Auto-wash for pet dogs sparks outrage among dog-loving netizens
Just4pets_autowash launched its self-service pet-washing service on July 12 in Holland Drive where, instead of getting your pet cleaned, washed and groomed by a human, it gets placed in an auto-wash machine that resembles a washing machine for pets.
The owners insist the machine is safe and prioritises "our furry friends' safety and comfort".
"From gentle wash cycles to pet-friendly shampoos, conditioner and drying, we ensure a stress-free experience for your beloved companion," they said in a post.
But netizens who watched the instructional video on Instagram disagree.
Many said the dog looked visibly distressed, while others questioned how such a contraption could even be allowed here.
The general view was that the enclosed washer with the water, shampoo and noise could traumitise dogs. Some worried about water and shampoo irritating their pets' eyes and ears.
User @mollylunaduo wrote: "A huge NO. Why would I wanna subject my furkids to such treatment? Being tied up in a metal box, scared, stressed, not knowing what's coming, sprayed by jets of shampoo/conditioner and water at intervals and then being dried thereafter.
The user added: "The sounds of all these in an enclosed environment as such is enough to make them panic. It's not about how safe it is and what type of shampoo is used. Tell us, how did you determine that it's 'stress-free' for the pets?"
Another said: "Pets aren't objects - forcing them into a noisy, enclosed machine is stressful, confusing, and completely unnatural. No animal should have to endure that just for human convenience."
One key selling point of the service was that it saved time. But pet owner YuJin Lim, 46, a busy sales and partnerships head and DJ, said he'd never use the machine on his dog.
"No way! Dogs don't like to be caged up - it's traumatising for them. If I need to give my dog a wash, I will give it a proper shower treatment, and definitely not in a cage," said Mr Lim, who adopted a small mixed-breed named Pixie during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Another Instagram commenter, @tehc_in_a_teacuppom, called the service "appallingly stressful" and questioned if it bordered on animal cruelty.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Mum at 15: More teens in Singapore gave birth in 2024
Find out what's new on ST website and app. In Singapore, abortions are legal for women up to 24 weeks into their pregnancy. SINGAPORE – Despite her mother's vehement objections and her former partner's indifference to her pregnancy, Sarah dropped out of school at Secondary 3 and became a mum at the age of 15. Sarah (not her real name), whose baby daughter is now 11 months old, said: 'I considered abortion at first, but when I saw my baby on the ultrasound, I felt a very strong connection to her.' The 16-year-old added: 'I feel the baby is innocent. I wanted to step up and take responsibility for the mistake I made.' More teenagers, like Sarah, are becoming mothers, according to the Report on Registration of Births and Deaths 2024 released by the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority on July 18. In 2024, there were 244 babies born to teenagers aged 19 or younger, up 7 per cent from the 228 such babies in 2023. In 2022, the figure was 218. The slight increase marks a reversal from the steady fall in teen births in the past 20 years, especially when the numbers for teen births were much higher in the decade leading up to 2010. For example, there were 853 teen births in 2005. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Woman taken to hospital after car falls into sinkhole on Tanjong Katong Road Singapore Students hide vapes in underwear, toilet roll holders: S'pore schools grapple with vaping scourge Singapore 'I've tried everything': Mum helpless as son's Kpod addiction spirals out of control Singapore NDP 2025: How Benjamin Kheng is whisked from Marina Bay to Padang in 10 minutes by boat, buggy Singapore Almost half of planned 30,000 HDB flats in Tengah to be completed by end-2025: Chee Hong Tat Singapore From libraries to living rooms: How reading habits take root in underserved S'pore children Asia Thai-Cambodia clashes spread along frontier as death toll rises Asia Thousands rally in downtown Kuala Lumpur for resignation of PM Anwar Ms Melisa Wong, executive director at Babes Pregnancy Crisis Support, a charity that provides support to pregnant teens, cited a combination of reasons for the rise. She said many teens felt isolated or struggled with other negative emotions during the Covid-19 pandemic, and they may have had unprotected sex to seek connection or to cope with whatever they were going through. While teenagers generally explore romantic relationships at an earlier age these days, some may not use contraceptives for various reasons, she added. The rise in the number of teen births could also be due to fewer of them choosing an abortion, she noted. Non-profit groups that help pregnant women in distress, such as Babes and Safe Place, have seen those as young as 12 seeking help, though most of the pregnant teens are between 16 and 18 years of age. In the past five years, the average age of pregnant teens was 18, the Health Ministry said in 2024. Mrs Jennifer Heng, director of Safe Place, said many of the teens the group sees chose to keep their baby because of their religious beliefs and a sense of attachment to their unborn child. They also have supportive families or partners. Ms Wong said some teens seek help only in their third trimester, when it is too late to get an abortion, so they end up giving birth. In Singapore, abortions are legal for women up to 24 weeks into their pregnancy. Social workers say these teen mums were not ready – mentally, emotionally or financially – for parenthood. And they struggled with feelings of fear and helplessness, and judgment from their friends and relatives, as Sarah did. Sarah said: 'Some of my relatives and friends say things like, 'So young, pregnant already'. I feel they look down on me for being a single mum.' She moved out from her mother's home to stay with her grand-aunt, the only person who supported her decision to keep her baby and who helps her with infant care. Her grand-uncle supports Sarah financially. She also broke up with her partner, who is five years older, before the baby was born. She said: 'I felt he didn't care about the baby, and there is no point staying if I have to do everything by myself. I didn't feel seen or heard.' She is thankful for Safe Place and its social workers, who give her counselling support and free necessities for her baby, such as milk powder and diapers, every month. 