Ramaphosa demands answers from Minister Nkabane over Seta appointments and conduct in Parliament
President Cyril Ramaphosa has requested Higher Education Minister Dr Nobuhle Nkabane to report to him about her recent behaviour in Parliament and contentious Sector Education and Training Authority (Seta) board appointments that have since been withdrawn.
'President Ramaphosa has noted the content from and media commentary on the appearance of the Honourable Dr Nobuhle Nkabane before the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training on 30 May 2025,' said Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya at a press conference at the Union Buildings on Thursday night.
'The President appreciates that what he has seen may not constitute the full scope or context of the engagement, therefore the President has requested that the minister provide him with a detailed report on the decorum and substance of her engagement with Parliament,' he continued.
Magwenya said Ramaphosa had also requested a report on 'the process undertaken to appoint the board members to the Sector Education and Training Authority that were at the centre of the portfolio committee's questions'.
Nkabane's appearance before Parliament followed leaked information last month about questionable appointments of chairpersons to Seta boards.
Among the contentious appointees were Ramaphosa's allies, former KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) premier Nomusa Dube-Ncube and former ANC deputy chairperson in KZN Mike Mabuyakhulu, along with Buyambo Mantashe, the son of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe, Daily Maverick's Siyabonga Goni reported.
The appointments of several ANC associates sparked immediate furore from MPs, who demanded answers.
On 16 May, Nkabane announced that she was withdrawing the appointments 'in response to public concerns'. She said she would issue a Government Gazette calling for fresh nominations to the board for a period of seven days. A new independent panel would also be established to process the nominations and recommend candidates, according to Nkabane.
Appearing before Parliament's higher education portfolio committee on Friday, 30 May, Nkabane, however, refused to disclose the names of the independent panel members and maintained that there were no flaws in the original appointment process, Daily Maverick reported.
Nkabane also drew the ire of the South African public after videos went viral of her seemingly chewing gum and being dismissive of MPs' questioning in the meeting.
After the meeting, the minister took to X to explain why she was chewing.
'Claims that I was rude or disrespectful are false and based on misleading clips taken out of context. I did not disrupt the process,' she wrote.
3. Claims that I was rude or disrespectful are false and based on misleading clips taken out of context. I did not disrupt the process.
4. I respect the work of Parliament and remain fully accountable to the Committee and the South African public.
— Dr Nobuhle Nkabane (@Dr_NobuhleN) June 1, 2025
On Thursday night, Magwenya said Ramaphosa expected Nkabane to 'establish a constructive relationship with the portfolio committee as she exercises her leadership and accountability.
'The request for the report is in view of the President's expectation that ministers, deputy ministers and senior executives in the public sector conduct themselves professionally, transparently and cordially in engaging with Parliament and other accountability structures.
'The public broadcast of parliamentary proceedings and the viral spread of content from, and public comment on, these proceedings demand that all ministers and senior officials remain conscious of all aspects of their conduct during such proceedings,' he said.
Magwenya did not confirm when Nkabane was expected to present her report to Ramaphosa.
'The President is attending to the matter… When it comes to deadlines and the substance of reports, it's often better to just leave it between the President and the minister concerned. Otherwise you're running the risk of the President managing issues with members of his national executive in the public domain, which is not ideal,' he said.
In a statement issued on X after Magwenya's briefing, Nkabane acknowledged that the 'situation could have been handled differently'.
I have noted the concerns raised by various stakeholders. Upon reflection, and having considered the feedback, I acknowledge that the situation could have been handled differently. I value the critical role of Parliament in providing oversight. pic.twitter.com/YoHqVgl5jA
— Dr Nobuhle Nkabane (@Dr_NobuhleN) June 5, 2025
'I intend to inculcate and maintain a constructive, respectful, and professional working relationship with all members of Parliament. I remain committed to the principles of accountability, good governance, and cooperative governance as outlined in our Constitution and parliamentary protocols. It was never my intention to evade accountability or undermine the decorum of Parliament,' she said. DM
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Amid wrecking balls like Trump, ANC, here's how organisations can still thrive
With rising global and South African uncertainty, as US President Donald Trump upends global politics, trade and markets, and as the ANC battles to transform from the unilateral decision-making of one-party dominance to collaborative multiparty governance, threatening the life of the country's Government of National Unity, organisations, whether state, private or nonprofit, have to be resilient — able to thrive in adversity, to navigate these shocks and see opportunities in uncertainty...
