Best Astrill VPN Alternatives in 2025: Faster, Safer, and More Streaming-Friendly
Astrill isn't exactly a household name, but for folks in places like China or the UAE, it's long been a go-to for punching through the Great Firewall. With built-in stealth protocols and unlimited devices, it looks powerful on paper. But dig deeper, and cracks start to show. It's one of the most expensive VPNs out there, and still doesn't offer a refund.
Pair that with its clunky app design and patchy support for streaming platforms, and it becomes clear: Astrill may no longer be the smartest tool in the box. If you've been thinking of jumping ship, we've tested dozens of services to bring you the top Astrill VPN alternatives, which are faster, cheaper, and just as stealthy.
Astrill isn't a bad VPN, but it feels like it's just stuck in 2015 pricing with 2020 features, while the competition is sprinting ahead in 2025. To find Astrill VPN alternatives that genuinely outshine it, we focused on the gaps it leaves wide open.
Astrill charges over $12/month for the long-term commitment, and doesn't offer a money-back guarantee. That's steep, especially if you just want to test the waters. We prioritized VPNs that give you top-tier features and a risk-free trial. NordVPN, for instance, packs in blazing speeds, obfuscated servers, and a 30-day money-back window, all for nearly half the price.
Astrill isn't built for binge-watchers. Even with Smart Mode, it struggles with Netflix US, BBC iPlayer, and others. We only picked VPNs that could reliably unblock multiple libraries without error screens or throttled streams. NordVPN and ExpressVPN are standout choices here, and it aced our tests across Netflix, Hulu+, and Prime Video.
They are also reliable options when it comes to watching Paramount+ programs from abroad.
From setup to server selection, Astrill's UI can feel stiff and overwhelming, especially for new users. So we focused on VPNs with clean, intuitive apps across all platforms: mobile, desktop, even Smart TVs and routers. Proton VPN gets full marks here with its polished dashboard and one-click profiles for streaming, torrenting, and stealth browsing.
Despite its advanced features, Astrill locks some key options behind paywalls (like StealthVPN or VIP add-ons). We favored VPNs that offer customization without extra fees, like Private Internet Access, which gives you full control over encryption levels, port forwarding, and protocol tweaks straight out of the box.
Astrill claims a no-logs policy but hasn't backed it up with third-party audits. That's a red flag in 2025. We only included providers that are independently audited, use RAM-only servers, and are based in privacy-friendly jurisdictions. NordVPN, again, checks every box here, has been audited five times, and is based in Panama.
Astrill has its fans, no doubt, but with its sky-high pricing, clunky interface, and no-refund policy, we couldn't help but ask: Is there something better out there? Spoiler: there is. Actually, there are several.
We tested over a dozen premium VPNs side-by-side with Astrill. The goal? Find services that offer better performance, smoother streaming, smarter security, and more transparency, all while keeping your wallet intact. Below are the top Astrill VPN alternatives that don't just match what Astrill offers, they improve on it.
Let's start with the one that raises the bar across the board.
According to our hands-on tests with NordVPN, it is the best Astrill VPN alternative to try right now. Whether you're streaming international Netflix libraries, shielding sensitive data on public Wi-Fi, or just tired of clunky interfaces and surprise charges, NordVPN delivers a smoother, faster, and more flexible experience than Astrill.
When it comes to bypassing censorship, NordVPN is highly effective and is often mentioned as one of the top VPNs capable of working in China.
With 7,400+ servers across 118+ countries, including a huge footprint in the US, UK, Australia, and Asia, NordVPN gave us ultra-fast speeds and consistent access to services Astrill struggled with, like Max, BBC iPlayer, Hulu, and Hotstar. While Astrill locks key streaming features behind premium plans, NordVPN's SmartPlay is built in, letting you stream geo-restricted content seamlessly without manual DNS tweaks.
It's not just a streaming beast, though. NordVPN takes privacy seriously. You get RAM-only servers, AES-256 encryption, a strict no-logs policy (audited five times), and Double VPN routing for sensitive activities. During testing, features like Threat Protection blocked trackers and malicious domains (even without an active VPN connection), something Astrill doesn't match.
We also found the Meshnet tool useful for device-to-device encryption, especially if you're working remotely or gaming with friends in other regions. Plus, with support for 10 simultaneous connections, your whole household can stay protected under one plan.