'Whenever I feel very overwhelmed, I would text my social worker and she comforts me. She also checks on me regularly,' Sarah said. 'It's exhausting to care for a baby, but I feel very happy to see my baby. She smiles a lot, and she is my pride and joy.' Baby's father not named Meanwhile, 330 babies were registered in 2024 without their father's name. This number has remained relatively stable in the past few years. In 2024, one in four of these babies was born to teens aged 19 or below, the report on registration of births and deaths stated. Besides teens, Mrs Heng said women in their 20s comprise the other major group with babies registered without the father's name. She said the women do so because the fathers do not want to be involved in the child's life. Or the woman does not want the man to be involved, and she is afraid he would fight for custody of the child if his name is listed as the father. Ms Wong said there are also teens with multiple partners who are unsure who the father is – hence the absence of a father's name. She added that some do not list the father's name 'as a way of starting afresh or emotionally detaching from a painful chapter'.
AsiaOne
2 days ago
- AsiaOne
Why I said 'I do' at 26 — even before most of my friends thought about it , Lifestyle News
When I signed our marriage certificate at 26, I didn't think I was doing anything radical. After all, I was viewing almost-weekly Instagram stories of my Junior College schoolmates tying the knot, so it seemed like plenty of my peers were getting hitched. But according to the latest figures from the Ministry of Social and Family Development's Family Trends Report 2025, the median age for first-time grooms in Singapore in 2024 was 31.1; I was five years below that. And for brides it's 29.6; my wife was 24 when we were solemnised. For us, it's been six months since we locked it in (aka joined in holy matrimony). Looking back, it wasn't a teenage impulse or a fairytale moment. It was a decision born out of long-term commitment, practical SG realities like BTO eligibility (gotta maximise those gahmen grants), and, perhaps unexpectedly, my in-laws. My now-wife and I had been together for close to five years before we tied the knot. We'd already weathered university life, job hunting, and the awkward early-20s phase of trying to figure ourselves out. But when it came to living together or planning a trip for just the two of us, we hit a wall. Her parents — loving, kind, but firmly traditional — had strong reservations about cohabitation before marriage. And so, between wanting a life together and respecting her family's values, we made a choice: we got married. It wasn't some grand proposal with hundreds of rose petals and a drone show over Marina Bay (ok but it was still a super fancy omakase in Japan). Just two people who decided they were ready, even if it was earlier than what is typical. 'Finally!' - but also, 'wah, so fast ah ?' While our closest friends were unsurprised, with their cheeky "finally lah " and "I already guessed" reactions (after all, we had been dating for close to five years), the occasional " wah , so fast ah ?" or "what's the rush?" comments from colleagues and acquaintances reminded us that our timeline was not exactly the norm. To be honest, the external chatter didn't cause us to second guess our decision; if anything, we were even more sure of it because it made us realise "actually, ya hor , what are we even waiting for?" Plus, I wouldn't say less enthu comments were "bad". The people who implied we should give it more thought or pause first didn't come across as unsupportive, it was more like checking if we had "double, triple confirmed" this momentous decision. Checking if we had the financial means to afford the coming big purchases (wedding, honeymoon, house, renovation), the maturity to weather the good and bad as a married couple when we were barely in our mid-20s, whether our careers were stable enough, and all the usual conservative Asian brakes installed on any big decision. On the contrary, while the external chatter didn't really faze us, our moments of doubt did give us pause. As two young working adults, we were not exactly rolling in disposable income. Our wedding reception at the end of this year will be intimate and modest (no swanky hotel ballroom), our BTO flat will not be ready until 2028, and our careers are still in their early stages. And my biggest worry: Would I be a "good enough" husband? Still, none of those worries outweighed the clarity I had about one thing: I wanted to do life, and everything that comes with it, with her. Marriage made the man I grew up an only child. That meant that before marriage, I was still living at home, eating my grandma's cooking, not being the one in charge of buying groceries, and relying on my parents to settle all my insurance needs. Post-marriage, I had to research insurance needs for my wife and myself (thankfully we have a super solid financial adviser), learn when the best supermarket deals are (discounted "must use by same day" proteins), and settle all the admin stuff. And while I'm still me, I'm also someone else now: a teammate, a planner, a provider (and occasional dishwasher). Essentially, a better version of myself that was, and still is, shaped by partnership, not perfection. I don't mean this in a cliche "marriage forces you to grow up" way. Rather, it gave me a reason to. When