New York man charged over explosives on subway tracks, rooftops
NEW YORK : A New York man has been charged with making improvised explosive devices and throwing one onto subway tracks in New York City, US authorities said yesterday.
Michael Gann, 55, allegedly manufactured at least seven explosive devices using chemicals ordered online and stored five devices and shotgun shells on apartment building rooftops in Manhattan's SoHo neighbourhood, according to the US attorney's office for the southern district of New York.
Authorities said Gann threw one IED onto subway tracks on the Williamsburg Bridge and was arrested with a seventh device on his person early June.
'As alleged, Michael Gann built explosive devices, stored them on a rooftop in SoHo, and threw one onto the subway tracks – putting countless lives at risk,' said US attorney Jay Clayton.
'Thanks to swift work by our law enforcement partners, no one was harmed.'
According to prosecutors, Gann ordered approximately two pounds of potassium perchlorate and one pound of aluminium powder – precursor chemicals to explosives – online in May, along with over 200 cardboard tubes and 50 feet of fuses.
One of the devices placed on the roof of a SoHo building 'contained approximately 30g of explosive powder – approximately 600 times the legal limit for consumer fireworks', the attorney's office said.
On or about June 5, just hours before his arrest while carrying an IED, he posted to Instagram: 'Who wants me to go out to play like no tomorrow?'
Before making the IEDs, prosecutors said, Gann posted a message on X on March 27 tagging the POTUS account, the official handle for the president of the US.
He wrote: 'I'm thinking just now here in NYC that it's too bad that the wall wasn't built before the National Guard would have to come here for the Protests and Riotation or would you just drop a bomb on this place while and because they seem to be coming and coming?'
Between May and June 2025, Gann also searched online for information on bomb-making, firearms, and 3D-printed guns, as well as background checks for firearm purchases, according to the indictment.
Gann, a resident of New York City's Inwood neighbourhood, faces charges of attempted destruction of property by explosives, transportation of explosive materials and unlawful possession of destructive devices.
The most serious charge carries a mandatory minimum of five years in prison and maximum of 20 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs seeks US$50m bond release before sentencing, arguing jail time doesn't fit the crime
NEW YORK, Aug 1 — Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyers on Tuesday urged the judge who oversaw his sex crimes trial to release him from jail on a US$50-million bond ahead of his October 3 sentencing, after the hip-hop mogul was found not guilty of the most serious charges he faced. In a court filing, Combs' defence attorney Marc Agnifilo said conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in Brooklyn were dangerous, and said defendants convicted in the past of prostitution-related charges that were similar to Combs' were usually released before their sentencing. 'Sean Combs should not be in jail for this conduct,' Agnifilo wrote. 'In fact, he may be the only person currently in a United States jail for being any sort of john.' A spokesperson for the US Attorney's Office in Manhattan, which brought the charges, declined to comment. After a six-week trial, Combs, 55, was found not guilty on July 2 of three counts of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, which carried potential life sentences. He was convicted on two lesser charges of transportation to engage in prostitution. Each of those counts carries a maximum 10-year sentence, but prosecutors have acknowledged that federal sentencing guidelines appeared to recommend a sentence well below the statutory maximum. Prosecutors alleged the Bad Boy Records founder used physical violence, threats, and the resources of his business empire to coerce two former girlfriends to participate in days-long, drug-fuelled sexual performances with male sex workers sometimes called 'freak-offs.' Combs pleaded not guilty, and his lawyers argued his two girlfriends took part willingly in the encounters. US District Judge Arun Subramanian denied Combs' initial request for release immediately after the verdict, citing the ample evidence presented at trial of violent acts he committed. In their filing on Tuesday, Combs' lawyers said it was unusual for him to be prosecuted on the prostitution-related offenses at all because he was not profiting financially from the acts of prostitution. They also said Combs' detention since September 2024 at the MDC should qualify as an 'exceptional circumstance' warranting Combs' release despite the evidence he had been violent. Combs' lawyers have said there have been fights in his unit, and wrote on Tuesday that his safety is at risk. A spokesperson for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, which operates MDC, said in a statement, 'The BOP continually works to improve conditions at all of our institutions, to include MDC Brooklyn.' — Reuters
Malay Mail
8 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Trump-Harvard crossfire: University accused of censorship after scrapping Palestine-themed journal issue