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
South Africa's inflation target under review: Weighing risks and rewards for stability
Should South Africa lower its inflation target? Does inflation targeting work? And if so, what should the target be? After surviving yet another week of political turbulence and internecine bickering, South Africa's increasingly rickety coalition government might be about to face yet another thorny dilemma: the South African Reserve Bank's (SARB) push to lower the country's inflation target to below 3%, from the current band of 3-6%. Speaking on Monday, 30 June 2025, Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago reiterated his argument for a lower inflation target, saying that the current rate undermined the value of the rand and contributed to persistent price increases. The SARB, along with the National Treasury, is 'almost done' completing a technical review of the inflation targeting framework and plans to submit recommendations to Kganyago and Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana shortly. 'Although an inflation rate of 4.5% may seem moderate, it still causes prices to double every 16 years,' Kganyago noted in the SARB's annual report. 'This is hard to reconcile with our constitutional obligation to safeguard the value of the currency. 'The main concern with South African inflation is not our ability to hit the target,' Kganyago said. 'Rather, it is that our target is high compared to other countries. For this reason, despite our success in stabilising inflation, the price level is almost 20% higher than it was in 2021.' The central bank currently aims to anchor inflation expectations at the midpoint of its 3-6% target, but this range is now under formal review. With May's inflation reading at 2.8%, Kganyago and his colleagues see an opportunity to lock in gains and update a framework that has remained unchanged since its introduction in 2000. 'Perfect opening for reform' David Fowkes, a member of the Monetary Policy Committee, recently called this moment 'amazing', suggesting that current low inflation levels provided the perfect opening for reform as they would minimise any potential transition costs, which might come in the form of momentarily higher interest rates. According to the bank's modelling, shifting to a 3% target would yield significant benefits, with inflation expectations declining quickly while 'borrowing costs would fall more significantly' compared with the SARB's baseline forecast. Behind the push is a clear driver: investor appetite. Global asset managers have been pressuring the government to support the SARB's plan in the hopes that a lower target would permanently reduce bond yields and lending rates. South African bonds and the rand have both strengthened recently, with South African borrowing costs at a three-year low, partly on expectations and hopes that the Treasury will approve the new target by early next year. According to insiders, hedge funds and portfolio managers are actively lobbying the Treasury, advising a cautious transition to manage market impact and the inevitable political fallout. And there is some merit in the proposal. South Africa's base interest rate keeps the prime lending rate near 11%, with 10-year bond yields around 10%. These rates are at least partly elevated because of the high upper bound of the inflation target. It is for this reason that other emerging economies, like Brazil, have already lowered their targets — from 4.5% to 3% — with a 1.5% tolerance range. It is clear that international investors would like to see an emerging market like South Africa fit into what they see as global monetary policy best practice. Yet despite these compelling arguments, there are three issues with changing it that the SARB is either missing or conveniently ignoring. First, it is politically toxic. Lowering the inflation target would be further ammunition for the ANC-led government to suppress wage growth in the public sector and restrain price hikes by state-owned enterprises and municipalities. Public sector unions, which of course dominate all critical wage negotiations, rely heavily on past inflation data and expectations — which are largely driven by the inflation target — to argue for increases. There have even been recent calls from the academic community on why South Africa should actually be looking at raising the target threshold, not lowering it. The factions of the ANC who are not aligned with the Treasury, which has consistently been viewed as 'neoliberal', will be spoiling for a fight. Second, moderate inflation is one of the few tools available for reducing public debt. For an emerging market with high debt-to-GDP like South Africa, a bit of inflation is critical to 'inflate away' liabilities. A lower target would negate this effect, making debt consolidation even harder and potentially putting more pressure