logo
Iran-Israel conflict leaves Iranian Americans feeling helpless, hopeless

Iran-Israel conflict leaves Iranian Americans feeling helpless, hopeless

Yahoo29-06-2025
The texts began coming late one night from somewhere outside Tehran, shaking Shaghayegh Cyrous from her sleep. For more than two weeks, the Los Angeles-based artist had tried in vain to reach her parents, retired designers who live near the capital city of Iran, the country from which she had left 14 years ago.
Israeli bombs had been hitting oil depots, military installations and nuclear facilities. The United States had just launched its own attack and worries were rising about a full-blown Middle East war.
Cyrous frantically made a video call. Her parents kept saying they were OK, but the internet signal was so weak, she could barely see them.
'It's very terrifying,' said Cyrous, 38, who left for America in 2011 and declined to provide her parents' names, fearing for their safety. 'We're just trying to send prayers for peace. Sometimes, I feel both helpless and hopeless.... I don't want them to be in danger.'
As the conflict between Israel and Iran rests on a fragile ceasefire, Cyrous and other Iranian Americans expressed dismay at American involvement and fear for loved ones still in Iran, saying a resurgence in violence could ripple around the world.
'Iranian Americans are worried, obviously, about their loved ones,' said Neda Bolourchi, executive director of the Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans.
Bolourchi said the national advocacy organization, based in Washington, D.C., has lobbied Congress to help Iranian Americans stay in touch with family and friends in Iran during times of crisis.
Reza Rajebi, an Iranian-born novelist and physician who now lives in Houston, said he worries daily about loved ones still living in his homeland.
'Like many in the diaspora, I live in two worlds,' said Rajebi, who came to the United States in 2005 and writes under the pen name Diako Hazhir. 'One is here in the U.S, where I work, making a living and care for my family. The other is in my mind, always carrying the weight of anxiety for those I love and all the people in Iran who have no escape.'
The situation, Rajebi said, represents a 'national tragedy' with roots in the 1979 revolution that vaulted Iran's theocratic regime to power.
'The leadership has made it clear that they would rather see the country burn than surrender their grip on power,' he said. 'Step by step, cell by cell, soul by soul, the holy men who once claimed to protect the oppressed transformed into oppressors.'
On June 24, Trump told reporters he was not seeking regime change in Iran and scolded both sides for violating the ceasefire.
Lana Silk, the Iranian-born CEO of Transform Iran, an international Christian humanitarian organization with offices in Glendale, California, said among the broad emotions unleashed by the U.S. airstrikes were feelings of relief from those who resent the longstanding regime.
'These past days have felt surreal,' Silk said. 'What once seemed like a distant hope now feels within reach …. While any form of military engagement brings with it the heavy burden of civilian suffering, many Iranians are acknowledging that the strikes have delivered the most significant blow to the Islamic Republic in over four decades.'
Silk said the Iranian regime 'does not negotiate in good faith' and employs diplomacy as a deceitful stalling tactic designed to preserve the Islamic theocracy. 'As war unfolds and daily life is disrupted by severe shortages of essential resources, many Iranians are facing displacement and growing fear,' she said. 'In the midst of this suffering, there is a desperate cry not only for freedom but for a swift end to the violence – even if that means welcoming further international intervention.'
Firuzeh Mahmoudi, of Berkeley, California, agreed.
"It is well established that the Islamic Republic of Iran does not mind killing civilians indiscriminately," Mahmoudi said. "We saw this during the Women, Life, Freedom movement and again in Iran's attacks on Israel."
War is not the means through which many Iranians want to achieve freedom after decades of undemocratic regimes that have combined religion and authoritarian control, said Nahid Siamdoust, a former journalist who grew up in Iran and is now a professor of media and Middle Eastern studies at the University of Texas, Austin.