NEW YORK, Aug 1 — The issue of academic research on the Middle East has become a political flashpoint in the United States, where critics of Israel allege a 'Palestine exception' exists when it comes to free speech rights. Case in point, recently a special edition of the prestigious Harvard Educational Review (HER) was in the works, entirely dedicated to the hot-button issue of the Palestinians—the articles had been painstakingly written, edited and approved. But authors said they received an unusual demand for a final readout by lawyers, which soon derailed their efforts. The publisher's stunning late-stage decision to scrap the entire edition reflects the overheated political climate in the US where academic research on the Middle East has attracted accusations of so-called 'wokeism' and 'anti-Semitism' from President Donald Trump, as conflict rages in the region. The edition began taking shape when, in March 2024 -- six months after the deadly October 7 Hamas attacks on Israel and the Israeli reprisals in the Gaza Strip—the renowned Harvard publication called for papers for a special issue on 'Education and Palestine.' Anthropologist Thea Abu El-Haj and her colleagues submitted a paper on 'scholasticide,' a term describing the destruction of an education system, like in Gaza, with reference to the experience of Palestinian teachers during the Lebanese Civil War between 1975 and 1990. But then the authors received phone calls informing them that the text would have to be submitted to Harvard's Office of the General Counsel for a 'risk assessment.' 'I have been publishing for decades in academic journals—including HER twice—and I have never been asked for this kind of review,' said El-Haj, a professor at Columbia University's Barnard College. After the authors objected to 'censorship,' the director of Harvard Education Press Jessica Fiorillo, told the authors the special issue had been cancelled in its entirety. 'Censorship'? Fiorillo denied 'censorship' in a memo to the authors, seen by AFP, blaming inadequate review because the editors insisted on limiting the publisher's involvement to copyediting—without touching the 'politically charged content.' 'The only explanation that makes sense to me is that this is another instance of what has been called the 'Palestine exception' to free speech,' said El-Haj, accusing Harvard of not upholding free speech while proclaiming to champion it amid its fight with Trump. Since returning to power, Trump has accused prestigious US universities of anti-Semitism for failing to protect Jewish students during protests against Israel's war in Gaza. In an escalating war of attrition against Harvard, Trump sought to cut more than $2.6 billion of funding to the Ivy League university, while seeking to block entry of international students—a quarter of its enrollment. Harvard said it had strengthened measures to protect Jewish and Israeli students while fighting the government's measures in court. 'The chilling climate for scholarly inquiry about Palestine at Harvard (and beyond) has been difficult for some time. Faculty, staff, and students have understandably felt a generalized cloud of fear and anxiety,' Margaret Litvin, an Arabic literature professor at Boston University, told AFP. At the start of the year, Harvard also adopted a definition of anti-Semitism used by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). That definition is contested, however, as critics argue it may prevent criticism of Israel. That distinction appears to be at the heart of the furor over the 'education and Palestine' edition of the HER, said Chandni Desai, a University of Toronto professor, who was supposed to pen an article for the journal. Harvard University did not comment. The submitted articles would 'likely fail' to have passed the IHRA definition test because 'all the pieces are critical of Israel,' Desai said. 'We've never seen an entire special issue collection being canceled—especially after... contracts have been signed and reviews and revisions done.' — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
21 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Indian court acquits ex-MP, 6 others accused of deadly bombing
Sadhvi Pragya Thakur spent nine years in jail before she was given bail in 2017. (AFP pic) MUMBAI : An Indian court today acquitted a firebrand Hindu nationalist nun and former lawmaker, and six others accused of participating in a deadly bombing near a mosque in 2008. The attack killed six people and wounded more than 100 others when a bomb strapped to a motorcycle exploded close to the mosque in Malegaon in the western state of Maharashtra. Seven people were tried on terrorism and criminal conspiracy charges, including former MP from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Sadhvi Pragya Thakur, in a case that dragged on for years. The prosecution claimed Thakur's motorbike was used to carry the explosives used in the attack, and that she took part in a key planning meeting before it was staged. However, Judge AK Lahoti ruled today that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient evidence against Thakur and the six others. 'Judgements cannot be based on morals and public perception,' Lahoti said, according to Indian legal website Live Law. Defence lawyer Ranjit Nair said the judge noted that the prosecution could not 'present any proof against the accused'. Indian parliamentarian Asaduddin Owaisi called the verdict 'disappointing', saying those killed were 'targeted for their religion'. 'A deliberately shoddy investigation/prosecution is responsible for the acquittal,' he said in a post on X. Islam is a minority religion in Hindu-majority India, the world's most populous country. During the trial, India's counter-terrorism unit said the 2008 bombing was orchestrated to incite communal tensions, local media reported. Thakur, 55, spent nine years in jail before she was given bail in 2017. She later won an election after being fielded by the BJP to run for a seat in the central city of Bhopal. Indian election rules allow anyone to stand for office as long as they have not been convicted of a crime. Thakur courted controversy when she called the radical Hindu assassin of Indian independence hero Mahatma Gandhi a 'patriot' – earning her a rebuke from prime minister Narendra Modi. She also raised eyebrows for claiming that drinking cow urine had helped cure her cancer and extolling the benefits of drinking a concoction of milk, butter and cow dung.
