and that's what we'll stick with."
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House restricts WSJ access to Trump over Epstein story
The White House on Monday barred The Wall Street Journal from traveling with US President Donald Trump during his upcoming visit to Scotland, after the newspaper reported that he wrote a bawdy birthday message to his former friend, alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. The move comes after Trump on Friday sued the WSJ and its media magnate owner Rupert Murdoch for at least $10 billion over the allegation in the article, which Trump denies. The Trump administration's handling of the Epstein case has threatened to split the Republican's far-right Make America Great Again (MAGA) base, with some of his supporters calling for a full release of the so-called "Epstein Files." The punishment of the Wall Street Journal marks at least the second time the Trump administration has moved to exclude a major news outlet from the press pool over its reporting, having barred Associated Press journalists from multiple key events since February. "As the appeals court confirmed, The Wall Street Journal or any other news outlet are not guaranteed special access to cover President Trump in the Oval Office, aboard Air Force One, and in his private workspaces," said Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. "Due to The Wall Street Journal's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the thirteen outlets on board (Air Force One)." Trump departs this weekend for Scotland, where he owns two golf resorts and will meet with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Earlier this month, the US Department of Justice, under Trump-appointed Attorney General Pam Bondi, said there was no evidence suggesting disgraced financier Epstein had kept a "client list" or was blackmailing powerful figures before his death in 2019. In its story on Thursday, the WSJ reported that Trump had written a suggestive birthday letter to Epstein in 2003, illustrated with a naked woman and alluding to a shared "secret." Epstein, a longtime friend of Trump and multiple other high-profile men, was found hanging dead in a New York prison cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges that he sexually exploited dozens of underage girls at his homes in New York and Florida. The case sparked conspiracy theories, especially among Trump's far-right voters, about an alleged international cabal of wealthy pedophiles. Epstein's death -- declared a suicide -- before he could face trial supercharged that narrative. Since returning to power in January, Trump has moved to increase control over the press covering the White House. In February, the Oval Office stripped the White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA) of its nearly century-old authority to oversee which outlets have access to certain restricted presidential events, with Trump saying that he was now "calling the shots" on media access. In a statement, the WHCA president urged the White House to "restore" the Journal to the pool. "This attempt by the White House to punish a media outlet whose coverage it does not like is deeply troubling, and it defies the First Amendment," said WHCA President Weijia Jiang. "Government retaliation against news outlets based on the content of their reporting should concern all who value free speech and an independent media." aha/ksb
