The surprising housing age gap in homebuying trends
Des Moines homebuyers are purchasing a greater share of newer homes than buyers in most major U.S. cities, thanks to new construction and a residual impact from the pandemic.
Why it matters: America's housing stock is aging, but building in some metros is better meeting demand, which can affect housing affordability.
The big picture: The median age of a U.S. home purchased last year was 36 years — the oldest since at least 2012, according to Redfin records.
In the DSM metro, the median home purchased last year was 24 years old.
Stunning stat: DSM has among the oldest housing stock in the nation, with nearly 28% of homes built in 1939 or earlier, compared with 12% nationally, according to U.S. Census Bureau estimates.
Reality check: Older homes are generally more affordable, but owners can struggle with increased upkeep, a situation that has led the city of DSM to consider widespread redevelopment as part of a larger draft housing strategy.
By the numbers: Almost 27% of DSM-area homes bought last year were built in the previous five years, while about 45% were more than 30 years old.
The median cost of a DSM-metro home over 30 was nearly $222,000, while a house built in the last five years had a median cost of $365,000, per Redfin's data.
What they're saying: New construction sales were significantly higher during the pandemic because fewer older homes were on the market, Les Sulgrove, a local Realtor and former president of the DSM Area Association of Realtors, tells Axios.
Yes, but: The share of new construction in the DSM metro's home sales inventory has declined in recent years, dropping from a peak of approximately 71% in February 2022 to below 50% this year, according to a review by Kalen Ludwig Real Estate Specialists.
That's mainly because the inventory of resales has increased, according to Ludwig.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Straumann Holding AG (STMN) Receives a Buy from Bernstein
Bernstein analyst Susannah Ludwig maintained a Buy rating on Straumann Holding AG (STMN – Research Report) yesterday and set a price target of CHF148.00. The company's shares closed yesterday at CHF104.50. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Ludwig covers the Healthcare sector, focusing on stocks such as Sonova Holding AG, GN Store Nord, and Carl Zeiss Meditec. According to TipRanks, Ludwig has an average return of -0.2% and a 39.29% success rate on recommended stocks. Currently, the analyst consensus on Straumann Holding AG is a Moderate Buy with an average price target of CHF128.29, which is a 22.77% upside from current levels. In a report released yesterday, Barclays also maintained a Buy rating on the stock with a CHF137.00 price target. Based on Straumann Holding AG's latest earnings release for the quarter ending December 31, the company reported a quarterly revenue of CHF1.23 billion and a net profit of CHF156.27 million. In comparison, last year the company earned a revenue of CHF1.19 billion and had a net profit of CHF40.3 million
a day ago
California energy regulator recommends pause on plan to penalize excess oil profits
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- California should pause Gov. Gavin Newsom's plan to penalize oil companies if their profits climb too high, a top energy regulator said Friday while unveiling proposals aimed at addressing high gas prices. The Democratic governor signed a law in 2023 giving the California Energy Commission the authority to penalize oil companies for excess profits, declaring the state had 'finally beat big oil.' More than two years later, the commission hasn't imposed a single penalty or determined what counts as an excessive profit. Now, Siva Gunda, the energy commission's vice-chair, says the state should pause the effort in favor of pursuing other policies to lower prices and maintain a steady oil supply — all while pushing to phase out reliance on fossil fuels over the next two decades. 'Together, we will evolve California's strategy to successfully phase out petroleum-based fuels by 2045 while protecting communities, workers, and consumers, and foster market conditions that support the industry's ability to operate safely, reliably, and successfully to meet demand through the transition,' Gunda wrote in a letter to Newsom. Gunda's recommended pause of the penalty would have to be agreed upon by the full commission. Newsom has pitched the penalty as a way to rein in profits by oil companies, but critics said it would only raise prices. California has the highest gas prices in the nation, largely due to taxes and environmental regulations. Regular unleaded gas prices were $4.61 a gallon Friday, compared to a national average of $3.20, according to AAA. The commission still plans to set rules that would require oil refineries to keep a minimum level of fuel on hand to avoid shortages when refineries go offline for maintenance, Gunda said. That proposal came out of a law Newsom signed last year after convening a special session aimed at preventing gas price spikes. Gunda's recommendations come months after Newsom in April directed energy regulators to work with refiners on plans to ensure the state maintains a reliable fuel supply as it transitions away from fossil fuels. Newsom spokesperson Daniel Villaseñor said in an email that the governor would review the recommendations and 'advance solutions that maintain a safe, affordable, and reliable supply of transportation fuels for California.' Two major oil companies announced plans over the past year to shut down refineries in the state, further driving uncertainty about how the state should maintain a stable fuel supply as California transitions toward renewable energy. Phillips 66 announced plans to shut down its Los Angeles-area refinery, and Valero said it would cease operations at its Benicia refinery. The two refineries combined account for more than 17% of the state's refining capacity, according to the energy commission. A group of about 50 environmental and consumer groups penned a letter to Newsom and legislative leaders Friday criticizing the proposal to pause implementing a penalty on oil company profits. 'California oil refiners do not need a bailout,' they wrote, adding that the state should 'finish the job' it started to prevent prices at the pump from spiking. ___