Best of all, NordVPN costs just over $3/month on long-term plans, with a 30-day money-back guarantee and a 7-day free trial on Android, which is a level of flexibility Astrill doesn't offer.
Still unsure if this is the right alternative for you? Reading our Astrill VPN vs NordVPN comparison will no doubt help you decide.
Buy at NordVPN
Pros
Cons
If your main gripe with Astrill is its clunky UI, unreliable region switching, or paywalled 'VIP' servers, ExpressVPN is the elegant alternative you've been looking for. It's fast, it's intuitive, and it works, especially when you just want to stream something without fiddling with settings.
With 3,000+ servers in 105 countries, ExpressVPN covers slightly fewer locations than NordVPN but nails the ones that matter most, like the US, UK, Japan, and Australia. In our tests, we unblocked Netflix, Hulu+, HBO Max, and Kayo Sports in seconds.
And thanks to Lightway Turbo, ExpressVPN's custom protocol, we consistently got fast speeds with low latency, even on long-distance connections.
One major upside over Astrill? ExpressVPN has native apps for nearly every device, including Apple TV, Fire TV Stick, PlayStation, and routers. It's also important to note that ExpressVPN offers a high-quality VPN app for Mac.
There's also MediaStreamer, a smart DNS tool that works on devices that don't support VPNs directly, with no additional fees and no 'VIP' server nonsense.
Privacy-wise, ExpressVPN runs TrustedServer architecture, where all servers are RAM-based and wiped on every reboot. It's also headquartered in the British Virgin Islands and has a no-logs policy that's been independently audited multiple times.
At just around $5/month on long-term plans, ExpressVPN is pricier than others on this list, but if you want a VPN that works across devices and platforms, it's well worth it.
Buy at ExpressVPN
Pros
Cons
If Astrill's paywalled features and confusing interface drove you up the wall, Private Internet Access (PIA) feels like a breath of fresh air. It's powerful without being overcomplicated, especially if you're the kind of user who wants control over encryption levels, protocols, ports, and even which apps use the VPN.
PIA has a massive network of over 30,000 servers in 91 countries, and it's one of the only VPNs that runs servers in all 50 US states. This is huge if you're trying to unblock regional streaming libraries, local sports broadcasts, or content restricted to certain states (like local FOX affiliates or blackout-limited MLB games).
While Astrill hides basic streaming support behind premium tiers, Private Internet Access works with Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime Video, and even region-sensitive platforms like PBS with no upcharges or shady gimmicks. Streaming was smooth in our tests, especially when using the WireGuard protocol, which gave us reliable performance on both short and long-distance servers.
Private Internet Access VPN also includes MACE, its built-in ad, tracker, and malware blocker, which Astrill doesn't offer without manual configuration. It's one of the few VPNs that's fully open-source, meaning every line of code in the apps is open for public inspection.
You can protect unlimited devices with one account, and subscriptions start at just over $2/month if you commit long term. It's a budget-friendly powerhouse that's ideal for tinkerers and casual streamers alike.
Buy at Private Internet Access
Pros
Cons
Astrill might boast about its 'Stealth VPN' or advanced configs, but for everyday users looking to stream, browse, and stay private without limits, Surfshark delivers where Astrill fumbles. It's the only premium VPN on this list that gives you unlimited device connections, making it perfect for households, friend groups, or just anyone with way too many gadgets.
What really makes Surfshark stand out is how consistent its streaming access is across global platforms. In our tests, it unblocked Netflix libraries in the US, UK, Japan, and South Korea, all regions where Astrill struggled or required extra payment. Surfshark even gave us full access to Hulu, BBC iPlayer, Prime Video, and Hotstar, without bandwidth throttling or weird buffering glitches.
It uses WireGuard by default, ensuring smooth speeds and low latency even across long distances. When you need extra stealth, the Camouflage Mode disguises your VPN traffic as regular HTTPS, ideal for getting around VPN blocks without triggering flags. It's not as granular as Astrill's setup, but for most users, it's plug-and-play with smarter defaults.
You also get some privacy perks Astrill doesn't touch: RAM-only servers, IP Rotator, GPS spoofing on Android, and the option for a dedicated IP. And if you're trying to save, Surfshark is among the cheapest long-term VPNs out there, with plans starting at just around $2.50/month with a 30-day refund guarantee.
Buy at Surfshark
Pros
Cons
Astrill's pricing can be steep, especially if you're only looking for basic protection or occasional streaming access. That's where Proton VPN stands out as the best free alternative to Astrill on this list, which isn't surprising, given that it ranked as the top free VPN in our tests.
