logo
How Yunus' assault on shared Bengali heritage betrays his own nation

How Yunus' assault on shared Bengali heritage betrays his own nation

First Post4 days ago
The Gopalganj violence, the failure to conduct autopsies, and the move to demolish Satyajit Ray's ancestral home are not mere missteps but a profound betrayal of the Bangladeshi people's trust and their shared history with India read more
It is absolutely essential that the Yunus-led interim government take immediate steps to restore Bangladesh's democratic character while safeguarding the rich Bengali heritage that defines the nation and its deep ties with India. Image: AP
The bloodbath in Gopalganj on July 16, 2025, is a gut-wrenching testament to the catastrophic failure of Muhammad Yunus's interim government, a regime that has plunged Bangladesh into a vortex of violence and cultural betrayal. This wasn't just a clash; it was a massacre, with at least five confirmed dead—though Bangladesh Human Rights Watch (BHRW) suggests a staggering 21 fatalities, a number the government refuses to verify. The Nationalist Citizens' Party (NCP), widely seen as Yunus's puppet, sparked the chaos by confronting Awami League supporters in Gopalganj, the symbolic heartland of Sheikh Hasina and the birthplace of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The state's response was not justice but repression: a suffocating curfew, over 160 arrests, and a chilling refusal to conduct autopsies on the victims, as confirmed by Jibitesh Biswas, superintendent of Gopalganj General Hospital. No death certificates were issued, and Dhaka Range DIG Rezaul Karim Mallick's vague promise of 'legal procedures' is a hollow insult to the grieving. As someone who holds Bangladesh's storied resilience close, I'm enraged by this desecration of Gopalganj, a place that embodies the nation's fight for freedom, now stained by a government that seems to revel in tearing it apart.
This isn't an isolated tragedy but a symptom of a broader collapse under Yunus's watch since August 2024. The interim government has presided over a relentless wave of violence—murders, mob lynchings, rapes, and attacks on minorities—that has left Bangladesh's social fabric in tatters. The brutal killing of Lal Chand Sohag in Dhaka and the gang rape in Cumilla are not anomalies but glaring evidence of a nation spiralling into lawlessness. Yunus, with breathtaking arrogance, claims crime statistics show 'stabilisation', a lie so blatant it mocks the fear gripping ordinary citizens. The move to demolish the ancestral home of Harikishore Ray Chowdhury, Satyajit Ray's forebear, in Mymensingh—once the Mymensingh Shishu Academy—is a deliberate act of cultural vandalism.
India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) requested for its preservation, offering to fund its transformation into a museum celebrating the shared Bengali heritage of both the nations. West Bengal's Mamata Banerjee echoed this plea, but Yunus's regime responded by saying that the said house has no connection to Satyajit Ray whatsoever, hell-bent on erasing a piece of history that binds India and Bangladesh. Belayat Hossain Mamun, general secretary of the Federation of Film Societies of Bangladesh, warns this is a trial run for further destruction, potentially targeting Upendrakishore Ray Chowdhury's birthplace in Moshua, Kishoreganj. The contrast with Sheikh Hasina's government, which restored the Kishoreganj site, is stark—Yunus seems intent on obliterating the very soul of Bengal.
Sheikh Hasina's blistering statement cuts through the fog of this crisis with razor-sharp clarity. She brands Yunus a 'murderer-fascist', accusing him of orchestrating a conspiracy to dismantle Bangladesh's identity through his NCP proxies. Her words are not mere passion but a righteous cry against a regime that has desecrated sacred symbols: Bangabandhu's residence, the Liberation War Museum, the national flag, the anthem, and the Constitution. She points to the NCP's 'March to Gopalganj' as a calculated assault on Bangabandhu's mausoleum in Tungipara, a site she rightly calls the heart of Bengali identity.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hasina's assertion that 'Bangabandhu and Bangladesh are one and inseparable' resonates deeply, as does her praise for the people of Gopalganj, who, despite facing tear gas and bullets, stood as guardians of their heritage. The state's response—indiscriminate gunfire on civilians—surpasses, as she puts it, 'medieval barbarity'. The refusal to conduct autopsies or inquests, as admitted by hospital and police officials, reeks of a cover-up, a desperate bid to bury the truth of this bloodshed. Hasina's call for resistance is a rallying cry for a nation under siege by its own government.
The international community is sounding the alarm, and rightly so. BHRW, in a scathing letter to UN Secretary-General António Guterres, accuses the Bangladesh Army of complicity in the Gopalganj crackdown, a charge echoed by a UK-based human rights group. BHRW's claim of 21 deaths underscores the scale of this tragedy, far beyond the government's sanitised narrative. The NCP, derisively (and accurately) called 'the king's party', stands accused of unleashing a reign of terror—vandalising and burning Hindu temples, statues of national heroes, businesses, and public properties.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This isn't just violence; it's a systematic campaign to erase Bangladesh's pluralistic identity. BHRW's demand for an independent UN investigation and the deployment of human rights observers is a damning verdict on Yunus's inability to govern. The silence from his administration, refusing to acknowledge the true death toll or address these accusations, only deepens the perception of a regime complicit in chaos. The world is watching, and Yunus's failure to act is a betrayal of the Bangladeshi people and their global allies.
What stings most is the betrayal of the shared heritage between India and Bangladesh. Since Bangladesh's birth in 1971, India has been the unwavering friend of its people, standing shoulder-to-shoulder through the Liberation War and beyond, championing the dreams of a free, vibrant nation. The MEA's offer to rebuild Satyajit Ray's ancestral home was a gesture of brotherhood, a plea to preserve a legacy that transcends borders. Yunus's rejection of this olive branch is not just an insult to India but a slap in the face to the Bangladeshi people, who cherish their cultural roots. The destruction of such sites, coupled with the violence in Gopalganj, signals a regime that cares nothing for the shared history that has long united our nations. It's a gut-punch to those of us who see Bengali culture—its art, its heroes, its spirit—as a bridge between two peoples.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It is absolutely essential that the Yunus-led interim government take immediate steps to restore Bangladesh's democratic character while safeguarding the rich Bengali heritage that defines the nation and its deep ties with India. The Gopalganj violence, the failure to conduct autopsies, and the move towards demolition of Satyajit Ray's ancestral home are not mere missteps but a profound betrayal of the Bangladeshi people's trust and their shared history with India, a steadfast ally since 1971.
The interim regime must heed the international outcry from groups like Bangladesh Human Rights Watch and honour India's plea to preserve cultural landmarks, such as transforming the Mymensingh site into a museum, as a symbol of unity. By prioritising transparent investigations into the Gopalganj deaths, curbing the NCP's violent excesses, and protecting sites like Bangabandhu's mausoleum and Upendrakishore's Kishoreganj home, the Yunus government can begin to rebuild public faith. Only through genuine democratic reforms and a commitment to preserving the pluralistic, cultural soul of Bangladesh can this government redeem itself and honour the aspirations of a people yearning for justice, stability, and preservation of their very identity.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The writer takes special interest in history, culture and geopolitics. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why ED raided Anil Ambani's Reliance Group-linked 50 companies
Why ED raided Anil Ambani's Reliance Group-linked 50 companies

