German defence minister does not rule out return of military draft, he tells FAS
FRANKFURT (Reuters) -Germany may consider reintroducing military conscription from as soon as next year if it does not attract enough volunteers for its armed forces, Defence Minister Boris Pistorius told the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung on Saturday.
Part of the NATO alliance, Germany is looking to enhance its military strength following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, but looks likely to fail to attract enough recruits. An additional 100,000 soldiers are needed in the coming years to meet NATO obligations, its armed forces have said.
Its Conservatives, which lead a coalition in which Pistorius' Social Democrats (SPD) are junior partners, have revved up military spending and signalled openness to a compulsory service in the armed forces, which was abandoned in 2011.
"Our model is initially based on voluntary participation," Pistorius said in an interview with the Sunday newspaper, which is already for sale on Saturdays.
"If the time comes when we have more capacity available than voluntary registrations, then we may decide to make it mandatory," he added.
A new bill to that extent could come into force as soon as January 1, 2026, he said.
The SPD has always focused more on voluntary options to rebuild the military.
Andreas Henne, Commander of Germany's Homeland Security Division, on Saturday also supported recruitment drives.
"We've taken the right path, but we now need to increase the pace," Henne said in an interview with news site t-online. "In terms of equipment, infrastructure expansion, and, above all, personnel."
(Reporting by Vera Eckert; Editing by Jan Harvey)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
Europe braces for US troop withdrawals amid NATO uncertainty
BRUSSELS: After securing NATO's defence spending pledge to appease Donald Trump, Europe now awaits a crucial US decision on troop withdrawals. Washington is reviewing global military deployments, with reductions in Europe expected in the coming months. The move has unnerved allies, particularly amid fears that Russia may target a NATO member if the Ukraine war subsides. However, recent talks have eased tensions, with US officials assuring no sudden disruptions. 'We've agreed to no surprises and no gaps in the strategic framework of Europe,' said Matthew Whitaker, US ambassador to NATO. He expects the review to conclude by late summer or early fall. While past US administrations considered scaling back in Europe to focus on China, Trump has pushed harder for the continent to bolster its own defence. Analysts see withdrawals as inevitable but debate the pace. 'There's every reason to expect a withdrawal from Europe,' said Marta Mucznik from the International Crisis Group. 'The question is not whether it's going to happen, but how fast.' The Pentagon reports nearly 85,000 US troops in Europe, fluctuating since Russia's 2022 invasion. Officials anticipate gradual reductions rather than abrupt cuts, though key capabilities like air defences remain irreplaceable for now. Trump may first withdraw residual forces deployed by Biden after Russia's Ukraine invasion. While manageable, deeper cuts or base closures could trigger alarm. 'The kinds of defence investments by Europe may only be felt in real capability terms over many years,' said Ian Lesser from the German Marshall Fund. 'So the question of timing really does matter.' Despite Trump's tougher stance on Russia, analysts question the timing of any drawdown. Previous attempts to pull troops from Germany failed due to logistical and political hurdles. European diplomats remain cautiously optimistic but acknowledge unpredictability. Trade disputes or shifting priorities could still strain transatlantic ties. 'It seems positive for now,' said one diplomat. 'But what if we are all wrong and a force decrease starts in 2026? To be honest, there isn't much to go on at this stage.' - AFP
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
German heavy industry stuck with dirty tech
BERLIN: In Geseke, a small town in Germany's western industrial heartland, plans to launch a large-scale carbon capture project at a local cement plant have been put on ice. Operator Heidelberg Materials AG had received European Union (EU) subsidies for the green project that's set to save 700,000 tonnes of carbon emissions annually, and planned to start construction next year. But the company – which last month started capturing and liquefying emissions in Norway – is no longer staking out a timeline for its German project because the conditions for a prompt, final investment decision aren't given. Germany's new conservative-led government has thrown its weight behind carbon capture and storage (CCS), touting it as a pragmatic path to meeting legally-binding climate goals in sectors that are hard to decarbonise. But while Chancellor Friedrich Merz has pledged to fast-track the technology by