logo
Depressed people who are terminally ill could be eligible for assisted dying

Depressed people who are terminally ill could be eligible for assisted dying

Yahoo11-02-2025
Depressed people who are terminally ill could get medical help to end their lives after MPs rejected proposals to tighten legislation on assisted dying.
On Tuesday, MPs scrutinising Kim Leadbeater's private members' Bill voted down amendments designed to stop people taking life-ending decisions if their judgment is impaired by mental disorder.
The Labour MP for Spen Valley had proposed changing the law so that mentally competent, terminally ill adults with six months to live were able to receive an assisted death.
However, her draft legislation – The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill – relies on a definition of mental competence in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 regarded as 'not sufficient' for such a profound decision by the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCP).
It comes after Ms Leadbeater was accused of 'watering down' assisted dying protections after proposing to scrap the requirement for a High Court judge to approve each assisted death – a safeguard critical to securing support at the Bill's second reading, when MPs voted 330 to 275 in favour.
Critics of the proposed change have claimed that it represents a 'slippage' in the safeguards, and has thrown the future of the Bill into doubt.
One MP who previously backed the Bill said that they would need further reassurance that the panel system 'will amount to a strengthening of the safeguards, not a weakening'.
They said that while they were 'still minded to support the Bill', they wanted to be 'sure on the detail' and were concerned about the regulation and 'accountability' of the change.
Meanwhile, some supporters have said that they believe that the input from other professionals, such as social workers and psychiatrists, will make the safeguards even stronger.
The Bill passed the previous stage in the Commons with a majority of 51, and only needs 28 MPs to change their minds for it to collapse.
A group of 10 Labour MPs, who all voted against the Bill, issued a statement warning that the legislation had 'fundamentally changed' and that 'proponents of the Bill have changed their argument'.
The MPs, including Dame Meg Hillier, added: 'Each MP voted at second reading with a promise of High Court scrutiny of each application for assisted dying.
'Supporters of the Bill insisted that it was a key part of the protections for vulnerable and marginalised people'.
In written evidence at the Bill committee on Tuesday, the body representing psychiatrists pointed out that someone with cancer and depression 'may have clinical depression which is influencing their wish to die but be determined in accordance with the [Mental Capacity Act] as having capacity to decide to end their own life and therefore eligible for [assisted dying]'.
The RCP added: 'While they may be capacitous, they might feel differently at a future time if provided with appropriate interventions and support to treat a co-occurring mental disorder.'
To address these concerns, Sarah Olney, a Liberal Democrat MP, suggested replacing the word 'capacity' with 'ability' in the legislation, a move she said would help doctors to better gauge someone's eligibility for assisted death.
Ms Olney told MPs: 'If they are only partially able to [understand, retain and weigh information] they will still be considered to have capacity under the Mental Capacity Act. So it is not a safeguard to protect a terminally ill person who happens to be suicidal due to depression.'
However, on Tuesday afternoon, MPs on the bill committee voted 15 to 8 against the proposals, with both ministers on the committee – Stephen Kinnock and Sarah Sackman KC – opposing the amendments.
Ms Olney's amendments focused on preventing terminally ill patients with co-occurring mental illnesses, such as depression or personality disorders, from qualifying for assisted dying, out of concern that these conditions could affect their decision-making.
Some psychiatrists, researchers and MPs also worry that women with anorexia could qualify for an assisted death if their eating disorder, or the physical consequences of starvation, is considered to be a terminal illness.
The decision to reject Ms Olney's amendments was arrived at despite an appeal from Daniel Francis, a Labour MP, who told the committee that his experience caring for a child with a learning disability had taught him that doctors' understanding of mental capacity was not infallible.
He described a 'constant daily battle' with healthcare professionals who repeatedly assume his child 'has more capacity than she has or less capacity than she has'.
The MP for Bexleyheath and Crayford said doctors called 'all the time' asking to speak to his daughter, despite her medical notes clearly stating she is an 11-year-old girl who can speak only 12 words, who has a severe sight impairment and other complex conditions including cerebral palsy.
'Therefore I do query how well some aspects of the Mental Capacity Act are currently being carried out,' he said.
He added: 'I absolutely understand that somebody at the end of their life should have the autonomy and choice to make decisions, but if that comes at the price of one person where an [assisted dying] capacity decision is made on their behalf, then it is one death too many.'
On Monday night, Ms Leadbeater announced a plan to change the Bill, effectively replacing the judge's role in the legislation with an expert panel.
She argued it would be a 'change for the better' and would actually strengthen safeguards. However, opponents of the legislation have argued the opposite amid a growing backlash.
James Cleverly, the Tory former home secretary who voted against the Bill when it cleared its first major parliamentary hurdle in November, wrote on social media: 'The protections that were promised in the assisted dying Bill are being watered down even before this becomes law.
'This Bill is being rushed, it is not properly thought through, none of the concerns raised at second reading have been addressed.'
Other opponents also voiced concerns.
Diane Abbott, the veteran Labour MP who also voted against the Bill, wrote on social media: 'Safeguards on the assisted dying Bill are collapsing. Rushed, badly thought-out legislation. Needs to be voted down.'
Danny Kruger, a Tory MP and vocal opponent of the Bill, said MPs would have rejected the legislation in November if it had included Ms Leadbeater's new plan.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Faith leaders hope bill will stop the loss of thousands of clergy from abroad serving US communities
Faith leaders hope bill will stop the loss of thousands of clergy from abroad serving US communities

