Finish RTE admissions by July 7 or face action: DEO to 43 schools
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
As a final reminder, the district education office has asked all defaulting schools to complete the online enrolment process by July 7 without fail. Schools have also been instructed to inform parents of the selected children and facilitate their admission promptly.
The RTE provision requires schools to reserve 25% of their entry-level seats for children from economically weaker and disadvantaged sections. According to a letter from the district administration, instructions were initially issued to all schools to complete the enrolment by June 2 and update the admission details on the dedicated RTE portal www.rteranchi.in for the academic session 2025–26.
However, considering the summer vacation in schools, the deadline was extended to June 25.
Despite this relaxation, it was found that many schools neither initiated nor completed the enrolment process.
The letter stated, "Non-compliance with the mandated RTE admission process will invite strict action from the administration. Schools failing to admit eligible children may face the withdrawal of their UDISE code, cancellation of CBSE affiliation, and penalties as per the provisions of the Right to Education Act, 2009."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
2023 Parliament security breach: Delhi HC grants bail to two accused
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday (July 2, 2025) granted bail to Neelam Azad and Mahesh Kumawat, two accused in the 2023 Parliament security breach case, but barred them from talking about the incident to the press or on social media. A Bench of Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar granted the reprieve on a personal bond of ₹50,000 each and two sureties. 'They shall not give interviews or make any statement regarding the case before the press or social media. They shall not leave Delhi and appear before the investigating agency every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday,' the court said. The accused had challenged a trial court's order rejecting their bail pleas. The trial court had found sufficient evidence to believe that the allegations were 'prima facie' true. Delhi Police had opposed the bail applications, alleging that the accused intended to bring back 'haunted memories' of the 2001 Parliament attack. The security breach occurred on December 13, 2023, coinciding with the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament terror attack. During the incident, the co-accused, Sagar Sharma and Manoranjan D., allegedly jumped into the Lok Sabha chamber from the public gallery during Zero Hour. They released yellow gas from canisters and sloganeered before being overpowered by some MPs. Around the same time, another accused, Amol Shinde, and Ms. Azad allegedly sprayed coloured gas from canisters outside Parliament premises while shouting 'tanashahi nahi chalegi (dictatorship won't work)'. According to the police, preliminary inquiries revealed that Ms. Azad and Mr. Shinde were associates of Mr. Sharma and Mr. Manoranjan, and together carried out the terror act. Delhi Police had arrested Mr. Kumawat on December 16 on charges of criminal conspiracy and destruction of evidence. Earlier, the court had sought clarification from the police on whether the act of carrying or using a smoke canister within Parliament premises or outside would invoke provisions under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, and if such an act would come under the definition of terrorist activities.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC seeks reply in plea challenging Act on shacks
Panaji: The high court of Bombay at Goa sought a response from state and central authorities, as well as the Calangute MLA Michael Lobo, in a public interest petition challenging the validity of the Goa Erection of Shacks on Public Beaches (Regulation and Control) Act 2024. Petitioners Desmond Alvares and other environmental activists alleged that the Act is unconstitutional and ultra vires. They submitted that the Act, under the guise of regulating temporary shacks, permits the construction of permanent or semi-permanent structures on beaches, including ecologically sensitive areas such as sand dunes, which are classified as CRZ-1 (A) areas. The Act undermines coastal protection and public safety and lacks provisions for ensuring the structural stability and safety of constructions as it dispenses with critical requirements like structural stability certificates, local calculations and architect conformity letters, the petitioners submitted to the court. They added that the Act allows structures up to nine metres in height (G+2) without adequate safeguards, circumventing existing building regulations and the National Building Code. It also enables the construction of permanent structures under the guise of temporary ones, as evidenced by the use of steel structures with concrete foundations and lacks provisions for completion or occupancy certificates, which are essential to ensure that structures are safe for occupation, they further submitted. The division bench of the high court, comprising Justices Bharati Dangre and Nivedita Mehta, directed the petition to be listed on Aug 4.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Disabled people entitled to due representation in elected boards'
Chennai: Madras high court has said persons with disabilities (PwDs)are entitled to due representation in every walk of life, including in the elected boards of statutory bodies such as the Bar Council and Medical Council. "It is only just and proper that apart from finding a place in educational institutions and in employment, disabled persons also find a place in the elected bodies," Justices G R Swaminathan and V Lakshminarayanan said. The court made the observations while clarifying that the high court, though being a constitutional court, cannot issue any writ of mandamus unless the petitioner shows the existence of any legal right. However, the court added that it can certainly nudge the authorities to take appropriate steps in that direction. The issue pertains to a plea moved by advocate B Rameshbabu, pointing out that there was no representation of PwDs in various statutory bodies such as Bar Council of India, National Medical Council, Dental Council of India, and Pharmacy Council of India. The petitioner said despite the mandates for the govt provided under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act to identify suitable posts in various govt establishments, no identification and nomination were done by the state. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nejpohodlnější farmářská hra. Instalace není potřeba Taonga Farm Přehrát nyní Undo Recording the submissions, the bench said, "The Act states that the chief commissioner for persons with disabilities shall promote awareness of the rights of PwDs and safeguards available for their protection." Now that we have brought it to the notice of the authorities that disabled persons have not given due representation, we direct the authorities to undertake appropriate steps in this regard, the court said.
