Brave firefighters 'saved many lives' in Perth tenement blaze
The rapid response of "brave firefighters" saved many lives during a tenement blaze in Perth over the weekend, a council meeting has heard.Deputy council leader Eric Drysdale said that the internal stairwell of the building on the corner of Scott Street and South Street had been destroyed during the fire, leaving no other means of escape for residents.A man died and two people - an eight-year-old girl and a 27-year-old man - were taken to hospital following the fire, which broke out at about 01:50 on Saturday.Cllr Drysdale said the girl had sustained serious injuries in the blaze, but was now "on the road to recovery."
Two firefighters, one of whom was struck by falling masonry, were given medical treatment.The entire building will be demolished as a result of the blaze and 50 families have been affected.
Cllr Drysdale told the meeting - convened to discuss financial aid for tenants and businesses - that the emergency services had responded "magnificently."He said: "On arrival, without hesitating, our brave firefighters proceeded towards what had already become an inferno and were able to rescue many residents from upper floor windows after the internal stairwell had already been destroyed by the fire leaving no other means of escape."The councillor said that it was "very clear" that the rapid response and evacuation tactics saved "many lives."Speaking about the residents, he said: "One minute most, if not all of them, were fast asleep in bed, the next they awoke in terror with flames and smoke in the stairway and entering their homes."Some in lower floors planned their escape by lowering bedsheets out of windows while others stood at windows shouting to be rescued. "All wearing nothing but their nightclothes, and all set to leave their homes and all their worldly possessions behind."The councillor also thanked the nearby Salutation Hotel for looking after the evacuated residents, and the kindness of the local community.
Councillors were told that about 70 businesses had approached the local authority for help following the fire.The Scottish government has also pledged its support.Perth and Kinross Council's chief financial officer Scott Walker said the authority is required to contribute the first £850,000 towards the significant costs associated with the incident response - largely the demolition of the unsafe building.Councillors will be asked on Wednesday to consider allocating financial support from the council budget to those most affected by the incident.Story by Kathryn Anderson, Local Democracy Reporting Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Notes from a nursing home: ‘We don't speak of sadness here'
I sit in my room in this nursing home near Sydney, a box of four walls that holds all I now call my own. Two suitcases could carry it: a few clothes, some worn books, a scattering of trinkets. The thought strikes me as both stark and oddly freeing. Not long ago my world was vast, a house with rooms I rarely entered, a garden that sprawled beyond need, two cars idling in the driveway, one barely driven. Now it's gone. The house, the cars, the cartons overflowing in the garage, all sold, given away or abandoned. A heart attack and dwindling funds brought me here two and a half years ago. Family ties, thin as they are, keep me from moving anywhere away from here. I don't resent it. I've seen the world, jungles, deserts, cities that glittered under foreign skies. That hunger is sated. This is a different journey, one of stillness, of finding meaning in what remains. The nursing home is no idyll, no glossy promise of golden years. It's a place of routine, of quiet necessity. Mornings begin with carers, gentle, hurried women who tidy my bed, adjust pillows, offer a smile before moving on. Tea and toast settle as I sit by the window. The air carries the clean sting of antiseptic, mingling with the chatter of birds outside. There's peace in these moments, before the home stirs fully awake. The staff do their work well, though they're stretched thin. They check on us, ask after our aches, offer kind words that linger like a faint warmth. Activities fill the day, card games, a singalong. I join when I feel like it, which is less often than I might. The choice is mine, and that's enough. The front doors creak as relatives arrive, their faces a mix of cheer and strain. Some hide tears, we all pretend not to see. We don't speak of sadness here. It's a silent agreement, a way to keep the days bearable. Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads The residents are a varied lot. Some are old, their bodies bent by years. Others are younger, broken by minds that betray them. A woman down the hall clutches a photograph, her son a rare visitor, his life too crowded for her. She speaks of him with no anger, only a flat resignation. A man, his eyes dim with addiction's toll, mutters of a sister who never calls. I listen, nod, share a story of my own. We understand each other here, bound by the shared weight of being left behind. This place is a mirror, reflecting a truth we'd rather not face. Families, once close, find it easier to place their own in these clean, quiet rooms. It's not cruelty, not always. Caring for the old, the broken, the lost-it, demands time, patience, a surrender most cannot afford. So they sign papers, appoint guardians and let the system take over. The nursing home becomes a vault, sealing away what disrupts the orderly march of life. Out of sight, out of mind. Yet I wonder if, in the quiet of their nights, those families feel the shadow of what they've set aside. Sign up to Five Great Reads Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning after newsletter promotion I walk the corridors, dim and smelling of antiseptic and something less tangible – forgotten promises, perhaps. Residents sit, staring at walls or televisions that drone with voices no one heeds. Many wrestle with dementia, their thoughts scattering like ash. Others bear scars of choices or chance, their lives eroded to this point. A few, changed by illness or time, became strangers to those who loved them. To care for such people is hard, unglamorous work. Easier to let them fade into these walls. Yet there's life here too. I find it in small things: a book that holds my attention, sunlight warming my room, a laugh shared over a memory. The community binds us. We talk of old days, of children grown distant, of the world beyond these walls. There's comfort in that, a kind of strength. The local shops are my horizon now but I don't mind. I've seen enough of the world to know its pleasures are fleeting. Here I have my memories, these people, this quiet. The day stretches before me, simple and unhurried, the sun climbing higher, the air still fresh. There's no need to rush, no call to chase what's gone. This is my life now, pared to its bones, and it's enough. The light shifts on the wall, and I breathe it in. It's a good day. Better than most. Andrew McKean is a writer and a resident of an aged care facility in New South Wales, Australia
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
As cage eggs are phased out around the world, how can producers lower the risks of free-range ‘hen heaven'?