Unlike most free VPNs, Proton VPN's free plan doesn't bombard you with ads, throttle your speeds to a crawl, or sneakily log your data. It gives you access to servers in five countries (the US, the Netherlands, Japan, Romania, and Poland) with unlimited bandwidth and a no-logs policy backed by independent audits and Switzerland's strict privacy laws.
For everyday private browsing, public Wi-Fi security, or location shifting to catch up on basic streaming, Proton's free version gets the job done. But if you upgrade to the Plus plan, that's where it gets competitive with Astrill on every front.
The premium tier adds servers in 90+ countries, access to Secure Core (which routes traffic through multiple hardened servers), Tor over VPN, and streaming access to Netflix, Hulu, Prime Video, and more. It also enables VPN Accelerator, a unique speed-boosting tech that minimizes latency over long distances, which is something Astrill struggles with in its standard configurations.
Proton VPN is easy to use, supports 10 devices simultaneously, and works across all platforms, from Android and iOS to Linux and routers. Pricing for premium plans starts at around $3.5/month, which makes it a flexible pick whether you want to stay free forever or level up later.
Buy at ProtonVPN
Pros
Cons
Astrill might look good on paper, but in the real world, it often overpromises and underdelivers, especially when it comes to price, streaming, and transparency. Whether you're frustrated by its high cost, limited server coverage, or lack of independent audits, there's no shortage of better options.
If you want the best all-rounder that actually backs up its claims, NordVPN is your move. It's faster, more secure, works reliably with major streaming platforms, and has been audited multiple times for its no-logs policy.
With support for up to 10 devices and rock-solid speeds, it's our top pick if you're ditching Astrill for something more future-proof. Try it risk-free with the 30-day money-back guarantee, and experience what a real premium VPN should feel like.
If you feel the need to continue your research, you can check out our list of the best VPNs right now, or the full comparison of Surfshark, NordVPN, and ExpressVPN.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
China's Two-Seat J-20 Stealth Fighter Poised To Enter Operational Service
A flurry of new images showing the two-seat variant of China's J-20 stealth fighter has emerged online. As well as providing new views of the two-seater, which also now wears a darker paint scheme, recent imagery published on Chinese social media reveals the progress being made in other fighter programs, including the J-35 family of carrier-based and land-based stealth fighters. It has been widely assumed that the appearance of the latest imagery of the J-20S is related to this version of the stealth jet having recently entered operational service or being poised to do so. At least one photo that emerged this month has been suggested as being an indication of operational service, with the J-20S aircraft in question wearing national insignia as well as five-digit serials associated with a frontline People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) unit, specifically the 172nd Air Brigade. While the J-20S was officially unveiled at the Zhuhai Airshow last year, there are rumors that it might be publicly unveiled as an operational PLAAF asset in September of this year, when the service marks the 80th anniversary of Japan's defeat in World War II. Rumors that a two-seat version of the J-20 was under development first emerged in early 2018, and the existence of the aircraft was confirmed beyond doubt by October 2021, when a prototype was noted undertaking high-speed taxi tests, as we reported at the time. To accommodate a second crewmember, the J-20's forward fuselage was redesigned. The aircraft also has enlarged tailfins and was powered from the start by locally developed WS-10C turbofan engines. With no equivalent two-seat stealth fighter in any Western inventory, the exact purpose of the J-20 has long been a source of debate. Some early assessments suggested it might be intended for electronic warfare, although this mission set is now very much the realm of the J-16D, a Chinese version of the Sukhoi Flanker multirole fighter. Of course, this could change in the future. Some kind of 'mini airborne command and control aircraft' was also a suggestion for the two-seat J-20S. More recent analysis suggests, which matches TWZ's original analysis, is that at least a significant portion of the stealth jet's mission might be in support of a growing fleet of PLAAF drones. This is a concept we have discussed in the past and which would essentially see the second crewmember