'So quick': dog licences recommended after fatal attack
In a matter of minutes - the time it took for his mother to get a drink for another child - the two-year-old was set upon by two dogs.
"It happened so quick," his mother told NSW Police of the attack in Cowra, central western NSW, on November 8, 2022.
"How did he even get in there? Why wasn't there a latch on the gate?"
Jyedon likely died from injuries inflicted by a rottweiler that lived at the Country Gardens Motor Inn after he opened the dog's enclosure, NSW deputy state coroner Carmel Forbes said on Wednesday.
The sudden and swift force of the animal, which was sharing the fenced-off area with a red heeler-cross, was consistent with evidence from previous inquests into dog attacks, Ms Forbes said.
"Jyedon's death highlights how quickly a fatal attack can unfold, especially when the attack is on a young infant or a young child," Ms Forbes told the coroner's court in Lidcombe.
"Such an attack may be wholly unexpected and, as such, come as a complete shock to the parents of the child and ... also the owner of the dog."
Handing down her findings into Jyedon's death, Ms Forbes made several recommendations to change dog ownership laws and introduce licensing in NSW.
The state government, in consultation with councils, should consider licences for dog owners, which could include safety education requirements, she said.
Licensing could alternatively be introduced for dogs that are disproportionately involved in attacks, such as Staffordshire terriers, American Staffordshire terriers, bull mastiffs and rottweilers.
She also recommended statewide dog safety education campaigns and animal enclosure requirements for hotel and motel owners, similar to pool fencing laws.
Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig encouraged pet owners to contribute to a review of companion animal laws, including enforcements after dog attacks.
"We need strong laws that hold pet owners to account and make sure owners take responsibility for their pets at home and in public spaces," Mr Hoenig said in a statement on Wednesday.
The inquest heard neither the rottweiler Brutus nor the red heeler had a formal history of aggression, though a neighbour told police the larger dog bit her pet on the neck.
A veterinarian gave evidence that once a dog attacked a person or an animal it was more likely to attack again and certain breeds had a propensity for initiating aggression.
Both dogs were euthanised after the attack.
Ms Forbes described the attack on Jyedon, a Wiradjuri boy, as a "terrible death" that continues to affect his family.
"His death has placed a sadness and hurt in their lives and has disturbed them deeply," she said.
"Jyedon's smiling face is the heartaching, missing piece of their family celebrations."
13YARN 13 92 76
Lifeline 13 11 14
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
a day ago
- Miami Herald
Wealthy owner of Florida telecom firm gets 5 years for fleecing $110M from U.S.
The wealthy owner of a major South Florida telecommunications company was sentenced on Thursday to five years in prison and ordered to pay about $110 million to the U.S. government for fleecing a federal program known as 'Lifeline' that provides discounted phone services to low-income customers. Issa Asad, CEO of Q Link Wireless LLC, and his Dania Beach-based company pleaded guilty last year to conspiring to defraud the U.S. government program, including theft of public funds, before U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz in Miami federal court. At the same time, Asad, 52, of Southwest Ranches, also pleaded guilty to bilking a government loan program meant to help struggling businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Under the terms of the plea deals with prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office, Asad and Q Link agreed to pay back the Federal Communications Commission in one of the largest financial penalties in the agency's history. Court records show they have paid almost all of the $110 million in restitution to the FCC. Also, Asad paid a criminal penalty of $17.5 to the government, representing his ill-gotten income from Q Link's Lifeline phone services scam. Asad also paid about $1.8 million in restitution to the Small Business Administration for laundering loan proceeds that his company received from the Paycheck Protection Program during the pandemic. He admitted to using that fraudulent money for construction on his new home, and more than $140,000 on property taxes, jewelry and donations to a local university. Asad must surrender to federal prison authorities in two months, Judge Ruiz ordered on Thursday. This was not Asad's first brush with the law. In 2014, Asad was charged with murder in connection with driving his Mercedes over a groundskeeper at his Dania Beach business following a dispute over $65 in pay for lawn services. Five years later, Asad pleaded no contest to misdemeanor culpuable negligence and was given one year of probation in Broward Circuit Court, according to court documents. Asad was also ordered to pay a $225 fine. Court records provided no explanation for the dramatically different outcome in the criminal case. But while the case was pending, the groundkeeper's family sued Asad over her brother's death in civil court, ending in a confidential settlement before the murder charge was substantially reduced to a misdemeanor. In Miami federal court, Asad and his company admitted to a longtime scheme to defraud the FCC's Lifeline program. It makes everyday communications services more affordable for low-income customers by providing deep discounts on certain monthly cellphone service, broadband internet service and bundled voice-broadband packages purchased from participating telecom provider. Asad and Q Link, represented by the law firm Kobre & Kim, admitted that they purposely conspired to defraud the FCC program between 2012 and 2021 by providing false information about their Lifeline customers and making repeated false claims for government reimbursement, according to a factual statement filed with their plea agreements. They also admitted to retaining Lifeline funds that they were not entitled to receive and deceiving the FCC about the company's compliance with program rules. 'Upon learning that the FCC was investigating their Lifeline billing, Q Link and Asad created and provided false records to the FCC to conceal the scam and to continue collecting reimbursement,' according to a sentencing memo filed by prosecutors Elizabeth Young and John Shipley. 'As part of this plan, they simply manufactured cellphone activity on behalf of Q Link customers who were not using their cellphones. 'At no point did Q Link amend past Lifeline claims for customers who were not using their cellphones or return any of the Lifeline payments (something they could have done),' they wrote in the memo. The case, filed last year, was investigated by the FCC, IRS, U.S. Postal Inspection Service and Special Inspector for Pandemic Recovery.