'It's a very depressing moment for Iranians right now,' said Siamdoust, who left Iran at age 10 with her family. 'They are not happy with the Islamic Republic, and they do not want war and destruction, but the historical precedents don't show anything favorable.'
More than a third of the nearly 400,000 Iranian immigrants in the United States live in the Los Angeles area, and more than half overall are in California, according to the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank based in Washington, D.C.
A national poll conducted last year by the Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans said Iranian Americans were nearly divided on the 2024 presidential election. About 45% of Iranian Americans voted for Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee, and 41% for Trump, the GOP nominee.
40,000 reasons to worry: U.S. troops in Middle East could face Iran blowback
Until last weekend, Trump had pursued negotiations to end Iran's nuclear enrichment program but began warning of annihilation after Israel's June 13 attacks on the country's nuclear and military operations killed multiple military leaders and nuclear scientists.
Siamdoust said she is "saddened for my people," believing America's involvement further complicates matters.
"It does not appear to be the case of a one-and-done," Siamdoust said. "Trump said he would keep the U.S. out of these 'forever wars,' and the U.S. has just engulfed itself in yet another war in the Middle East that will cost Iranians dearly."
Persis Karim, an Iranian American and professor of comparative and world literature at San Francisco State University, said that as much as her family dislikes the regime, they've already lived through a war between Iran and Iraq in the 1980s that killed more than a million people combined. They don't want another one.
'They know what war looks like,' Karim said. 'It's messy, it's ugly, and it does not resolve a situation.'
While Karim, 63, doesn't believe Iran is innocent, "I think the negotiating table is the only wise choice,' she said.
However, she fears Iranians in the United States will be vilified "just like Latinos are vilified, just like Arabs were vilified and like we were vilified after 9/11."
That concern is shared by Bolourchi, of the Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans, which had worked with the Justice Department's civil rights division to help fight discrimination and hate crimes against Iranian Americans. She worries the Trump administration's elimination of that unit earlier this year may put the community at risk of increased targeting should the conflict escalate.
'Iranian Americans constitute the fabric of our American society,' she said, and risk 'getting caught up in a resurgence of post-9/11 Islamophobia and hate, even though Jews, Christians and Baha'is make up who we are.'
Despite the dire situation in Iran, Mahmoudi said, many Iranians remain cautiously hopeful about the potential for change.
"It is heartwarming to see how unified Iranians (in Iran) are becoming, helping each other wherever they can," said Mahmoudi, founder and president of United for Iran, a nongovernmental organization working to improve civil liberties in Iran. "Doctors are offering free medical support, strangers are opening their homes and assisting the elderly, and restaurant owners are providing free food. It's a good omen of what the future could bring."
Siamdoust said she feels for those back home just struggling to live normal lives.
'The country has among the best-educated young people in the Middle East," she said. "They don't deserve the tightrope they have been put on and … the devastation that is yet to come. They've worked so hard to bring about changes to their political and social circumstances.'
"#ww3"?: Gen Z, Iran and the mass panic happening on TikTok
Jamal Abdi, president of the National Iranian American Council, urged restraint and expressed concern for people living in the region who will suffer the consequences should tensions reignite.
'Our hearts are with everyone in Iran who has been impacted by this horrific war already and could soon be put at risk by the consequences of this outrageous choice to broaden the war,' he said in a statement. '… The way ahead seems more perilous than ever.'
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Israel-Iran conflict: Iranian Americans feel helpless, hopeless
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From flag poles to a $200 million ballroom: Inside Trump's ‘legacy project' at the White House
From flag poles to a $200 million ballroom: Inside Trump's ‘legacy project' at the White House