control, to varying degrees, 'loyal wingman'-type drones that would accompany crewed J-20s and other aircraft into battle. In this way, the drones could fly deeper into hostile airspace, clearing a way through air defenses, for example, or otherwise supporting the crewed assets. The same concept is apparently already being explored by the PLAAF using modified J-16 fighters. The U.S. is moving full steam ahead with its own Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) loyal wingman drone plans, as well. So far one of the best Images of a PLAAF J-20S — @Rupprecht_A (@RupprechtDeino) July 8, 2025 Since the first flight of the J-20S prototype in November 2021, at least five other prototypes have appeared, the most recent emerging in March of this year. Presuming that the new J-20S imagery shows the jet in its definitive production form, then there are several features that are worthy of note. First, the nosecone has been reprofiled compared with earlier J-20S aircraft. This suggests that it now accommodates the same radar found in the J-20A, the improved single-seat version of the stealth jet. While unconfirmed, there are rumors that the active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar in the J-20A could feature gallium nitride (GaN) semiconductors. Compared with previous technology, GaN generates less heat and has the capacity to operate at higher voltages, meaning that output power can be increased, while component size can be reduced.威龙系列来源 @铁皮摄影师/wb — Húrin (@Hurin92) July 5, 2025 As well as an apparent new radar, the latest J-20S is fitted with an improved type of electro-optical system below the nose. Very similar to the F-35's Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS), this news system offers 360-degree coverage, and may also be of the same variety as fitted in the single-seat J-20A. The J-20's original electro-optical system had a limited field of view and reduced capability set, which you can read about in this past piece of ours. The second picture shows the export – version EOTS – 86 exhibited by China in 2017. Because the military considered that the core of the J – 20 should be focused on air combat, this version of EOTS was abandoned. — Andong (@andong41739) July 6, 2025 Finally, the J-20S now wears a paint camouflage scheme, with most of the airframe painted in a dark-gray finish, close to black. This is absent from the leading and trailing edges of the control surfaces, the intake 'lips,' and the radome. While unconfirmed, this might indicate a new type of radar-absorbent coating to enhance the aircraft's low-observable characteristics. Taken together, these developments indicate that China has been refining the J-20S ahead of its operational service entry and before production ramps up, although it remains to be seen what kind of force mix is planned for the single- and two-seat J-20 versions, let alone the smaller J-35A. As for the J-35, some new imagery has also emerged of the carrier-based version of the jet. In particular, we now have a much better look at the arrester hook that's fitted on the navalized J-35 version, to allow it to make carrier landings. In a recent Chinese TV report, a J-35 can be seen in the back of a construction hall, still wearing primer, with the black-and-white hook extended. If I'm not mistaken then this is the first time we see the tail-hook. — @Rupprecht_A (@RupprechtDeino) July 8, 2025 Meanwhile, recent imagery showing the J-35 in the air reveals the tidy low-observable housing for its arrester hook, which is entirely concealed between the engines when not deployed. This is a bit different arrangement to the F-35C's hook that has a shroud attached to it. While much attention has rightfully been placed on China's sixth-generation jets, two of which are now under test, for the PLAAF, the J-20 remains the most important tactical jet program, while the future of the J-35 is coming clearer into view. At the very least, these latest images reinforce just how central the J-20 remains when it comes to the service's burgeoning ambitions. Contact the author: thomas@
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Morningstar Says Korean Stocks Are EM's Best Bet Despite Tariffs
A fund manager at Morningstar Wealth is selling Chinese and Japanese equities to increase exposure to South Korea, which he's betting on to provide the best returns in both emerging and Asian markets over the next decade. Korea's key draws are technology stocks tied to the artificial intelligence boom and a newfound political will for corporate reforms, according to Mark Preskett, a London-based senior portfolio manager at the firm. He said he's betting on annual returns from Korean stocks of 11%-12% in dollar terms over the next 10 years.