on the Treasury to cut spending at a time when the economy needs all the stimulus it can get. This could, theoretically, have adverse consequences for growth. Importance overstated Finally, the long-term importance of the inflation target is overstated. While financial markets might care about the level of the target, its long-term effect on economic fundamentals is minimal. The actual target itself is essentially random. The first economists who devised inflation targeting in New Zealand in the 1980s knew this — it is essentially a pragmatic and political decision as to what you make the target, not an economic one. What matters more is whether inflation expectations are well anchored and consistent, and then of course whether wages rise in tandem with prices. On that latter point, South Africa has clearly fallen short. Wage growth, especially outside the public sector, has consistently lagged inflation since the global financial crisis. The gap widened sharply during the Zuma-era stagnation and the Covid-19 pandemic. Rising food and transport costs, load shedding-related expenses and record-high unemployment have meant that even with inflation near historic lows most South Africans feel worse off than ever. For this reason, the debate is a red herring. The SARB should quit listening to the demands of the investor community and rather stick to its job of keeping prices in line with expectations. If the economy was being properly managed by the government and creating private sector jobs — which would mean more people being paid a decent salary — then we would not be having this debate in the first place. DM
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Diplomatic tensions mount as Zambia and Lungu's family clash over burial in South Africa
Former Zambian President Edgar Chagwa Lungu's death has triggered a bitter dispute between his family and the Zambian government led by President Hakainde Hichilema. Image: File A diplomatic and legal impasse over the burial of former Zambian President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has sparked tensions between Lusaka and Pretoria, exposing deep political rifts and challenging cross-border legal norms. On Wednesday, moments before a private burial ceremony was set to begin at Johannesburg's Cathedral of Christ the King, the High Court in Pretoria issued an emergency order halting the proceedings. The decision followed a petition filed by Zambian Attorney General Mulilo Kabesha, who argued that Lungu, as a former head of state, must be accorded a full state funeral in Zambia. Lungu, 68, died earlier this month in South Africa while receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness. His death has since triggered a bitter dispute between his family and the Zambian government led by President Hakainde Hichilema. At the heart of the standoff is a fundamental disagreement: Lungu's family insists that one of his final wishes was to be buried privately, away from the political theatre of Lusaka, and without the involvement of his successor and long-time rival, Hichilema. In contrast, the Zambian government maintains that, as a former president, Lungu must be buried on Zambian soil with full military honours — and with the current head of state presiding. While the Zambian state prepared for a formal reception of Lungu's remains in Lusaka, complete with military honours and a public funeral, the family quietly made arrangements for a private burial in South Africa. The Pretoria court's ruling has now placed the funeral in limbo, pending a full hearing scheduled for August 4. South African officials have found themselves caught in the middle of the high-stakes diplomatic and legal standoff. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) has declined to comment publicly but confirmed it is engaging both parties to ensure compliance with South African law. 'We recognise the sensitive nature of this matter,' a DIRCO spokesperson said. 'We are working closely with the Zambian authorities and the family to support a peaceful resolution.' Zambian Foreign Affairs Minister Mulambo Haimbe addressed the issue during a live interview in South Africa, calling for cooler heads to prevail. 'This situation is regrettable,' Haimbe said. 'We must honour our former president with dignity, but also uphold the rule of law and the unity of our nation.' Observers say the dispute is as much about legacy as it is about politics. Lungu and Hichilema's acrimonious relationship dates back years. After losing the 2016 presidential election to Lungu, Hichilema was arrested and charged with treason — a move widely viewed as politically motivated. After defeating Lungu in the 2021 polls, Hichilema accused his predecessor of corruption and abuse of power, deepening their political enmity. Lungu's body remains in South Africa, a symbol of unresolved wounds in Zambia's democratic journey.