CNN

time26 minutes ago

  • CNN

From flag poles to a $200 million ballroom: Inside Trump's ‘legacy project' at the White House

Donald TrumpFacebookTweetLink Follow President Donald Trump held plenty of meetings at the White House this summer: with foreign delegations striking trade deals, Cabinet members plotting a government overhaul and industry executives seeking tariff relief. But amid the various audiences, he's also found time for discussions of a different purpose. In recent weeks, Trump has gathered officials with varying responsibilities on the White House campus — including from the National Park Service, the White House Military Office and the Secret Service — to talk over his ideas for transforming the building and its grounds to his liking. His specifications have been exacting, including finishes that closely resemble his gold-trimmed private clubs — or, in some cases, have been shipped directly from Mar-a-Lago. His ambitions extend well beyond a temporary cosmetic makeover. 'It'll be a great legacy project,' he said Thursday of his plans to construct a 90,000-square-foot ballroom off the East Wing of the mansion. 'And I think it'll be special.' No president in recent memory has put his physical imprint on the executive mansion or its plot of land as much as Trump has done this year. Barely six months after reentering office, his aspirations to dramatically alter the White House have now entered an advanced stage. Two large flagpoles now tower over the North and South Lawns, their massive stars-and-stripes visible even to passengers landing at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport five miles away. Trump personally dictated the poles' galvanized steel, tapered design and interior ropes, and oversaw their installation in June. The Rose Garden has been stripped of its grass and paved over with stone, an attempt to replicate the patio at Mar-a-Lago, where Trump dines al fresco during his weekends away from Washington. The president made frequent check-ins this summer with the orange-shirted workers tearing out the grass and reinforcing the ground underneath, at one point inviting them into the Oval Office for a photo. Presidential seals have been embedded into the stone, and the drainage grates are styled like American flags. The Oval Office itself is adorned with lashings of gold decoration, which Trump ordered up from a craftsman in Florida who'd worked on his Palm Beach estate, people familiar with the matter said. Tiny gold cherubs looking down from above the doorways came straight from Mar-a-Lago. And soon, construction will begin on the new ballroom, whose footprint will amount to the first major extension of the White House in decades. Trump said he, along with other private donors, will foot the $200 million bill. (He also has said he paid for the flag poles and funded the Rose Garden renovations through private donations, without disclosing the price tag of either.) 'President Trump is a builder at heart and has an extraordinary eye for detail,' White House chief of staff Susie Wiles said in a statement this week. 'The President and the Trump White House are fully committed to working with the appropriate organizations to preserving the special history of the White House.' Renderings provided by the White House depict a vast space with gold and crystal chandeliers, gilded Corinthian columns, a coffered ceiling with gold inlays, gold floor lamps and a checkered marble floor. Three walls of arched windows look out over the White House's south grounds. The gold-and-white style closely mimics the Louis XIV-style main event room at Mar-a-Lago. Trump has not shied away from drawing comparisons to his clubs. 'No president knew how to build a ballroom,' Trump said last weekend, meeting the European Commission president in another of his crystal-draped ballrooms, this one at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland. 'I could take this one, drop it right down there, and it would be beautiful.' Trump's impulse to make his own improvements is animated by several factors, he and his aides say. One is a builder's instinct, cultivated over decades in real estate and never quite extinguished when he entered politics a decade ago. 'I love construction,' Trump told reporters as he was watching his new flagpoles going up in June. 'I know it better than anybody.' Another is Trump's genuine belief that aspects of the White House can be improved, even as he voices reverence for the building itself. 'It won't interfere with the current building,' he said of the new ballroom this week, which the White House says will triple the amount of indoor ballroom space and eliminate the need for temporary tents to host state dinners. 'It'll be near it, but not touching it, and pays total respect to the existing building, which I'm the biggest fan of. It's my favorite place.' The alternative, he said, was an unpleasant solution that he said didn't match the dignity of a state affair. 'When it rains, it's a disaster,' he said. 'People slopping down to the tent — it's not a pretty sight, the women with their lovely evening gowns, all of their hair all done, and they're a mess by the time they get (there).' Trump said last week that a new ballroom had long been an aspiration of his predecessors. But officials in previous administrations said the concept never arose. 