The Verge
3 hours ago
- The Verge
Confirmed: Nintendo's Switch 2 can work with existing docks and webcams after replacing their firmware
Over the last two weeks, I've sought to uncover why the Nintendo Switch 2 didn't work with a host of USB-C accessories that worked perfectly fine with other devices, including third-party docks and some of the best-reviewed webcams. But today, I have first-hand confirmation that existing gadgets can work — as long as their manufacturers issue the right firmware updates, and as long as Nintendo doesn't break compatibility from here on out. You shouldn't necessarily need to buy a brand-new gadget to plug a TV or video glasses into your Nintendo Switch 2. Three manufacturers have already proven that firmware updates are enough for now, and hopefully more will follow! The existing gadgets I just successfully tested are: the AverMedia Elite Go GC313 Pro and AverMedia Core Go GC313 compact charger docks, the Elgato Facecam MK.2 webcam, and the Viture Pro Mobile Dock for the company's AR glasses. None of them worked with the Nintendo Switch 2 at launch, but each now has firmware updates available, and I was able to get them all working in my own home — and bust a few additional myths about Switch 2 compatibility. The gadget: Elgato Facecam MK2 The story: Elgato was one of the very first companies to promise it would update some non-working webcams to work with the Switch 2, and provided its own theories to The Verge on why they didn't work on day one. The company won't formally release its firmware updates for the Facecam MK2 and Facecam Neo till the end of July, but it sent us an early copy so I could show you video proof! Here, follow along with me as I install and test it for the very first time: (Sorry, I'm not allowed to share the early firmware update files.) What we learned: Elgato originally claimed the primary reason its cameras didn't work was that the Nintendo Switch 2 requires cameras to advertise a low-resolution 480p video mode, even if that's not the mode the Switch 2 winds up using. Sure enough: the USBView tool shows me that the Facecam MK2 now makes 480p the default video streaming mode that a USB host device (like the Switch 2) will see before anything else. Also: Remember when Ugreen told us that cameras wouldn't work with Switch 2 if they used the HID (human interface device) protocol? Weirdly, it seems Elgato actually added some HID references in its latest firmware. Here's the diff if you want to peek. The gadgets: AverMedia Elite Go GC313 Pro and AverMedia Core Go GC313 The story: I'd never even heard of these 100W GaN compact charging docks, the $130 GC313 Pro and the $90 GC313 — but it now appears they're the first and only portable docks for the Switch 2! (The Pro also doubles as a 1080p60 USB capture card, if you're wondering about the price delta.) The company has a whole page dedicated to Switch 2 compatibility firmware updates, mostly for its video capture devices, but also these portable docks, as well as a more traditional standing dock if you don't mind plugging your Switch in upside-down. What we learned: The firmware update was quick to install and the HDMI connection totally works — probably because AverMedia's dock is now using the exact same proprietary commands that we see Nintendo's official dock using. (Once again, I pulled out a USB-C PD analyzer to check. Before the update, AverMedia's dock didn't speak Nintendo's language and was quickly rejected; after the update, it did.) AverMedia's dock didn't work quite as reliably as the official dock in my early tests. It doesn't always connect the first time I plug it in, and there's also a short delay. Also note: the GC313 only seems to support vanilla 4K60 output with no HDR or VRR. As you'll read below, video glasses maker Viture has a firmware update that makes its gadgets compatible with Switch 2 — but takes away compatibility with the original Nintendo Switch. But I tested the AverMedia dock working with both generations of Switch, and Viture says it'll do the same in future. The gadget: Viture Pro Mobile Dock The story: This $130 dock is a battery pack that can power your handheld or phone, while routing its video to Viture's USB-C video glasses or a USB-C monitor. (The HDMI port is for input, not output to a TV.) With a firmware update, it gains support for Switch 2, but breaks support for the original Switch unless you downgrade afterwards. A future update will support both, though, Viture spokesperson Emily Wang tells The Verge. What we learned: Viture shipped me its dock pre-updated, so I didn't test before-and-after. But with the update, it totally works — after a bit of a delay, which seems to stem from some miscommunication between Viture's gadgets and the Switch 2, if I'm reading the USB-C PD traffic right. But after that miscommunication, I can see the Viture dock sends the exact same proprietary commands as Nintendo's official dock. One of the things we'd heard early on is that Switch 2 docking stations need to offer 20 volts of power for the Switch 2 to kick into TV mode — even though the handheld only actually uses 15 volts. But the Viture dock only advertises a maximum of 15 volts at 1.34 amps (20 watts in total), and yet Viture got video output working anyhow. We know these third-party docks are working with the Switch 2 as of today, and we expect more are on the way. (One I didn't get to test is this Hagabis, which fits the entire HDMI adapter into a cable instead of a dock — beware that the firmware update only official works with the 8K version which is black, not white or red and blue and keeps going out of stock.) But we don't know if Nintendo will move to block these accessories with firmware updates of its own. Today, it appears that each of these docks can fool the Switch 2 into thinking they're the official dock by emulating its commands, but several manufacturers admit that could lead to a game of cat-and-mouse where they have to issue new firmware updates to keep up with Nintendo. 'Similar to what Antank shared with you, it's true that we may need to provide firmware updates if Nintendo changes its protocol specifications,' Viture tells The Verge.
