US retail giants pushing Chinese suppliers to shoulder up to 66% of tariff costs
Advertisement
US retailers have been locked in talks with Chinese producers for weeks over how to handle the additional costs caused by the trade war, with the firms facing intense political pressure at home to '
eat the tariffs ' and keep prices stable.
Walmart and other major US retail groups previously agreed to bear the full cost of the tariffs when they asked their Chinese suppliers to resume shipments in late April, industry sources
told the Post at the time
But global brands including several US retail giants are now pushing suppliers in both China and parts of Southeast Asia to absorb a large chunk of the cost of the levies, according to sources from suppliers serving companies including Walmart, Target, Nike, Puma and Adidas.
'Most of our customers, the garment vendors exporting to major retailers and brands, are being asked to cover 50 to 66 per cent of the current tariffs,' said an executive at a fashion supplier, which produces and sources from China and Southeast Asia and then sells across the United States and Europe.
Advertisement
The negotiations remain fluid and the details of how the tariff costs will be divided have not yet been finalised, the sources stressed, as both sides remain in constant contact as they try to navigate a 'tough time' for the industry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
38 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Sean Stein on why US businesses are walking a tightrope to stay in China
Sean Stein is president of the US-China Business Council (USCBC), a Washington-based non-profit organisation that promotes trade between the world's two largest economies. The council represents more than 270 American companies doing business in China. He most recently served as board chair of the American Chamber of Commerce in China and is chair emeritus of the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai. Before that, he served for nearly three decades as a diplomat, including as US Consul General in Shenyang and Shanghai. This interview first appeared in SCMP Plus . For other interviews in the Open Questions series, click here It has been broadly assumed the US and China will extend the 90-day pause on tariff increases they agreed to after talks in Geneva by another 90 days. What trade deals could we see by November? What do American companies with business in China expect? How will their voices be heard in Washington? That is correct – it is almost inevitable that the 90-day pause gets extended, particularly since the two sides have announced that there is a framework deal. The alternative is unthinkable. It would mean going back to pre-Geneva, triple-digit tariffs, something neither side wants. Looking at the potential for a broader deal, now that China has added two fentanyl precursors to its list of restricted chemicals, there is some expectation that the US may lower the 20 per cent tariff it put in place due to fentanyl. When that happens, China is expected to lower some of its retaliatory tariffs. This could be a path back toward a more normal trade relationship, but so far, we have not seen the US take steps to reciprocate China's gesture. What the business community is worried about is that virtually all the discussion between the countries has been about tariffs.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Australia should not sabotage its own efforts to boost ties with China
Chinese media outlets were keen to accentuate the positives of Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's visit to China. However, sections of the Australian media played up the idea that China was attempting to drive a wedge between Australia and the United States and members of the Australian opposition criticised the visit, calling some of Albanese's stops 'indulgent'. The visit achieved much in some areas, but otherwise made little progress. Despite reported efforts by Elbridge Colby, US undersecretary of defence for policy, to seemingly sabotage the visit, Albanese deftly refused to allow questions about Taiwan to divert him from his mission of reaffirming the improvement of Australia-China relations. But if Albanese was trying to convince Chinese investors that Australia is a reliable place to invest in, he sabotaged himself. This is best summed up by the Australian Financial Review headline 'PM stares down China retaliation threat over Darwin Port sale'. The Albanese government is moving to overturn the China-based company Landbridge Group's 99-year lease on the port of Darwin just a decade into the lease period. It would be difficult to find a better and more pertinent example of Australia's limited reliability when it comes to long-term investment from China.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts likely to disappoint, ex-prosecutors say
A Justice Department request to unseal grand jury transcripts in the prosecution of chronic sexual abuser Jeffrey Epstein and his former girlfriend is unlikely to produce much, if anything, to satisfy the public's appetite for new revelations about the financier's crimes, former federal prosecutors say. Advertisement Lawyer Sarah Krissoff, an assistant US attorney in Manhattan from from 2008 to 2021, called the request in the prosecutions of Epstein and imprisoned British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell 'a distraction'. 'The president [Donald Trump] is trying to present himself as if he's doing something here and it really is nothing,' Krissoff told Associated Press in a weekend interview. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche made the request on Friday, asking judges to unseal transcripts from grand jury proceedings that resulted in indictments against Epstein and Maxwell, saying 'transparency to the American public is of the utmost importance to this Administration'. The request came as the administration sought to contain the firestorm that followed its announcement that it would not be releasing additional files from the Epstein investigation, despite previously promising that it would. Advertisement Epstein killed himself at age 66 in his prison cell in August 2019, a month after his arrest on sex trafficking charges. Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year prison sentence imposed after her December 2021 sex trafficking conviction for luring girls to be sexually abused by Epstein.