'We never had the desire nor did I ever hear or participate in a conversation to build a ballroom on the White House lawn. We were focused on issues that actually affected people and communities,' said Deesha Dyer — who, as social secretary in President Barack Obama's administration, was responsible for organizing major events like state dinners. The vision of a new White House ballroom has been floating in Trump's mind dating back at least to 2010, when he called Obama's White House proposing to build one. Officials at the time weren't quite sure what to make of the offer. 'I'm not sure that it would be appropriate to have a shiny gold Trump sign on any part of the White House,' then-press secretary Josh Earnest, who confirmed the offer, said in 2015. Trump, however, was serious about it and seemed affronted to be turned down. 'It was going to cost about $100 million,' Trump said during his first term. 'I offered to do it, and I never heard back.' By the time he was in office for his first term, Trump has said he was too consumed with defending himself from his perceived enemies to get it done. 'I had to focus,' he said earlier this year. 'I was the hunted. And now I'm the hunter. There's a big difference.' Now in his second term, Trump says he is unencumbered by naysayers questioning his design ambitions. And he has forged ahead with the most extensive reshaping of the executive mansion in decades, dictated mainly by his own tastes. While his cosmetic changes to the Oval Office will likely go with him when he departs in 2029, the other changes he's made could be more lasting. Removing the flagpoles could risk appearing unpatriotic. Tearing out the Rose Garden pavers would be costly. And once a nearly quarter-billion-dollar, 650-person ballroom is built, it's unlikely to be torn down. 'People's tastes differ. I will say this about presidential changes: Some are long-lasting and embraced by the American people. And some just disappear,' said Tim Naftali, a presidential historian at Columbia University. He cited Theodore Roosevelt's addition of mounted moose and elk heads in the State Dining Room as a detail that didn't withstand time. 'What President Trump does inside the Trump ballroom may not survive the Trump presidency,' Naftali said. 'As long as the bones of the structure are good, future presidents will be able to redesign that space as they see fit.' In Trump's own telling, the additions will contribute to his legacy — akin to the Truman Balcony the 33rd president added to the second floor of the building, or the Lincoln Bedroom the 16th president used as an office. Nearly every president has put his own mark on the building, either through individual fancies or practical necessity, going all the way back to its construction in 1792. 'The White House has been shaped by the visions and priorities of its occupants, from Jefferson's colonnades to Truman's monumental gutting,' wrote White House Historical Foundation President Stewart McLaurin in a recent essay. 'Each change, whether Jackson's North Portico, Arthur's opulent redecoration, or Clinton's security measures—has sparked debate, reflecting tensions between preservation and modernization, aesthetics and functionality, and openness and security.' McLaurin said often, in time, the changes have come to be accepted by the public. 'Media and Congressional criticisms have often focused on costs, historical integrity, and timing, yet many of these alterations have become integral to the identity of the White House, and it is difficult for us to imagine The White House today without these evolutions and additions,' he wrote. For Trump, making the additions integral to the White House's identity is part of the plan. He has raised questions about the renovations even in meetings ostensibly meant for other purposes. 'Who would gold-leaf it?' he asked members of his Cabinet in early July, gesturing to ceiling moldings in the West Wing. 'Could you raise your hands?' One member of his Cabinet, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., offered a several-minute aside during the start of a speech this week to praise the president's updates. 'I've been coming to this building for 65 years and I have to say that it has never looked better,' said Kennedy, the nephew of President John F. Kennedy and his wife Jacqueline. Like Trump, Jackie Kennedy took intense interest in improving the White House. She undertook an extensive redecoration of the State Floor, including procuring antiques and paintings from wealthy philanthropists to improve the building's grandeur. Much of her designs remain in place today. She also oversaw a redesign of the Rose Garden with the help of heiress and famed horticulturalist Rachel 'Bunny' Mellon, turning the space into a grassy and floral respite from the Oval Office nearby. Now, the grass is mostly gone. Trump, who had voiced concern about women's high heels sinking into the soil during events, selected light-colored square pavers to replace the lawn. 'It's always extraordinary to go into that sacred space, but I have to say that it looked kind of drab in the pictures,' Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said of looking back on old family photos of the Oval Office during his uncle's era. 'It looks the opposite of drab today.'

