Cyclists send record amount of video to police showing close passes by drivers
That is more than double the total of 7,249 in 2021.
Many cyclists capture footage of their journeys, with basic cameras available for under £50.
IAM RoadSmart sent a Freedom of Information request to 43 police forces asking how many pieces of footage showing a close pass of a cyclist by a motorist were submitted as part of Operation Snap, an initiative introduced in 2017.
Twenty forces provided data.
The responses show the percentage of reports leading to a notice of intended prosecution being served rose from 38% in 2021 to 54% last year.
A separate survey of 655 drivers who are members of IAM RoadSmart indicated that 58% are not aware the Highway Code recommends the minimum gap they should leave when passing cyclists is 1.5 metres (4.9ft).
Harriet Hernando, the charity's active travel spokeswoman, said: 'It is extremely concerning that more than half of motorists don't know how much space to give a cyclist when overtaking.
'Passing too closely to a cyclist can be intimidating and dangerous, especially if they need to move out to avoid a pothole.
'It is small wonder then that record numbers of cyclists are installing cameras and submitting footage of dangerous or careless drivers to the police.
'While it is heartening to see that prosecution rates have increased, it would be better if it didn't reach that stage and motorists weren't doing it in the first place.'
Provisional Department for Transport figures show 85 cyclists were killed on Britain's roads in 2024.
Between 2019 and 2023, most cyclist fatalities occurred in collisions involving a car.
IAM RoadSmart has launched a No More Close Calls campaign aimed at eradicating close passes.
Ms Hernando said: 'When overtaking a cyclist, always look beyond them to judge your ability to get past safely, leaving at least 1.5 metres of space when overtaking at speeds of up to 30mph and give them more space when overtaking at higher speeds.
'By hanging back two or three car lengths, you'll be able to see further up the road and look out for oncoming traffic.
'If it isn't safe to overtake then don't try and squeeze past – shaving seconds off your journey isn't worth taking someone's life.'
Duncan Dollimore, head of campaigns at Cycling UK, said it has 'not seen the big safety impact we'd hoped for' from changes to the Highway Code in 2022 providing more protection to cyclists.
He went on: 'The majority of people who drive simply aren't aware how much distance to give to people who cycle when overtaking.
'This is why it's crucial to educate all road users of their responsibility to protect those most vulnerable.'
He called on the Government to 'address this oversight by better promoting the new Highway Code'.
A Department for Transport spokesperson said: 'We take road safety extremely seriously, and there are already strict penalties in place for those who put the safety of cyclists at risk.
'Our roads are among the safest in the world, but we are always looking to improve.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
EV drivers 'more at risk' for breaking little-known rule with £5k fine
Brits overlooking a strict Highway Code rule could find themselves in hot water — especially those driving electric vehicles (EVs). With the UK bracing for a fourth intense heatwave with 32C temperatures, many motorists will be opting for comfortable footwear including Birkenstocks, Crocs, flip-flops and sliders. While these popular warm-weather choices keep our feet cool, they can pose hidden dangers when worn behind the wheel. According to a 2013 study by Sheila's Wheels, up to an estimated 1.4 million accidents and near misses on UK roads could be avoided simply by opting for safer driving shoes. While backless footwear is a key concern, even some seemingly practical options such as wellies — often preferred by campers and festival-goers — can create issues for safe driving due to their bulky fit. Drivers face £100 fine for common move which actually breaks the Highway Code Many drivers may not realise the additional associated risks faced by those driving EVs. Co-founder of Vehicle Mats UK, Chris Astley, underscores these dangers, especially as EVs become more common on Britain's roads. "We see it every summer: drivers in backless shoes, like flipflops, mules, and sliders," he said in a statement sent to the Mirror. "While they might be ideal for hot weather comfort, these kinds of shoes can slip off, get caught under pedals, or simply not give you enough grip to operate your car's pedals safely. And if your feet are wet, whether it's from a dip in the sea or sweating in the heat, you're more at risk." When it comes to driving an EV, the expert warns this advice is even more important - as electric cars tend to have 'significantly more torque' than their traditional petrol or diesel counterparts, meaning they respond more sharply to pedal movement. "This makes precise foot control crucial, and something as innocuous as a wet or unsuitable shoe could make all the difference in an emergency," Chris added. So for EV drivers, the need for pedal control is even greater. Lost grip, a shoe that slips, or a foot clumsily encumbered by inappropriate footwear could mean the difference between a close call and a crash. Legally, there is no explicit ban on driving in flip-flops, sliders, or driving barefoot in the UK. However, Rule 97 of the Highway Code states that drivers must ensure their 'footwear do[es] not prevent you from using the controls in the correct manner'. If an accident occurs and it emerges that inappropriate footwear played a role, drivers can face prosecution for driving without due care and attention under Section 3 of the Road Traffic Act 1988. The penalties can vary dramatically — at the lower end of the scale, a £100 fine and three points on your licence, but this can rise to a £5,000 fine, up to nine points, or even disqualification if the court deems the offence serious — so motorists would be wise to heed the expert's advice and choose their footwear carefully over the coming months. The RAC 's guidance for suitable driving shoes is clear. The best driving shoes have a sole no thicker than 10mm, but not so thin or soft as to compromise safety. They need enough grip to prevent your foot from slipping off the pedals, must not be heavy, should not restrict ankle movement, and be narrow enough to avoid accidentally pressing two pedals at the same time. As temperatures soar and we experience more frequent heatwaves, drivers are urged to keep these simple warnings in mind to stay on the right side of the law — and out of harm's way.