lifting regulatory barriers, the government's sweeping budget cuts are undercutting the very projects it says it supports. The result is a climate strategy caught between political convenience and fiscal restraint – leaving the country's most emissions-intensive industries facing a rising cost of carbon emissions in the coming years with German industry already struggling to stay in business. Berlin recently revived a draft proposal that was left unfinished by the previous government to legalise CCS. Yet funds for a clean industry programme – which was developed to support everything from hydrogen to carbon capture – are set to be cut to €1.8bil (US$2.1bil) from €24.5bil in the mid-term, according to this year's draft budget law that's currently being discussed in Parliament. While the ruling coalition has promised to stick to the nation's 2045 climate neutrality goal, it's becoming increasingly unclear who will foot the bill. 'If the government deprioritises funding for the decarbonisation of industry, this would be by far the most problematic measure in terms of climate protection,' said Jens Burchardt, co-founder of Boston Consulting Group's Centre for Climate and Sustainability. The nation's manufacturers are already struggling with layers of red tape, high energy prices and a shortage of skilled staff. They will come under additional pressure in the coming years as costs for polluting the environment increase. 'Against this backdrop, withdrawing the financial support companies need to invest in green alternatives at the same time is a recipe for the further deindustrialisation of Germany,' said Burchardt. Swiss building materials specialist Holcim AG, which plans a carbon capture project near Hanover, said the budget cuts have led to uncertainty throughout the industry as to how decarbonisation funding will continue overall. A representative for industry group Carbon Management Alliance said the cuts are a setback for climate targets. The government's key programme to help clean up its heavy industries relies on an auction instrument to bridge the pricing difference between conventional processes and cleaner, more expensive alternatives. While a first auction last October awarded contracts to 15 projects, an economy ministry spokesperson said preparations for a potential second round were 'complex,' though it's technically possible for another to take place this year. One company that could be eligible to participate is Hamburg-based copper recycler Aurubis AG. It installed two hydrogen-ready anode furnaces last year, but with no hydrogen available at competitive prices, it continues to burn natural gas in its state-of-the-art ovens. At an energy conference last month, economy minister Katherina Reiche explained that the expected demand for hydrogen isn't materialising, or is very delayed. Meanwhile, the German budget envisions slashing two-thirds of the funding the previous administration allocated to hydrogen. Of course, the lack of state support isn't the only reason why decarbonisation projects are stuck or failing. For example, when steelmaker ArcelorMittal SA last month announced it would hand back a €1.3bil subsidy for two local green steel units, it pointed to 'unprecedented' market pressure, weak demand, unfavourable European policy and high electricity prices. That's an even bigger problem for the chemical industry in Germany, which is facing factory closures, layoffs and production cuts. 'I can only spend every euro once,' said Martin Naundorf from Infraleuna GmbH, operator of a chemical hub in the country's east. Given the current conditions, 'nobody can afford to invest in technologies where it's unclear when they'll become profitable.' Major industrial competitors, such as China, are investing massively in new technologies to help manufacturers decarbonise, said Julia Metz, director of think tank Agora Industry. 'If Germany wants to keep up, it must not miss the boat and must invest massive amounts of money in new climate protection technologies.' — Bloomberg
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
US and EU avert trade war with 15 per cent tariff deal
THE US struck a framework trade agreement with the European Union on Sunday, imposing a 15 per cent import tariff on most EU goods - half the threatened rate - and averting a bigger trade war between the two allies that account for almost a third of global trade. US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced the deal at Trump's luxury golf course in western Scotland after an hour-long meeting that pushed the hard-fought deal over the line, following months of negotiations. "I think this is the biggest deal ever made," Trump told reporters, lauding EU plans to invest some US$600 billion in the United States and dramatically increase its purchases of US energy and military equipment. Trump said the deal, which tops a US$550 billion deal signed with Japan last week, would expand ties between the trans-Atlantic powers after years