Duval County Public Schools considers removing DEI language from its policies, no decision made yet
Cami Sams, the district's Executive Director of Policy and Compliance, said she does not want to risk losing federal dollars for the continuation of DEI practices.
'I don't know if we can predict when that will impact us or when these policies will be reviewed, but I do think that for us as a district, that's something we do have to look at,' Sams told board members.
The Policy Handbook Review Committee shared this agenda packet (see below).
PUBLISHED - May 28, 2025, Policy Handbook Review Committee - REVISED4 - GC by ActionNewsJax on Scribd
The lines of red text that are marked through signal the proposed removal of a policy.
This was done so by Sams.
Some of her suggestions include removing the equity policy, eliminating cultural considerations when creating curriculum, and scrapping language that prohibits racial, gender, and age discrimination.
Sams reiterated to members that this is only an attempt to be compliant with the federal executive order.
'We wanted to bring this policy forward to the board because the law has updated,' she told members.
Board members spent hours discussing how the policies in the handbook could be reworded for compliance but still incorporate language that is fair and welcoming.
Board Members Darryl Willie and Reginald Blount tossed around the idea of swapping out the word 'diverse' for words like 'broad' or 'multi-talented.'
'It's important to figure out some word that explains to the public that we do want you if you're a veteran, or if you're coming from somewhere else, or if you have a different background,' Willie said.
Board Chair Charlotte Joyce, though, believes the district will continue to use fair practices in hiring because discrimination is already illegal.
[DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks]
'We're not really looking at your ethnicity, we're not looking at your gender, we're not factoring those things into consideration,' Joyce said.
Board Member Melody Bolduc told her colleagues that she is for diversity, too. But feels like it is forced when the DEI language is included in policy.
'I don't want it engineered. I'd like it to happen natural,' Bolduc said.
[SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter]
DCPS spokesperson Dr. Tracy Pierce said that this conversation is just the first of many as the board continues to iron out the details of what this policy revision could look like.
'After today's conversation, we'll take all of that input back and our team will kind of rewrite the policy and try to get it to a point where the board will have its debate and arrive at final language that they can agree on,' he said.
Pierce encourages people to stay up to date with the board's meeting agendas as he expects more conversations about DEI through June.
Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
5 hours ago
- UPI
DOJ launches new civil rights probe into George Mason University
The Justice Department under Attorney General Pam Bondi on Monday launched a new civil rights investigation into George Mason University. File Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo July 21 (UPI) -- The Justice Department on Monday announced it has launched an investigation into George Mason University's admissions process, marking the fourth federal probe the Trump administration has targeted the school with this month. George Mason University was informed of the civil rights investigation in a letter stating that federal prosecutors will look into whether the school has denied equal treatment to students based on race or national origin, a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. No specific instances of violations or complaints were provided in the letter, but it suggests alleged racial segregation regarding access to programs and facilities, as well as preferential treatment based on race in its admissions process and in awarding student benefits and scholarships. "Public educational institutions are contractually obligated to follow our nation's federal civil rights laws when receiving federal funds," Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division said in a statement. "No one should be denied access to opportunity or resources because of their race, color or national origin, and the United States is committed to keeping our universities free of such invidious bias." It is the fourth federal investigation launched into the Fairfax, Va., university this month and the second in under a week amid the Trump administration's crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion policies in both the private and public sectors. Diversity, equity and inclusion, known as DEI, is a conceptual framework that promotes fair treatment and full participation of all people. It has been a target of conservatives who claim it focuses on race and gender at the expense of merit. President Donald Trump has sought to remove DEI from the federal government through executive orders and has threatened to revoke federal funding from several universities, including Harvard, over their alleged DEI programs. Last week, the Justice Department launched an investigation into the school over alleged illegal hiring practices, which followed the Department of Education opening a civil rights investigation into the university on July 10 and another probe over allegations it failed to respond effectively to a "pervasively hostile environment for Jewish students and faculty" earlier this month. George Mason University President Gregory Washington has yet to respond to the announcement of the latest Justice Department investigation but has repeatedly denied the accusations leveled at the school by the previous three. "It is inaccurate to conclude that we created new university policies or procedures that discriminate against or exclude anyone," he said last week in a statement. "To the contrary, our systems were enhanced to improve on our ability to consistently include everyone for consideration of every employment opportunity. That is our ethos and it is core to our identity as a national leader in inclusive excellence in higher education." In a separate statement earlier this month that does not directly accuse the Justice Department of misusing Title VI, Washington said he has seen a "profound shift" in how it is now being applied to attack longstanding efforts to address inequality. "Broad terms like 'illegal DEI' are now used without definition, allowing virtually any initiative that touches on identity or inclusion to be painted as discriminatory," he said. "This shift represents a stark departure from the spirit in which civil rights law was written: not to erase difference, but to protect individuals from exclusion and to enable equal opportunity for all." George Mason University has retained Torridon Law to engage with the federal government regarding the investigations.
