OnePlus to launch 2 new phones under ₹30000 very soon in India- Details
Also read: India's digital job scene to expand in 2025 with rise in AI and data-driven roles
OnePlus Nord 5 series will officially debut on July 8, 2025, globally at 2 PM IST. The launch event will not only include the Nord 5 and Nord 5 CE models, but the company also teased to introduce OnePlus Buds 4 in India. Rumours also suggest that OnePlus could also debut a new generation smartwatch, the OnePlus Watch 3, and the OnePlus Pad Lite. Therefore, we could see 5 products launching on July 8, making it a big launch day for OnePlus.
With the launch, the company revealed that the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor will power the OnePlus Nord 5, along with a 7300mm square VC cooling system. It will also allow users to play Call of Duty: Mobile at 60 FPS. Furthermore, Nord 5 will enable users to play games like COD and BGMI at a 144Hz refresh rate. Therefore, we can expect several other upgrades to be underway.
Also read: Apple to launch major Siri AI upgrade with iOS 26.4 by March 2026
Alongside the performance upgrades, OnePlus has also tweaked the design of its all-metal body on the Nord 4 to a glass or plastic build for the Nord 5. The revealed design showcases a matte-finish rear panel with a vertically placed dual camera setup. Furthermore, the Nord 5 will be announced in two colour ways: Blue and White, as shown in the teased image.
The OnePlus Nord 5 is expected to feature a 6.83-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate. Whereas, the Nord 5 CE could come with a 6.7-inch OLED display. The Nord CE 5 is expected to be powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 chip for performance. Lastly, we can see a major upgrade on battery life as the Nord 5 is expected to be backed by a 6700mAh battery, whereas the Nord 5 CE could come with a 7100mAh battery.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- Indian Express
1 in 3 US smartphone imports now made in India, China's lead shrinks
India's share in US smartphone imports surged to nearly 36 per cent in the first five months of 2025, from about 11 per cent in 2024. China, which continues to dominate the product category, saw its share drop from 82 per cent to 49 per cent over the same period. India's growing share — now 1 in 3, driven largely by Apple iPhones — comes amid ongoing trade talks with the US. While smartphones are India's top export to the US by value, President Donald Trump has threatened a 25 per cent tariff on Indian-made iPhones. US smartphone imports from India jumped by over three times year-on-year to 21.3 million units between January and May this year, according to data from the US International Trade Commis-sion (USITC). In value terms (CIF), imports of Indian-made smartphones increased 182 per cent y-o-y to $9.35 billion, already higher than around $7 billion in the whole of 2024. In May, Apple CEO Tim Cook had said the company expects most iPhones sold in the US in the April-June quarter to have India as their country of origin. Roughly 20 per cent of Apple's global iPhone production capacity is now based in India. Meanwhile, China exported 29.4 million smartphones to the US between January and May — a 27 per cent y-o-y drop — valued at around $10 billion. China (49 per cent) and India (36 per cent) were followed by Vietnam with 8.3 million units exported, accounting for a share of 14 per cent. Apple doubled down on production in India in 2020, after the government announced its flagship Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme to support smartphone manufacturing in the country. Through its contract manufacturers, the company has been the biggest beneficiary of the scheme, which has helped it move some production away from China. While it started by making some of its older iPhones in India, Apple today produces all models, including the higher-end Pro range, in the country. Apple's pivot to India from China for US-bound exports has drawn criticism from Trump, who, in May, said he's told Apple's chief executive that he does not want the company to expand its manufacturing operations in India. 'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else. If that is not the case, a tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the US. Thank you for your attention to this matter,' Trump had said in a social media post. However, Apple is unlikely to overhaul its India expansion plans in the near-term. In May, its contract manufacturer Foxconn informed the London Stock Exchange of a $1.49 billion investment in one of its India units, Yuzhan Technologies (India) Pvt Ltd. The new plant is expected to come up in Tamil Nadu, where Foxconn already has a major iPhone production base. There are some challenges though. Of Apple's latest official supplier list, in 2023, as many as 157 of the company's various vendors and suppliers manufactured in mainland China, up from 151 the previous year. The number of Indian suppliers was 14. People in the know say that number has now risen to 64, marking a slow but steady shift of Apple's supplier base to India. In a Lok Sabha reply on Wednesday, Union MoS for Electronics and Information Technology Jitin Prasada said mobile manufacturing units in India have increased to 300 in 2024-25, from just 2 in 2014-15. At the same time, production of mobile phones increased 28 times to Rs 5.45 lakh crore, while exports increased 127 times to Rs 2 lakh crore. 