Hindustan Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Why ED raided Anil Ambani's Reliance Group-linked 50 companies

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Thursday carried out extensive raids at 35 locations across India as part of a probe into alleged loan fraud involving companies of Anil Ambani-led Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (ADAG). Anil Ambani, chairman of the Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group(File Photo/Reuters) As previously reported by Hindustan Times, citing officials familiar with the matter, the searches were conducted at premises linked to over 50 companies and 25 individuals. The raids are part of a money laundering investigation initiated under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), based on two FIRs originally filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in September 2022. Yes Bank loans to Reliance firms under scrutiny The CBI cases pertain to loans extended by Yes Bank to Reliance Home Finance Ltd (RHFL) and Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd (RCFL). Both FIRs name former Yes Bank chairman Rana Kapoor. An officer from the probe agency said, 'Preliminary investigations have revealed a well-planned and thought-after scheme to divert or siphon off public money by cheating banks, shareholders, investors, and other public institutions.' He further added, 'The offence of bribing bank officials, including founder of Yes Bank [Rana Kapoor] is also under scanner." A second official involved in the investigation said ED suspects illegal diversion of around ₹3,000 crore in loans issued by Yes Bank between 2017 and 2019. 'We have also found that just before the loan was granted, the Yes Bank promoters [Kapoor] received money in their concerns. The ED is investigating this nexus of bribe and the loan,' the officer added. Another ED official highlighted 'gross violations' in loan approvals, pointing to systemic lapses in Yes Bank's internal processes. 'Credit approval memorandums (CAMs) were back-dated, investments were proposed without any due diligence or credit analysis in violation of the bank's credit policy,' the officer said. Loans routed through shell firms and group companies Investigators have uncovered evidence of loan diversions to multiple group companies and shell firms, flouting the terms of lending. The agency also identified several red flags, including: Loans to financially weak entities Absence of proper documentation Borrowers with common addresses and directors Loans disbursed on or before the application date Evergreening of loans Misrepresentation of financial data 'These findings clearly indicate a pattern of financial mismanagement and manipulation,' an officer said. The ED is also probing a sharp increase in corporate loans disbursed by RHFL, which jumped from ₹3,742.60 crore in FY 2017–18 to ₹8,670.80 crore in FY 2018–19. Apart from the CBI, several regulatory and financial institutions including the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), National Housing Bank, National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA), and Bank of Baroda have also provided inputs to the ED as part of the investigation. According to a Reuters report, shares of Reliance Infrastructure and Reliance Power dropped by up to 5% on Thursday following reports of ED probe. Reliance Group's statement In response, Reliance Infrastructure and Reliance Power issued a statement: 'The media reports appear to pertain to allegations concerning transactions of Reliance Communications Limited (RCOM) or Reliance Home Finance Limited (RHFL) which are over 10 years old,' the companies said. They further added, 'RCOM is undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process as per the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 since over 6 years. RHFL has been fully resolved pursuant to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Similar allegations as those set out in the media reports are sub-judice and pending before the Hon'ble Securities Appellate Tribunal, as per publicly available information.' (With inputs from Neeraj Chauhan in New Delhi)