Gizmodo
11 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk-Founded Brain Implant Startup Says It's a ‘Disadvantaged' Business Despite Being Worth $9 Billion
Elon Musk, the rightwing culture warrior waging a 'civilization-saving' battle against the 'woke mind virus,' apparently isn't above taking advantage of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs when it serves his business purposes. Neuralink, the $9 billion brain implant startup that Musk founded, recently characterized itself as a 'small disadvantaged business' in a federal filing with the Small Business Administration. The SBA website notes that Neuralink attested in its filings that it is a 'Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business.' According to the SBA, businesses can qualify for this designation if the company is '51% or more owned and controlled by one or more disadvantaged persons.' The firm must also 'be small, according to SBA's size standards,' the site states. According to the code of federal regulations, socially disadvantaged people are defined thusly: …those who have been subjected to racial or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias within American society because of their identities as members of groups and without regard to their individual qualities. The social disadvantage must stem from circumstances beyond their control. The filing was first spotted by MuskWatch, a Substack focused on the Tesla billionaire, which accuses the company of having 'falsified federal forms.' MuskWatch published an excerpt from a form that it said was filed by Neuralink on April 24, in which the company checked the box affirming that it is a small disadvantaged business as defined in the code. The blog points out that the SDB designation can also only be legally claimed by companies owned by 'economically disadvantaged individuals,' and that federal regulations state that 'individuals with a net worth exceeding $850,000, excluding the value of their primary residence,' do not qualify as 'economically disadvantaged individuals.' Musk is obviously worth a lot more than that. It is certainly difficult to understand what disadvantaged group Neuralink could claim maintains ownership over the company. The structure of Neuralink's ownership isn't publicly available, but Musk held a majority stake in the company in 2019. The startup has since engaged in raising more funds, but primarily from Silicon Valley's lily white venture capital community. Gizmodo reached out to the firm for more information. The news is amusing and infuriating because two of the things Musk enjoys whining about most are the societal scourge of DEI and people who ask for help from the government. Now, his own company appears to be claiming it should get a federal handout because it is socially and economically disadvantaged. Of course, federal handouts have been the lifeblood of Tesla and SpaceX for many years. Since it was founded in 2016, Neuralink has sought to use neural implants and experimental science to usher in a new era of computer-to-brain interfacing. The startup received FDA approval for human clinical trials in May of 2023. Last year, the company streamed an interview with a quadriplegic who used Neuralink's brain implant to play video games. Prior to human testing, Neuralink trialed its implants on animals. While many of those test subjects are still alive today, many ended up getting euthanized. Some, allegedly, died quite horribly, leading to accusations of 'grotesque' animal abuse and a lawsuit from a physicians' group.
The Hill
11 hours ago
- The Hill
Judge temporarily blocks DEI ban in Mississippi
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Monday blocking a Mississippi law prohibiting diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs in public schools and colleges, citing First Amendment grounds. 'This Court finds that each day the statute remains unclarified, undefined, and under a threat of open interpretation, exacerbates the suppression of protected speech,' Judge Henry Wingate said in his ruling. The plaintiffs included the Mississippi Educators Association, which represents public school teachers, as well as student organizations and faculty at several state colleges, including Jackson State University, a historically Black institution. They argued that the Mississippi law had chilled free expression and forced them to cancel previously scheduled DEI initiatives or training. The law prohibits the promotion of 'divisive concepts' or programming that 'increases awareness or understanding of race, sex, color, gender identity, sexual orientation, or national origin.' In his ruling, Wingate argued that the law was unclear and could be construed to be enforced unevenly. 'Institutions have spent the intervening months attempting to interpret and implement the statute, often erring on the side of caution by canceling or defunding programming that arguably falls within its prohibitions. This prolonged period of uncertainty has deepened the chilling effect,' Wingate wrote. The parties are due back in court on July 23 for a hearing on a possible preliminary injunction, which would be a stronger block on the law. Mississippi is one of at least 16 states that have passed bills since 2023 restricting DEI in some way, including by targeting diversity statements, DEI-related courses, or mandatory training.
