Growth the single agenda, Air India Express defies the standard LCC model
With the induction of these two aircraft, the airline now has B737-800NG aircraft, the only type it had when it was privatised, the B737 MAX8 (part of the order placed by Air India group in 2023), A320ceo and A320neo, most of which it inherited from erstwhile AirAsia India, which merged with Air India Express. Some planes came from parent Air India, and now, the A321s also come from parent Air India.
Low-cost carriers traditionally focus on having a single fleet type. This helps the airline keep costs low by having a single training requirement, the ability to swap planes and crew, and ensuring better On-Time Performance and operational efficiency. Additionally, it helps on the engineering and maintenance side by having to maintain spares for just one type of plane.
Air India Express has always been under the shadow of its parent company, Air India. It was a government entity largely restricted to routes from the southern part of India to the Gulf.
Cut to now, the airline has a sizable domestic presence, part of which it inherited from erstwhile AirAsia India, which merged into Air India Express, and some transferred from Air India.
The airline's fleet now includes A321neo, A320neo, A320ceo, 737 MAX8 and 737NG, totalling a little over 100 planes. While it has been a traditional operator of 737NG and built capability for the 737 MAX8, it inherited the capability to maintain the A320 family from erstwhile AirAsia India and Air India.
In the end, it boils down to accounting. As an unlisted entity, it may never be known how the airline handles internal transfers, finances and inventory management.
The airline has been expanding rapidly. By May, it will be 1.5 times the size it was last May. The growth is more on the domestic routes, which will be nearly thrice in terms of capacity compared to last May.
However, this growth comes with many ups and downs.
The airline is growing rapidly on some holiday-centric routes like Delhi-Srinagar, Bengaluru-Goa and Tier II routes like Delhi-Ranchi, Bengaluru-Bhubaneswar, amongst others. However, it has also pulled out of routes like Chennai-Kolkata, Hyderabad-Amritsar, Delhi-Gwalior or Jaipur-Pune.
A churn in routes is common when an airline grows as rapidly as Air India Express is. However, the airline can hope that this churn is handled well and does not create a negative impact on passengers.
The airline has also been receiving flak for its On-Time Performance, with parent Air India often showing better punctuality.
In its quest to add capacity, it has a livery conundrum. The legacy fleet features the old livery, with each side of the tail depicting a different scene from India.
The MAX 8 have the new Air India Express livery depicting the art and culture imprints from different states of the country, it has a whole bunch of A320s which it inherited from erstwhile AirAsia India which are in Red livery without titles and it has old Air India livery planes with decals mentioning its operations for Air India Express.
In a market constrained by capacity, it is only logical that the airline waits for a major check to take the aircraft out of service and plan the livery change, rather than taking it out twice.
There are also many planes up for redelivery, and they may not be repainted at all. However, such multiple liveries never bode well for a customer-facing business, which is rather particular about its brand image.
India has had two bankruptcies in the recent past, Jet Airways and Go FIRST, with a pandemic in between them. Growth has moderated from what it was ten years ago.
For double-digit growth to return, the country needs capacity, but capacity induction can happen when there are slots at airports, which are hard to come by at most large airports in the country.
Amidst this, the Air India group is pushing Air India Express, seemingly with a lower cost structure, to be the flag bearer of competition against IndiGo and fill the void left by carriers which collapsed.
In the past, IndiGo used its superior financial numbers to push competition by dropping fares on competition-specific routes. However, Air India Express is coming in with a force which was not seen before, thus making it difficult to counter with the same strategies. As long as the battle helps the consumers, it will be a good battle in the industry where the two players are backed by large groups.
