Why China sees US trade deals with partners as a threat – and how it could react
Beijing has renewed its warning to other countries not to strike deals with the United States on terms that come at China's expense – ahead of Washington's looming deadline to conclude tariff negotiations with most of its trade partners.
Chinese officials are concerned that nations from Europe to Southeast Asia may enter into trade agreements with the US that divert supply chains, reduce bilateral trade with China or compel governments to exit Beijing-led projects, analysts said on Monday.
'The first important one is not to shift the supply chain,' said Liang Yan, professor of economics at Willamette University. 'There's a possibility that other countries would disengage from China.'
Issued
over the weekend , Beijing's latest warning echoed a similar statement in April. It came after US President Donald Trump hinted at lower tariffs or extended waivers for countries that negotiate in 'good faith' – raising concerns in China, especially as many third countries maintain close ties with Washington, analysts said.
On April 2, the Trump administration imposed sweeping global tariffs – dubbing it 'Liberation Day' – only to suspend most of the duties for 90 days to allow for talks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
26 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
China's crackdown on banquets and booze dims spending outlook, Goldman Sachs says
Institutional investors are concerned that a ban on alcohol at official meals in mainland China could hamper Beijing's efforts to boost spending and juice up the economy, according to Goldman Sachs. Advertisement The recent alcohol ban at official meals, together with stricter enforcement of frugality rules by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), had made mutual funds, private equity funds and asset managers worry about whether consumer spending would rebound, Goldman Sachs analysts led by Lisheng Wang said in a report on Sunday. Investors also fretted about whether economic stimulus policies would be effectively implemented, the investment bank said. In May, Beijing reiterated eight points that are a key part of President Xi Jinping's campaign to combat corruption and uphold integrity within the party. In the newly revised Regulations on Practicing Thrift and Opposing Waste in Party and Government Organs, the CCP required its more than 100 million members to adopt a more frugal lifestyle: no banquets, booze or cigarettes. Last week, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, China's top anti-corruption agency, reported that more than 21,000 violations were investigated nationwide in May, including offences related to the dining and alcohol bans. The austerity measures likely further suppressed consumption of certain goods and services, said Jing Wang, an analyst at Nomura, in a note on Monday. Advertisement Shares in distiller Kweichow Moutai, a brand synonymous with lavish banquets, fell more than 6 per cent over the past month. Wuliangye, another large distiller, suffered a 4 per cent decline during the same period. Both brands have already been affected by the country's sluggish economy; last year, UBS Group lowered its ratings on Kweichow Moutai and other major Chinese liquor distillers.
AllAfrica
an hour ago
- AllAfrica
China is not alone in building a new cult of heroes and martyrs
A tour guide competition was held in the central Chinese city of Wuhan in late May. This was not some fun contest. According to Chinese state media, it was a carefully conceived effort to 'attract and cultivate a group of politically firm and professionally skilled storytellers of heroes and martyrs in the new era.' It symbolizes the ambitious and far-reaching campaign launched by the Chinese state to revive the country's pantheon of national heroes and martyrs. The aim is to unite and mobilize the nation in what the Chinese leadership sees as the crucial final phase in the quest to become a modern global superpower. On the same day as the Wuhan competition, but 750 miles farther inland in Sichuan province, children from a kindergarten gathered with martyrs' family members to engage in traditional crafts. The official newspaper of the Chinese Communist party, the People's Daily, explained how this activity helped 'pass on the torch of heroes' to young generations. And two weeks earlier, in China's eastern province of Shandong, representatives from the official state news agency, Xinhua, attended an immersive training session on hero spirit. By coming 'face to face' with heroes of the past, the trainees were able to grasp the 'spirit' that had guided the extraordinary deeds of these ordinary people. This 'facing up' to past heroes increasingly takes place through digital means. Thanks to developments in AI, and with the help of universities, museums and various government units, numerous Chinese people have now been 'reunited' or become 'acquainted' with family members martyred decades ago. Activities such as these have become commonplace in recent years. They are encouraged, guided and overseen by an expanding architecture of laws and regulations. There are at least two reasons why the campaign to build a new 'spirit' of heroism and sacrifice requires attention beyond China-watchers. A boy places flowers on a monument at the Shanghai Longhua Martyrs Cemetery. Photo: Alex Plavevski / EPA The first reason is the increasingly global reach of the campaign. Just as China's economic statecraft is affecting global trade and finance, so too are Chinese memory politics spreading across the globe and reshaping the transnational memory landscape. Beijing has become an active sponsor of commemorations that are concerned more with shaping the future