Intersection lanes in Allouez close, expected to last 10-15 days
Green Bay tattoo shop offers $200 giveaway to benefit local animal rescue
According to a release from the Village of Allouez, in partnership with the Brown County Highway Department, village officials will close the outside north and southbound lanes at Webster Avenue and Green Avenue starting on Monday, August 4.
The closure is said to be necessary to allow for improvements to be made to the existing pedestrian crossing, which will include new ADA curb ramps, rapid flashing beacons, pavement markings, and signage.
The improvement work, weather permitting, is expected to keep the intersection lanes closed for 10 to 15 days.
More information and updates about this project and other Allouez construction projects can be found here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US market avoids tariff impacts as outlook improves
Sales Summary According to preliminary estimates, US Light Vehicle (LV) sales grew by 7.3% YoY in July, to 1.39 million units. July 2025 had one additional selling day as compared to July 2024, meaning that sales were up by 4.1% YoY on a selling day-adjusted basis. The daily selling rate was measured at 53.6k units/day in July, up from 52.7k units/day in June. The annualized selling rate was estimated at 16.6 million units/year in July, up from 15.2 million units/year in June. Retail sales were estimated at 1.19 million units, up by 10.8% YoY, while fleet sales were thought to total 206k units, down by 4.5% YoY. OEM Analysis GM was once again the bestselling OEM in the market, with total sales of 237k units, and a market share of 17.0%. Despite a seemingly impressive monthly volume, GM's market share has now declined for three straight months. Toyota Group ranked second in July sales, on 218k units, for a 15.6% share, with the group's sales jumping by 19.9% YoY. Ford Group was in third place, on 182k units, but after a stellar Q2, the OEM's share fell back to a modest 13.1% in July. At a brand level, Toyota outsold Ford, by 187k units to 176k units. While it has been typical in recent times for Toyota to sell higher volumes than Ford, the reverse had been the case in June. Chevrolet was third, on 153k units. Model Analysis Despite a slightly quiet month for Ford overall, the F-150 was the nation's bestselling model once again in July, on 44.2k units – the F-150 has now held the top spot for four consecutive months. The Toyota RAV4 was in second on 39.8k units, while the Chevrolet Silverado came in third on 35.4k units. The ranking of the top three models was unchanged from June. The Chevrolet Equinox sold 31.8k units in July, its highest volume since March. Segment Analysis According to initial estimates, Compact Non-Premium SUV's market share was 21.5% in July, the segment's highest share since March. To some extent, however, this performance was upstaged by Midsize Non-Premium SUV, which achieved a market share of 17.2%, up by 2.0 pp on June's result, and the highest for the segment since May 2022. The segment was boosted by robust volumes from models such as the Toyota 4Runner and Hyundai Palisade. After two stronger months in May and June, the Large Pickup segment saw its market share ease back to 13.8% in July. David Oakley, Manager, Americas Sales Forecasts, GlobalData, said: 'There was little sign of tariffs negatively impacting the market in July. Automakers have made a point of absorbing the higher costs they are seeing, and some have even extended offers that were previously due to expire at the beginning of the July. Therefore, from the consumer's point-of-view, there was perhaps little to dissuade buyers from making purchases as normal. At the present time, OEMs are still vying for market share, rather than being overly concerned with protecting inventory. We should also bear in mind that for the majority of the month of July, the landscape regarding tariff rates in the longer-term was highly unclear. Automakers have therefore largely tried to maintain a business-as-usual approach, while mostly avoiding knee-jerk reactions in the face of uncertainty. The announcement that the tax credits available for Electric Vehicles (EVs) will be discontinued from September 30th appeared to notably boost sales of some EVs in July, an effect that we would expect to continue as we move through the next two months and the deadline looms larger'. Forecast Updates While OEMs have thus far largely adopted a 'holding pattern' approach to tariff uncertainty, this is not necessarily a strategy they can maintain indefinitely. Several automakers reported either outright financial losses in Q2, or large reductions in profitability due to the cost of absorbing tariffs. Recent trade deals with various countries have given greater clarity to the industry, as it appears that the benchmark rate will be 15% for countries outside of North America. Although the Trump administration raised tariffs on some Canadian goods to 35%, vehicles compliant with the USMCA trade agreement – which covers the vast majority of models sourced from Canada – will still be subject to 25% tariffs on the non-US content of the vehicle, and the same applies to Mexico. Nevertheless, the prospect remains of some vehicles sourced from the US's neighbors potentially incurring higher tariffs than a model imported from Japan, for example. In the longer-term, this seems unlikely to be sustained, but negotiations with Mexico, and particularly Canada, have been difficult. With an earlier-than-expected lowering of tariff rates, we now see US sales at around 15.7 million units in 2025, still down from almost 16.0 million units in 2024, but a considerably better outlook than would have been the case had the original tariffs remained in place without mitigation. This article was first published on GlobalData's dedicated research platform, the . "US market avoids tariff impacts as outlook improves – GlobalData" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Wall Street Bullish or Bearish on Copart Stock?