Near Lake Macquarie on the central coast of New South Wales, Belinda Stauner-Dawson is running what appears to be a chicken utopia. Her 60 egg-laying ISA Brown hens – a popular laying breed – have the run of a 1.4-hectare paddock. Each day they have access to fresh, green pasture and they come and go as they please from a chicken caravan – a trailer with a water tank, feed and roosting perches. Keeping a watchful eye over them are two permanent guardian maremma dogs. Stauner-Dawson prides herself on happy chooks and their eggs, with golden yellow yolks, which are sold to farm-gate customers and to an organic butcher. The utopia is not without challenges. Stauner-Dawson worms her 'girls' twice a year and moves the caravan regularly to reduce parasites, and is wary of diseases, such as avian influenza, which may be introduced from wild birds. Predation has also been a major problem in the past. 'I would use electric fencing to control foxes and I used to lose a lot of birds from wedge-tails and sea eagles but since I've had the dogs I haven't lost a single chook to predation,' she says. 'If I didn't have dogs I couldn't have pasture-raised chickens.' It's not a large-scale operation. 'It's not for everyone,' Stauner-Dawson says. 'It takes more land with fewer birds and is more expensive. It doesn't make a lot of money.' Sixty years ago, most eggs came from free-range and back yard producers. Today, Australia's 19m hens producing eggs for our tables are housed in three main systems: caged, barn-raised (often advertised as cage-free) and free range. The cage system is climate controlled, reduces the occurrence of disease and provides freedom from feather pecking and cannibalism, but it confines the animal without perches or nesting boxes. Free-range gives the bird outdoor exposure and allows it to exhibit natural behaviours but can expose it to predation and disease transferred by wild birds. The barn system gives access to perch and nesting boxes while still confining the bird to an indoor environment. Jed Goodfellow is a director of Australian Alliance for Animals and spent eight years involved with the development of the Australian Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines for Poultry. He says all three systems have good and bad points, but a significant difference is the cumulative welfare concerns in cage egg production. Mortality rates in free-range systems can be reduced with proper management practices such as the development of proper hygiene protocols and vaccination programs, he says. 'Within the cage system issues such as behavioural deprivation, fatty liver disease and bone breakage on depopulation are inherent in the system itself,' Goodfellow says. 'But the welfare issues of cage-free systems such as feather pecking, increased mortality and cannibalism, all of which are serious concerns, can be alleviated as producers become more experienced with the system.' The Alliance for Animals this month joined a global call for faster action to ban cage eggs, off the back of an investigation in 37 countries, including Australia, which allegedly showed 'systemic suffering' in chickens. Brian Ahmed is the president of the Victorian Farmers Federation egg group and in the 1960s his father started the family egg business with free-range hens, before overseeing the change to caged-egg production in the 1970s. Sign up to receive Guardian Australia's fortnightly Rural Network email newsletter 'Back then you couldn't control disease and the science showed taking chickens off the ground [into cages] and away from their faeces improved their welfare and reduced parasite issues and the use of antibiotics,' Ahmed says. 'We had better control in the sheds and this gave us a more affordable egg.' Sign up to The Rural Network Subscribe to Calla Wahlquist's fortnightly update on Australian rural and regional affairs after newsletter promotion Ahmed says animal health then was measured by freedom from injury, disease and pain, hunger and thirst and for these reasons caged egg production was considered superior to other farming systems. The psychological wellbeing of the animal, as addressed in contemporary animal welfare science, was not considered in the 1960s. Goodfellow also points to the EU's ban of caged-egg production in 2012 in the discussion of chicken welfare. Although Australian eggs are not exported, he believes our continued use of the cage system negatively affects trade relations. 'The Europeans are very sensitive about animal welfare generally and the fact Australia continues to permit [cage production] negatively impacts the general perception of Australia's broader animal welfare standards.' Greg Mills is a consultant to the egg industry, working primarily with caged egg systems. He pointed to research commissioned by the Australian Egg Corporation in 2012, which measured levels of the hormone albumen corticosterone in eggs as a way of measuring the stress of chickens and found 'no differences in mean corticosterone concentrations' across production systems – but a significant difference between different farms, even of the same production type. Mills says it comes down to a question of 'mortality or confinement,' arguing that cage systems see lower mortality rates than free range 'but as humans we don't like confinement'. But animal welfare advocates argue that while the risk factors potentially leading to higher mortality rates – like temperature fluctuations and predation – can be managed or reduced in free-range systems, or alleviated entirely in open barn-raised systems, the issues associated with confinement are inherent in cage egg systems. Some egg producers, such as Canobolas Eggs in central NSW and Somerville Eggs near Werribee in Victoria, employ all systems. Lou Napolitano from Somerville Eggs says the diverse business is based purely on market demands but his preference from an animal welfare standard remains cage or simple barns. 'The worst thing you can do to chooks is let them out,' Napolitano says. 'When you let them out there is no biosecurity because they mix with wildlife; it looks nice when they are free-ranging but it is very deceiving. Disease can still get in cages, but biosecurity can be better controlled. All I have to do is open the door of our sheds and listen. The hens are all chattering and cackling and telling us everything is fine.' Sign up for the Rural Network email newsletter
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Fruit stickers are annoying and bad for the environment. So why did an Australian ban come unstuck?