From flag poles to a $200 million ballroom: Inside Trump's ‘legacy project' at the White House
From flag poles to a $200 million ballroom: Inside Trump's ‘legacy project' at the White House

CNN

time27 minutes ago

  • CNN

From flag poles to a $200 million ballroom: Inside Trump's ‘legacy project' at the White House

President Donald Trump held plenty of meetings at the White House this summer: with foreign delegations striking trade deals, Cabinet members plotting a government overhaul and industry executives seeking tariff relief. But amid the various audiences, he's also found time for discussions of a different purpose. In recent weeks, Trump has gathered officials with varying responsibilities on the White House campus — including from the National Park Service, the White House Military Office and the Secret Service — to talk over his ideas for transforming the building and its grounds to his liking. His specifications have been exacting, including finishes that closely resemble his gold-trimmed private clubs — or, in some cases, have been shipped directly from Mar-a-Lago. His ambitions extend well beyond a temporary cosmetic makeover. 'It'll be a great legacy project,' he said Thursday of his plans to construct a 90,000-square-foot ballroom off the East Wing of the mansion. 'And I think it'll be special.' No president in recent memory has put his physical imprint on the executive mansion or its plot of land as much as Trump has done this year. Barely six months after reentering office, his aspirations to dramatically alter the White House have now entered an advanced stage. Two large flagpoles now tower over the North and South Lawns, their massive stars-and-stripes visible even to passengers landing at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport five miles away. Trump personally dictated the poles' galvanized steel, tapered design and interior ropes, and oversaw their installation in June. The Rose Garden has been stripped of its grass and paved over with stone, an attempt to replicate the patio at Mar-a-Lago, where Trump dines al fresco during his weekends away from Washington. The president made frequent check-ins this summer with the orange-shirted workers tearing out the grass and reinforcing the ground underneath, at one point inviting them into the Oval Office for a photo. Presidential seals have been embedded into the stone, and the drainage grates are styled like American flags. The Oval Office itself is adorned with lashings of gold decoration, which Trump ordered up from a craftsman in Florida who'd worked on his Palm Beach estate, people familiar with the matter said. Tiny gold cherubs looking down from above the doorways came straight from Mar-a-Lago. And soon, construction will begin on the new ballroom, whose footprint will amount to the first major extension of the White House in decades. Trump said he, along with other private donors, will foot the $200 million bill. (He also has said he paid for the flag poles and funded the Rose Garden renovations through private donations, without disclosing the price tag of either.) 'President Trump is a builder at heart and has an extraordinary eye for detail,' White House chief of staff Susie Wiles said in a statement this week. 'The President and the Trump White House are fully committed to working with the appropriate organizations to preserving the special history of the White House.' Renderings provided by the White House depict a vast space with gold and crystal chandeliers, gilded Corinthian columns, a coffered ceiling with gold inlays, gold floor lamps and a checkered marble floor. Three walls of arched windows look out over the White House's south grounds. The gold-and-white style closely mimics the Louis XIV-style main event room at Mar-a-Lago. Trump has not shied away from drawing comparisons to his clubs. 'No president knew how to build a ballroom,' Trump said last weekend, meeting the European Commission president in another of his crystal-draped ballrooms, this one at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland. 'I could take this one, drop it right down there, and it would be beautiful.' Trump's impulse to make his own improvements is animated by several factors, he and his aides say. One is a builder's instinct, cultivated over decades in real estate and never quite extinguished when he entered politics a decade ago. 'I love construction,' Trump told reporters as he was watching his new flagpoles going up in June. 'I know it better than anybody.' Another is Trump's genuine belief that aspects of the White House can be improved, even as he voices reverence for the building itself. 'It won't interfere with the current building,' he said of the new ballroom this week, which the White House says will triple the amount of indoor ballroom space and eliminate the need for temporary tents to host state dinners. 'It'll be near it, but not touching it, and pays total respect to the existing building, which I'm the biggest fan of. It's my favorite place.' The alternative, he said, was an unpleasant solution that he said didn't match the dignity of a state affair. 'When it rains, it's a disaster,' he said. 'People slopping down to the tent — it's not a pretty sight, the women with their lovely evening gowns, all of their hair all done, and they're a mess by the time they get (there).' Trump said last week that a new ballroom had long been an aspiration of his predecessors. But officials in previous administrations said the concept never arose. 'We never had the desire nor did I ever hear or participate in a conversation to build a ballroom on the White House lawn. We were focused on issues that actually affected people and communities,' said Deesha Dyer — who, as social secretary in President Barack Obama's administration, was responsible for organizing major events like state dinners. The vision of a new White House ballroom has been floating in Trump's mind dating back at least to 2010, when he called Obama's White House proposing to build one. Officials at the time weren't quite sure what to make of the offer. 