logo
'Nothing more than the usual': Hockey Canada verdict echoes cases in Sault Ste. Marie

'Nothing more than the usual': Hockey Canada verdict echoes cases in Sault Ste. Marie

Ottawa Citizen4 days ago
Article content
Wednesday's verdict in a London courtroom, which found five former Canadian world junior players not guilty in a 2018 sexual assault case, marked the end of a high-profile trial that reignited national conversations — including in Sault Ste. Marie — about sexual violence and accountability in hockey.
Article content
The outcome has resounded across the country, particularly among those working directly with survivors.
Article content
Article content
Article content
'We were really, really disappointed to hear the verdict,' said Sarah Paciocco, a sexual assault and abuse crisis counsellor at Women in Crisis Algoma.
Article content
Article content
In the case, the complainant, known as E.M., spent years under public scrutiny before taking the stand. Over the course of her testimony, she faced long hours of cross-examination and was asked to relive painful memories.
Article content
'I think it really drives home the point for people to understand why women often don't come forward,' Paciocco said. 'The trauma they go through having to sit on trial, having to divulge so many details, being re-traumatized, doing all that work, all that time.'
Article content
This moment didn't begin in London, and it likely won't end there. The Hockey Canada verdict — in which five players, Michael McLeod, Alex Formenton, Carter Hart, Dillon Dube and Cal Foote, were found not guilty of sexually assaulting a woman in a London hotel room — is one in a long line of similar cases involving junior hockey players. In communities across the country, including Sault Ste. Marie, allegations of sexual misconduct have surfaced consistently.
Article content
Article content
In 2012, three Soo Greyhounds players — Nick Cousins, Andrew Fritsch, and Mark Petaccio — were charged in connection with an alleged sexual assault on a woman. The charges were dropped eight months later when the Crown found there was 'no reasonable prospect of conviction.'
Article content
Despite the serious nature of the allegations, all three players walked away without a trial. Each entered into a 12-month peace bond that required no admission of guilt but included conditions like staying 500 metres away from the complainant.
Article content
The complainant, present in the courtroom, left quickly after the judge's decision. No one from the Crown's office commented on the case. Lawyers for the players emphasized the stress their clients endured and described the prosecution's decision as vindication.
Article content
In 1996, CBC's Fifth Estate revisited the case of former Greyhound Jarrett Reid, who was charged with 21 offences against two women during his time with the Hounds in the early '90s. He pleaded guilty to eight charges and served part of a nine-month jail term.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bath & Body Works refutes U.S. woman's lawsuit about exploding candle made at Canadian facility
Bath & Body Works refutes U.S. woman's lawsuit about exploding candle made at Canadian facility

Vancouver Sun

time9 minutes ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Bath & Body Works refutes U.S. woman's lawsuit about exploding candle made at Canadian facility

