
Brics+ vs G7 in charts: What ails the biggest global south bid to western dominance?
However, it started on a lacklustre note, with Chinese President Xi Jinping skipping it and Russian President Vladimir Putin joining virtually to avoid arrest warrants against him.
Nevertheless, the summit, which saw representatives from other countries, including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, garnered the attention of US President Donald Trump, who threatened an additional 10% tariff on any country aligning with the 'anti-American policies of BRICS".
While the US president did not specify what he meant by 'anti-American policies", he has earlier warned about Brics's efforts to create an alternative currency or alternative trade payment system. The idea, first floated in 2015, found mention again this year, but meaningful progress has been a distant dream.Such a move, however, is in line with the bloc's aim of coordinating multilateral policies of the global south, which is deemed as an alternative to the G7, or Western countries, by several experts. Brics+, comprising 11 countries, represents 48% of the world population while G7 nations account for about 10%. Moreover, Brics+ is closing the gross domestic product (GDP) gap with the G7 nations rapidly, underlining the importance and the need for such a group.
Growing GDP
In 2024, G7 nations—the US, Germany, Japan, the UK, France, Canada, and Italy—dominated the GDP contribution to the world, with a 42% share. However, their share has declined from 49% in 2010.
Brics+, in 2024, accounted for 31% of the global GDP, buoyed by the expansion from Brics, which accounted for only 19% of the global GDP in 2010. Brics, which started with an informal grouping of Brazil, Russia, India and China, added South Africa in 2010. The group has expanded further since, with the addition of Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia (the final status of Saudi Arabia is unclear, but the country is listed on Brics 2025 website and has been considered for analysis by Mint).
The GDP contribution of both these blocs is highly skewed by the presence of the US in one case (G7) and China in the other (Brics+). The US accounts for 56% of G7's GDP (23% of the world), and China accounts for 62% of the Brics+ GDP (19% of the world).
Trade ties
India's position in Brics+ is marked by its status as the world's fastest-growing nation and as an emerging leader in the global south. Also, India is set to become the world's fourth-largest economy shortly. However, the dominance of China in the group puts India in an awkward position, as the two nations are often in competition with each other, with little or no common political ground.
While India has strong trade ties with Brics+, led by China, the UAE and Russia, the country's trade relations with G7 countries, especially the US, cannot be ignored. India also signed a landmark free trade agreement with the UK this year.
While Trump's trade policies and incessant tariff threats have caused India (and every country around the world) a great deal of uncertainty, recent trade policies by China restricting critical minerals and fertilizers have also caused disruptions in India. As such, India will have to walk a tightrope while representing the interests of Brics+ without isolating its partners in the G7.
Divided house
Even as Brics+ aims to create a unified bloc to represent the interests of the global south, its member countries have more differences than similarities. While G7 enjoys homogenous democratic values typical of Western liberal democracies, Brics+ ranges from democracy to authoritarian to dictatorial leadership.
Also, while all countries in the G7 have high scores on the Economist Intelligence Unit's Democracy index, only India and South Africa represent strong democratic values among Brics+ nations.
Moreover, Russia's war with Ukraine puts it at odds with countries like Brazil and South Africa, which are members of the International Criminal Court that has an arrest warrant against Putin over the war with Ukraine.
India, which enjoys a long-standing strategic partnership with Russia, often finds China undermining its interests, as seen during the recent India-Pakistan conflict.
As such, despite its growing influence, Brics+ often gets undermined by its divisions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Abu Salem told to approach SC for clarity on remission in 1993 blasts case
MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Monday directed gangster Abu Salem to approach the Supreme Court for clarification on whether he is entitled to remission while serving a life sentence in two Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) cases, including the 1993 Mumbai serial bombings. Mumbai : Underworld don Abu Salem walks out of the Sessions Court after a hearing in Mumbai on Wednesday. PTI Photo by Mitesh Bhuvad (PTI1_18_2012_000148A) (PTI) {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} A division bench of Justice Ajey Gadkari and Justice Rajesh Patil was hearing Salem's plea seeking early release on the grounds that he would complete 25 years of imprisonment by March 31, 2025. Salem argued that his release was mandated under the terms of his 2005 extradition from Portugal, in which the Indian government had given a solemn assurance to Portuguese authorities that he would not be sentenced to death or imprisoned for more than 25 years. {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} The confusion stems from the fact that Salem was arrested in one case on October 11, 2005, and in another on October 24, 2005. He was later convicted in both cases on February 25, 2015, and September 7, 2017, respectively. In July 2024, he had moved a special TADA court seeking a tentative date of release, but the court declined to consider remission, citing the grave nature of the offences. {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} In July 2022, while deciding Salem's appeals against convictions in both cases, the Supreme Court observed that Salem's sentence must be computed from October 12, 2005, the date of his arrest, and that he was entitled to release upon completing 25 years in custody. The apex court also stated that the Centre would be bound to advise the President under Article 72 of the Constitution once this term was completed. {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} In July 2022, while deciding Salem's appeals against convictions in both cases, the Supreme Court observed that Salem's sentence must be computed from October 12, 2005, the date of his arrest, and that he was entitled to release upon completing 25 years in custody. The apex court also stated that the Centre would be bound to advise the President under Article 72 of the Constitution once this term was completed. {{/usCountry}} Read More {{^usCountry}} On Monday, however, additional solicitor general Anil Singh contended that Salem was conflating separate conviction periods to claim that he had already completed 24 years and nine months of detention by the time he approached the TADA court. Singh submitted that, as per the Ministry of Home Affairs' calculation, Salem had only completed 19 years, five months, and 21 days of imprisonment. {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} On Monday, however, additional solicitor general Anil Singh contended that Salem was conflating separate conviction periods to claim that he had already completed 24 years and nine months of detention by the time he approached the TADA court. Singh submitted that, as per the Ministry of Home Affairs' calculation, Salem had only completed 19 years, five months, and 21 days of imprisonment. {{/usCountry}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} Salem's counsel, senior advocate Rishi Malhotra, insisted that both sentences were running concurrently and, taking into account his pre-trial custody, time served, and jail-earned remission, Salem had effectively completed 25 years on March 31, 2025. 