Valued at a market cap of $44 billion, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) is a Dallas‑based global leader in online vehicle auctions and remarketing, serving insurance firms, dealerships, fleet operators, and individual buyers across 11 countries through its patented VB3 platform and associated brands like BID4U and CrashedToys. Shares of CPRT have lagged behind the broader market over the past 52 weeks. Copart has dipped 12% over this time frame, while the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX) has gained 18.4%. Moreover, on a YTD basis, the stock is down 20.3%, compared to SPX's 7.6% rise. More News from Barchart Options Traders Expected Palantir Stock's Tamest Earnings Reaction in a Year. Did They Get It Right? Dear Nvidia Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for August 27 Tesla Gains on Elon Musk's New Pay Package. Is TSLA Stock a Buy? Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Zooming in further, Copart has also struggled to keep up with the Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund's (XLI) 23.1% uptick over the past 52 weeks and 14.7% rise on a YTD basis. Copart released its Q3 2025 earnings on May 22, and its shares slumped 11.5%. While revenue grew 7.5% year-over-year to $1.2 billion, it missed consensus estimates by 2.5%, primarily due to a 2.1% decline in vehicle sales. Service revenues rose 9.3% year-over-year to $1 billion. Its EPS stood at $0.42, up 7.7% from the prior-year quarter and in line with analysts' expectations. For the fiscal year that ended in July, analysts expect Copart's EPS to grow 11.4% year over year to $1.56. The company's earnings surprise history is mixed. It exceeded or met the consensus estimates in three of the last four quarters, while missing on another occasion. Among the nine analysts covering the stock, the consensus rating is a 'Moderate Buy' which is based on four 'Strong Buy,' and five 'Hold' ratings. On Jul. 17, Baird reaffirmed its 'Outperform' rating for Copart but lowered the price target from $64 to $55, signaling a more tempered near-term outlook while maintaining confidence in the company's long-term potential. The mean price target of $60.14 represents a 31.5% premium from CPRT's current price levels, while the Street-high price target of $66 suggests an upside potential of 44.3%. On the date of publication, Kritika Sarmah did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Autopilot verdict deals Tesla a 'black eye', threatens Musk's robotaxi ambitions
By Abhirup Roy SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -A court verdict against Tesla last week, stemming from a fatal 2019 crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, could hurt its plans to expand its nascent robotaxi network and intensify concerns over the safety of its autonomous vehicle technology. A Florida jury ordered Musk's electric vehicle company on Friday to pay about $243 million to victims of the crash, finding its Autopilot driver-assistance software defective. Tesla said the driver was solely at fault and vowed to appeal. The verdict follows years of federal investigations and recalls related to collisions involving Tesla's autonomous-vehicle technology, and comes as CEO Elon Musk seeks regulatory approval to rapidly expand the robotaxi service across the U.S. "The public perception of this verdict or things like this are going to fuel pressure on regulators to say, 'We just can't let this stuff be launched without a lot more due diligence'," said Mike Nelson, founder of Nelson Law and an expert on legal issues in the mobility sector. Tesla could have a tough time convincing state regulators that its technology is road-ready, threatening Musk's goal of offering robotaxis to half the U.S. population by year end, legal experts and Tesla investors said. Expanding its robotaxi service is crucial for Tesla as demand for its aging lineup of EVs has cooled amid rising global competition and a backlash against Musk's far right political views. Much of Tesla's trillion-dollar market valuation hinges on his bets on robotics and artificial intelligence. Success in the self-driving realm will require winning the confidence of regulators and potential customers on the full-self driving (FSD) software that underpins Tesla's robotaxis, analysts said. "The timing (of the verdict) for Tesla in light of the FSD rollouts and robotaxis is awful," said Aaron Davis, co-managing partner at law firm Davis Goldman. "Now there's essentially an opinion that some aspect of Tesla's business is not safe and maybe the safety that the company advertises isn't what it's cracked up to be." The FSD is an advanced version of Autopilot. Autopilot, which was been updated since 2019, controls speed, distance and lane centering on highways, while the FSD can operate on city streets, helping the vehicle make automatic turns and change lanes. "This case does not have direct implications for Tesla's FSD roll-out," analysts at Piper Sandler said in a note on Sunday, citing the modern iterations of the software. A spokesperson on behalf of Tesla acknowledged the company had received a request for comment from Reuters but had not provided one by the time of publication. REGULATORY ROAD AHEAD Perfecting autonomous vehicles has been harder than expected. The high costs of hardware, years of trial and error, and regulatory hurdles have forced many players to close shop or pivot, including General Motors' Cruise unit. Musk, however, has pursued what he calls a simpler and cheaper path, relying only on cameras and AI instead of pricey sensors such as lidars and radars used by Alphabet's Waymo, Amazon's Zoox and others. After years of missed deadlines, Musk rolled out a small robotaxi trial in June with about a dozen Model Y crossover SUVs in Austin, Texas, each overseen by a human safety monitor in the front passenger seat. While Musk has said Tesla was being "super paranoid about safety", he has also pledged to expand the service fast and make it available for half of the U.S. population in the next five months - a stark contrast to Waymo's cautious years-long rollout. Until Tesla's entry, Waymo was the only U.S. firm to operate a paid, driverless robotaxi service. Tesla is currently awaiting approvals in several states, including California, Nevada, Arizona and Florida. California's department of motor vehicles declined to comment on the impact of the verdict on regulatory approval. Nevada said it held talks with Tesla about a robotaxi program several weeks ago, while Arizona said it was still considering Tesla's request for certification. Both did not comment on the verdict. Florida did not respond. Tesla has typically either won other Autopilot litigation or resolved the case with the plaintiffs out of court. The Florida verdict stands out. Several such cases are pending. The case involved a Model S sedan that went through an intersection and hit the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it. The driver had reached down to retrieve a dropped cellphone and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign before the crash. The jury found that Tesla's Autopilot had a defect and held the company partially responsible, despite the driver admitting fault. "It's going to take time to get regulators to move forward and time being more than the end of the year," said Gene Munster, managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, a Tesla investor. "From an image standpoint, it's a black eye."
