Britain is ready to fight if conflict breaks out over Taiwan, says Defence Secretary John Healey
The island nation has long been at loggerheads with China, strongly rejecting Beijing 's claim to sovereignty over it after the countries separated in the late forties.
China's president Xi Jinping has previously said he would not rule out using force in the 'reunification of the motherland'.
And now Mr Healey, when asked what the UK is doing to help countries like Taiwan prepare for potential Chinese escalation, has said Britain would fight in the Pacific.
He was speaking on a visit to the HMS Prince of Wales, docked in the Australian city of Darwin, with the country's deputy prime minister and defence minister Richard Marles.
He told The Telegraph, during the carrier group's nine-month Pacific deployment: 'If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together.
'We exercise together and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together.'
These are some of the strongest words ever issued by the British government on the topic of potential engagement in any conflict in the region.
The island nation has long been at loggerheads with China, strongly rejecting Beijing's claim to sovereignty over it after the countries separated in the late forties. Pictured: From second left, Mr Healey, Australian deputy prime minister and minister for defence Richard Marles, British foreign secretary David Lammy and Australian foreign minster Penny Wong on the visit to the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier today
But the minister emphasised he was talking in 'general terms' - and the UK would prefer any disputes there were resolved 'peacefully' and 'diplomatically'.
'We secure peace through strength, and our strength comes from our allies', he added.
Experts have previously warned an invasion of Taiwan could cause a large-scale conflict, pulling in nations from across the world.
It is because the country manufactures most advanced computer chips.
Mr Healey said 'threats' in the Indo-Pacific region are on the rise.
It follows the Chinese military taking control of contentious reefs - and was accused of intimidating its neighbours there.
The Defence Secretary's remarks also come as the HMS Prince of Wales carrier group sails with advanced F-35 fighter jets from Singapore to northern Australia for the first time in nearly 40 years.
The fleet will continue on to Japan, likely coming close to Taiwan.
The Defence Secretary's remarks also come as the HMS Prince of Wales carrier group (pictured on the visit today) sails with advanced F-35 fighter jets from Singapore to northern Australia for the first time in nearly 40 years
Deploying the strike carrier group, which is the UK's largest of its kind, in the Pacific for nine-months shows Britain is aware of increasing threats in the region.
Sending it to Darwin in particular indicates close ties between the UK and Australia - key to any potential conflict in the Indo-Pacific.
Indeed, Mr Healey noted such a partnership was especially important currently, as threats in the region increase.
The defence secretary emphasised the UK's interest in international rules, stability and security, as well as both freedom of the seas and navigation in the area.
British officials have previously not commented on whether the UK would intervene in any conflict in the region.
This is in line with the United States' stance, which has been dubbed 'strategic ambiguity' - and most other nations follow it too.
Two Royal Navy patrol vessels are stationed permanently in the region.
The UK government recognised, in its National Security Strategy published earlier this year: 'There is a particular risk of escalation around Taiwan.'
Former defence secretary Gavin Williamson (pictured in 2019) said the UK is probably becoming more candid on its stance on the matter as threats in the Indo-Pacific increase.
Former defence secretary Gavin Williamson said the UK is probably becoming more candid on its stance on the matter as threats in the Indo-Pacific increase.
'I think there's a realisation that by being completely silent it doesn't make it more or less likely', he explained.
Deterrence, he added, involves making clear the consequences that will come if others act dangerously or maliciously.
Mr Williamson, who led the MoD from 2017 to 2019, added it is important someone as prominent as the British defence secretary is clear actions have consequences.
Former US president Joe Biden has previously broken strategic ambiguity on several occasions, saying the US would support Taiwan against China.
His successor Donald Trump has not done this - but Pentagon officials are said to be preparing for conflict.
His government has said it will review its membership of the AUKUS security agreement, between the US, Australia and the UK.
It comes as part of Mr Trump's 'America first' approach.
Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese has also not spoken out whether the nation would join the US and other allies to fight China in any conflict in the region.