than looking into the past. Recent examples include Victory Day celebrations in Moscow and Minsk, and joint commemorations in the Serbian capital, Belgrade, of the Chinese 'martyrs' of Nato's bombing of the Chinese embassy there in 1999. China is also fostering bilateral memory partnerships in south-east Asia and Africa. And it has even resorted to memory diplomacy in seeking improved relations with the US by invoking the spirit of Sino-US cooperation during the second world war. China's historical statecraft operates globally in the legal realm, too. Laws have come into effect that aim to promote patriotism and spread 'core socialist values' among Chinese communities worldwide. Chinese embassies and consulates are required to locate Chinese martyrs buried in their host jurisdictions and to erect and maintain memorials for them. They are also expected to organize commemorations involving local Chinese diasporic and expat communities. Recent laws have been used to detain Chinese citizens living abroad. One example is Chinese artist Gao Zhen. Gao had been a permanent US resident for 13 years when he was detained in China in 2024 for his critical depictions of Mao Zedong a decade earlier. Gao was charged with the crime of 'slandering China's heroes and martyrs' under a law that did not exist when he created and exhibited his artwork. Other countries, including traditional democracies, have also sought to shape and control historical memory. Phot: Will Oliver / EPA The second reason why China's martyrs and heroes campaign matters globally is possibly more disturbing. China has become an example of a growing body of cases in which state actors seek to shape and control historical memory. With several democracies beginning to show signs of democratic backsliding, the Chinese case is one of many that show that polar distinctions between 'liberal' and 'illiberal' systems are untenable. Perhaps the most obvious example of a democracy in democratic recession is the US. Donald Trump, a constitutionally elected president, is relying on a series of executive orders to consolidate power and hamper critical debate. One such directive, issued late in Trump's first term, entails a proposal to build a so-called 'national garden of American heroes.' The proposal was revived recently with an executive order on 'restoring truth and sanity to American history.' The order aims to remove what the administration deems divisive and anti-American ideologies from national museums and public monuments. Washington's efforts to control how history is presented seem to come straight out of Beijing's playbook. In 2020, during his July 4 address, Trump claimed: 'Our nation is witnessing a merciless campaign to wipe out our history, defame our heroes, erase our values and indoctrinate our children.' These words eerily resemble those used previously by Chinese president Xi Jinping to justify his campaign against what he calls 'historical nihilism' – attempts to 'destroy' the Chinese nation by eradicating its history. Memory laws have also been adopted across Europe. The European Parliament, for example, has codified its own historical interpretations of the causes of the Second World War in an attempt to counter what it labels Russian disinformation. The causes and consequences of war have always been and will continue to be hotly debated among historians, and there is no need for the EU's bureaucracy to unilaterally 'resolve' these debates. A problem with these bureaucratic efforts to codify historical interpretation is that they feed memory wars and fuel escalation. Even more damaging is that they emulate authoritarian practices of 'dictating' history and restricting debate. These examples show that distinctions between authoritarian and democratic regimes are not as pristine as is often claimed. Increasingly, global memory practices are evolving and possibly converging on a fluid spectrum between these two poles. China's new hero cult is an important case for shedding light on these dynamics. Vincent K.L. Chang is an assistant professor of the history and international relations of modern China at Leiden University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Apple eyes AI boost with Anthropic or OpenAI as it rethinks Siri's future
Apple is considering using artificial intelligence (AI) technology from Anthropic or OpenAI to power a new version of Siri, sidelining its own in-house models in a potentially blockbuster move aimed at turning around its flailing AI effort. The iPhone maker has talked with both companies about using their large language models for Siri, according to people familiar with the discussions. It had asked them to train versions of their models that could run on Apple's cloud infrastructure for testing, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations. If Apple ultimately moves forward, it would represent a monumental reversal. The company currently powers most of its AI features with home-grown technology that it calls Apple Foundation Models and had been planning a new version of its voice assistant that runs on that technology for 2026. A switch to Anthropic's Claude or OpenAI's ChatGPT models for Siri would be an acknowledgment that the company is struggling to compete in generative AI – the most important new technology in decades. Apple already allows ChatGPT to answer web-based search queries in Siri, but the assistant itself is powered by Apple. iPhones on display at an Apple store in the Huangpu district in Shanghai. Photo: AFP Apple's investigation into third-party models was at an early stage, and the company had not made a final decision on using them, the people said. A competing project internally dubbed LLM Siri that uses in-house models remains in active development.