Miami Herald
a day ago
- Miami Herald
High mortgage rates are still impacting home sales in 2025
High mortgage rates are still impacting home sales in 2025 Spring usually brings with it open houses, moving vans and new mortgages. But for many would-be homebuyers, this year's homebuying season felt more like Groundhog Day. Ever since interest rates for mortgages climbed from 3% following the COVID-19 pandemic to over 6% starting in late 2022, home sales in the U.S. have cooled to a level not seen in decades. Over the past 30 years, it's been typical for more than 5 million homes to change hands annually, according to data from the National Association of Realtors. In 2024, however, barely 4 million homes were bought and sold - the fewest since 1995. Not only have "for sale" signs become more rare, but there are now fewer prospective homebuyers checking out properties than in prior years - some perhaps discouraged by the current state of the market. Homes are lingering on the market far longer than they have in recent memory as well. In January, residential real estate company Redfin reported that homes took longer to sell than any time since 2019. Tariff uncertainty will likely extend that timeline even further, at least in the short term. Although home prices are falling in some markets - particularly in parts of California, Florida and Texas - prices are still climbing in most other residential markets in the U.S. The reasons for the current home sales slump are multifaceted, but housing supply, insurance, demographics, and macroeconomic conditions all play a role. In this article, Experian focuses on the role mortgage rates have on home sales, as measured by home loan originations. The Historical Trend: Can Rising Mortgage Rates Explain Home Sale Slumps? There is a relationship between mortgage financing rates and home prices in the U.S., where most homebuyers finance their purchase with a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage. But it may not be the relationship you'd expect. According to a study by the Urban Institute, home price appreciation has historically increased slightly when mortgage rates are higher. This tilt occurs because higher interest rates are typically associated with robust economic growth, and rate cuts are often the result of central banks seeking to stimulate a slowing economy. As we were reminded last fall, however, Federal Reserve interest rate cuts don't necessarily lead to lower mortgage rates the same way they would for, say, credit cards. In fact, since the first rate cut in September 2024, mortgage rates have barely budged - if anything, they've trended slightly higher in the months following the cuts. You can extend the line back even further. Ever since the 10 interest rate hikes executed by the Federal Reserve from 2022 to 2024, mortgage rates have remained stuck in a narrow, elevated range from near 6% at the lowest to almost 8% at the high end. Indeed, there are recent instances where declining mortgage rates boosted home sales: It occurred that way for most of the 21st century. As rates declined from 8% in 2000 to below 3% during the height of the pandemic, home sales generally increased. Notably, however, home sales were interrupted for a few years by a little thing known as the Great Recession. Challenges Likely to Persist for Homebuyers When mortgage rates climbed from those ultra-low mortgage rate levels several years ago, it wasn't surprising to see home sales volume decline. Quick math reveals the increase in mortgage rates from 3% to 6% increases a homebuyer's average monthly mortgage payment by 34%, from $1,657 to $2,227. Even if buyers were willing to tighten their belts to unhealthy levels in order to make payments, underwriters of mortgages wouldn't be willing to make loans where most of a homeowner's after-tax income services their debt payments. Elevated mortgage rates mean persistently higher mortgage costs for prospective homebuyers, some of whom are being priced out of the market entirely under these conditions. Looking forward to the rest of 2025 and beyond, mortgage rates will likely stay relatively unchanged unless the Federal Reserve gets more aggressive with its rate cuts than the one percentage point already made. With whiffs of inflation still in the air, however, the Fed has signaled that it's unlikely since reducing rates could reignite price hikes. Meanwhile, a recent downgrade of the U.S. Treasury's credit rating by Moody's will mean more near-term upward pressure on mortgage rates, not downward. On top of everything we've covered here, there are also the secondary factors buffeting the homebuying market, including: The cost of rent: Lower rents mean less incentive to move from renting to buyers: All-cash buyers tend to outbid those financing, since they'll be assuming no debt; sellers tend to prefer them paralysis: No one wants to make a big decision, families and executives alike, amid all the costs: Sharply rising insurance costs are also factors making homebuying less likely than in some markets this summer. Unless these factors let up, it's unlikely the conditions buyers (and renters) face will change in the near future. However, despite the pessimistic news facing homebuyers broadly, it's important to understand that home prices are driven more by local economic conditions, not national trends. If the local economy is healthy, then it will attract more workers and create a virtuous and stable cycle of economic growth. In the coming months, everyone will see how large the economic "if" is in impacting local mortgage markets. Methodology: The analysis results provided are based on an Experian-created statistically relevant aggregate sampling of our consumer credit database that may include use of the FICO® Score 8 version. Different sampling parameters may generate different findings compared with other similar analysis. Analyzed credit data did not contain personal identification information. Metro areas group counties and cities into specific geographic areas for population censuses and compilations of related statistical data. FICO® is a registered trademark of Fair Isaac Corporation in the U.S. and other countries. This story was produced by Experian and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. © Stacker Media, LLC.