Poll finds most US adults still support legal abortion three years after Roe was overturned
Poll finds most US adults still support legal abortion three years after Roe was overturned

New Indian Express

time44 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Poll finds most US adults still support legal abortion three years after Roe was overturned

Similarly, about half now say abortion should be available in their state when someone doesn't want to continue their pregnancy for any reason — about the same as in June 2021 but down from about 6 in 10 who said that in 2024. Adults in the strictest states are just as likely as others to say abortion should be available in their state to women who want to end pregnancies for any reason. Democrats support abortion access far more than Republicans do. Support for legal abortion has dropped slightly among members of both parties since June 2024, but nearly 9 in 10 Democrats and roughly 4 in 10 Republicans say abortion should be legal in at least most instances. Fallout from state bans influenced some people's positions Seeing what's happened in the aftermath of the ruling has strengthened the abortion rights position of Wilaysha White, a 25-year-old Ohio mom. She has some regrets about the abortion she had when she was homeless. 'I don't think you should be able to get an abortion anytime,' said White, who calls herself a 'semi-Republican.' But she said that hearing about situations — including when a Georgia woman was arrested after a miscarriage and initially charged with concealing a death — is a bigger concern. 'Seeing women being sick and life or death, they're not being put first — that's just scary,' she said. 'I'd rather have it be legal across the board than have that.' Julie Reynolds' strong anti-abortion stance has been cemented for decades and hasn't shifted since Roe was overturned. 'It's a moral issue,' said the 66-year-old Arizona woman, who works part time as a bank teller. She said her view is shaped partly by having obtained an abortion herself when she was in her 20s. 'I would not want a woman to go through that,' she said. 'I live with that every day. I took a life.' Support remains high for legal abortion in certain situations The vast majority of US adults — at least 8 in 10 — continue to say their state should allow legal abortion if a fetal abnormality would prevent the child from surviving outside the womb, if the patient's health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy, or if the person became pregnant as a result of rape or incest. Consistent with AP-NORC's June 2024 poll, about 7 in 10 US adults 'strongly' or 'somewhat' favor protecting access to abortions for patients who are experiencing miscarriages or other pregnancy-related emergencies. In states that have banned or restricted abortion, such medical exceptions have been sharply in focus. This is a major concern for Nicole Jones, a 32-year-old Florida resident. Jones and her husband would like to have children soon. But she said she's worried about access to abortion if there's a fetal abnormality or a condition that would threaten her life in pregnancy since they live in a state that bans most abortions after the first six weeks of gestation. 'What if we needed something?' she asked. 'We'd have to travel out of state or risk my life because of this ban.' Adults support protections for seeking abortions across state lines — but not as strongly There's less consensus on whether states that allow abortion should protect access for women who live in places with bans. Just over half support protecting a patient's right to obtain an abortion in another state and shielding those who provide abortions from fines or prison time. In both cases, relatively few adults — about 2 in 10 — oppose the measures and about 1 in 4 are neutral. More Americans also favor than oppose legal protections for doctors who prescribe and mail abortion pills to patients in states with bans. About 4 in 10 'somewhat' or 'strongly' favor those protections, and roughly 3 in 10 oppose them. Such telehealth prescriptions are a key reason that the number of abortions nationally has risen even as travel for abortion has declined slightly.

