Minister insists fuel supplies not under threat despite oil refinery closure
State Oil – the parent company of Prax Group, which owns the Lindsey refinery in North Lincolnshire – collapsed into administration last month, putting hundreds of jobs at risk.
Michael Shanks pledged to support the workers who are facing redundancy, but said there is little action the Government can take to improve the statutory redundancy offer.
Speaking in the Commons, he said: 'We have worked urgently to ensure the safety of the refinery site, the security of fuel supplies and to protect workers.
'This has also allowed time for bidders to express an interest in the site.
'Following a thorough process, the official receiver has rigorously assessed all the bids received and concluded that sale of the business as a whole is not a credible option.'
He added: 'A package has been offered to all those directly employed at the refinery, which guarantees their jobs and pay over the coming months.
'And alongside the usual support that is offered to workforces in insolvency situations, the Government will also immediately fund a comprehensive training guarantee for those refinery workers to ensure they have the skills needed and the support to find jobs, for example, in the growing clean energy workforce.'
The Lindsey site is one of only five large oil refineries remaining in the UK after the recent closure of the Grangemouth plant in Scotland.
Prax Group is led by majority owner and chairman and chief executive Sanjeev Kumar Soosaipillai, who bought the Lindsey oil refinery from French firm Total in 2021.
Shadow energy minister Andrew Bowie, who tabled the urgent question, claimed 625 jobs are at risk as he pressed the minister for an update on its investigation into the collapse of the company.
He also asked: 'What, if any, assessment has been made into the UK's resilience given the steep reduction in our refining capacity over the past six months?
'What, if any, assessment has been made on the increased reliance on imports that will be necessary as a result of the reduction in British refining capacity?'
Mr Shanks said fuel supplies had 'adjusted' in the past few weeks, adding: 'Our assessment suggests there isn't an immediate risk to fuel supplies locally or in the wider area, but we'll continue to monitor that.'
On the investigation, he said: 'There is not much I can update the House on at the moment, because the insolvency service is carrying out that investigation.'
Conservative MP Martin Vickers, whose Brigg and Immingham constituency includes the oil refinery, said he wanted to see 'the maximum support given to those workers'.
Mr Shanks replied: 'We have looked and pushed and pushed to see if there is more action Government can take to change or to give any additional payments.
'It's not possible for Government to do that, not least because the insolvency service has to follow very specific rules in terms of creditors and what their parameters are to operate in the event of an insolvency.
'But I do think the owners of this company have profited from this business, and they should do the right thing by the workforce that delivered that for them.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Voices: There won't be a wealth tax – but Rachel Reeves can't afford to rule it out just yet
Normally, when politicians decline to rule something out, a sceptical media and public believe they are about to do it. But there should be one exception to this rule. Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves and other ministers are refusing to rule out introducing a wealth tax in this autumn's Budget, when the chancellor is likely to raise taxes by at least £20bn to stick within her fiscal rules. I'm told Starmer and Reeves will not bring in a new wealth tax, such as the 2 per cent levy on assets of more than £10m advocated by a growing number of Labour MPs and Neil Kinnock, the party's former leader, to raise £10bn. A wealth tax is an easy slogan and fits on to a banner. It would do nicely for the Starmer allies hoping to nudge him in a more progressive direction as he seeks a long overdue 'story' for his government. But Reeves and Starmer are not convinced. The chancellor thinks wealth taxes don't work. Twelve developed nations had them in 1990s but only three remain; only one, in Switzerland, brings in lots of money. Reeves burnt her own fingers by targeting non-doms – a process begun by Jeremy Hunt, the outgoing Tory chancellor. I'm told Reeves privately dismissed fears the rich would respond by leaving the UK, saying: "They always say that, but it never happens." It is happening, and she is now considering changing her plan to make worldwide assets, including those in foreign trusts, liable to inheritance tax. One government insider told me: 'People can choose where to pay their taxes. It's very easy to move countries and they are doing it.' A new wealth tax would be complex, take years to introduce and probably not be worth the candle. Dan Neidle, founder of Tax Policy Associates, said its study found such a tax would 'lower long-run growth and employment, thanks to a decline in foreign and domestic investment. It would make UK businesses more fragile and less competitive, and create strong incentives for capital reallocation and migration.' Why not just say no to a wealth tax now? Reeves offered one explanation to her Tory predecessor Norman Lamont at a Lords committee hearing this week. He told her he found it 'a bit strange' the government has not ruled out the move. Reeves replied that if she ruled out one tax rise, the media would move on to the next option, and assume that one was going to happen if she failed to rule it out. A fair point – but not her only reason. Reeves and Starmer need to build bridges with the parliamentary Labour Party after it filleted their welfare legislation, so rejecting a wealth tax now would inflame tensions. I suspect that when the Budget comes, Reeves and her allies will whisper to Labour MPs they are introducing a form of wealth tax through other measures, while avoiding headlines about implementing a specific one. Another reason not to rule out a wealth tax is to help message discipline. Labour certainly needs more of that: ministers unwittingly fuelled speculation about tax rises in media interviews by giving different definitions of "working people'. Far easier to say taxes are a matter for the Budget and we don't comment in advance. Some senior Labour figures think Reeves's reticence is because she is considering proposals that are close to being a wealth tax – for example, increasing property-based taxes. I think she should bring in higher council tax bands for the most expensive properties. It's ludicrous that this tax is based on 1991 property values, and that in England, people in homes valued at more than £320,000 pay the same amount in their local authority. Reform could be sold as a genuine levelling up measure the Tories flunked as it would cut bills in the north and Midlands while raising them in the south. Alternatively, Reeves could increase capital gains tax for the second Budget running, perhaps by bringing it into line with income tax rates, which are higher. Some in government favour a rise in income tax with the money earmarked for defence, as I have suggested. Another option is to raise the top rate of income tax from 45 per cent to 50 per cent. But both ideas would leave Labour open to the charge of breaching its manifesto pledge not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT. Reeves could argue that circumstances had changed in a more dangerous world. But breaking its promise might be a step too far for an already deeply unpopular PM and party. I don't think there will be a wealth tax. However, the rich shouldn't celebrate. The Budget will increase existing taxes on the wealthy, in line with the government's mantra of protecting "working people", while ensuring 'those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden'. Health warning: creating losers is not pain-free for them or the government, as Reeves discovered when she brought in the 'family farms tax'. But reforming some taxes under a better banner – 'fair tax' – is her best shot.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 UK Stocks Estimated To Be Up To 47.5% Below Intrinsic Value
The UK stock market has recently faced challenges, with the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 indices experiencing declines amid concerns over China's economic recovery and its impact on global trade. As London markets respond to these global cues, investors might find opportunities in stocks that are currently trading below their intrinsic value, offering potential for long-term growth despite short-term volatility. Top 10 Undervalued Stocks Based On Cash Flows In The United Kingdom Name Current Price Fair Value (Est) Discount (Est) Vistry Group (LSE:VTY) £6.236 £11.87 47.5% Topps Tiles (LSE:TPT) £0.3845 £0.71 45.5% TBC Bank Group (LSE:TBCG) £48.35 £95.75 49.5% Moonpig Group (LSE:MOON) £2.145 £4.04 46.9% Marlowe (AIM:MRL) £4.42 £8.37 47.2% LSL Property Services (LSE:LSL) £2.98 £5.87 49.2% Gooch & Housego (AIM:GHH) £6.04 £11.14 45.8% Franchise Brands (AIM:FRAN) £1.41 £2.69 47.5% Begbies Traynor Group (AIM:BEG) £1.22 £2.26 45.9% AstraZeneca (LSE:AZN) £108.02 £194.02 44.3% Click here to see the full list of 53 stocks from our Undervalued UK Stocks Based On Cash Flows screener. Here we highlight a subset of our preferred stocks from the screener. Franchise Brands Overview: Franchise Brands plc operates in franchising and related activities across the United Kingdom, Ireland, North America, and Continental Europe, with a market cap of £271.48 million. Operations: The company's revenue is primarily derived from its segments: Azura (£0.81 million), Pirtek (£63.91 million), B2C Division (£5.75 million), Filta International (£25.60 million), and Water & Waste Services (£46.05 million). Estimated Discount To Fair Value: 47.5% Franchise Brands is trading at £1.41, significantly below its estimated fair value of £2.69, suggesting it is undervalued based on cash flows. Earnings are expected to grow 29.39% annually, outpacing the UK market's 14.7%. Although revenue growth at 7.4% per year is slower than desired, it still exceeds the UK market average of 3.6%. Recent earnings growth was substantial at 143.9%, highlighting strong financial performance potential. According our earnings growth report, there's an indication that Franchise Brands might be ready to expand. Unlock comprehensive insights into our analysis of Franchise Brands stock in this financial health report. Victorian Plumbing Group Overview: Victorian Plumbing Group plc is an online retailer specializing in bathroom products and accessories for both B2C and trade customers in the United Kingdom, with a market cap of £237.09 million. Operations: Victorian Plumbing Group generates revenue through its online retail sales of bathroom products and accessories to both consumer and trade markets in the UK. Estimated Discount To Fair Value: 39.5% Victorian Plumbing Group is trading at £0.72, considerably below its estimated fair value of £1.2, highlighting its potential undervaluation based on cash flows. Despite a volatile share price and insider selling, earnings are forecast to grow significantly at 29.7% annually, surpassing the UK market's growth rate. However, profit margins have declined from last year and dividends remain inadequately covered by free cash flows despite a recent increase in payout to shareholders. Insights from our recent growth report point to a promising forecast for Victorian Plumbing Group's business outlook. Take a closer look at Victorian Plumbing Group's balance sheet health here in our report. Wickes Group Overview: Wickes Group plc is a UK-based retailer specializing in home improvement products and services, with a market cap of £532.73 million. Operations: The company generates revenue of £1.54 billion from its retail operations in home improvement products and services within the UK. Estimated Discount To Fair Value: 28.0% Wickes Group, trading at £2.25, is undervalued compared to its fair value estimate of £3.12, reflecting a discount greater than 20% based on discounted cash flow analysis. The company forecasts robust earnings growth of 26.8% annually, outpacing the UK market's average. Despite this potential, dividends are not well-covered by earnings and recent results show declining profit margins from last year. Recent index additions signal increased visibility among investors. In light of our recent growth report, it seems possible that Wickes Group's financial performance will exceed current levels. Click to explore a detailed breakdown of our findings in Wickes Group's balance sheet health report. Make It Happen Unlock more gems! Our Undervalued UK Stocks Based On Cash Flows screener has unearthed 50 more companies for you to here to unveil our expertly curated list of 53 Undervalued UK Stocks Based On Cash Flows. Are any of these part of your asset mix? Tap into the analytical power of Simply Wall St's portfolio to get a 360-degree view on how they're shaping up. Unlock the power of informed investing with Simply Wall St, your free guide to navigating stock markets worldwide. Ready To Venture Into Other Investment Styles? Explore high-performing small cap companies that haven't yet garnered significant analyst attention. Diversify your portfolio with solid dividend payers offering reliable income streams to weather potential market turbulence. Fuel your portfolio with companies showing strong growth potential, backed by optimistic outlooks both from analysts and management. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include AIM:FRAN AIM:VIC and LSE:WIX. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Total Mental Collapse': Trump Ripped After 'Insane' New Ramble In Europe
President Donald Trump spent part of his weekend in Scotland reviving his old grievances against wind power, even claiming at one point that it was 'killing' Americans. During a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Trump abruptly detoured from immigration to wind turbines. 'And the other thing I say to Europe: We will not allow a windmill to be built in the United States,' Trump said. 'They're killing us.' He added: 'They're killing the beauty of our scenery, our valleys, our beautiful plains ― and I'm not talking about airplanes. I'm talking about beautiful plains, beautiful areas in the United States, and you look up and you see windmills all over the place. It's a horrible thing. It's the most expensive form of energy. It's no good. They're made in China, almost all of them.' He complained that wind turbines 'rust and rot in eight years,' and then can't be 'buried' because they will harm the soil. 'The whole thing is a con job,' he said. 'It's very expensive. And in all fairness, Germany tried it and wind doesn't work.' Much of what the president said was wildly inaccurate: Germany gets more than a quarter of its energy from wind, turbines last about 30 years (not eight) according to the U.S Department of Energy, it's not the most expensive form of energy, and they're not 'almost all' made in China. Several users asked Grok, the AI tool within X, to fact-check Trump's claims on wind power. Here's a typical response: Trump, who has frequently attacked renewable energy, has a special hatred of wind power that likely began some two decades ago, when an offshore wind farm was proposed near the land that would become his golf resort in Scotland. He sued to block it, lost, and has complained about wind and other forms of renewable energy since. He mentioned that on Sunday as well. 'Today I'm playing the best course I think in the world, Turnberry ― even though I own it ― it's probably the best course in the world, right?' he said. 'And I look over the horizon and I see nine windmills... I said, 'Isn't that a shame? What a shame.'' Trump has previously taken his anti-wind stance to absurd extremes, such as in 2019, when he falsely claimed wind turbines cause cancer. 'The wind, the wind, it sounds so wonderful,' he said last year. 'The wind, the wind, the wind is, the wind is bullshit, I'll tell you.' Trump's critics called him out for his latest out-of-the-blue tirade against wind energy: Solve the daily Crossword
