Passing police detention powers to NHS staff ‘could cause significant harm'
In March, the Government suffered several defeats in the Lords as peers debated ways to modernise mental health legislation.
Conservative shadow health minister Lord Kamall proposed a change to the Mental Health Bill so that nurses, doctors and other staff could carry out detentions of patients without the need for police officers to attend incidents.
Health minister Baroness Merron told the Lords the Government did not support 'extending police powers in this way' but peers backed the Conservative proposal, resulting in changes to the draft new law.
The changes mean powers previously reserved only for police could be transferred to health or other professionals to detain and restrain people in crisis, in public spaces or at home.
It comes after concerns have repeatedly been raised by police leaders about the pressures mental health issues are placing on policing.
Launching a joint statement, major health organisations have expressed 'grave concerns' and argue the 'police play a crucial role in carrying out many tasks that medical practitioners cannot perform, such as assessing whether a home is safe to enter'.
They said 'reducing police involvement in mental health emergencies could lead to serious risks for both patients and clinicians.'
The joint statement said wording accompanying the amendment 'states that 'the proposed amendments would remove the need for the presence of police at mental health incidents in the absence of any risk.'
'This is misleading as instances of detentions under the Mental Health Act where there is no risk are almost non-existent.
'It also negates the fact that the mere presence of uniformed officers can ensure that an otherwise risky situation remains contained and safe.'
Transferring police powers to health professionals also risks damaging their 'therapeutic relationships' with patients, the signatories said.
This has the 'double-effect' of hindering the ability to provide care, while also deterring people from seeking help from services where they might be forcibly detained, they added.
The organisations said the changes 'have not been tested' with health professionals or discussed with patients.
Their statement said: 'We are keen to work with police and Government to find ways to improve responses to mental health crises to ensure the safety of all professionals involved, patients and the community.'
Dr Lade Smith, president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, said delegating police powers to health professionals 'would not be within the spirit' of the proposed reforms to the Mental Health Act.
She added: 'It is well known that at times, people experiencing a mental health crisis cannot be safely reached and cared for without the assistance of the police.
'Delegating police powers without proper consultation or planning is likely to disproportionately affect those from minoritised backgrounds and would increase risk to patients and compromise the safety of others. It sets a dangerous precedent.
'Like mental health services, the police are facing significant workload pressures.
'It is simply logical and now vital that we work together to develop more effective ways of responding to mental health crises.'
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Extending police powers to other professionals would represent a major shift in the roles, responsibilities and practice for health and care staff and would place additional resource on an already stretched NHS at a time where we are trying to rebuild a health service fit for the future.
'It also raises questions around whether it is right for the health and social care professionals to have powers to use reasonable force which could have implications for patient, public and staff safety, as well as potentially damaging the relationships clinicians have with patients.
'We are grateful to health and social care stakeholders for their in-depth engagement on this complex issue.'
Signatories to the joint statement are:
– Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE)– Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS)– Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP) Leads Network– British Association of Social Workers (BASW)– British Medical Association (BMA)– College of Paramedics– Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM)– Royal College of Nursing (RCN)– Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mail
Tory councillor's wife jailed for Southport riots tweet is set to be freed within weeks, close friend says
The wife of a Conservative councillor who was sentenced to two years in jail over a 'racist' tweet will be freed next month, a close friend has said. Lucy Connolly was imprisoned at HMP Drake Hall, Staffordshire after she pleaded guilty to a charge of inciting racial hatred following last summer's Southport riots. But now a friend of the mother and former childminder has shared a post to X saying Connolly will be 'with a glass of Whispering Angel in-hand' this time next month. The pal, who describes herself as a '"conspiracy" blonde', said: 'Missed a call whilst working today and not spoke to her for 2 weeks now... *HOWEVER* Happy to say that this time next month Lucy will be with a glass of Whispering Angel in-hand - And more importantly her family AT HOME.' She concluded the post with, 'What a year it's been...' Connolly was given a 31-month sentence in October after admitting to making her 'racist' post on X, formerly known as Twitter. The post, which she later deleted, said: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care... if that makes me racist so be it.' News of Connolly's scheduled release comes just two months after she lost an appeal to shorten her 31-month sentence. The post, which she later deleted, said: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care... if that makes me racist so be it' Connolly had told the Court of Appeal in London she 'never' intended to incite violence and did not realise pleading guilty would mean she accepted she had. But her argument was rejected. A number of public figures and politicians have spoken out since Connolly was handed her sentence claiming she is a victim of 'two-tier justice'. Connolly's husband, Raymond, a former West Northamptonshire Conservative councillor, said on the day she lost her appeal: 'Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood says she will release 40,000 prisoners, some of them dangerous men on tag. 'Lucy has not been allowed out on tag and she has been denied leave to see our child who is struggling. 'Today, the court had the opportunity to reduce her cruelly long and disproportionate sentence, but they refused. That feels like two-tier justice. 'The British people know all this is not right. They have given an amazing £81,000 so far to Lucy's crowd-funder. Despite today's upsetting setback, Lucy gets courage from everyone's kind support.' Mr Connolly had been a Tory West Northamptonshire district councillor but lost his seat in May. He remains on the town council. Lucy Connolly, of Northampton, was arrested on August 6, by which point she had deleted her social media account. But other messages which included other condemning remarks were uncovered by officers who seized her phone. Her X post was made just hours after killer Axel Rudakubana murdered three young girls and attempted to murder 10 others at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class on July 29, sparking nationwide unrest. The former childminder was sentenced at Birmingham Crown Court in October after pleading guilty to a charge of inciting racial hatred. The Southport atrocity sparked nationwide unrest, with several people - including Connolly - jailed as a result. Her tweet was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before she deleted it. She later pleaded guilty to distributing material with the intention of stirring up racial hatred at Birmingham Crown Court and was sentenced to 31 months in prison in October. But she told the Court of Appeal in May that she had no idea the full extent of what she was admitting, and that her solicitor Liam Muir had not properly explained what 'inciting violence' meant in the context of her tweet. It was only when the judge was speaking at her sentencing hearing that it fully dawned on her, she said when applying to have her prison term reduced. The case sparked international interest with the White House saying in May it was 'monitoring' Connolly's case. It came as US officials said they had 'concerns' about free speech in Britain. The Ministry of Justice has been contacted for comment.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Hedge fund boss Ray Dalio warns Britain trapped in 'debt doom loop'
Britain is caught in a 'debt doom loop', the boss of one of the world's biggest hedge funds has warned. US billionaire Ray Dalio (pictured), who founded Bridgewater Associates, said that the warning signs were 'beginning to flash and flicker' amid higher taxes, rising debts and sluggish growth. But he said the Government's efforts to raise funds by hiking taxes would drive away wealthy taxpayers – leading to a downward spiral for the economy. It comes as Rachel Reeves prepares to further increase levies and slash spending in October to avoid breaking her fiscal rules. Analysts have warned that the Chancellor is facing a black hole of up to £30billion in the Autumn Budget. 'As the financial problems and the social problems worsen, having the effect of causing people with money to leave. That's a problem because – I don't know the exact numbers in the UK, but they're analogous to the US – 75 per cent of income taxes are paid by the top 10 per cent. So if you lose 5 per cent of the population in that category, half of those people, you lose 35 per cent or more of the tax revenue.' He added: 'So you have this financial deterioration, that precedes social and economic deterioration that has caused migrations all around the world and so on. And there is only one way to deal with that. Both of our countries need a strong leadership of a strong middle. They have to have the war between those of the left and those of the right begin to end because difficult choices are going to have to be made, you know, like our countries had in World War II.' It comes after the International Monetary Fund (IMF) last week cautioned that Ms Reeves faces having to take drastic action on spending unless she abandons her pledge not to hike taxes on working people. Mr Dalio's comments echoed a warning from the head of the UK spending watchdog who earlier this month said there were 'reasons to worry' about surging debt, but cautioned against 'higher and higher taxes'. Richard Hughes, chairman of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), told MPs that successive chancellors had been willing to see the debt pile 'ratcheted up and up over time'.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Banned Octopus advert falsely tells customers they can buy a £500 heat pump
Octopus Energy has been ordered to take down an advert claiming it could install heat pumps for as little as £500 after the watchdog ruled it was misleading. The online advert boasted that households could heat their homes without gas by switching to a heat pump 'from as little as £500'. But the Advertising Standards Agency watchdog said the advert 'was likely to mislead' because it omitted 'material information' and did not provide enough evidence that a typical consumer could have a heat pump installed by the company for £500. Octopus Energy has been a key player in the Government's drive to reach net zero, which has involved pushing households to switch from gas boilers to heat pumps, even after Labour quietly ditched the Conservatives' target to have 600,000 fitted each year. The company, led by chief executive Greg Jackson, sells its own brand of heat pumps and runs a research and development facility in Slough to make them cheaper and easier to install. However, the EUA said claims that a heat pump could be installed for as little as £500 were exaggerated. It added that the campaign neglected to highlight eligibility criteria for the Government's Boiler Upgrade Scheme, which offers grants of up to £7,500 to households fitting a heat pump. The ASA upheld both complaints – finding that in September, when the advert was running, only 6pc of heat pump sales had been made at or below the price claimed in the ad. Though the figure had risen to 24pc by December, the ASA concluded the price 'did not reflect what a significant proportion of consumers were likely to pay at the time the advert appeared'. The standards body also criticised the advert for not stating that government funding was subject to eligibility criteria, or that the £500 figure included the Boiler Upgrade Scheme grant. Octopus Energy denied that the advert was misleading, and claimed to have used a predictive model based on energy performance certificates to underpin the claim made in the advert. The company accused the 'fossil fuel lobby' of pressuring the standards body to 'undermine the clean energy sector'. However, Mike Foster, of the EUA trade body, said it was counterproductive for energy companies 'to make misleading claims because it is part of a wider green agenda'. He added: 'Consumers should not be misled into buying a product or choosing a supplier, and this is especially relevant with new technologies or ones that they are not familiar with, such as heat pumps. 'It doesn't matter how big a company you are – the rules apply to everyone. Indeed, larger companies should be taking the lead in behaving properly.' An ASA spokesman said: 'Rulings like this one provide clarity for advertisers on how to promote new, greener technologies such as heat pumps in a way that treats people fairly and in terms that they will understand. 'This forms part of a wider cross-sector project that aims to shine a regulatory spotlight on green claims so that there is a level playing field for business.' Rebecca Dibb-Simkin, of Octopus Energy, said: 'We disagree with this ruling – 13pc of all heat pumps sold by Octopus during the campaign were £500 or less, exceeding the ASA's guideline of 10pc. 'This clearly has the fossil fuel lobby worried, which is why they are relentlessly pressuring the authorities to undermine the clean energy sector.'