'They are not considering my jail-earned remission,' Malhotra told the court. Remission can be granted on various grounds, including good behaviour and completion of a portion of the sentence. However, the high court pointed out that the Supreme Court's 2022 ruling made no mention of remission. 'Do you want us to say something that the Supreme Court has not said?' the bench asked. 'This clarification needs to come from the Supreme Court,' it added. The bench admitted Salem's petition but declined interim relief, stating that it would be heard in due course. {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Brics 2025: 'We don't want an emperor,' says Brazil's Lula; slams Trump tariffs, hints at dollar alternative
AP photo Brazilian President Lula da Silva took a sharp dig at Donald Trump as the Brics summit wrapped up on Monday: "The world has changed. We don't want an emperor". His words came just hours after the US President took to his familiar playbook of tariff threats, warning the bloc of extra duties if they took what he branded as "anti-American" positions. The warning? A 10 per cent tariff against Brics nations -- unless, of course, they looked for their interest rather than American interest! In his trade salvo on Sunday night, Trump said that this administration was preparing to finalise dozens of bilateral deals before a self-imposed July 9 deadline. But the developing powers weren't biting. "This is a set of countries that wants to find another way of organising the world from the economic perspective," Lula said, according to news agency Reuters, adding, "I think that's why the Brics are making people uncomfortable." According to a source familiar with the matter, the White House isn't planning to slap that 10 per cent tariff immediately. But if the bloc's policies appear "anti-American," the trigger could be pulled. At the Rio summit's close, Lula doubled down on his call for a diversified global economy. He took aim at the dollar's dominance in international trade, saying: 'The world needs to find a way that our trade relations don't have to pass through the dollar.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo 'Obviously, we have to be responsible about doing that carefully. Our central banks have to discuss it with central banks from other countries,' he clarified. 'That's something that happens gradually until it's consolidated.' In February, Trump had already warned of '100 per cent tariffs' on the Brics nations if they dared undermine the dollar's role. That same threat seems to have cooled the bloc's ambitions for a common currency, an idea floated last year but quietly parked under Brazil's current presidency. Other Brics members offered a more diplomatic response to Trump's outburst. South African president Cyril Ramaphosa said the bloc 'does not seek to compete with any other power,' and voiced optimism about reaching a trade understanding with the US. Over in Beijing, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning was characteristically measured: 'Tariffs should not be used as a tool for coercion and pressuring,' she said, noting that the Brics favours 'win-win cooperation' and 'does not target any country.' The Kremlin, for its part, reminded reporters that its work within the Brics reflects a "common world view" that "will never be directed against third countries". Without naming the US, the Brics group in Rio, including India, raised "serious concerns" about the rise of tariffs which it said were 'inconsistent with WTO (World Trade Organisation) rules.' The restrictions 'threaten to reduce global trade, disrupt global supply chains, and introduce uncertainty," the group said in a statement even as there was confusion even in Washington about the efficacy of the Trump approach.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
37 minutes ago
- First Post
In a veiled dig at China, PM Modi urges Brics to 'prevent weaponisation' of rare earths
PM Modi has urged BRICS nations to work together to secure supplies of critical minerals and cautioned against any country using these resources as a 'weapon,' in remarks seen as a veiled swipe at China's export restrictions on rare earths. read more India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi speaks during the first plenary session of the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on July 6, 2025. Image- AFP Prime Minister Narendra Modi urged Brics nations to work together to secure supply chains for critical minerals and, in an indirect way, took a dig at China, saying that no country should use these resources as a 'weapon' against others. Speaking on Sunday at the Brics summit session on multilateralism, finance, and artificial intelligence, Modi also called for global rules on AI to ensure transparency and stop misuse. His remarks come amid worries about China's restrictions on exporting rare earth minerals and its lack of transparency in the sector. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We need to work together to make supply chains for critical minerals and technology secure and reliable. It's important to ensure that no country uses these resources for its own selfish gain or as a weapon against others,' Modi said. China's dominance in rare earth market Critical minerals like lithium, nickel, and graphite are essential for making high-tech products such as electric vehicles, drones, and batteries. China currently dominates the global supply of these minerals. China controls an overwhelming share of mining, refining, and processing for critical minerals, holding roughly 85–90 per cent of global rare earth element refining and around 60 per cent of lithium chemicals, 68 per cent of nickel refining, 73 per cent of cobalt refining, and 99 per cent of battery-grade graphite production. In 2024, it accounted for about 75 per cent of global processing capacity for key minerals like copper, lithium, cobalt, graphite, and rare earths. This dominance extends upstream through major investments in mines across Africa and Latin America and downstream into refining, component manufacturing, and EV battery factories. China's tight grip gives it strategic leverage but also poses risks for Western nations, as any disruption or export controls—especially on rare earths and graphite—could severely impact global technology and clean energy supply chains. As a result, Western governments are urgently seeking alternative sources and building up their own processing capacities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD