
Reconsider Gaza family case, court tells Foreign Office
The case sparked headlines in February when it became the centre of a misunderstood row at Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs).Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer clashed over mistaken and muddled claims that the family had exploited a scheme for Ukrainian refugees.But their case was in fact dealt with on its own merits and not under the rules for resettling Ukrainians.
The father, known only as "BEL", and his two young adult children had been fired at by Israeli forces at an aid distribution point.Their link to the UK is through the father's brother, referred to in court as "BSJ". He legally settled in the UK after Hamas came to power in Gaza in 2007 and became a British citizen.The court heard that Hamas had so discriminated against the family, who had worked for its political opponents, that it had killed a relative.After the October 2023 war began, BSJ began asking if his brother and his family could come to the UK.The Home Office granted the family permission to come to the UK in January this year, telling them they must first pass biometric checks at the British consulate in Jordan.However, the Foreign Office has refused to ask Israel to let the family leave Gaza because it only does so in exceptional cases involving couples or a parent and child separated by the war.Ruling against the government, Mr Justice Chamberlain said while the law did not require the government to assist the family to reach the UK, the foreign secretary should look again, considering the legally exceptional nature of the situation.Liz Barratt, the family's lawyer, said: "We hope that the Foreign Office will consider the judgment carefully and act quickly to reconsider their approach to this case and the policy more widely so that our clients and others in a similar position can be assisted to leave Gaza."
Back in February, the family's case became a political row when Badenoch said during PMQs that it had been "completely wrong" for a judge to grant Palestinians the right to live in the UK after they originally applied through a scheme designed for Ukrainians.Starmer fired back that the government would close the loophole. "It should be Parliament that makes the rules on immigration," he said at the time. But the publicly-available appeal judgment shows the family were not given permission to arrive under the scheme for Ukrainian refugees.While they had initially used that immigration form, in error, they won their case under general human rights considerations which allow families from all backgrounds to make an exceptional request for help.The Lady Chief Justice, Dame Sue Carr, later said the way both leaders had presented the case in Parliament had been "unacceptable", given their duty to respect the role of judges in upholding the law.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump sends envoy to Gaza to assess ‘dire humanitarian situation'
Donald Trump is sending his Middle East envoy into Gaza to observe the 'dire situation on the ground'. Steve Witkoff, the US special envoy to the Middle East, and Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, met Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel on Thursday. On Friday, they will be given rare access to Gaza, Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, announced. 'Tomorrow, special envoy Witkoff and ambassador Huckabee will be travelling into Gaza to inspect the current distribution sites and secure a plan to deliver more food and meet with local Gazans to hear first-hand about this dire situation on the ground,' Ms Leavitt told a briefing on Thursday. The men will brief the president immediately after the visit 'to approve a final plan for food and aid distribution into the region,' she said. Photographs of emaciated children in the war-torn territory are beginning to turn the tide of public opinion against Israel's military campaign against Hamas. Aid agencies are warning that hunger and malnutrition may already have reached a tipping point after two and half years of war, raising fears of mass starvation. Mr Trump said he had seen the pictures coming out of Gaza. 'Everybody, unless they are pretty cold hearted or worse than that nuts... there's nothing you can say other than it's terrible when you see the kids,' he said aboard Air Force One on Tuesday. Sections of Mr Trump's Maga base are growing increasingly hawkish on Israel with Marjorie Taylor Greene, a fierce Trump loyalist, this week accusing Israel of 'genocide'. The Gaza health ministry, run by Hamas, has recorded 156 deaths from starvation, including at least 90 children, mostly during recent weeks. The United Nations says Israeli forces have killed more than 1,000 Palestinians trying to reach aid stations since late May, when the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation took over responsibility for delivering aid. The deepening crisis has prompted a string of Washington's allies to signal they will recognise the state of Palestine. Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, announced this week he would take that step in September if Israel did not declare a ceasefire in Gaza, help to ease the humanitarian emergency, and commit to a long-term peace process with the 'two-state solution' as its goal. A day later, Canada said it planned to recognise the state of Palestine at a meeting of the United Nations in September, further loading pressure on Israel. Mr Trump and his administration has warned that it risks rewarding Hamas, which sparked the conflict with its October 7 attack on Israel in 2023. Since then, the Israeli offensive has flattened the enclave and killed more than 60,000 people, mostly civilians, according to Gaza health officials. On Thursday, Washington announced visa bans on officials with the Palestinian Authority (PA) and members of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO). 'It is in our national security interests to impose consequences and hold the PLO and PA accountable for not complying with their commitments and undermining the prospects for peace,' the State Department said. It accused the ground of supporting terrorism 'including incitement and glorification of violence,' and of 'providing payments and benefits in support of terrorism to Palestinian terrorists and their families'. Gideon Saar, the Israeli foreign minister, welcomed the US sanctions. They displayed 'moral clarity,' he said.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Donald Trump must put himself at the forefront of peace-building
