Looming California Budget Changes Threaten Black Students, Study Says
'The Cost of Equity: Exploring Recent K-12 Federal and State Funding Shifts and Their Impact on Black Students,' examines how changes in legislative and policy could impact California's school systems, which enroll more than 287,000 Black students.
Now, important programs covering a gamut of services used by Black students, ranging from tutoring to transportation to counseling, could be cut, the report says.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
The 45-page meta-analysis, which was edited by USC Rossier School of Education Professor Kendrick Davis and published by Rossier's freshly formed Critical Policy Institute, lands at a critical time for budgeting decisions in California and elsewhere.
Shifts in federal, state and local funding and policy are prompting changes in districts across the state, Davis said in a recent interview.
Those developments could exacerbate long-standing inequities — especially for Black students in low income, he said.
'It feels like so many reasons why education should be, and currently is, front and center in a lot of the local, statewide and national conversation,' said Davis. 'But when there's drastic changes happening … information and perspective can get lost.'
Here are some key takeaways from Davis's study, which was written with graduate researchers from Rossier's Black Student Collective and is the first in a series of three reports to be published by the Critical Policy Institute.
Federal funding cuts, including the expiration of pandemic relief, have combined with dropping enrollments and shrinking tax bases to cut budgets for local school districts across California, with districts in other states across the country facing similar headwinds.
School systems such as Los Angeles Unified have already begun making tough choices about what to prioritize in the face of looming cuts, and how those choices play out could have an outsize impact on Black kids, said Davis.
California currently allocates state funding for local districts based on average daily attendance, giving school districts their share of per-pupil funding based on how many students on average showed up at class.
That money typically accounts for more than a third of a local district's budget. The state is now researching a change to the way that funding is shared, so that money will be allocated based on how many kids are enrolled in each district, instead of how many attended class.
It'll cost the state more to fund schools this way, Davis said, but more of the money will go to districts with schools serving vulnerable populations, like Black kids, who have higher rates of chronic absenteeism and lower graduation rates.
Even before President Donald Trump Took office, ushering in a slew of new changes, programs for Black students were already under scrutiny in districts across California after LAUSD overhauled its signature effort for those students in response to new federal guidance.
Now, new policies at the federal level, including threats to cut funding to districts that do not end diversity, equity and inclusion programs, present fresh legal and regulatory challenges for efforts to reach Black kids with effective services, said Davis.
'It makes an already precarious situation worse,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Black America Web
42 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Trump Administration Cuts Funding For Black Infant Health Research, Labeling It A DEI Initiative
Source: Cultura Creative / Getty It would surprise absolutely no one that infant mortality rates in America are disproportionately high among Black babies, or that Black and Latino babies are more vulnerable than their white counterparts to serious, life-threatening illnesses such as upper respiratory infection (URI). Of course, anyone who has been paying attention to our current political climate would be equally unsurprised to find that, under the Trump administration, medical research that seeks to understand why Black children suffer these health issues so often is under attack, because the results of that research might hurt white people's feelings. In other words, Black babies might have to die in order to placate white fragility. According to The Cincinnati Herald, a federally funded study exploring why Black babies in Detroit are disproportionately born prematurely has been abruptly terminated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), apparently, because the study focused on the effects of stress associated with racism and poverty, and how that stress might alter gene function and contribute to adverse birth outcomes — or as the Trump administration defines it, DEI. From the Herald: In termination letters sent to researchers, the NIH claimed the project relied on 'artificial and non-scientific categories' linked to DEI and asserted it did not 'enhance health or advance science.' Researchers behind the project strongly contest that explanation, calling the decision politically motivated. The cancellation aligns with a broader initiative by the Trump administration to dismantle DEI initiatives across the federal government, including within health and science agencies. Numerous projects focused on minority and LGBTQ health have been defunded under the same rationale. So, a bunch of so-called medical authorities from the same administration that gave the position of a Secretary of Health and Human Services to RFK Jr. — who thinks Black people don't need vaccines as much as white people because we have super negro immune systems — have canceled funding for this research, because, in their non-medical opinions, any research tied to racial disparities is 'non-scientific.' Actual medical experts, of course, say differently. 'Health-related social needs are health care,' said Dr. Alex Peahl, an OB-GYN at the University of Michigan and co-director of the Partnering for the Future Clinic. 