Fast Company
2 days ago
- Fast Company
Hulk Hogan changed media forever with his ‘Gawker' lawsuit
Tear a tanktop in half today for Terry Bollea, the entertainer better known as Hulk Hogan, who has died at age 71. Though he was a towering icon of the 1980s professional wrestling scene and seamlessly transitioned into 'celebreality' TV in the aughts, Bollea's most lasting contribution to our culture may have been what he has done to digital publishing. Bollea's star had diminished considerably by 2012, when blog-era media giant Gawker published a brief clip from a stealthily recorded sex tape of Hogan and Heather Clem, then-wife of Bollea's then-best friend, radio personality Bubba the Love Sponge. The clip was featured in a post by former Gawker editor in chief AJ Daulerio, a meditation on celebrity sex tapes. Just days after the sex tape's publication, Hogan sued for emotional distress and invasion of privacy. For its part, Gawker defended its inclusion of the clip by arguing that the footage was newsworthy, considering Hogan's celebrity status and past comments on his sex life. In March 2016, a Florida jury found in favor of Hogan, awarding him $115 million in compensatory damages and $25 million in punitive damages. The verdict ultimately bankrupted Gawker, hastening an end to digital media's freewheeling blog era. (The website was revived in 2021 under owner Bryan Goldberg, but shuttered again just two years later.) Perhaps more shocking than the verdict itself, however, was the revelation of who paid for the lawsuit in the first place: Two months after the smoke cleared, Forbes reported that tech billionaire Peter Thiel had been bankrolling Bollea. The former Paypal Mafia member spent roughly $10 million on the lawsuit, apparently with the aim of destroying Gawker, as revenge for outing him as gay in a 2007 post. Thiel's involvement raised concerns that the victory over Gawker could become a playbook for extremely wealthy individuals to silence media outlets—a First Amendment nightmare. The New Yorker, for instance, warned at the time that the verdict could pave the way for 'a war against the press.' And those concerns have since proven well-founded. Within a year, the ' Gawker Effect,' as coined by journalist Margaret Sullivan had cast a chilling pall over the media environment. Music reporter Jim DeRogatis said a number of publishers passed on his bombshell investigation into sexual abuse claims against singer R. Kelly, citing concerns over potential libel lawsuits. Reporter Kim Masters wrote in October 2017 about her difficulty trying to find an outlet who would touch her investigation into allegations that Amazon Studios executive Roy Price had made inappropriate sexual remarks. Even 'the weakest of legal claims,' she recalled, triggered genuine fear among editors and lawyers, and Price eventually hired Charles Harder, the attorney who defended Bollea. (The investigations eventually ran in BuzzFeed and The Information, respectively.) Many more blockbuster lawsuits against media outlets have followed in the years since. Blackwater Founder Erik Prince has sued The Intercept multiple times over its coverage of his activities; while the cases were dismissed, they successfully drained the publication of time and money (and effectively diminished their capacity to expend resources on further investigations). In 2020, right-wing provocateur group Project Veritas sued The New York Times for defamation, over publishing legal documents describing the group's deceptive practices, tying up the Times in court for years. More recently, Elon Musk's X filed a defamation lawsuit against the left-leaning Media Matters for America in 2023, claiming it 'manufactured images' showing ads on X placed alongside neo‑Nazi content on the platform, with the aim of driving advertisers away. The publication countersued in March, accusing Musk and X of bringing 'abusive,' costly and meritless lawsuits to punish Media Matters for the crime of doing journalism. (Those suits are currently still winding their way through courts; in the meantime, the organization has laid off at least a dozen staffers, citing legal costs.) And of course, suing news organizations has become a cornerstone of Donald Trump's strategic response for unflattering coverage. Just since last winter, he has sued ABC over George Stephanopoulos's on-air claim that Trump has been found liable for rape—rather than the more accurate term 'sexual abuse'—settling for $15 million plus legal fees, he has successfully sued CBS for $16 million, alleging a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris was 'unfairly' edited, and just last week, he filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and its parent company for a story linking him to Jeffrey Epstein. Any outlet that can't afford to defend itself in court now knows not to break any unflattering news about Trump—or any other public figure who might be backed by wealthy benefactors with an ax to grind. Whether Bollea would approve of all this or not—and judging by his professed admiration for Trump, he certainly might—the dire current state of U.S. media is his true legacy.'Whatcha gonna do when Hulkamania runs wild on YOU?' he used to ask wrestling opponents. Nearly a decade after Bollea's lawsuit destroyed Gawker, newsrooms across the country are still grappling with that question.