Daily Record
19 hours ago
- Daily Record
Motorists could be slapped with a £100 fine for a common motorway mistake
A common myth is that the left lane on the motorway is the 'slow' lane and the right is the 'fast' lane. However, this is not the purpose of each lane and goes against rules dictated in the Highway Code and the law Motorists throughout the UK could be hit with a £100 fine and three penalty points for a frequent motorway mistake. A widely believed myth is that the left lane on the motorway is for 'slow' driving and the right is for 'fast' driving. However, this belief is incorrect and contravenes the Highway Code and legal regulations. In fact, drivers are encouraged to stick to the left lane when travelling on the motorway and only use the right lanes for overtaking, returning to the left lane as soon as it's safe. Ignoring these rules can lead to legal issues and pose a risk to other road users. Rule 264 of the Highway Code clearly instructs: "Keep in the left lane unless overtaking. If you are overtaking, you should return to the left lane when it is safe to do so." Penalty for not sticking to the left lane Failing to move back into the left lane after overtaking, known as 'lane hogging', is an offence. This behaviour is not just discourteous to other drivers but also creates a danger for those who wish to overtake. The main problem with lane hogging is that it compels more drivers to switch to the outer lane to pass, which should be unnecessary. On a three-lane motorway, this means a driver would have to change across two lanes to overtake and then switch back again, which is not ideal. Drivers will be compelled to take this action to avoid the risky move of undertaking a lane hogger by passing them on the left. The Highway Code also states: "Do not overtake unless you are sure it is safe and legal to do so. Overtake only on the right." Lane hogging is also deemed 'careless driving' and can result in penalties if police choose to enforce it. Since 2013, officers have been able to hand out on-the-spot fines of £100 and three penalty points for careless driving offences, including lane hogging. Should the offence be deemed particularly grave, you could be summoned to court where you might incur a fine of up to £5,000 and receive as many as nine points on your licence. In addition, the court has the authority to disqualify you from driving. Dealing with lane hoggers When dealing with lane hoggers, it's generally recommended to remain composed and avoid any actions that could be construed as road rage or illegal. This includes refraining from undertaking manoeuvres, which would be an offence in itself. The advised course of action is to safely switch to the outer lane to overtake the lane hogger before returning to the correct lane.
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Brits offered £3,750 to switchover to EVs but experts warn of huge catch
UK drivers are being offered generous grants worth almost £4,000 as the government unveils its latest investment to make electric vehicles (EVs) more affordable. However, many models won't be eligible Brits could get thousands knocked off the price of a new car if they switch over to an electric vehicle (EV) thanks to a major new investment. In an effort to encourage drivers to make the switchover from internal combustion engine (ICE) to electric vehicles (EVs), the government is offering grants cutting the cost of selected models by up to £3,750. However, insiders have highlighted a significant shortcoming with the scheme. The Department for Transport (DfT) has announced a new £650 million grant, which is available for three years and applies to any eligible model with a price tag of up to £37,000 — the most sustainably produced and environmentally friendly models qualify for the largest reductions — with the aim of making EVs more affordable for the average British household. Manufacturers can now apply for this grant, and once their models are approved, buyers will see the discounted price directly at dealerships. According to the RAC, these discounted vehicles are expected to be available 'within weeks'. The scheme is part of the government's wider efforts to increase EV uptake, helping the UK meet environmental targets and close in on its goal of banning the sale of new ICE cars by 2030. However, this incentive has prompted mixed reactions from the automotive industry — particularly in terms of its accessibility and effectiveness for ordinary buyers. An expert at Auto Express welcomed the introduction of support for consumers transitioning to EVs, but expressed several concerns regarding the scheme's reach. In a statement sent to the Mirror, Head of digital content at the automotive publication, Steve Walker, said: "EV registrations have been growing steadily and are up nearly 35 per cent year on year. But there are two problems. "First, the rate of uptake still falls below the levels required by the government's ZEV mandate targets for manufacturers. Second, most of these new registrations are being driven by the fleet sector. "It's no coincidence that while businesses and company car users have strong tax incentives to purchase and run EVs, the private buyer has had nothing, not since the old plug-in car grant expired in 2022. Therefore, the prospect of new government assistance to help ordinary families afford a new EV and access the running costs savings that an electric car can bring, will be welcomed across the industry." The ace went on to argue that while any incentive is 'good news', it does not address some of the main barriers to EV uptake. He cited how around 70 per cent of new EVs cost more than £40,000, yet the new grant of up to £3,750 is only available at the point of sale for cars priced at or under £37,000, meaning most models won't qualify. He went on to add that, since April this year, owners of EVs costing £40,000 or more have to pay an additional £410 a year in road tax for five years — a total extra cost of £2,050 — which Auto Express has asked the government to reconsider. While Steve said the new grant is a 'welcome boost', he stressed that it's not enough on its own, arguing that to really speed up private EV adoption, the government must drop the luxury car tax for EVs and improve access to charging points, especially for people without home charging. Responding to the criticism, a Department for Transport spokesperson told the Mirror: "The price cap ensures the Electric Car Grant targets the more affordable end of the market, ensuring funding can reach as many people as possible, rather than spending taxpayer's money subsidising luxury cars. The grant is in addition to the £63 million announced this week to support charging infrastructure, making it cheaper and easier for families, businesses and the public sector to make the switch."
