Democrats are labeled as ‘woke' in new poll
A new poll by the Democratic super PAC Unite the Country reveals voters perceive the party as 'out of touch,' 'weak,' and 'woke.'
Critics, including Senator Bernie Sanders, argue Democrats have alienated working-class voters by prioritizing social issues over economic concerns.
This negative perception is not new, with previous reports also highlighting voter concerns about the party's focus on diversity and elite groups.
The party's ability to address these perceptions will be crucial for their performance in the 2026 midterm elections, where control of the Senate is at stake.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Democrats laugh off Trump attempts to blame them for Epstein fallout
Donald Trump 's political rivals seemed unshaken by his attempts to pin blame on them for the fallout over his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation this weekend. As the president and his allies leveled allegations about the Biden Justice Department supposedly tampering with evidence to link Trump to the convicted pedophile, Democrats remained fixed on calling for the full release of the Justice Department's cache of evidence and investigation. Even as news broke this past week that Trump had instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to release grand jury testimony from the investigations into Epstein and his mistress, those same Democrats called the move an attempt to cover up the president's involvement, given that it constituted less than full transparency. On Sunday, Sen. Amy Klobuchar laughed off a suggestion made by Trump on Wednesday in an interview with a MAGA-supporting channel, Real America's Voice: 'I can imagine what they put into files, just like they did with the others.' 'The president blaming Democrats for this disaster, Jake, is like that CEO that got caught on camera blaming Coldplay, okay?' Klobuchar joked to CNN's Jake Tapper on State of the Union, referencing a now-viral clip that made the rounds last week. 'This is a problem of his own making.' Eric Swalwell, a congressman from California, also discussed the president's response and call for the release of the Epstein grand jury testimony. 'If you're Donald Trump and you have Elon Musk saying you're in the files, and Mick Mulvaney, your former chief of staff, saying you're in the files, and Michael Wolff, your biographer saying that you're not just in the files but that there's some pretty disturbing things you did with underaged girls, wouldn't you want to clear your name?' he asked during an appearance Saturday evening. 'I think that's why his supporters are scratching their heads,' Swalwell continued, adding that the president was 'willing to throw his supporters overboard to keep these files buried.' Numerous other Democrats across the ideological spectrum joined in on the calls for the files' release this past week, bridging across the party's ideological spectrum and revealing a generational divide more than a policy gap. Senior Democrats, like Nancy Pelosi, have referred to the controversy as a 'distraction'. But younger Democrats roll their eyes at the notion of letting Republicans off easy on the first issue that has truly divided the MAGA base in years. 'This is Donald Trump's effort…to gaslight you into thinking they're turning over the Epstein files, when in reality, they're turning over nothing that is relevant to what everybody deserves to know,' Congressman Dan Goldman said on Friday. 'The grand jury testimony of course will only relate to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell — the two people who were charged in the case.' The Justice Department moved this past week to unseal grand jury transcripts from the prosecutions of Jeffrey Epstein and his girlfriend/accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell. Epstein died in federal custody in 2019 while Maxwell remains in prison. Any transcripts released from those grand jury proceedings would relate solely to Maxwell and Epstein themselves, and would not likely contain any mention of Trump or other powerful men known to have cultivated relationships with the billionaire financier who was set to face trial for sex trafficking underage girls when he died. The motions were filed in court a day after the Epstein story again blew up with a bombshell story from Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal. The Journal published the text of a note that was allegedly penned by Trump to Epstein as part of a 50th birthday card. The note itself was framed with the silhouette of a naked woman, Trump's signature in place of pubic hair; the contents alluding to a 'secret' that Trump wrote the two men shared. Trump has fiercely denied the authenticity of all parts of the Journal 's reporting, from the drawing to the contents of the note.