Retailer Bath & Body Works is refuting a lawsuit filed by a woman who says she was severely burned by an exploding candle manufactured at a Canadian facility. Renita Francois says she was lighting the candle from Bath & Body Works, with a scent called Sweater Weather, on Jan. 19, 2023 in her home on Long Island, New York. She leaned in to smell the candle when 'a sudden explosion erupted from the glass container, propelling molten wax and flames outward in every direction,' according to the lawsuit obtained by National Post. The explosion occurred 'within moments' of lighting the candle, the claim says. As well as Bath & Body Works, Francois is also suing Premier Candle Corporation, the Canadian candle producer, for 'negligence, failure to warn, product defect, breach of warranty,' which are related to 'a defective candle that exploded and caused severe burns and permanent disfigurement.' Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The suit, filed on July 4, alleges that both companies, 'despite knowing of prior explosions and safety risks related to their three-wick candles, failed to recall, redesign, or properly warn consumers about the risk of catastrophic injury.' In an emailed statement to National Post, a spokesperson for Bath & Body Works denied the allegations. They said the explosion was due to misuse. 'In millions of hours of testing we have never seen our candles explode. Based on third party testing it is evident that the candle involved in this incident was improperly burned and extinguished. 'Bath & Body Works stands by the safety of our product, and when used appropriately, our best-in-class safety and testing standards make our candles safe,' the statement said. It continued: 'All Bath & Body Works candles made by Premier in Canada are subject to the exact same quality standards, inspections, and rigorous testing as other candles manufactured and sold by Bath & Body Works in the United States.' According to its website, Premier Candle Corporation says it has 'stringent procedures from incoming material inspections, batching confirmations, in process inspections, and many other quality checks up to the final pre-shipment inspection.' Francois said she followed the instructions on the bottom of the candle and adhered to its safety warnings. The label says the candle should not be lit for more than four hours and that the wick should always be trimmed to a quarter of an inch before it is lit. 'This explosion was not the result of improper use, negligence, or failure to follow safety guidelines,' per the lawsuit. Francois suffered severe second-degree burns, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, emotional distress, and permanent scarring, the claim says. Francois's husband, McEvans Francois, is also named in the lawsuit as a plaintiff. He was there when Francois was lighting the candle and 'witnessed his wife's face catch fire, crackle, and blister as molten wax burned her skin, resulting in severe emotional distress, PTSD, and loss of consortium.' Loss of consortium is when the intangible benefits of a relationship — such as companionship, comfort, affection, and love — are lost or impaired, according to Cornell Law School's Legal Information Institute. It can be claimed by a spouse. The lawsuit called the candle 'defective' and maintained that the explosion occurred 'within moments' after lighting. A webpage dedicated to candle safety by Health Canada says most cases of candle fires are caused by 'human errors.' It also says 'the obvious hazard when you burn candles is the risk of injury or death from fire.' 'But the design of candles can also increase the risk of fire and fire-related injuries,' per the federal government, adding that candles with three wicks, depending on the kind, can produce high flames. This can lead to a 'very intense heat' that can cause materials such as curtains or clothing to catch fire. 'These candles can also melt rapidly, leaving a large pool of hot wax that can cause burns,' per Health Canada. Francois's lawsuit says she is a mother, wife and leader in public safety, community advocacy, and strategic policy reform. 'This is not just a physical injury — it is an emotional and psychological battle, an assault on her self-perception, and a daily reminder of a tragedy that could have been prevented,' says the lawsuit. In 2017, a Texas woman said that a three-wick Bath & Body Works candle 'burst' in her face, news outlet NBC 5 reported . However, she said that she did not follow its warnings, which told consumers not to blow on the candle or to throw water on it in order to extinguish the flame. There have not been any recalls for Bath & Body Works candles reported by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission since 2004. That year in March, Bath & Body Works voluntarily recalled its 'Real Essence' votive candles — a different kind of candle than the three-wick Sweater Weather scented candle in the lawsuit. In the recall announcement, it says the votive candles that were recalled could 'burn with a high flame or irregular flame, posing a fire hazard to consumers.' Votive candles are smaller candles, sometimes used for prayer. 'The safety of our customers is our top priority. With hundreds of millions of units sold, our candles have a longstanding, exceptional safety record. Our candles undergo extensive quality and safety testing under rigorous burn and use conditions to meet or exceed all applicable industry and government standards for safety and performance,' the emailed statement from Bath & Body Works said. 'Many factors beyond the construction of the candle itself can affect any candle's performance, which is why we provide safe candle burning tips on our website and proper use guidelines on our products. For more information on safely enjoying room-filling fragrance, follow this important safety information when caring for your candle.' Premier Candle Corporation did not return National Post's request for comment. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

‘I felt like the old Genie': Bouchard extends career with first-round win at NBO
‘I felt like the old Genie': Bouchard extends career with first-round win at NBO

Global News

timean hour ago

  • Global News

‘I felt like the old Genie': Bouchard extends career with first-round win at NBO

Eugenie Bouchard's retirement will have to wait. The former world No. 5 — and first Canadian woman to contest a Grand Slam final in the open era — upset Colombia's Emiliana Arango 6-4, 2-6, 6-2 in the first round Monday night at the National Bank Open, extending her tennis career for at least one match. 'I told my family that if I won the tournament, I would come out of retirement,' she said from centre court. 'I felt like the old Genie out there.' Bouchard, who also earned her 300th singles win, announced on July 16 that she would hang up her racket at the end of her hometown event. The 31-year-old from Westmount, Que., rose to prominence with a sensational season in 2014. At only 20, she reached the Wimbledon final, played in the Australian Open and French Open semifinals and won her only WTA title. Story continues below advertisement Bouchard never returned to that level in a short-lived run among the best in tennis, but for one night at least, she resembled her old self — striking the ball with flair and painting the lines with forehand winners. 'I woke up this morning just telling myself, look I can't control the result, I just want to have a good attitude, have good fight and try to feel good with my shots, feel good with my game,' she said. 'No matter what happens, I wanted to walk off the court having enjoyed that gritty battle. 'I enjoyed every second of it.' Now ranked 1,062nd, Bouchard has moved away from the pro tennis circuit in recent years, spending more time on the PPA Pickleball Tour, where she ranks 12th in singles. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Knowing it could be her last dance, fans mostly filled IGA Stadium, welcoming Bouchard with loud applause when she stepped on the court and cheering her on — with mixed chants of 'Let's Go Genie!' and 'Allez Eugenie!' — with every point. Bouchard could feel the crowd's energy running through her. Sometimes a little too much. When Bouchard broke the 82nd-ranked Arango twice in the decisive third set — first with a forehand, then from the Colombian's missed volley — to build a 5-1 lead, she described the feeling as an 'out-of-body' experience. Story continues below advertisement 'The crowd was so noisy that I didn't feel my body for 30 seconds,' she said. 'And I lost the game after that. It didn't help me at the time.' Arango broke back with Bouchard serving for the match to make it 5-2, but the Canadian went up 40-love in the ensuing game. Arango then sent her forehand wide on Bouchard's second match point. The local favourite held her hands above her head in disbelief, blew kisses to the crowd, and later told a shouting fan 'I love you, too!' 'It was electric out there,' Bouchard said. 'I'm so proud of how I competed and stayed focused throughout the whole match and fought. It was a physical battle, a mental battle, and it just felt amazing to play in Montreal in front of everyone.' Bouchard will take on 17th seed Belinda Bencic of Switzerland in the second round Wednesday night. She came out with flashes of her attacking style, pushing Arango out of position with a dangerous backhand before hitting a forehand winner to go up 1-0 in the first set. After holding serve to go up 5-4, Bouchard earned double breakpoint and hit a forehand winner down the line to take the set. 'I know that I have good tennis, but I didn't know if I could show it today,' she said. 'I put effort into practice recently and I really wanted to have a good performance. So I knew I could do that, but it depended on whether I could stay in the game mentally and not be in my emotions or think about all the things that were around this game and around this tournament. Story continues below advertisement 'I'm proud I was able to do that. I still have my focus.' Bouchard's momentum didn't carry into the second set as Arango broke her three times to comfortably force a third. Then she got it back. Also on Monday, Canada's Kayla Cross, Ariana Arseneault and Carson Branstine dropped out of the NBO after the first round. Cross let a one-set lead slip away in a 4-6, 6-3, 6-2 loss to Kamilla Rakhimova of Russia, and Arseneault of Richmond Hill, Ont., fell 6-4, 6-2 to Japan's Naomi Osaka. Branstine, who grew up in California but represents Canada through family ties in Toronto, pushed former world No. 3 Maria Sakkari to three sets, but ultimately dropped the two hour, 23-minute match 6-2, 3-6, 7-5. Toronto's Victoria Mboko, Bianca Andreescu of Mississauga, Ont., and Vancouver's Rebecca Marino advanced to the second round with wins Sunday. Andreescu's status for the remainder of the tournament is unclear after she hurt her left ankle on match point against Czechia's Barbora Krejcikova.