Washington Post

time10 hours ago

  • Washington Post

Faith leaders hope bill will stop the loss of thousands of clergy from abroad serving US communities

Faith leaders across the U.S. are hoping a bipartisan bill, recently introduced in the U.S. Senate and House, might finally bring resolution to an immigration issue that has been hindering their service to their communities for more than two years. In March 2023, the Biden administration made a sudden change in how the government processes green cards in the category that includes both abused minors and religious workers. It created new backlogs that threaten the ability of thousands of pastors, nuns, imams, cantors and others to remain in the United States.

Voices: We can't afford to let London's ‘golden postcodes' go to the wall
Voices: We can't afford to let London's ‘golden postcodes' go to the wall

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Voices: We can't afford to let London's ‘golden postcodes' go to the wall

The top end of London's property market usually eases into the year, but 2025 has got off to an unusually subdued start. The capital recorded just 34 sales of more than $10m during the first quarter of this year – about a third fewer than the same period in 2024, according to Knight Frank's latest Global Super-Prime Intelligence report. The slowdown stands in stark contrast to a global market that is gaining momentum. Worldwide, 527 super-prime properties changed hands in the first quarter, a six per cent year-on-year increase. By now, we all know what's behind the discrepancy. Labour's heavy-handed taxation of high earners has come at a time when there are more attractive alternatives than ever before. The Dubai lifestyle, light-touch tax in Italy, and the rising stock of true luxury homes in Paris and Madrid are all prompting high-net-worth individuals to hedge their bets on London. Meanwhile, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told the Financial Times that more than 70,000 people have applied for Donald Trump's new 'gold card' visa, which grants long-term residency to foreign investors willing to spend and stay in the US. It turns out that the small group of very wealthy individuals living in Britain are flightier than the Treasury expected, and the taxpayer will now have to foot the bill. The government has already lost more than £400m in stamp duty on sales above £5m – overwhelmingly in London's 'golden postcodes' such as SW1 and W1, including prime locations like Mayfair, Chelsea, St John's Wood and South Kensington – since the first non-dom reforms were announced by the previous government, according to analysis by Knight Frank UK research head Tom Bill. The real cost is likely to be much, much higher. Even the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is coming around to that idea. A combination of reforms to the non-dom regime, first introduced under Jeremy Hunt in March 2024 and then expanded by Labour in October, were expected to raise £13.1bn from 10,000 individuals by 2027/28. Capital gains tax reforms were supposed to deliver another £2.5bn by the end of the decade. However, the behavioural assumptions underpinning those numbers haven't held. 'Higher earners' behavioural responses to tax changes are more uncertain and potentially higher than assumed,' the OBR conceded on July 8. 'A growing reliance on this small and mobile group of taxpayers therefore represents a fiscal risk.' The OBR isn't the first to issue that warning – yet, it's not clear whether the penny has dropped for those in Downing Street. Despite rumblings that Chancellor Rachel Reeves was considering reversing parts of her non-dom crackdown to stem departures of high net worth individuals, nothing has materialised so far. Former Labour leader Neil Kinnock also recently called for a two per cent wealth tax on assets above £10m, which may not have been endorsed, but it wasn't ruled out either. Even this kind of speculation is damaging – confidence is fragile, and the message from policymakers matters. Successive governments have treated high-net worth individuals as a dependable source of revenue, but trust has now been eroded. It will take years of