First Published: 28 Apr 2025, 12:40 PM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Air India privatisation a disaster, says Manish Tewari
Congress leader Manish Tewari called the government's decision to privatise Air India and transfer its ownership to the Tata Group a 'disaster' over complaints about cancellations and delays, and described the airline as a 'management mess'. 'The Government of India should take Air India back from the Tata Group. They have run the airline into the ground,' he wrote in a post on X on Friday (August 1, 2025), calling the privatisation exercise a 'disaster'. He lamented the cancellations and delays by Air India 'at the drop of a hat', and claimed that these were happening without any explanations being offered by the airline. In a reference to appointees from Tata Group companies at the airline, he remarked that 'pilots and crew tell me that people who grow tea in Tata Tea, make steel in Tata Steel, make cars in Tata Motors are running Air India' and labelled the airline as a complete management mess. Tata Group took over Air India in January 2022 after it won the bid invited by the government for selling its 100% stake in the erstwhile national carrier. The airline has been at the centre of public and regulatory scrutiny since the June 12 crash in Ahmedabad that killed 260 people, the deadliest crash in the country in three decades, and the first involving a Boeing 787-8 aircraft.
News18
12 hours ago
- News18
The Dreamliners' Nightmares Are Increasing In Frequency
Last Updated: The recent spate of glitches in Boeing 787s of several other airlines indicates that the AI-171 crash was just waiting to happen Even after a LatAm Airlines' Boeing 787-800 Dreamliner en route to Santiago in Chile circled over the Pacific for an hour on August 1 before returning to Los Angeles Airport to make an emergency landing due to engine failure, will Boeing and its proxies still blame Indian pilots for the crash of AI 171 in Ahmedabad in June? Flight trackers and video evidence note that when it landed, its Ram Air Turbine (RAT) was clearly deployed—as AI-171's last visual showed too. Just the day before, on July 31, a London-bound Air India Dreamliner flight from Delhi aborted take-off on Thursday after 'technical issues' were detected. The Boeing 787-900 aircraft returned to the parking bay and Air India said it was conducting 'precautionary checks". Such 'precaution" is understandable but given the rising public unease over incidents involving Dreamliners, transparency about these incidents, wherever they happen, must become standard practice. Due to the AI-171 crash and the orchestrated blame game by 787's components suppliers and manufacturer, most Indians know now that the RAT emerges when power fails, and fuel supply cut-off is one of several possible causes. Electrical failure resulting in loss of power to flight control, navigation and other systems can also cause the RAT to deploy. And if this latest RAT deployment on the LatAm flight is not probed transparently the public will, well, smell a rat. Intriguingly, in December 2018, a LatAm Boeing 777-300 on its way from Sao Paulo to London Heathrow had to make an emergency landing at Belo Horizonte. At that time too, the RAT was deployed and 12 of its 14 tyres burst due to its heavy weight as it had been unable to dump fuel. Passengers said there had been a strong smell of burning electricals before the cabin lights and entertainment systems went out. The crew said all navigation equipment had failed too. The testimony of the lone miraculous survivor of the Ahmedabad Dreamliner disaster had also reported that there was a loud bang and a high pitched whine (which was deduced to be the sound the RAT deploying) and the cabin lights had flickered just before the aircraft crashed. Unless he gets sudden amnesia or mysteriously retracts the statements he made to multiple news networks, Boeing cannot swat away the similarities between the 777 and 778 electrical issues. Even before this latest LatAm Dreamliner nightmare, a United Airlines 787-800 bound for Munich returned soon after take-off from Washington Dulles Airport on July 25. Its left engine failed, and the pilots issued a Mayday call, flew in a holding pattern and then landed back at the airport. It was considerably higher in the air than AI-171 when this happened and thus could recoup and land safely. But as the engines were inert, the plane had to be towed off the runway. Not many in India (or indeed anyone apart from aviation watchers) know that in March 2024 Boeing had told airlines with Dreamliners to check pilots' seats as part of a probe into another (!) Latam flight wherein 50 people were hurt when it plunged suddenly in mid-air. Media reported that a cabin crew had 'accidentally" pressed a switch on the seat, pushing the pilot into the control panels, causing