'And if we want to improve the health of pregnant people and their families, we have to care for every part of their lives, not just the clinical pieces.' Peahl noted that access to prenatal care is inseparable from issues like lack of transportation, food insecurity and other external stressors that disproportionately affect Black people. 'It is really hard to come to your prenatal visit if you don't have a car, or to take a medication if you don't have food on the table,' she explained. And it would be nice if the administration of President Donald Trump cared about any of that, but it does not. Source: MEHMET ESER / Getty In April, Trump signed an executive order that essentially made housing discrimination easier by requiring federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), to stop using 'disparate impact' data to identify discriminatory policies and practices that disproportionately harm certain groups. Days before signing that order, Trump signed a similar order discouraging school administrators from using 'disparate impact' data to address racial disparities in disciplinary actions taken against students. In other words: Trump decided researchers can't use data involving racial disparities to study potential racial discrimination because, in his mind and that of his ilk, anything that addresses systemic racism against anyone but white people is a diversity, equity and inclusion effort. Hell, also in April, the Trump administration ended a wastewater settlement for a mostly Black Alabama town, erroneously calling it 'environmental justice as viewed through a distorting, DEI lens' because the case addressed environmental racism. So, a whole town full of Black people has to continue living with well-documented wastewater sanitation issues all because a White House full of white nationalists is far more invested in silencing calls for racial justice than it is in correcting racial injustice (again, except for fictional racial injustice against white people). Anyway, according to the Herald, the research team in Detroit, which is currently scrambling to secure private funding so it can continue its work, has 30 days to appeal the NIH decision. Last month, a federal judge ruled that the agency's funding cuts to minority health research were illegal and an example of 'government racial discrimination' like nothing the judge had ever seen. Unfortunately, that ruling could also be appealed by the Trump administration. The very idea of correcting systemic racism in America makes white conservatives deeply resentful, and Black health continues to suffer because of it. Sad. SEE ALSO: Op-Ed: We Should All Be More Concerned That Trump Keeps Threatening To Deport US Citizens Trump's DOJ Investigates University Of California Over Effort To Recruit Racially Diverse Faculty SEE ALSO Trump Administration Cuts Funding For Black Infant Health Research, Labeling It A DEI Initiative was originally published on


Black America Web
42 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Covfefe Chronicles: The 1st White Man Deported To Africa? Trump Wants To ICE Elon Musk
The opinions expressed in audio and on this page are those of the author. Donald Trump has spent years whipping up his base with chants of 'Build the Wall' and demonizing desperate Black and Brown migrants seeking safety in America. But in an absolutely unhinged twist, he's now threatening to deport one of his own biggest donors-turned-enemies: Elon Musk. Yes, you read that right. The man who turned ICE into his personal scarecrow is now suggesting we slap a 'Return to Apartheid Heir' label on Elon's crate and ship him back to South Africa. This week, at one of his typically chaotic press events, Trump mused that they might 'have to take a look' at deporting Musk after their feud went nuclear. Trump is furious that Musk dared to call the GOP's new anti-EV bill a 'fiscal disaster.' But Musk is a naturalized U.S. citizen. Since 2002. Legally, you can't just deport him because he hurt your feelings. Deportation isn't for citizens, it's for non-citizens without the right paperwork. And unless Trump's got proof Elon lied on his citizenship application, there's no process for booting him from the country. So what is this really? Political theater. The worst kind. It's the authoritarian fantasy of punishing critics not with debate, but with state power. Trump's threat to deport Elon isn't about policy differences over electric cars. It's a test balloon for wielding government machinery as a personal vendetta weapon, even against billionaires. This episode of The Covfefe Chronicles takes you on a tour of this insane saga. So grab your coffee—or covfefe—and tune in. SEE ALSO: Covfefe Chronicles: Trump Turns Beach Boys Nostalgia Into A Genocide Anthem Covfefe Chronicles: ICE Raids Echo Nazi Germany. The Question for Black Folks Is: Now What? [AUDIO] SEE ALSO Covfefe Chronicles: The 1st White Man Deported To Africa? Trump Wants To ICE Elon Musk was originally published on


New York Post
12 hours ago
- New York Post
Uganda-born Zohran Mamdani ID'd himself as Asian and African American on Columbia application: report
Democratic socialist New York City mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani, a Muslim immigrant, identified as both Asian and African American on his college application, a report claims. The 33-year-old checked both 'Asian' and 'Black or African American' on his Columbia University application, which was ultimately rejected, when he applied to the elite institution as a high school senior in 2009, the New York Times reported Thursday. Zohran Mamdani holds a rally with union leaders on Wednesday, July 2, 2025. Paul Martinka for NY Post Advertisement Mamdani, born in Uganda, told the outlet he doesn't identify as either race but rather 'an American who was born in Africa.' 'Most college applications don't have a box for Indian-Ugandans, so I checked multiple boxes trying to capture the fullness of my background,' the Queens lawmaker said. This is a breaking story. Please check back for updates.