Los Angeles Times
3 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
David Geffen accused of abusing ex in suit alleging paid sex and superyacht drug parties
David Geffen has been sued by his estranged husband, Donovan Michaels, who says that the billionaire film producer preyed on his vulnerabilities as a young gay Black man from the foster system and trapped him in a manipulative and abusive relationship. Geffen, 82, and Michaels, 32, met in 2016 on a dating site where affluent individuals often seek relations with younger singles in return for some form of compensation, according to the complaint. On the night they met, the media mogul allegedly paid Michaels $10,000 to have sex with him. The pair continued their relationship and married in 2023, minus a prenup, according to the complaint. In May of this year, Geffen filed for divorce. Now Michaels, whose legal name is David Armstrong, is suing Geffen for breach of contract, saying that the billionaire promised to take care of him financially but left him near broke and homeless. The lawsuit compares their relationship to the plot of the movie 'Trading Places,' saying Geffen used Michaels as a trophy to show off to his rich and famous friends. 'It was a sick game,' the complaint states. 'Michaels became a prop in Geffen's theater of virtue, paraded around as evidence of Geffen's supposed altruism, while privately used as a sexual commodity.' Geffen's attorney Patty Glaser pushed back on Michaels' allegations. 'There was no contract — express, written, oral, or implied — that has ever existed,' she said in a statement to The Times. 'We will be vigorously and righteously defending against this false, pathetic lawsuit.' The 33-page complaint is packed with explosive claims about the exploits of the richest man in the entertainment industry. Geffen has an estimated net worth of $8.8 billion, according to Forbes. He amassed his wealth as a music and movie producer, signing major artists including the Eagles and Joni Mitchell and co-founding Dreamworks Pictures, which has produced iconic movies such as 'Saving Private Ryan' and 'Shrek.' Michaels entered the Michigan foster-care system at 18 months old and grew up in various foster and group homes where he regularly experienced physical and emotional abuse, according to the complaint. He moved to Florida at 19 and relied on exotic dancing and X-rated videos to get by financially. The lawsuit claims that Geffen expected Michaels to use drugs such as cocaine and molly alongside Geffen's friends on the billionaire's 450-foot superyacht the Rising Sun. The complaint alleges that Geffen enjoyed physically dominating his sexual partners and causing them pain. This type of sexual behavior triggered Michaels' childhood trauma and caused him digestive issues, headaches and the need to isolate, according to the complaint. The suit further alleges that the billionaire 'critiqued every aspect of Michaels' appearance,' and that the mere existence of an ingrown hair would raise Geffen's ire. The media mogul allegedly told Michaels 'where to go, what to wear, what to read, what to watch, and what to say' and required him to submit to extensive painful cosmetic treatments. In addition, Geffen allegedly prevented Michaels from continuing to pursue his modeling career, saying he needed to be constantly available. Michaels says he began reevaluating his life and relationship after entering addiction treatment earlier this year. He then approached his husband and said he 'wanted a new beginning wherein he could stand shoulder to shoulder with Geffen as an equal free from power dynamics that existed.' According to the complaint, Geffen then cut Michaels off, demanded a divorce and denied Michaels financial support 'commensurate with his lifestyle' and his share of assets acquired during their cohabitation. While the media mogul was attending fellow billionaire Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez's wedding in Italy last month, he ordered Michaels to vacate his New York residence, the complaint alleges. Michaels is seeking compensatory damages and a judicial determination of his rights under an alleged oral agreement made with Geffen. His attorneys argue that this should entitle him to having his living expenses covered for the rest of his life and an equal division of all properties subject to the agreement. 'While Geffen holds himself out to the public as an extraordinarily charitable man whose foundation gives millions and millions of dollars to advocacy and support groups for the homeless and disadvantaged populations,' the complaint states, 'he is simultaneously endeavoring to render Michaels impoverished and homeless.'