Bihar showdown: RJD's Tejashwi Yadav claims Amit Shah no longer trusts Nitish Kumar's leadership; dares BJP to end speculation
Bihar showdown: RJD's Tejashwi Yadav claims Amit Shah no longer trusts Nitish Kumar's leadership; dares BJP to end speculation

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Bihar showdown: RJD's Tejashwi Yadav claims Amit Shah no longer trusts Nitish Kumar's leadership; dares BJP to end speculation

File photo (Picture credit: ANI, PTI) NEW DELHI: RJD leader and leader of opposition Tejashwi Yadav on Thursday claimed in the Bihar Assembly that Union home minister Amit Shah no longer has faith in Chief Minister Nitish Kumar 's leadership. The statement triggered a stormy debate on the floor of the House, forcing the speaker to adjourn proceedings post-lunch. 'What is the reason behind Shah losing his trust in Kumar? He keeps saying that the upcoming assembly polls will be fought under the JD(U) president's leadership, but time will tell who would be the chief minister,' Yadav said during a debate on a cut motion moved by the opposition on the penultimate day of the monsoon session. As per news agency PTI, Yadav challenged the BJP to publicly back Kumar. 'If indeed Shah still has faith in Kumar's leadership, let him put to rest all speculation and declare that the chief minister will continue to occupy the seat of power till 2030. Let the home minister make this announcement during his upcoming tour of Sitamarhi,' Yadav said. Shah is scheduled to visit the district next month to lay the foundation stone for a temple dedicated to Goddess Sita. Attacking the ruling NDA government, the former deputy CM said it has become a 'rickety car' after 20 years in power. 'Even the central government has said that vehicles older than 15 years should be off the roads,' he quipped. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Great news for Filipinos! Read More Undo Yadav also accused Kumar of remaining silent on key issues and failing to pressure the Centre for a special economic package for Bihar, despite being part of the ruling NDA. 'The JD(U) has reduced itself to a cell of the BJP. A handful of people who are said to have the eyes and the ears of the CM are all working for the BJP,' he alleged. In a sharp attack on perceived nepotism, Yadav referred to JD(U) national general secretary Ashok Choudhary's claim that his son-in-law was appointed to the state board for religious trusts based on a recommendation from the RSS. 'People in the JD(U) have started speaking of an RSS quota,' he remarked. 'This NDA should now be called the National Damaad Aayog (Commission for Sons-in-law),' he added. The RJD leader also took aim at the Nitish-led government's recent promise of 125 units of free electricity, calling it a 'copycat' of RJD's pledge to provide 200 free units and stipends for women under a proposed 'Maai Bahen Yojana.' 'In due course, they will copy our other schemes too,' he claimed. Tensions escalated when Yadav raised concerns about the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls by the Election Commission. 'Polling officials are throwing enumeration forms on the streets. Journalists who report such issues are slapped with FIRs,' he alleged. The remarks infuriated ruling NDA MLAs, leading to a noisy confrontation in the House. An NDA member was seen ripping off a desk mic and charging toward opposition benches, prompting Speaker Nand Kishor Yadav to adjourn the session till 4 pm. Later, outside the Assembly, Yadav accused BJP members of attempting a physical assault on him. 'BJP MLA Janak Singh hurled expletives at me. No one stopped him. Sanjay Singh also charged toward me. I was saved by my party colleagues,' he told reporters. Responding to a remark by deputy CM Vijay Kumar Sinha, who alleged that 'contract killing is in RJD's DNA', Yadav shot back, 'I am ready to surrender my licensed weapon. The government can get me killed if that makes it happy.' Yadav's attack comes amid his warning that the RJD might boycott the upcoming Bihar elections if the SIR exercise is not scrapped. 'What is happening in the name of SIR is nothing short of fraud,' Yadav had said earlier. He accused the Election Commission of acting under 'remote control' from Delhi and claimed the exercise was aimed at deleting voter names selectively. JD(U) leader and Union minister Rajiv Ranjan Singh 'Lalan' called Yadav's boycott threat an admission of defeat. 'He knows they will lose. Their forgery has been exposed,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store