Iran trying to 'save face' following US strike on nuclear sites, expert says
Print Close
By Stephen Sorace, Anders Hagstrom
Published June 26, 2025
As the total damage to three Iranian nuclear sites continues to be assessed, one Middle East expert says that Iran's stated assessment only reinforces U.S. and Israeli views.
Israel, which has said the strikes set the Iranian nuclear program back years, has the greatest resources in place to make a determination and the most incentive to get the facts right, Jacob Olidort, director of the Center of American Security at the America First Policy Institute, told Fox News Digital.
"Both the US and Israel say they achieved their objectives," Olidort said. "Israel presumably had planned around this for many years, and Israel says it has met its objectives, which is destroying Iran's ability to enrich uranium."
The U.S. launched a surprise strike using B-2 stealth bombers and bunker-buster bombs on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities on Saturday.
HEGSETH TEARS INTO REPORTERS, ALLEGING THEY 'CHEER AGAINST TRUMP' AND IRAN STRIKES
Some media reports have pushed back on the Trump administration's claims that the sites were destroyed and set Iran back years in its quest to achieve a nuclear weapon.
Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei on Wednesday told Al Jazeera that "our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure," though he refused to go into detail.
Olidort said that "everything Iran is doing now is to save face."
'THE MISSION WAS ACCOMPLISHED': SENATE REPUBLICANS PUSH BACK AGAINST LEAKED REPORT ON IRAN STRIKES
"We should never take anything Iran says at face value, but their assessment can only reinforce the views of Israel and the U.S. view," he said.
The head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog, International Atomic Energy Agency Director Rafael Grossi, reiterated on Thursday that the damage done by Israeli and U.S. strikes at Iranian nuclear facilities "is very, very, very considerable."
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
"I think annihilated is too much, but it suffered enormous damage," Grossi told French broadcaster RFI.
The Associated Press contributed to this report. Print Close
URL
https://www.foxnews.com/world/expert-reacts-irans-assessment-damage-nuclear-sites
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Oil Falls as Traders Wind Back Risk Premium Before OPEC+ Meeting
Oil fell after its biggest weekly loss in more than two years as hedge funds piled into bearish bets following a fragile truce between Iran and Israel, and before an OPEC+ meeting that may see another super-sized production increase. Brent for September fell as much as 0.8% to near $66 a barrel after sliding 12% last week, while West Texas Intermediate traded near $65. Iran said it remains skeptical that the US-brokered ceasefire with Israel would last, although President Donald Trump suggested he might back eventual sanctions relief for the Islamic Republic.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iran signals openness to transfers of enriched uranium abroad
Iran could transfer its stocks of enriched uranium to another country in the event of an agreement with the United States on Tehran's nuclear programme, Iran's UN Ambassador Amir-Saeid Iravani said on Saturday, according to news site Al-Monitor. A transfer of 20% and 60% enriched uranium would not be a red line for Tehran, Iravani said, adding that the material could alternatively remain in Iran under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supervision. However, he stressed that Iran would not renounce its right to domestic uranium production, a condition the United States firmly rejects. Iravani also ruled out any restrictions on Iran's ballistic missile programme, and reiterated that a new agreement would hinge, among other conditions, on the lifting of international sanctions. His remarks come hours after Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X late Friday that Iran is fundamentally willing to resume nuclear negotiations with the United States, though he urged US President Donald Trump to moderate his tone. "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers," Araghchi said. "Good will begets good will, and respect begets respect." Trump recently said that new talks with Iran would take place "next week," though he offered no further details. Several previous rounds of negotiations between Washington and Tehran have failed to yield an agreement. Earlier this month, tensions escalated sharply when Israel, accusing Iran of fast-approaching a point of no return in its goal of obtaining atomic weapons, carried out strikes on nuclear sites, defence positions, cities and energy infrastructure during a 12-day war. More than 20 high-ranking Iranian military officials were killed, some in their homes. The US also intervened with a strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump later said the attacks had set back Iran's nuclear programme by years, and when asked if he would strike again should uranium enrichment continue, he replied in the affirmative, insisting Iran must not acquire nuclear weapons. In response to the attacks, the Iranian parliament passed a law this week suspending cooperation with the IAEA. However, Tehran has not formally notified the agency, and experts warn that negotiations cannot proceed without the IAEA's technical oversight. Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is intended solely for civilian purposes. The IAEA believes Iran has managed to produce 400 kilograms of uranium with a purity level of 60%. Experts say this could be used to produce several nuclear weapons if the material were further enriched to 90%. It is unclear what happened to the stockpile in the wake of the attacks by Israel and the US.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mamdani faces barrage of Islamophobic attacks after New York primary success
'Hamas terrorist sympathizer', 'jihadist terrorist', calls for deportation and predictions of another 9/11 – these are among the torrent of Islamophobic attacks that have erupted across social media and conservative political circles following Zohran Mamdani's success in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor. The 33-year-old state assembly member, a democratic socialist who would become the first Muslim mayor of America's largest city, has been subjected to a barrage of death threats and xenophobic rhetoric from prominent Republican figures and online activists since his primary win became apparent. Related: Mamdani says leftwing populist victory can be replicated across US The coordinated nature of the attacks, spanning grassroots activists and senior political figures, reflects how anti-Muslim sentiment intersects with broader political divisions. Those targeting him have seized on Mamdani's immigrant background and Muslim faith alongside his hyper-progressive positions to frame his potential mayoralty as a civilizational threat. Far-right activist and White House whisperer Laura Loomer posted on X that 'there will be another 9/11 in NYC' under Mamdani's leadership, while the New York City councilwoman Vickie Paladino described him as a 'known jihadist terrorist' and 'communist' in a radio interview, calling for his deportation despite his American citizenship. Senior Trump administration figures have joined the pile-on, including White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and architect of mass deportations claiming: 'NYC is the clearest warning yet of what happens to a society when it fails to control migration.' The New York representative Elise Stefanik, Trump's one-time pick for UN ambassador, sent fundraising emails branding Mamdani a 'Hamas terrorist sympathizer' before the race was even called. Donald Trump Jr amplified a post reading, 'I'm old enough to remember when New Yorkers endured 9/11 instead of voting for it,' adding: 'New York City has fallen.' Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene posted an AI-generated image of the Statue of Liberty draped in a burqa, while conservative commentator Matt Walsh lamented on how the famously immigrant New York isn't 'an American city anymore' because of its population being 40% foreign-born. For longtime observers of American politics, the ferocity of the attacks may be shocking but their themes are depressingly familiar, especially after the 9/11 attacks. The playbook targeting Mamdani – questioning loyalty, invoking terrorism and weaponizing faith – has been deployed against Middle Eastern and Muslim candidates and officials for nearly two decades – such as with former Minnesota congressman and the state's current attorney general, Keith Ellison, in 2006 – with predictable regularity. 'Many of the trends we are seeing mirror common Islamophobic content- Muslims as other and as a threat,' Council on American-Islamic Relation (Cair) research and advocacy director Corey Saylor told the Guardian. Saylor warned this could become a 'larger issue, much like the Park 51 project did back in 2010', referencing the controversy over the proposed Islamic cultural center near Ground Zero that sparked nationwide Islamophobic sentiment. Cair said it doesn't track Islamophobic incidents online, but that the volume of xenophobic posts on Mamdani's primary is 'noteworthy'. At a time when political violence on the whole is on the rise, Mamdani has reported multiple death threats, including voicemails threatening to blow up his car in the final stretch of his campaign. The NYPD's hate crimes taskforce is investigating the incidents, one of which referenced the explosive pagers used in Israel's recent attack on Hezbollah members in Lebanon. His campaign had upped his security detail over the last few weeks in response to the threats, and the scale of hatred has also taken a deeply personal toll on Mamdani. 'I get messages that say the only good Muslim is a dead Muslim. I get threats on my life, on the people that I love,' Mamdani said last week while holding back tears. 'My focus has always been on making this a city that's affordable, on making the city that every New Yorker sees themselves in.' Trump also weighed in on Wednesday, calling Mamdani a '100% Communist Lunatic' while criticizing his appearance and voice. And despite notably steering clear of overt language about Mamdani's religion and ethnic background, he again called Senator Chuck Schumer a 'Palestinian' as a slur. The attacks represent a broader pattern of Islamophobic targeting throughout the primary campaign. Interviewers repeatedly pressed Mamdani on Israel-Palestine issues while giving other candidates more latitude – including demanding his stance on Israel's right to exist when candidates were asked which foreign country they'd first visit. Mamdani said he would remain in New York and that Israel should be a state of equal rights for all. Speaking on MSNBC about the attacks, Mamdani reflected on their broader impact: 'I've spoken to many Muslims across this city who have shared that their fear of having to be essentially branded a terrorist just by living in public life is one that keeps them preferring life in the shadows, life outside of that specter. And this is not the way that we can have our city be. It's not the way that we can have our country be.'
