Japanese firm declares lunar mission a failure after crash landing
Tokyo-based company ispace said on Friday that its lander, named Resilience, dropped out of lunar orbit as planned and that the mission appeared to be going well.
But flight controllers lost contact with Resilience, which was carrying a mini rover, moments before its scheduled touchdown on the surface of the moon following an hourlong descent. Ground support was met with silence as they attempted to regain contact with the lander and after several hours declared the mission a failure.
The company's livestream of the attempted landing then came to an abrupt end.
'We have to take seriously what happened,' ispace CEO and founder Takeshi Hakamada said after the failed mission, as he apologised to everyone who contributed.
This is the firm's second failed attempt to soft land on the lunar surface, coming two years after the Japanese start-up's first attempt to reach the moon ended in a crash landing.
Launched in December 2022, the firm's Hakuto-R Mission 1 reached lunar orbit but crashed during its final descent after an error caused the lander to believe it was lower than it actually was.
That mission's successor, Resilience, was launched in January from Florida on a long, roundabout journey. It shared a ride on a SpaceX rocket with Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost, which, upon reaching the moon first in March this year, made the US firm the first private entity to make a 'fully successful' soft landing there.
The 2.3-metre (7.5-foot) Resilience lander was targeting the top of the moon, where the ispace team had chosen a flat area with few boulders in Mare Frigoris, or Sea of Cold, to land.
Resilience was expected to beam back pictures within hours of landing, before ispace's European-built rover – named Tenacious – would have been lowered onto the lunar surface this weekend. The rover, made of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic and sporting a high-definition camera, would then have scouted out the area and scooped up lunar dirt for NASA.
Resilience was also carrying a toy-sized red house created by Swedish artist Mikael Genberg. Moonhouse, as the model Swedish-style cottage was called, was intended to be the moon's first 'building', in a nod to Hakamada's vision of humans living and working there as early as the 2040s.
But ispace's now second failed landing has left the Japanese entrepreneur's vision in doubt. The aerospace company's next, much bigger lander is scheduled to launch by 2027 with NASA's involvement.
Prior to Friday's failed mission, the Japanese firm's chief financial officer, Jumpei Nozaki, promised to continue its lunar quest regardless of the outcome.
But Jeremy Fix, chief engineer for ispace's US subsidiary, said at a conference last month that the firm does not have 'infinite funds' and cannot afford repeated failures.
Company officials said this latest failed mission cost less than the first one – which exceeded $100m – but declined to provide an exact figure.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
What has been the impact of Trump's tariffs so far?
United States President Donald Trump's tariffs are set to come into effect on August 1. They mark a significant escalation in US trade policy, leading to higher prices for consumers and bigger financial hits for companies. Trump had initially postponed 'reciprocal tariffs', which he had announced on April 2, giving countries time to reach trade deals with the US. On Sunday, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the August 1 tariffs were a 'hard deadline'. What are the August 1 tariffs? Several countries are facing a slew of tariffs on August 1. While the situation remains dynamic, different levies are going to hit countries ranging from 15 percent on Japan and the European Union to 50 percent on Brazil. Who has struck last-minute deals? Trump has struck a series of bilateral trade deals in the last few days. With the EU, the US secured $750bn in energy purchases and reduced tariffs on steel via a quota system. In exchange, it lowered auto tariffs from 30 percent to 15 percent, applying the same rate to pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. Japan committed $550bn in investments targeting US industries such as semiconductors, AI and energy, while increasing rice imports under a 100,000-tonne duty-free quota. It will also purchase US commodities like ethanol, aircraft and defence goods. Indonesia reportedly agreed to duty-free access for many US products and increased energy and agricultural imports, although Jakarta has only confirmed tariff cuts and key commodity purchases so far. The United Kingdom gained aerospace and auto export benefits, while granting the US duty-free beef quotas and a 1.4 billion litre ethanol quota. China saw its reciprocal tariffs slashed from 145 percent to the baseline 10 percent that was imposed on all countries. In addition, there's a 20 percent punitive tariff for fentanyl trafficking. A temporary pause for the final tariff rate has been extended until August 12 while the two hammer out a deal. China matched the cut and eased non-tariff measures, resuming rare earth exports and accepting Boeing deliveries. Deals with the Philippines, Cambodia and Vietnam also include tariff adjustments and market access, though not all terms have been confirmed by those governments. Which sectors are expected to be hit worst? According to a Reuters news agency tracker, which looks at how companies are responding to Trump's tariff threats, the first-quarter earnings season saw automakers, airlines and consumer goods importers take the worst hit by tariff threats. Levies on aluminium and electronics, such as semiconductors, led to increased costs. 'When you start to see tariffs at 20 or more, you reach a point where firms may stop importing altogether,' Joseph Foudy, an economics professor at the New York University Stern School of Business, told Al Jazeera. 'Firms simply postpone major decisions, delay hiring, and economic activity declines,' Foudy added. Economists widely agree that the impact of tariffs implemented so far has not been fully felt, as many businesses built up their stockpiles of inventories in advance to mitigate rising costs. In an analysis published last month, BBVA Research estimated that even the current level of US tariffs – including a baseline 10 percent duty on nearly all countries, and higher levies on cars and steel – could slow economic growth and reduce global gross domestic product (GDP) by 0.5 of a percentage point in the short term, and by more than 2 percentage points over the medium term. Have prices increased? According to HBS Pricing Lab reports, prices of US-made and imported goods saw modest seasonal declines through early March, with imports falling slightly more. The first 10 percent US tariff on Chinese goods (February 4) had little effect, but prices rose after broader tariffs were imposed on March 4, including a 25 percent tariff on Canadian and Mexican imports and another 10 percent tariff on China. Imported goods prices jumped by 1.2 points, while prices of domestic goods rose by half as much. After a 10 percent global tariff was announced on April 2, 'Liberation Day', and 145 percent on China on April 10, import prices rose more sharply. A brief price dip followed the May 12 tariff rollback on Chinese goods, but trends resumed by June. Overall, import prices rose about 3 percent since March – small compared to headline tariff rates. Have tariffs brought in money? Trump's tariffs have brought in revenue from higher duties paid by importers. Between January 2 to July 25, the US Treasury Department data shows that the US generated $124bn this year from tariffs. This is 131 percent more than the same time last year. In early July, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said this could grow to $300bn by the end of 2025 as collections accelerate from Trump's trade campaign.
