Albanese heads to China as Trump upends the global order. The PM may wish he lived in less interesting times
In Australia for the G20 summit, and hosted by Tony Abbott, China's president told MPs he had visited the country five times over 30 years, spending time in every state and territory.
Xi said the friendship between Australia and China would be as 'strong and everlasting' as Uluru and the Great Wall of China.
As he prepares to meet Xi later this month, Albanese may be forgiven for wishing the friendship and stability the Chinese leader talked about that day in Canberra had come to pass.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Both men's stations have shifted dramatically in the intervening decade. Xi changed party rules to become China's president for life, and Albanese, a leadership rival to Bill Shorten, has entered the pantheon of Labor greats, securing two election victories and the party's biggest win since the second world war.
It has fallen to Albanese as prime minister to negotiate a newfound stability in the relationship with Beijing after an acrimonious period which has included a years-long trade and diplomatic deep freeze, lingering bad blood from the Covid-19 pandemic and persistent interference in Australian society.
Albanese and his foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, have succeeded in returning things to a more even keel, promising the two governments will cooperate where they can and disagree where they must.
That has meant resisting some public criticism of China, or taking a more measured approach than the media and some commentators demand, including when Chinese warships circumnavigated the country earlier this year, running a live fire exercise that caused dozens of commercial flights to be rerouted.
Cooperation with disagreement is a formulation which the government might be privately retrofitting to Australia's other most pressing international priority: managing Donald Trump.
Usually a rock solid partnership regardless of which party is in power in Washington or Canberra, Trump's incredible restoration to the Oval Office has disrupted relations with Canberra. A mix of the Republican's unconventional style and fractious events in the Middle East has meant even the straightforward task of locking in a meeting between the prime minister and the president has become one of the major political challenges since the government's return to power.
Albanese needs to seek assurances from Trump on the future of the Aukus nuclear submarines deal, explain his position on America's demands for Australia to spend 3.5% of GDP on defence and make the case for preferential treatment under the Trump tariff regime, but has been left hanging on when talks will actually take place.
For Labor, the problem is something between a scheduling snafu and an emerging foreign policy flashpoint. The Coalition describes it as a major failure, saying the government should have anticipated Trump's win and laid better diplomatic groundwork.
The opposition is continuing to demand the prime minister go to the White House and meet with Trump, as if Albanese is somehow sitting at Canberra airport refusing to get on the plane. In reality, an invitation will only be issued when a time of mutual agreement can be secured.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
After her meeting with the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, and their Quad counterparts in Washington this week, Wong confirmed the Americans are eager for a meeting to take place as soon as possible.
A September visit to the United Nations general assembly or the Quad leaders' summit in India later in the year are the most likely timing windows, guaranteeing Albanese will hold his second round of face-to-face talks with Xi before he meets Trump for the first time.
Labor has been careful to keep its response to the tariffs in check in recent weeks.
Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement turned into an unlikely positive for Albanese during the federal election campaign, and government sources say being included in the list of countries at the 10% baseline rate is as good as things are likely to get. Purported major deals with the United Kingdom and Vietnam might be more hype than substance and Labor won't be the only government hoping Trump might cave on his 9 July deadline and extend the pause on most of the tariffs.
Albanese has described the tariffs as an act of economic self-harm, warning American consumers will pay the price for Trump's inflexible belief in import duties. He will stress Australia has a trade surplus with the United States, even as he says the imposition of tariffs is not the act of a friend. Labor sources say privately the government won't push for any major new deal that could undercut the 20-year-old US-Australia free trade agreement.
But, as with Xi – described this week by Simon Case, the former head of the UK's civil service, as a 'dictator' intent on causing conflict over Taiwan – careful criticism of Trump may not stand the test of time.
He is ramping up extra judicial deportations, going after perceived enemies in the media, abusing political rivals and the leaders of friendly nations, and cutting social programs including health insurance and food stamps to fund the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill. Now law, it is replete with tax cuts for the richest Americans and big corporations and will add trillions to national debt. No one should forget Trump tried to overturn a democratic election, goading his supporters to deadly violence as he attempted to cling to power.
If Trump uses the 30-day snap review of Aukus to pull out of the deal, even after Australia has sent about $800m to support the US defence industrial base, Albanese will have a major political crisis on his hands. Australia has structured its defence and foreign policy around the United States alliance for decades and any move by Trump towards his own isolationist instincts would be bad news for allies in the Indo-Pacific and good news for Xi.
For Albanese and Labor, cooperating with both Xi and Trump, while disagreeing when Australia must, might be the only good approach.
Tom McIlroy is Guardian Australia's chief political correspondent
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Wild kangaroo harvests are labelled ‘needlessly cruel' by US lawmakers – but backed by Australian conservationists
The bill, introduced into the US Senate last month, came with plenty of emotive and uncompromising language. 'The mass killing of millions of kangaroos to make commercial products is needless and inhumane,' said the Democratic senator Tammy Duckworth, as she introduced the Kangaroo Protection Act to ban the sale and manufacture of kangaroo products in the US. With the high-profile former Democratic presidential nominee Cory Booker as a co-sponsor, the two senators said Australia's commercial kangaroo harvest was 'unnecessarily cruel' and their proposed ban would protect 'millions of wild kangaroos and their innocent babies who are needlessly killed every year'. Backed by animal rights campaigners, the move is the latest in a string of attempts in recent years in the US Congress to ban kangaroo products. A similar push is ongoing in Europe. Last week the Center for a Humane Economy, which runs the Kangaroos Are Not Shoes campaign, announced British sportswear brand Umbro was the latest to join the likes of Nike, Adidas, Puma and Asics in phasing out the use of so-called 'k-leather' that has most often been used in some of their brand's football boots. But the success of the campaigns, and the ongoing criticism of Australia's regulated kangaroo harvests, hides a complex story and one which, Prof Chris Johnson says, is 'infuriating' for many Australian conservationists and ecologists. 'The public advocacy by opponents has been very effective, but unfortunately it's all wrong, is conceptually muddled and it's not based on knowledge or experience,' says Johnson, a kangaroo expert and professor of wildlife conservation at the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage. The Nationals leader and shadow agriculture minister, David Littleproud, accused the governing Labor party of failing to 'dispel misconceptions around the use and overseas imports of kangaroo products'. 'This has allowed animal activists to spread false information that kangaroos are being killed solely for [soccer] cleats. 'It's important to note that without a commercial industry, conservation culling is still needed to occur to manage populations. 'We know kangaroos can breed easily and are not a threatened species. The practical reality of import bans in the US would be detrimental to kangaroo populations in Australia.' The government did not answer questions sent to the agriculture minister, Julie Collins. Since European colonisation, farmers have grown pasture for livestock and added watering holes across Australia's landscape, both of which help kangaroos to survive and, in times of good rainfall, have backed controls and culls of the kangaroo's natural predator – the dingo. Johnson says grazing from abundant kangaroos can take away areas that other native animals such as bandicoots and dunnarts use to hide from introduced predators like cats and foxes. 'Overgrazing can be a serious ecological threat,' he says. 'The harvest protects other native species because it protects vegetation. If the kangaroo program fails, that would be a contributor to increased extinction threat.' Regulated commercial kangaroo harvesting takes place every year in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia. Since 2010, data collated by the Australian government shows that between 1.1 million and 1.7 million kangaroos have been killed annually under the commercial harvest. Harvest quotas are set at about 15% of the estimated kangaroo population, but the data suggests less than a third of the quota is used up each year. Kangaroo harvesting takes place at night, and a national code of practice says the animals should be killed by a bullet to the head. Ben Pearson, Australia and New Zealand country director for World Animal Protection, says this method of killing, coupled with a lack of oversight of both commercial and non-commercial kangaroo culling, which is also done under licence, is a concern. 'In other animal farming industries there is a requirement for humane slaughter which includes stunning before slaughter,' he says. 