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Japan ruling party's election loss is in the price, investors say
SINGAPORE, July 21 (Reuters) - Japan's upper house election on Sunday dealt a big blow to the ruling coalition and sets markets up for possible policy paralysis and a bigger fiscal deficit, much of which is already priced in, analysts said. Exit polls after Sunday's election showed the ruling coalition led by Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is likely to lose control of the upper house, thus making it a minority in both chambers of the government. Japanese markets are closed on Monday for a holiday, so the yen may be where investors get their first inkling of any disruption from the election outcome. The Japanese currency has already weakened considerably this year on expectations of changes to taxes and a bigger fiscal deficit. The election result, while not entirely a shock to markets, also comes at a tricky time for a country trying to get a tariff deal with U.S. President Donald Trump before an Aug. 1 deadline. Japanese government bonds (JGBs) plunged last week, sending yields on 30-year debt to an all-time high, while the yen slid to multi-month lows against the U.S. dollar and the euro. "I will not chase the coalition loss trades, and I suspect participants will spend some time analyzing the implications of the loss, which could take time to materialize, and also refocus attention to the trade negotiations which is another major macro risk for Japan," said Rong Ren Goh, a portfolio manager in the fixed income team at Eastspring Investments. Investors expect it will be a while before it becomes clear whether the ruling coalition intends to continue as a minority government, or draw in a new partner. Among the most likely candidates is the Democratic Party for the People (DPP), which has urged the Bank of Japan to reverse course and again loosen monetary policy. Investors are bracing for the LDP to compromise heavily to accommodate opposition parties' desire for tax cuts. Ishiba's fate also remains an unknown, although he said on Sunday he intends to stay in his position. Within the LDP, a leading candidate to replace Ishiba, should he step down, is Abenomics proponent Sanae Takaichi, who has advocated for a resumption of monetary easing by the BOJ. All three leading opposition parties back some form of consumption tax cuts, with the populist, right-wing Sanseito proposing a phase-out of VAT altogether. Those cuts would have to be paid for with increased Japanese government bond issuance. With debt about 2-1/2 times GDP, Japan is already the world's most indebted major country. "Preliminary tallies indicate that the Liberal Democratic Party–Komeito coalition will retain office only as a minority government," Shoki Omori, chief desk strategist at Mizuho Securities in Japan, said in a note. Omori also does not expect the LDP to force a leadership change, particularly while trade talks with the U.S. government are ongoing. "Against that political backdrop, prospects for an aggressive fiscal stimulus are limited....A meaningful supplementary budget, if one emerges, would not be debated until the autumn Diet session at the earliest," he wrote. If Ishiba resigns, the political uncertainty could be a trigger for foreign investors to sell Japanese shares and the yen, analysts said. Barclays analysts estimate a five percentage point cut to Japan's sales tax, currently at 10%, would lead to a 15-20 basis point increase in the 30-year yield. Japanese government 30-year yields are up 80 basis points (bps) this year and the yield curve is at its steepest in years, with the spread between 10-year and 30-year bonds above 150 bps. The yen has had a volatile first half of 2025 in a range of 140-160 per dollar. It rallied hard after the Bank of Japan's rate rise in January stoked expectations for a faster pace of monetary tightening, but has dithered since late April on political uncertainty, fractious tariff negotiations with the Donald Trump administration and the BOJ's dovishness. Long speculative positions in the yen are however still very large, making it likely that the currency will fall rapidly if Japan calls for a snap election or fiscal policy is loosened. The Nikkei 225 benchmark (.N225), opens new tab, by contrast, is up more than 11% since April 2, when Trump unveiled his global tariffs.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump demands NFL's Washington Commanders change name back to Redskins 'immediately'
Donald Trump is tackling the biggest issue in Washington: The local NFL team's 2020 decision to drop 'Redskins' in favor of a more politically correct nickname. Known as the Commanders since 2022, Washington's football team dropped the controversial moniker fiver years ago amid uproar over the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police. 'The Washington "Whatever's" should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team,' Trump wrote on social media before a scheduled round of golf at Trump National Golf Club in Washington D.C. 