Nobody expects consistency from Donald Trump, nor the Trump administration, dominated as it is by capricious personalities, but America's latest diplomatic moves in Middle Eastern policy are especially bewildering. The Palestinian Authority (PA) has latterly become a target for US sanctions, for which it is hardly the most deserving of candidates. It is not Hamas, for example – far from it, in fact: the terrorist organisation is a bitter rival, having effectively ceded Gaza from PA control many years ago. In contrast to so many other entities in the region, it has renounced violence and has even recognised the state of Israel. And yet Marco Rubio, secretary of state, has imposed new visa restrictions on PA officials, such that they cannot visit the US, which would include, ironically, peace conferences such as the one currently organised by the United Nations and being held in New York. Can the Trump administration be so resentful about the unexpected success of the conference that it could be so spiteful? It seems so – but it is counterproductive and unhelpful to the peace process. The conference, boycotted by Israel and the United States, is the result of a joint French and Saudi Arabian initiative, and has enjoyed great success in further securing international recognition for the state of Palestine while demanding Hamas disarm and give up its grip on Gaza. Virtually the entire Arab world has endorsed that concept of Palestinian nationhood, without Hamas – as has, in effect, the UK. Yet despite President Trump giving the green light to the British and French to recognise Palestine, and never having raised any retrospective objections to some 140 other nations that have previously done so, including India and China, he has thrown a tantrum. The latest country to recognise Palestinian statehood is Canada. This has provoked an unusually harsh reaction from Mr Trump, who once again is threatening Canada with a trade war in retaliation, itself an attack on Canadian sovereignty. Then again, given that President Trump doesn't recognise the legitimacy of the state of Canada itself, that is not so surprising. By contrast, he has shown no such vengeance – yet – towards Britain or France, nor Saudi Arabia or the rest of the Arab League. Or Mexico, for that matter, which is also joining the diplomatic wave. The world has had to act now, not because it wishes to reward Hamas for the atrocities it committed on 7 October 2023, but to try to preserve life in Gaza and advance the cause of a two-state solution to the conflict. At its simplest, the act of recognising Palestine is a way of pressuring Israel into declaring a ceasefire, ending the military actions, and preventing the famine from worsening. It is not about putting Hamas back into power; any viable two-state solution by definition cannot allow Hamas, or any Hamas-like organisation, to have a role in the governance of any part of the state of Palestine. That is why it is in the interests of Israel and America to support the creation of such an entity. An independent Palestine, by its own actions and with international guarantees, cannot be allowed to exist as a threat to Israel; nor, however, can Israel follow policies that force the Palestinian people to suffer and drive them from their homeland, as defined as the occupied territories. 'From the river to the sea' cannot be the slogan of either side if peace, stability and prosperity are to prevail. With a sustainable Israeli ceasefire, the hostages are far more likely to be released. Not so very long ago, that was the avowed and consistent aim of US policy under successive administrations. It was also, from time to time, the policy of Israeli prime ministers. There were successes – international treaties, peace accords, smaller deals and, in President Trump's first term, the Abraham accords, which saw more regional players normalising full diplomatic relations with Israel. That process was interrupted by the murderous attacks and hostage taking of 7 October, but it must be resumed, as another part of the peace process. Like presidents before him, Mr Trump could and should be at the forefront of peace-building. Indeed, he can hardly avoid it, given the geopolitics, and he ran for office on a pledge that he would end the war in Gaza. He has sent another envoy, Steve Witkoff, to see the situation on the ground, and Mr Witkoff should confirm the dire humanitarian situation. That is but the first step in a process that takes in a permanent ceasefire, the establishment of Hamas-free governance in Gaza, a plan to rebuild Gaza – with American investment along the lines of Mr Trump's Mediterranean resort plan – and the aim of a Palestinian nation peacefully co-existing with its neighbour, with both peoples free from fear and secure in their respective homelands. The expulsion of the population of Gaza, a continuation of the war and a return to terrorism isn't good for anyone, and certainly not the people of Israel, who yearn for permanent safety and security for themselves and their families, and no future '7 Octobers'. That vision is surely something that President Trump could get behind – preferably with a dogged determination and consistency.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
States of Alderney backs Guernsey Gaza statement
The States of Alderney has said it endorses a compassionate message from the government of Guernsey in highlighting the humanitarian situation in the letter, Deputy Lindsay de Sausmarez said members were "profoundly concerned by the deaths and suffering of innocent civilians in Gaza".Alderney's States said it endorsed "the compassionate message from the government of Guernsey in highlighting the humanitarian situation in Gaza alongside the numerous other humanitarian crises in the world, and the commitment to upholding the principles of international law".Israel, which controls the entry of all supplies into Gaza, has blamed Hamas for any cases of malnutrition. The Guernsey letter was signed by 17 deputies pressuring de Sausmarez to write to UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. De Sausmarez said: "Members are deeply moved by the plight of people of all ages who are caught up in any conflict."The members hope that the global community soon finds and implements effective ways to protect civilians, alleviate human suffering and secure lasting peace."