predictable, measured policymaking to rebuild it. The silver lining is that many of the highest earners appear to be holding onto their London homes while they weigh up their options. Bill's analysis showed that the number of new sales instructions in the first six months of the year in prime central London (PCL) was 32 per cent higher than the five-year average (excluding 2020). Above £5m, there was an equivalent increase of 14 per cent and above £2m, there was a rise of 22 per cent. In other words, property listings in the first half of 2025 were skewed towards the lower price brackets. Crucially, lenders are playing their part – banks are working on very tight margins and taking a proactive approach to help borrowers reach decisions that work for them. London remains one of the world's most desirable cities, but desirability isn't destiny. The government can't afford to keep learning the same lesson: that you cannot bank on a mobile, globally-minded minority to fund massive imbalances in taxing and spending. What happens next will depend not just on rates and rules, but on tone. The sooner the government steadies the narrative, the faster London can reassert its position as Europe's foremost hub for private wealth. Simon Gammon is a managing partner at Knight Frank Finance

MP explains call for UK to recognise Palestine
MP explains call for UK to recognise Palestine

Yahoo

time15 hours ago

  • Yahoo

MP explains call for UK to recognise Palestine

A Labour MP who signed a cross-party letter demanding the government recognise Palestine as a state, has said the situation in Gaza is an "atrocity" which "cannot be allowed to continue". Julia Buckley, MP for Shrewsbury, is among some 220 MPs from nine political parties to have backed the call. "We are witnessing deliberate blockades, targeted destruction of food supplies, and the starvation of civilians; acts that shock the conscience and demand urgent and significant accountability," she said. In a statement, Sir Keir Starmer said recognising Palestinian statehood would have to be part of a "wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution". The letter has been signed by 131 Labour MPs, including senior figures like former minister Liam Byrne and committee chair Ruth Cadbury. While recognition alone would not end the suffering in Gaza, "British recognition of Palestine would be particularly powerful" given its history in the region, the MPs say. It comes after the UK and 27 other countries condemned the "drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians" seeking food and water in Gaza. Israel, which controls the entry of all supplies into the Palestinian territory, has repeatedly said that there is no siege and blames Hamas for cases of malnutrition. Buckley became Shrewsbury's first female MP, when she won the seat for Labour in the 2024 general election. She posted on her Facebook site that she regularly responds directly to constituents who had contacted her about the issue. But she added: "I believe it is important, as with any matter of such gravity, that all residents are aware of where I stand as an elected representative." She said the letter aimed to "remind the Prime Minister of the previous parliament's overwhelming support" for recognising Palestine. The MP also said "the UK will be under international scrutiny to update its position" at a UN conference on Monday. In his statement, Sir Keir said: "Alongside our closest allies, I am working on a pathway to peace in the region, focused on the practical solutions that will make a real difference to the lives of those that are suffering in this war. "That pathway will set out the concrete steps needed to turn the ceasefire so desperately needed, into a lasting peace. On Friday, Sir Keir said the government would "pull every lever" to get food and life saving support to Palestinians, and evacuate children "who need urgent medical assistance". Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram. More on this story 220 MPs call for Starmer to recognise Palestinian state MP's town centre office targeted by vandals Labour in historic win with town's first female MP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store