'I'm not sure that it would be appropriate to have a shiny gold Trump sign on any part of the White House,' then-press secretary Josh Earnest, who confirmed the offer, said in 2015. Trump, however, was serious about it and seemed affronted to be turned down. 'It was going to cost about $100 million,' Trump said during his first term. 'I offered to do it, and I never heard back.' By the time he was in office for his first term, Trump has said he was too consumed with defending himself from his perceived enemies to get it done. 'I had to focus,' he said earlier this year. 'I was the hunted. And now I'm the hunter. There's a big difference.' Now in his second term, Trump says he is unencumbered by naysayers questioning his design ambitions. And he has forged ahead with the most extensive reshaping of the executive mansion in decades, dictated mainly by his own tastes. While his cosmetic changes to the Oval Office will likely go with him when he departs in 2029, the other changes he's made could be more lasting. Removing the flagpoles could risk appearing unpatriotic. Tearing out the Rose Garden pavers would be costly. And once a nearly quarter-billion-dollar, 650-person ballroom is built, it's unlikely to be torn down. 'People's tastes differ. I will say this about presidential changes: Some are long-lasting and embraced by the American people. And some just disappear,' said Tim Naftali, a presidential historian at Columbia University. He cited Theodore Roosevelt's addition of mounted moose and elk heads in the State Dining Room as a detail that didn't withstand time. 'What President Trump does inside the Trump ballroom may not survive the Trump presidency,' Naftali said. 'As long as the bones of the structure are good, future presidents will be able to redesign that space as they see fit.' In Trump's own telling, the additions will contribute to his legacy — akin to the Truman Balcony the 33rd president added to the second floor of the building, or the Lincoln Bedroom the 16th president used as an office. Nearly every president has put his own mark on the building, either through individual fancies or practical necessity, going all the way back to its construction in 1792. 'The White House has been shaped by the visions and priorities of its occupants, from Jefferson's colonnades to Truman's monumental gutting,' wrote White House Historical Foundation President Stewart McLaurin in a recent essay. 'Each change, whether Jackson's North Portico, Arthur's opulent redecoration, or Clinton's security measures—has sparked debate, reflecting tensions between preservation and modernization, aesthetics and functionality, and openness and security.' McLaurin said often, in time, the changes have come to be accepted by the public. 'Media and Congressional criticisms have often focused on costs, historical integrity, and timing, yet many of these alterations have become integral to the identity of the White House, and it is difficult for us to imagine The White House today without these evolutions and additions,' he wrote. For Trump, making the additions integral to the White House's identity is part of the plan. He has raised questions about the renovations even in meetings ostensibly meant for other purposes. 'Who would gold-leaf it?' he asked members of his Cabinet in early July, gesturing to ceiling moldings in the West Wing. 'Could you raise your hands?' One member of his Cabinet, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., offered a several-minute aside during the start of a speech this week to praise the president's updates. 'I've been coming to this building for 65 years and I have to say that it has never looked better,' said Kennedy, the nephew of President John F. Kennedy and his wife Jacqueline. Like Trump, Jackie Kennedy took intense interest in improving the White House. She undertook an extensive redecoration of the State Floor, including procuring antiques and paintings from wealthy philanthropists to improve the building's grandeur. Much of her designs remain in place today. She also oversaw a redesign of the Rose Garden with the help of heiress and famed horticulturalist Rachel 'Bunny' Mellon, turning the space into a grassy and floral respite from the Oval Office nearby. Now, the grass is mostly gone. Trump, who had voiced concern about women's high heels sinking into the soil during events, selected light-colored square pavers to replace the lawn. 'It's always extraordinary to go into that sacred space, but I have to say that it looked kind of drab in the pictures,' Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said of looking back on old family photos of the Oval Office during his uncle's era. 'It looks the opposite of drab today.'

Trump officials aim to divert money meant for buying wilderness land
Trump officials aim to divert money meant for buying wilderness land

Washington Post

time28 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Trump officials aim to divert money meant for buying wilderness land

Trump officials are seeking to divert money from a fund dedicated to purchasing wilderness areas in a bid to halt the expansion of federal public lands, according to three people familiar with the matter. The Department of Interior is drafting an order that would take money from the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which has an annual budget of $900 million primarily to buy land and easements, and use it for maintenance of existing national parks and federal lands, the people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the order was under internal discussion and not public. The order could be announced as soon as Monday, they said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store