of what he called unfair treatment of US exporters. Von der Leyen, describing Trump as a tough negotiator, said the 15 per cent tariff applied "across the board", later telling reporters it was "the best we could get." "We have a trade deal between the two largest economies in the world, and it's a big deal. It's a huge deal. It will bring stability. It will bring predictability," she said. The agreement mirrors key parts of the framework accord reached by the US with Japan, but like that deal, it leaves many questions open, including tariff rates on spirits, a highly charged topic for many on both sides of the Atlantic. The deal, which Trump said calls for US$750 billion of EU purchases of US energy in coming years and "hundreds of billions of dollars" of arms purchases, likely spells good news for a host of EU companies, including Airbus, Mercedes-Benz and Novo Nordisk, if all the details hold. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal, saying it averted a trade conflict that would have hit Germany's export-driven economy and its large auto sector hard. German carmakers, VW, Mercedes and BMW were some of the hardest hit by the 27.5 per cent US tariff on car and parts imports now in place. The baseline 15 per cent tariff will still be seen by many in Europe as too high, compared with Europe's initial hopes to secure a zero-for-zero tariff deal. Bernd Lange, the German Social Democrat who heads the European Parliament's trade committee, said the tariffs were imbalanced and the hefty EU investment earmarked for the US would likely come at the bloc's own expense. Trump retains the ability to increase the tariffs in the future if European countries do not live up to their investment commitments, a senior US administration official told reporters on Sunday evening. The euro rose around 0.2 per cent against the dollar, sterling and yen within an hour of the deal's being announced. MIRROR OF JAPAN DEAL Carsten Nickel, deputy director of research at Teneo, said Sunday's accord was "merely a high-level, political agreement" that could not replace a carefully hammered out trade deal: "This, in turn, creates the risk of different interpretations along the way, as seen immediately after the conclusion of the US-Japan deal." While the tariff applies to most goods, including semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, there are exceptions. The US will keep in place a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminum. Von der Leyen suggested the tariff could be replaced with a quota system; a senior administration official said EU leaders had asked that the two sides continue to talk about the issue. Von der Leyen said there would be no tariffs from either side on aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, certain generic drugs, semiconductor equipment, some agricultural products, natural resources and critical raw materials. "We will keep working to add more products to this list," von der Leyen said, adding that spirits were still under discussion. A US official said the tariff rate on commercial aircraft would remain at zero for now, and the parties would decide together what to do after a US review is completed, adding there is a "reasonably good chance" they could agree to a lower tariff than 15 per cent. No timing was given for when that probe would be completed. The deal will be sold as a triumph for Trump, who is seeking to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old US trade deficits, and has already reached similar framework accords with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has not hit its goal of "90 deals in 90 days." US officials said the EU had agreed to lower non-tariff barriers for automobiles and some agricultural products, though EU officials suggested the details of those standards were still under discussion. "Remember, their economy is US$20 trillion ... they are five times bigger than Japan," a senior US official told reporters during a briefing. "So the opportunity of opening their market is enormous for our farmers, our fishermen, our ranchers, all our industrial products, all our businesses." Trump has periodically railed against the EU, saying it was "formed to screw the United States" on trade. He has fumed for years about the US merchandise trade deficit with the EU, which in 2024 reached US$235 billion, according to US Census Bureau data. The EU points to the US surplus in services, which it says partially redresses the balance. Trump has argued that his tariffs are bringing in "hundreds of billions of dollars" in revenues for the US while dismissing warnings from economists about the risk of inflation. On July 12, Trump threatened to apply a 30 per cent tariff on imports from the EU starting on August 1, after weeks of negotiations failed to reach a comprehensive trade deal. The EU had prepared countertariffs on €93 billion (US$109 billion) of US goods in the event a deal to avoid the tariffs could not be struck. — REUTERS