'With wild harvesting, kangaroos are shot outright and evidence suggests that many are not killed instantaneously, instead being merely wounded and thus suffering from gunshot wounds. Kangaroos that are wounded but escape could suffer over a prolonged period.' Sign up to Clear Air Australia Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis after newsletter promotion A 2021 inquiry in the New South Wales parliament on kangaroo welfare found there was a lack of monitoring at the 'point of kill' for both commercial and non-commercial shooting, but the state government supported only two of the 23 recommendations in full. The inquiry heard that kangaroo kills were deeply distressing for some Aboriginal people, and animal rights groups said kangaroos had a right to live freely without human interference. If female kangaroos are shot, harvesters can find young joeys still alive in the mother's pouch. A national code of practice for commercial kangaroo harvesting recommends joeys are killed using blunt force trauma to the back of the head, and suggests using the tray of a utility vehicle as a suitable immovable object. It's a method which Pearson says is 'barbaric'. 'On an ethical level, we are opposed to the killing of kangaroos for non-essential items like football boots, particularly given alternatives exist and are in widespread use,' he says. Neal Finch is a wildlife ecologist and executive officer of the Australian Wild Game Industry Council, which represents kangaroo harvesters. He says the codes of practice of the kind covering kangaroo harvesting do not exist in other jurisdictions. 'It is not that we are inhumane. It is that we are exemplary,' he claims. 'Over 6 million native deer are killed in the USA every year. Over-abundant herbivores need management. The code of practice for shooting kangaroos requires a shot to the brain. Virtually all deer shot in the USA are shot in the chest. 'The reason campaigners can quote how many kangaroos are killed is because we actually publish that information,' he said. Kangaroo numbers are known to boom in times of good rainfall and then crash during droughts – swings that mirror Australia's variable climate. Between 2010 and 2023, official estimates of kangaroo numbers across four states show numbers fell as low as 25 million in 2010 and went as high as 53 million in 2013. Latest figures estimate a kangaroo population of 34 million. 'We either choose to sustainably harvest these kangaroo populations or we will see kangaroos starve in their many thousands during droughts, and habitats will be overgrazed and degraded,' says Prof Euan Ritchie, a wildlife ecologist at Deakin University. 'It's a choice.' As uncomfortable as the thought may be for many, Johnson says that in lean times, many kangaroo deaths may not be as short and sharp as one from a harvester's gun. 'The natural alternatives are being killed by a dingo or dying by starvation,' he says. 'There's less suffering entailed by the harvest than by either of those alternatives.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Simple money hack could save you hundreds of dollars over July 4th weekend
Gen Z-ers are spilling the tea on why purchasing items with cash helps save money. The simple money hack that's been sweeping social media for the last couple of years has been intensifying recently as young Americans grapple with rising costs. Australian influencer Matt Hey has been an advocate for paying with cash and keeping credit cards in wallets. He revealed in a TikTok video that using cash for recreational purposes makes him have a 'more conscious decision' into what he purchases. Before learning the trick, he would go over his $100 weekly budget because he did not think about what he was purchasing. Now, he pulls the money out of an ATM and typically has funds leftover to put into his savings. Another trick is to opt out of tap-to-pay, according to financial planner Nadia Vanderhall. By going cash-only, anyone celebrating the 4th of July will have a better chance of tracking their payments and eliminating the temptation for impulse buys. 'You decide how much you want to spend for the weekend, pull that amount in cash on Friday, and that's all you allow yourself to use through Sunday,' she told Bustle this week. Big spenders can try out the trick any time they'd like, all they need is a debit card and a way to withdraw money. Besides controlling overspending habits, it can also help save money on food or other things, which helps 'create real awareness.' Before giving it a go, cardholders are advised to check their bank balance, plan out the week ahead, and withdraw enough money to cover fees without going overboard. 'A lot of folks budget their fixed costs, but forget about the spontaneous "I deserve it" spending that tends to happen on the weekend,' Vanderhall explained. 