Fruit stickers may be small, but they can be mighty annoying. Each year 5.62bn plastic labels are picked off fruit and vegetables in Australia, data shows. Those that are not accidentally eaten, washed down the sink or buried in compost, usually end up in landfill, adding about 110 tonnes of plastic to the pile. South Australia was set to ban the stickers from September, along with other problematic plastics like soy sauce fish, and it would have been the first Australian jurisdiction to do so. Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter Residents overwhelmingly supported the proposed ban. 'These are so bloody annoying and unnecessary,' one wrote in a submission. 'I hate these stickers and consider them totally unnecessary on my fruit products,' said another. But the stickers will be sticking around a little longer. This week SA shelved its September deadline, after growers and industry bodies asked for more time. Meanwhile, across the Tasman Sea, New Zealand's ban, instituted in 2023, has been put on hold. Are fruit sticker bans coming unstuck? The plastic labels become a problem when they end up in home compost or in the curbside organics bin, says Ryan Collins, the head of research at Planet Ark. 'If they're left on those scraps, on the skin, and they go into curbside collection, then it ends up being a contaminant for the organics processor or composter,' he says. That becomes a cost and quality issue for organic waste companies, whose products are used in agriculture and urban landscaping. They could also become litter, Collins says. Cip Hamilton, the plastics campaign manager at the Australian Marine Conservation Society, says the stickers often end up in compost bins and eventually contaminate the soil. 'Once in the environment, plastics are almost impossible to recover. Plastic fragments can cause devastating impacts to our wildlife and ecosystems.' The plastic labels, glued to the skin of apples, bananas, pears and more, are for convenience: there is nothing in Australia's Food Standards Code that requires retailers to label fresh fruits and vegetables. Most include a PLU: the acronym for price look-up code, four or five digits used to identify the variety of fruit and how it was grown – part of a voluntary global system for categorising fresh produce. Some feature eye-catching designs. The stickers are the best option for providing information to consumers and retailers (about origin, variety and price) with the least amount of packaging, the Australian Fresh Produce Alliance said in a submission last year. 'Additionally, they play a vital role in inventory management, traceability, reducing food waste and quality control for both producers and retailers.' Sign up to Clear Air Australia Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis after newsletter promotion There were non-plastic alternatives – like compostable stickers – the industry group said, but they were not yet available at commercial scale. Fruit tattoos – labels lasered on to skin or peel – have also emerged as an option, trialled by producers and supermarkets across Europe and the UK. Several Australian jurisdictions have flagged fruit stickers for the chopping block, as they look to get rid of single-use plastics. And governments have agreed they are a priority, where better coordination is needed. The South Australian environment minister, Dr Susan Close, said the state remained committed to the reform. 'Many South Australians told us through previous surveys and consultations that they 'loathed' fruit stickers as an inconvenience to remove before they recycle their food scraps.' It was a short delay – rather than a stop – Close said, and over the next 12 months the government would be working with growers, industry bodies and other jurisdictions. New South Wales has proposed to require compostable labels by the end of 2030. In Tasmania, fruit stickers have been slated for the second stage of the state's single-use plastic phase-out. New Zealand, which has delayed its bar on non-compostable labels to 2028 to align with the EU, was 'not stepping back from its leadership role in tackling plastic waste', the environment minister, Penny Simmonds, said. 'We are taking a more measured approach to ensure that alternatives are available, that industry has time to adapt, and that any changes are well-considered and manageable so that cost-of-living impacts are limited for businesses and households.'