He refused to comment on the matter last week.
The UK and Australia have made a renewed commitment to each other in recent times.
The two nations signed the Geelong Treaty this weekend - a 50-year agreement cementing their commitment to the AUKUS pact.
It also commits them to building a new fleet of nuclear-powered submarines.
The HMS Prince of Wales anchoring in Darwin marks the first time a British carrier strike group has docked in Australia.
It is also the first time a non-US carrier has taken part in Australia's annual military drills, the so-called Talisman Sabre.
The event this year was the largest it has ever been.
While the UK is turning more of its attention to the Indo-Pacific, Mr Healey (pictured on the visit today) confirmed there would be no change to its level of engagement with Taiwan
Foreign secretary David Lammy also boarded the HMS Prince of Wales, on the same day as and just before his colleague Mr Healey.
He has previously said Britain plans to undertake more freedom of navigation operations in the Taiwan Strait.
Last month, a Royal Navy patrol ship, the HMS Spey, moved through the strait - which was praised by Taiwan but frowned upon by China.
Britain does not comment on the future movements of its vessels.
But it is thought the HMS Prince of Wales will soon also travel through the strait on its way to South Korea and Japan.
While the UK is turning more of its attention to the Indo-Pacific, Mr Healey confirmed there would be no change to its level of engagement with Taiwan.
Mr Williamson said Britain would likely only alter this stance if China got increasingly aggressive.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sydney Harbour Bridge shut as nearly 100,000 join ‘historic' pro-Palestine march
Watch as thousands of protesters in Australia marched across Sydney Harbour Bridge as part of a pro- Palestine rally on Sunday (3 August). Aerial footage shows demonstrators walking through torrential rain across the iconic bridge, whilst other clips show protesters wielding flags and placards as they chant 'free Palestine' around the city. The planned protest, which involved around 90,000 people according to New South Wales police, was authorised by the Supreme Court just one day prior on Saturday (2 August) in what organises called a 'historic decision'. The Sydney Harbour Bridge was closed to traffic at 11.30am and reopened again at 5.00pm.
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Britain hopes a crackdown on people-smugglers' social media ads will help curb Channel crossings
Britain says people who advertise fake passports or people-smuggling services on social medial could face up to five years in prison, in the government's latest effort to deter migrants from crossing the English Channel in small boats. The government said Sunday that anyone convicted of creating online materials intended to break U.K. immigration law will face prison time and a large fine. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the aim was to stop the 'brazen tactics on social media' used by smuggling gangs. 'Selling the false promise of a safe journey to the U.K. and a life in this country — whether on or offline — simply to make money, is nothing short of immoral,' she said. Assisting illegal immigration to the U.K. is already a crime, but officials believe a new offense — part of a border security bill currently going through Parliament — will give police and prosecutors more powers to disrupt gangs that send migrants on perilous journeys across one of the world's busiest shipping lanes. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said the crime gangs are a threat to global security and should be treated like terror networks. Since taking office a year ago, Starmer's center-left Labour Party government has adopted powers to seize the assets of people-smugglers, beefed up U.K. border surveillance and increased law-enforcement cooperation with France and other countries to disrupt the journeys. Despite that, more than 25,000 people have reached Britain by boat so far this year, an increase of 50% on the same period in 2024. Small boat crossings have become a potent political issue, fueled by pictures of smugglers piling migrants into overcrowded, leaky inflatable boats on the French coast. Opposition parties say the government's plans aren't working — though the government argues the problems built up during 14 years when the Conservative Party was in power, The Conservatives say Starmer should not have scrapped the previous government's contentious and expensive plan to send migrants arriving by boat on a one-way trip to Rwanda. 'This is a panicked attempt to look tough after months of doing nothing,' Conservative immigration spokesman Chris Philp said. The government says it will take time to clear a backlog of applications that has left thousands of migrants stuck in temporary accommodation — often hotels — without the right to work. The hotels have become flashpoints for tension, attracting protests fueled by a mix of local concern, misinformation and anti-immigrant agitation.