Jamie Sarkonak: Hockey Canada judge believed in truth, not 'believe all women'
Jamie Sarkonak: Hockey Canada judge believed in truth, not 'believe all women'

National Post

time2 hours ago

  • National Post

Jamie Sarkonak: Hockey Canada judge believed in truth, not 'believe all women'

Article content She didn't leave happy, though: towards the end, McLeod asked her if she had STDs, and whether she was going to be leaving soon, which she felt was rude. E.M. also testified that McLeod also seemed annoyed at her when she returned to the room to search for a lost ring; she took an Uber home and was found crying in the shower by her mother, who 'took it upon herself' to report a sexual assault to police. Article content E.M. later explained to the court that her actions were driven by fear — fear that she never mentioned until she filed a civil suit against Hockey Canada, four years after the fact. Her mind 'separated' from her body to cope, she claimed. The judge didn't buy her story: important details had changed over time, and E.M.'s own concept of truth was uncomfortably fuzzy. Plus, E.M. initially told police that she didn't think the men would have physically forced her to stay. Article content The judge didn't hypothesize the complainant's actual feelings about what happened, but I suspect E.M. was quite miserable. She may have felt shame and regret for cheating on her boyfriend, as the defence argued during the trial. The little oral sex that was had was awkward and not erotic at all. The STD question may have felt like an accusation. Article content Article content Pop culture tells women that consensual sex is a neutral to empowering act, and good feminists will tell their friends that there's nothing to be ashamed about in sex. Slut shaming, we all knew in the good year 2018, was bad. But missing from that intense belief in female agency was the other side of the coin: that women can consent to something and wish they hadn't. Article content And certainly, the men regret it too. Their evidence suggested they took care to ensure consent was given at the time, and even that wasn't enough to keep an investigation from pausing, perhaps snuffing out, their NHL careers. McLeod and Foote were put on indefinite leave last year by the New Jersey Devils, as was Hart by the Philadelphia Flyers and Dubé by the Calgary Flames. And in 2022, Formenton may have lost out on a new contract with the Ottawa Senators due to the allegations; he played in Sweden until the charges were laid in 2024, and now works in construction. As for the future of these five men, the ball is still in the Ontario Crown's court. Prosecutors will have to decide in the next month whether to appeal for another shot at securing convictions; there's still a way this can drag out for years. Article content Supporters of E.M. will say the acquittals amount to a terrible outcome for women and sexual assault survivors, but they're the opposite. If sexual assault is to be taken seriously, it needs to mean something. It's to the actual victims' benefit that Carroccia didn't bend the rules to acrobatically extend the concept of sexual assault to new frontiers of apparently regretful intercourse, as courts have done in the past; doing so would have cheapened the concept to dollar store levels. Article content So, now what? After the decision was read, E.M.'s lawyer, Karen Bellehumeur, immediately took to calling for reform. 'While the accused's rights are important, those protections should not come at the expense of survivors' well-being,' she told a media scrum late Thursday. She expressed frustration with the fact that E.M. had to testify for nine days and was subject to 'insulting, unfair, mocking and disrespectful' cross-examination. 'She's really never experienced not being believed like this before.' Nine days of careful scrutiny is a very modest ask when a man is facing jail for an apparently consensual act that didn't pass the initial police sniff test. Article content

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store