'There is a big clamoring for this.' Daily Mail has reached out to Commanders spokespeople for comment. While Trump may be slightly off about the team name (they were the 'Washington Redskins' and then the 'Washington Football Team' but never the 'Washington Redskins Football Team'), he is right about uproar over the changes. Fans and even some Native American groups have voiced support for the team's new ownership group to revert to 'Redskins.' Several public opinion polls of self-identified Native Americans have found most were not offended by the term, while critics have pointed to academic research by the University of Michigan and UC Berkeley that found the opposite was true. Trump appeared to reference the public polling in favor of a name change on Sunday. Trump is slightly off about the team names. They were the 'Washington Redskins' and then the 'Washington Football Team' but never the 'Washington Redskins Football Team' 'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,' he claimed. 'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' A year ago, the family of the man depicted in the former Redskins logo urged the team to bring his image back to the helmet. 'The fans want him back and we want him back,' Thomas White Calf, a great nephew of late Blackfeet Nation chief John Two Guns White Calf, told Fox News after meeting with Senator Steve Daines (Republican, Montana ). Thomas' pleas came four years after the team began its rebranding, first becoming the Washington Football Team on a temporary basis before adopting 'Commanders' and dropping the feathered John Two Guns White Calf emblem. 'Our ancestor was the most famous and most photographed native in history,' Thomas told Fox alongside his mother, Delphine White Calf, a niece of the late Blackfeet chief. 'Two Guns was also the face on the Indian head nickel. I'm proud of him. The Blackfeet are proud of him.' The club began as the Boston Braves in 1932 before changing its name to 'Redskins' a year later and moving to the US Capital in 1937. But it wasn't until 1971 that Blackfeet leader Blackie Wetzel created a portrait of John Two Guns White Calf that ultimately became the team's logo. The term's origin is disputed, according to a 2016 Washington Post article that claims it was first used as a pejorative as early as 1863 in Minnesota. 'The State reward for dead Indians has been increased to $200 for every red-skin sent to Purgatory,' read an announcement in The Winona Daily Republican. 'This sum is more than the dead bodies of all the Indians east of the Red River are worth.' By 1898, Webster's Collegiate Dictionary began defining 'redskin' with the phrase 'often contemptuous.' A 2016 Washington Post poll found that 90 percent of the 504 Native American respondents were 'not bothered' by the team's name. Now-former team owner Daniel Snyder ultimately wrote an open letter, defending his decision to keep the moniker by citing the study. However, that survey and other similar studies have been slammed by journalists and social scientists as being unreliable. 'The reporters and editors behind this story must have known that it would be used as justification for the continued use of these harmful, racist mascots,' read a statement from the Native American Journalists Association. 'They were either willfully malicious or dangerously naïve in the process and reporting used in this story, and neither is acceptable from any journalistic institution.' Redskins fan Louis Hilliard, center, has a conversation with Native American protester Jay Winter Nightwolf, left, and Peter Landeros in December of 2017 In March of 2020, UC Berkeley revealed a study that found that more than half of its 1,000 Native American respondents were offended by the team name. The Supreme Court ruled in 2017 that a trademark law barring disparaging terms infringes on free speech rights. Prior to that, the United States Patent and Trademark office had tried to revoke the Redskins' trademark because it was a racial epithet. Ultimately it was uproar over Floyd's death in 2020 that led to the change. When the team joined in a social media campaign against racism, many slammed Washington for its continued use of 'Redskins,' leading to the temporary adoption of 'Washington Football Team.' One twist in the story of the Commanders was their unexpected success with rookie quarterback Jayden Daniels last season. Finishing 12-5, Washington upset the Lions in Detroit en route to the NFC Championship, where they lost to the ultimate Super Bowl winners, the Philadelphia Eagles. By taking another step in 2025, and potentially winning a Super Bowl as the 'Commanders,' Washington might sideline the debate indefinitely. Washington D.C. and the NFL's Commanders are set to announce a deal Monday to bring the team back within the city limits after a nearly three-decade run in Landover NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Commanders owner Joshua Harris met Trump at the Oval Office in May to announce plans to bring the league's draft to the National Mall in 2027. Washington was selected as draft hosts just days after DC mayor Muriel Bowser announced a plan to bring the team back to the city with a new field on the site of the old RFK Stadium, where the team then known as the Redskins played until 1996. Currently, RFK Stadium stands on the site on the banks of the Anacostia River in the eastern part of the city. The building has been in the process of a prolonged demolition that has been delayed multiple times. The building was closed back in September 2019, but structural demolition has only begun this year.