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The huge Harbour Bridge march shows people have had a gutful of seeing starving children in Gaza. Politicians need to catch up
The NSW premier, Chris Minns, risks going down in history as the most conservative premier of the modern era. Renowned for his political nous, his slick media management, urbane delivery and ability to tamp down controversy, Minns is perennially attuned to the loud voices of the shock jocks on Sydney radio and in the Murdoch media. But his decision to oppose the march for Palestine across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday was a critical error of judgement – and the 100,000 or more people who braved torrential rain and wind to walk for those in Gaza told him so. There were women in hijabs, men in Palestinian scarves, families with children, older couples, unionists and tens of thousands of young people from all parts of Sydney. Muslims, Jews and Christians declared their faith with placards. The turnout, and its diversity, suggest people have had a gutful of the images of starving children, of desperate people risking their lives in a scramble for food at aid stations, of bombed out buildings as far as the eye can see. They're prepared to put aside their reservations about being associated with one side of the Israel-Palestinian conflict in the interests of humanity. If it's not genocide, what's taking place in Gaza is a mass displacement, because it's hard to see how anyone, let alone children, can live in what is left of Gaza. Along with the horror over what's happening in Gaza, there was also a palpable sense of anger towards Minns and, to a lesser extent, the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, over Australia's fence-sitting. 'Hey Chris Minns – whose bridge? Our bridge!' protesters shouted as they marched. A placard carried onto the bridge also called out the premier: 'Hey Minns. Walking on a bridge won't starve us, but blocking aid starves Palestinians. We will survive, they won't.' 'Public safety concerns YES! The Palestinian public are not safe being starved and bombed,' stated another. Chants rippled through the crowd calling for Albanese to act. The legal right to protest is fundamental to the proper functioning of our democracy. Sometimes the institutions of government lag far behind public opinion – or fail to recognise the need for change. Just ask the suffragettes, the activists who campaigned for the right of First Nations peoples to vote, for marriage equality for LGBTQ+ people, or the union movement, which fought using protest for the eight-hour workday. In the face of an unfolding tragedy such as Gaza, people feel understandably powerless. Turning up and marching in a place that can accommodate huge numbers while garnering international attention is a legal and effective option to tell politicians they are tone deaf. Minns' overtly pro-Israel stance and his natural reflex toward the conservative on this and other issues, such as pill testing, drug reform and the right to protest, are now rattling his own team. Among the state Labor MPs who defied the premier and joined the march on Sunday were the deputy premier, Penny Sharpe, and Jihad Dib, Lynda Voltz and Stephen Lawrence, as well as federal MPs Ed Husic, Alison Byrne and Tony Sheldon. Asked why he walked, Lawrence said: 'It's time for the world to act. It's time for Australia to sanction Israel. The people have spoken today. They want more action from the Australian government to stop the genocide in Palestine.' Privately, some inside state Labor are querying why Minns didn't leave it to the police and the courts. The premier instead weighed in against the protest early, egged on by conservative pro-Israel commentators. The result was a potential shambles. The Metro was closed for maintenance as was the eastern suburbs train line. There had been too little thought given to how 100,000 or more people might return from North Sydney, leading the police to turn around the massive crowd and walk them back to the city using geolocated texts and speakers on low-flying helicopters. It all went as well as it could, thanks to the goodwill of the crowd, the organisers and NSW police. But members of the Labor party, with its long heritage of progressive politics, human rights advocacy and embrace of direct action, want a serious rethink. 'It's time for fundamental change of position in the Labor party on the right to protest, and our approach to this question of Palestinian protests,' Lawrence said on Sunday. 'The last few days have shown we cannot take away the right of people to protest. Inconvenience occurs. It should be minimised, but public safety is the key thing, and that is a key reason why the right to protest must be protected.' Anne Davies is Guardian Australia's NSW state correspondent.