'Total FDI in field of electronics manufacturing in last 5 years (i.e. since FY 2020-21) is US$ 4,071 mn, cumulative FDI of US$ 2,802 mn has been contributed by MeitY PLI beneficiaries,' Prasada said. Aggam Walia is a Correspondent at The Indian Express, reporting on power, renewables, and mining. His work unpacks intricate ties between corporations, government, and policy, often relying on documents sourced via the RTI Act. Off the beat, he enjoys running through Delhi's parks and forests, walking to places, and cooking pasta. ... Read More Soumyarendra Barik is Special Correspondent with The Indian Express and reports on the intersection of technology, policy and society. With over five years of newsroom experience, he has reported on issues of gig workers' rights, privacy, India's prevalent digital divide and a range of other policy interventions that impact big tech companies. He once also tailed a food delivery worker for over 12 hours to quantify the amount of money they make, and the pain they go through while doing so. In his free time, he likes to nerd about watches, Formula 1 and football. ... Read More
Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
Meta Clashes With Apple, Google Over Age Check Legislation
(Bloomberg) -- The biggest tech companies are warring over who's responsible for children's safety online, with billions of dollars in fines on the line as states rapidly pass conflicting laws requiring companies to verify users' ages. The struggle has pitted Meta Platforms Inc. and other app developers against Apple Inc. and Alphabet Inc.'s Google, the world's largest app stores. Lobbyists for both sides are moving from state to state, working to water down or redirect the legislation to minimize their clients' risks. This year alone, at least three states — Utah, Texas and Louisiana — passed legislation requiring tech companies to authenticate users' ages, secure parental consent for anyone under 18 and ensure minors are protected from potentially harmful digital experiences. Now, lobbyists for all three companies are flooding into South Carolina and Ohio, the next possible states to consider such legislation. The debate has taken on new importance after the Supreme Court this summer ruled age verification laws are constitutional in some instances. A tech group on Wednesday petitioned the Supreme Court to block a social media age verification law in Mississippi, teeing up a highly consequential decision in the next few weeks. Child advocates say holding tech companies responsible for verifying the ages of their users is key to creating a safer online experience for minors. Parents and advocates have alleged the social media platforms funnel children into unsafe and toxic online spaces, exposing young people to harmful content about self harm, eating disorders, drug abuse and more. Meta supporters argue the app stores should be responsible for figuring out whether minors are accessing inappropriate content, comparing the app store to a liquor store that checks patrons' IDs. Apple and Google, meanwhile, argue age verification laws violate children's privacy and argue the individual apps are better-positioned to do age checks. Apple said it's more accurate to describe the app store as a mall and Meta as the liquor store. The three new state laws put the responsibility on app stores, signaling Meta's arguments are gaining traction. The company lobbied in support of the Utah and Louisiana laws putting the onus on Apple and Google for tracking their users' ages. Similar Meta-backed proposals have been introduced in 20 states. Federal legislation proposed by Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah would hold the app stores accountable for verifying users' ages. Still, Meta's track record in its state campaigns is mixed. At least eight states have passed laws since 2024 forcing social media platforms to verify users' ages and protect minors online. Apple and Google have mobilized dozens of lobbyists across those states to argue that Meta is shirking responsibility for protecting children. 'We see the legislation being pushed by Meta as an effort to offload their own responsibilities to keep kids safe,' said Google spokesperson Danielle Cohen. 'These proposals introduce new risks to the privacy of minors, without actually addressing the harms that are inspiring lawmakers to act.' Meta spokesperson Rachel Holland countered that the company is supporting the approach favored by parents who want to keep their children safe online. 'Parents want a one-stop-shop to oversee their teen's online lives and 80% of American parents and bipartisan lawmakers across 20 states and the federal government agree that app stores are best positioned to provide this,' Holland said. As the regulation patchwork continues to take shape, the companies have each taken voluntary steps to protect children online. Meta has implemented new protections to restrict teens from accessing 'sensitive' content, like posts related to suicide, self-harm and eating disorders. Apple created 'Child Accounts,' which give parents more control over their children's' online activity. At Apple, spokesperson Peter Ajemian said it 'soon will release our new age assurance feature that empowers parents to share their child's age range with apps without disclosing sensitive information.' As the lobbying battle over age verification heats up, influential big tech groups are splintering and new ones emerging. Meta last year left Chamber of Progress, a liberal-leaning tech group that counts Apple and Google as members. Since then, the chamber, which is led by a former Google lobbyist and brands itself as the Democratic-aligned voice for the tech industry, has grown more aggressive in its advocacy against all age verification bills. 