you're dating, you can still float around each other's lives. One night, maybe a month after we got married, I came home from work and found my wife sitting on the couch, unusually quiet (she's usually a yapper-cino). She had had a long day-something about a tough client, back-to-back meetings, and barely time to eat lunch. I was tired, too, but instead of letting her marinate (wallow) in her funk and retreating to my usual decompression routine (doomscrolling TikTok, or mindlessly Youtubing), I sat next to her, pulled her feet onto my lap, and asked, "Want to talk or nah ?" She said, "not really," so I understood that she just wanted to be allowed to unwind and babied. I ordered our favourite dessert, put on a favourite Mr Bean episode (she loves Mr Bean), put away the laundry, and just accompanied her till she felt more recharged. It sounds like such a small thing. But it was the first time I realised: this is what building a shared life looks like. It is not about dramatic gestures or constant romance. It is about showing up, not just when it's convenient, but when it matters. It is about adjusting your rhythm so that it matches someone else's, even if only for a night. That moment shifted something in me. I stopped thinking in terms of "my time" or "my space." I started thinking in "ours", and how I should always create a safe space for her where she can just drop everything and relax. Six months in Now, half a year later, while my friends swipe on dating apps and contemplate whether to DTR ("define the relationship"), I spend my evenings making dinner with my wife, going on long walks, or debating whether to watch the last season of Squid Game or rewatch Modern Family for the fifth time. It's quieter, yes, but it's also fuller. Do I think everyone should marry early? No. Honestly, I never even thought I would. In my teens and early 20s, I imagined myself following the Singapore script: build your career, settle down closer to your 30s, do the usual dance. But love doesn't always follow timelines. And in our case, the circumstances, the history, the values, they all made sense. I don't romanticise early marriage. It's hard work, and it asks things of you that you might not feel ready for. You learn that love is not just a feeling, but something you nurture every day. It asks for patience when you're both tired and irritable. For generosity when one of you is having a tougher week. For maturity when making decisions that shape your future as a unit. And sometimes, it asks for faith, that even if you do not have it all figured out, you will figure it out together. It may be tough at times, but I also don't regret it. Not for a second. Because when you find someone you want to come home to, build a life with, and grow alongside — not just despite your age, but because of where you are in life — you find that marriage isn't about settling down. It's about growing up, together. [[nid:718596]] This article was first published in .
New Paper
2 days ago
- New Paper
Woman demands refund after finding mouldy strawberries in dessert order
What was meant to be a sweet treat turned sour for a stay-at-home mother who discovered a mouldy strawberry tiramisu in her dessert order. Ms Nasriah Aziz had ordered a selection of cakes from online seller Strictly Dessert for her family but was appalled to find mould growing on one of the items. The $109 order had been paid for using CDC vouchers. When she asked for a full refund, she was told it was not possible as her purchase was made with the vouchers. The outlet initially offered a refund for the affected item but later offered a replacement instead. "I ordered three choco moist cakes, one original tiramisu, one pistachio tiramisu, and of course, that strawberry tiramisu that was mouldy," Ms Nasriah told The New Paper. "It was super disgusting and scary! And there was no apology from the Strictly Dessert." She said that she wanted a full refund on her order because she could not be certain that the other items were fit for consumption. She added that the remaining cakes did not look fresh or appetising, and her family did not dare to eat them . "To be fair, when we informed her about the mould in the strawberry tiramisu, she agreed to refund us for it. However, when we informed her to arrange for the driver to take back all the dessert orders and demanded a full refund, she refused," Ms Nasriah, who declined to share her age, said. In a Facebook post that was shared on Reddit , Ms Nasriah said: "The decent thing to do is to apologise and give a refund." "Just because I paid with CDC vouchers doesn't mean it's okay to serve expired cake. What if my kids had eaten it?" she added. "Who would dare eat the other cakes after seeing this? Makes you wonder how long they've been keeping their desserts." PHOTO: NASRIAH AZIZ/FACEBOOK Netizens were largely sympathetic. One Redditor, Mesapholis, wrote: "I am amazed how shops in a competitive environment like SG would rather be known as the shop that sells rotten dessert than refund the customer." "Report to SFA. Don't try to argue any further," added Redditor Tehogaokosong. Another Redditor, ChanPeiMui, said: "I can understand why they can't refund you because you used CDC voucher, but they should compensate you with something." Another Facebook user, Darwisy Nazz, said they had a similar experience. "I bought their fruit cup a month ago and the strawberry was spoiled too," they wrote, adding that the seller had offered a refund for just the strawberries. They added that they had reported the incident to the Singapore Food Agency (SFA), which said it would look into the matter. Ms Nasriah has also filed a report with the SFA. TNP has reached out to SFA for comments. "At this moment, we wish to move on. The purpose of the post is not to bring down her business but to create awareness. As a consumer, I have never come across such a vendor, she said. Strictly Dessert, which lists an address at Changi Village on their TikTok and Instagram accounts, did not respond to messages left for them by TNP.