'This approach helps you feel your spending in real time, keep your non-bill budget in check, and make more intentional choices — all without killing your fun.' Another money trend known as the 'treat yourself tax' can help Americans control spending as it requires matching the cost of impulse buys to a savings deposit. Americans can also turn to the '1 percent rule' to control over spending, and consider using the 'one-tenth rule' when purchasing a car. Hundreds of Reddit users have already said that they would choose cash over cards any time they entered a bar. Tap-to-pay using apps like Apple Pay and Google Pay is a common payment method for Gen Z 'I've never once opened a tab at a bar. It honestly seems like such a weird and unusual thing to do to me, paying every time you go to the bar just makes way more sense,' a Gen Z Reddit member wrote. 'This is why cash is king. Don't need to worry about leaving your card at the bar,' a bargoer responded. 'Packed college town bar/crowded bar mid bar hop? Pay every time,' a commenter admitted. 'In countries that aren't stupid, you pay for every drink as you get it and that's that,' another person wrote. Others believe cash-only payment methods at bars are 'unreasonable' and make it 'extremely difficult' for bartenders. 'It creates a huge amount of pointless work for servers and bartenders, with the exact same outcome for you,' a Reddit user insisted. 'It's also massively inconsiderate and entitled.' 'This is an a** move on the customer part. You keep it open and close when you leave,' another person wrote regarding bar tabs.
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Putin and Xi's plot to topple the US dollar is dead
As the 17th Brics Summit kicks off in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, this weekend, leaders of two of the most important founding nations will be conspicuous by their absence. Chinese president Xi Jinping will skip the meeting, for the first time in more than a decade, sending Premier Li Qiang in his stead. Russia's Vladimir Putin is also sitting this one out. Foreign minister Sergei Lavrov will represent Russia, in light of the outstanding International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant against the Russian president, which Brazil would be obliged to enforce. But there may be more to their decision to avoid the summit than meets the eye. The Brics has been on Donald Trump's target list ever since he won the 2024 election. In January, 10 days after he started his second term as president, Trump issued a statement on Truth Social. 'We are going to require a commitment from these seemingly hostile Countries that they will neither create a new Brics Currency, nor back any other Currency to replace the mighty US Dollar or, they will face 100 per cent Tariffs'. Formally founded in 2009 by Brazil, Russia, India, and China, the Brics – which South Africa joined a year later – has since expanded to include 10 countries, with Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia all now members. Effectively created to act as a counterweight to perceived US and Western dominance in international institutions, it has since become far more than just a talking-shop for emerging economies. The group has expressed an interest in challenging the hegemony of the US dollar, ending its role as the preferred currency for conducting international transactions. This ambition will have been driven in part by fears among the member nations – many of which are governed by authoritarian regimes – of financial sanctions, should the US seek to punish them for behaviour contrary to international norms. The concept of creating a Brics currency, as an alternative to the dollar, gained additional momentum in the aftermath of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which saw Moscow hit with significant US and European sanctions, Russian banks removed from the SWIFT payment system, and Russian international currency reserves frozen. But since the beginning of the year, Trump's threats against the Brics have escalated. 'There is no chance that Brics will replace the US Dollar in International Trade, or anywhere else, and any Country that tries should say hello to Tariffs, and goodbye to America!' he said in January. In February, as he was heading out to meet with Narendra Modi, the prime minister of India, Trump pronounced the Brics 'dead,' adding that 'if they want to play games with the dollar, they're going to be hit with a 100 per cent tariff'. In April, Trump's tariff blitzkrieg sent shockwaves across the Brics nations, prompting foreign ministers from the member countries, led by Brazilian ambassador Mauricio Lyrio, to begin coordinating a response criticising 'unilateral measures of any origin'. The planned joint declaration fell through, however, due to internal disagreements. Failing to reach consensus, the joint statement was replaced with a 'chair statement', containing generic language that did not name the US.