Al Jazeera
4 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump announces trade deal with South Korea, setting tariff at 15 percent
United States President Donald Trump has announced a trade deal with South Korea, the latest agreement unveiled ahead of his August 1 deadline for the imposition of steep tariffs on dozens of countries. Under the 'full and complete' trade deal, South Korean goods will be subject to a 15 percent tariff, while US exports will not face duties, Trump said on his Truth Social platform on Wednesday. South Korea will also pay $350bn for investments 'owned and controlled' by the US, purchase $100bn of liquefied natural gas and other energy products, Trump said. The East Asian country also agreed to invest a 'large sum' of money for its own investment purposes, Trump said, with the amount to be announced 'within the next two weeks' when South Korean President Lee Jae-myung visits the White House. 'It is also agreed that South Korea will be completely OPEN TO TRADE with the United States, and that they will accept American product including Cars and Trucks, Agriculture, etc.,' Trump wrote. Lee, who took office in June after a months-long leadership vacuum prompted by impeached former president Yoon Suk-yeol's short-lived declaration of martial law, said the agreement 'eliminated uncertainties' and ensured that South Korea would tariffs at equal or lower levels than its competitors. 'The key is not to pursue unilateral benefits but to derive mutually beneficial results,' Lee said in a post on Facebook. 'This agreement is the outcome of aligning the US interests in revitalising its manufacturing industry with our determination to expand the competitiveness of our companies in the US market. Through this, we anticipate that industrial cooperation between Korea and the U.S. will be further strengthened, and the Korea-U.S. alliance will become even more solid.' South Korea had faced a 25 percent tariff from August 1 if it did reach a deal, in addition to separate duties on steel, aluminum, vehicles and auto parts. South Korea's KOSPI rose on the news, with the benchmark stock index up nearly about 0.4 percent in early trading on Thursday. More to follow…
Al Jazeera
4 days ago
- Al Jazeera
UN expert condemns US rollback of sanctions on Myanmar regime allies
The United Nations's top expert on Myanmar has sharply criticised the United States for lifting sanctions on allies of the country's governing military regime, warning the move is a 'major step backward'. Tom Andrews, the UN special rapporteur on human rights in Myanmar, on Wednesday called the decision 'shocking'. The US quietly removed sanctions on five individuals and companies allegedly tied to the regime's arms trade on July 24. 'This is a major step backward for international efforts to save lives by restricting the murderous junta's access to weapons,' Andrews said in a statement. 'It is unconscionable to undermine these efforts by rolling back sanctions on Myanmar arms dealers and junta cronies.' The move has drawn criticism amid an ongoing civil war in Myanmar, where the military, led by Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, seized power in a 2021 coup that overthrew the government of Aung San Suu Kyi. Andrews said the companies removed from the sanctions list had been implicated in brokering weapons and materials for the regime's military operations. 'What makes this action even more appalling is that sanctions against the junta are proving to be effective,' Andrews added, pointing to data showing a more than 30 percent decline in Myanmar's imported military equipment from 2023 to 2024, which he attributed in part to US-led sanctions. The move comes despite US President Trump signing a notice in February extending the executive order underpinning Myanmar-related sanctions, saying the 2021 coup 'continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat' to US national security. And in a June statement to the UN, the US representative accused the military regime of bombing civilians and conscripting Rohingya to fight on its behalf. But the decision to ease sanctions came two weeks after Myanmar's military chief sent a glowing letter of praise to US President Donald Trump. In the letter, the general commended Trump's 'strong leadership' and praised his administration for defunding US-backed media outlets critical of the regime. A senior official from Trump's administration said the sanctions decision was unrelated to the letter. But critics say the timing raises serious concerns. John Sifton, Asia advocacy director at Human Rights Watch, called the move 'extremely worrying' and warned that it 'suggests a major shift is underway in US policy, which had centered on punitive action against Myanmar's military regime'. Andrews urged the Trump administration to reverse course. 'Rather than removing sanctions, the US should be extending them to include Myanmar Economic Bank, the key military-controlled financial institution that it relies on to pay for imported military equipment.' 'This is a dangerous and disturbing trend,' he added. 'I urge the Trump administration to stand with the people of Myanmar and reconsider its decision to make it easier for the military junta to attack them with sophisticated weapons of war. It is literally a matter of life and death.'