the plane's nose to go downwards. But was that the real reason for the fall? Is it a coincidence that among the first of many wildly speculative statements by (mostly) American aviation experts was the allegation that the seat of one the AI-171 pilots moved suddenly, making him fall on the control panel, causing engines to cut out and the plane to crash? The 'experts" were pointing to both pilot error and bad maintenance by Air India. Was this a pre-emptive strike to ward off suspicions that the seats had possibly malfunctioned on a 787 before? Ominously, aviation news sites have reported this week that the US Federal Aviation Authority is taking action after learning that the RATs on some Boeing 787s and Airbus were produced using inferior titanium sourced from China supplied by Spirit AeroSystems. It has issued a notice of proposed rule that if approved would require airlines to inspect the fittings on selected 787-9s and 787-10s. The Boeing whistleblower Sam Salehpour worked for that company. These two recent incidents involving Dreamliners belie statements endlessly pushed after the AI-171 crash that Boeing 787s have a 'flawless" safety and performance record. The aircraft manufacturer has to strongly push that line considering that after many similar assertions of perfection, Boeing's 737-Max had been revealed to have a faulty software which was the real cause of the crashes of Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines, months apart in 2018 and 2019. When Boeing was so confident back then and also had many cheerleaders for its aircraft—till conclusively proven otherwise—what is the probability that it would try the same tactic again in 2025? At that time too, it had the backing of President Trump until the world outcry got too loud and all Boeing 737 Maxes had to be grounded pending safety checks. But eventually the behemoth American corporation negotiated a deal to avoid prosecution for those 346 deaths. This June, Boeing agreed to fork out $1.1billion in a deal with the Department of Justice that includes paying $444.5 million to the victims' families and spending another $445m to 'improve" its compliance, safety and quality programmes. Boeing has already paid $243m of a $487.2m criminal penalty settled in 2021. Some call this blood money. Finding Air India's pilots responsible for the AI-171 crash rather than any design or manufacturing fault would help Boeing too. The US media has also been curiously reticent when it comes to reporting on the two most recent Boeing Dreamliner glitches that appear to indicate that what happened to AI-171 was not the result of any deliberate actions of pilots but a catastrophic failure of aircraft systems which left no time for remedial measures. Why is the US media not analysing the spate of mishaps? Just because none of these led to the same tragic consequences as the Dreamliner called VT-ANB? The author is a freelance writer. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. tags : boeing view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 02, 2025, 14:23 IST News opinion Opinion | The Dreamliners' Nightmares Are Increasing In Frequency Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
18 hours ago
- News18
India Aviation Watchdog Finds 263 Lapses At Indian Airlines In Annual Audit, Check Details
Last Updated: Reuters reported that DGCA had found 51 safety lapses at Air India in its July audit, including a lack of adequate training for some pilots, and a poor rostering system. India's aviation regulator said on Wednesday it had found 263 safety-related lapses at the country's airlines, including 23 at the largest carrier IndiGo and 51 at the second largest Air India, as part of its regular annual audit. The audits were carried out as part of International Civil Aviation Organisation requirements and global best practices, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) said on Wednesday, cautioning that higher number of findings are normal for airlines with bigger fleet sizes. Reuters reported on Tuesday that DGCA had found 51 safety lapses at Air India in its July audit, including a lack of adequate training for some pilots, the use of unapproved simulators and a poor rostering system. The audit was not related to the deadly Boeing 787 crash last month that killed 260 people in Ahmedabad. The DGCA said it had also found 14 deficiencies at SpiceJet and 17 at Vistara, which is now part of Air India. The regulator found 25 lapses at Air India Express, Air India's budget carrier. Akasa Air is yet to be audited. The regulator did not detail what kind of lapses were found but divided the list of breaches into 'Level I", which are significant breaches, and 'Level II", which are other non-compliances. In total, 19 'Level I" breaches were found at Indian airlines, the DGCA said. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