'I understand the temptation within a company to try to redirect policymakers towards the company's rivals, but ultimately most legislators don't want to intervene in a squabble between big tech giants,' said Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich. Meta tried unsuccessfully to convince another major tech trade group, the Computer & Communications Industry Association, to stop working against bills Meta supports, two people familiar with the dynamics said. Meta, a CCIA member, acknowledged it doesn't always agree with the association. Meta is also still a member of NetChoice, which opposes all age verification laws no matter who's responsible. The group currently has 10 active lawsuits on the matter, including battling some of Meta's preferred laws. The disagreements have prompted some of the companies to form entirely new lobbying outfits. Meta in April teamed up with Spotify Technology SA and Match Group Inc. to launch a coalition aimed at taking on Apple and Google, including over the issue of age verification. Meta is also helping to fund the Digital Childhood Alliance, a coalition of conservative groups leading efforts to pass app-store age verification, according to three people familiar with the funding. Neither the Digital Childhood Alliance nor Meta responded directly to questions about whether Meta is funding the group. But Meta said it has collaborated with Digital Childhood Alliance. The group's executive director, Casey Stefanski, said it includes more than 100 organizations and child safety advocates who are pushing for more legislation that puts responsibility on the app stores. Stefanski said the Digital Childhood Alliance has met with Google 'several times' to share their concerns about the app store in recent months. The App Association, a group backed by Apple, has been running ads in Texas, Alabama, Louisiana and Ohio arguing that the app store age verification bills are backed by porn websites and companies. The adult entertainment industry's main lobby said it is not pushing for the bills; pornography is mostly banned from app stores. 'This one-size fits all approach is built to solve problems social media platforms have with their systems while making our members, small tech companies and app developers, collateral damage,' said App Association spokesperson Jack Fleming. In South Carolina and Ohio, there are competing proposals placing different levels of responsibility on the app stores and developers. That could end with more stringent legislation that makes neither side happy. 'When big tech acts as a monolith, that's when things die,' said Joel Thayer, a supporter of the app store age verification bills. 'But when they start breaking up that concentration of influence, all the sudden good things start happening because the reality is, these guys are just a hair's breath away from eating each other alive.' (Updates with App Association statement in 24th paragraph.) More stories like this are available on
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
Dutch regulator delays Apple ruling amid EU talks on App Store: Report
Dutch antitrust watchdog, the Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM), has delayed its decision on Apple over fees charged to dating app providers on the App Store. According to a report by news agency Reuters, the regulator said that it is waiting for the outcome of ongoing discussions between Apple and the European Commission on a similar issue before moving forward. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now According to ACM, Apple recently changed its fee structure in response to those talks and has said it plans to make further adjustments later this year. The regulator had previously ruled that Apple abused its dominant market position by imposing unfair conditions on dating app developers. That decision was upheld by a Dutch court in June, which found that the company's practices in the App Store violated competition laws. The ACM has not provided a new timeline for its final ruling. The ongoing talks between Apple and the European Commission are expected to influence how both EU and national regulators handle competition issues related to the App Store in the future. In a related news, Reuters recently reported that Apple's updates to its App Store rules and fees are likely to get approval from EU antitrust regulators soon. Citing people familiar with the matter, the report said that this could help the Cupertino-based company avoid large daily fines. Last month, the iPhone maker said that developers will soon be required to pay a 20% processing fee for purchases made via the App Store. For Apple's small-business program, the fees could go as low as 13%.
