Suwayda cleared of tribal fighters as Syrian forces implement ceasefire
'Following intensive efforts by the Ministry of Interior to implement the ceasefire agreement — after the deployment of its forces in the northern and western areas of Suwayda province — the city of Suwayda has been cleared of all tribal fighters, and clashes within the city's neighborhoods have been brought to a halt,' said ministry spokesperson Nour al-Din al-Baba, according to the state-run SANA news agency.
The announcement came after the Syrian presidency declared a comprehensive and immediate ceasefire in the southern province, where armed clashes erupted on July 13 between Bedouin Arab tribes and local Druze militias.
Violence in the region escalated rapidly, with Israeli airstrikes targeting Syrian military positions and infrastructure in Damascus. Israel cited the protection of Druze communities as justification for the strikes.
Most Druze leaders in Syria, however, have publicly rejected foreign interference, emphasizing their commitment to national unity and the sovereignty of the Syrian state.
The situation in Suwayda unfolded amid broader changes in the country's political landscape. Following the fall of President Bashar al-Assad's regime in December and his flight to Russia, the long-standing Baath Party rule — in power since 1963 — effectively ended.
In January, a new transitional administration led by President Ahmad al-Sharaa was formed. Since then, Israel has declared the 1974 Disengagement Agreement void and intensified its military operations inside Syria. — Agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
For the sake of peace, America should recognize Palestine
After an unexpected delay due to Israel's unprovoked attack on Iran last month, the UN will finally convene a crucial high-level meeting in New York this week. Scheduled for Monday and Tuesday at the foreign minister level, the meeting aims to discuss the long-promised but still unrealized political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: the two-state solution. The idea is not new. It envisions two states — Israel and Palestine — living side by side in peace. While Israel has been recognized by the global community, including Arab nations and the Palestinians themselves, the state of Palestine still lacks full recognition by the UN Security Council. That recognition is a necessary step before Palestine can be admitted as a full UN member. Three permanent members of the UNSC — France, the UK and the US — have so far blocked that recognition. But change is coming. President Emmanuel Macron, whose government is co-chairing the UN conference with Saudi Arabia, has announced that France will recognize Palestine when the UN General Assembly meets this fall. The UK has expressed similar intentions, conditioned on there being a 'wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution.' Without a political horizon for Palestinians and a realistic long-term solution, we will only be kicking the can down the road. Both France and the UK understand the urgent need for an end to the Israeli revenge war on Gaza, accomplishing the release of detainees on both sides, followed immediately by an urgent effort to carry out the more important challenge of finding a political solution. Before the end of September, it is expected that 150 of the UN's 193 member states will have recognized the state of Palestine on the June 4, 1967, borders. This leaves the US as the lone major holdout. Leaders from both major American political parties, including President Donald Trump, have supported the idea of a two-state solution. Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken, despite his staunch support for Israel, even visited Ramallah last year and met with senior Palestinian leader Hussein Al-Sheikh. Yet, paradoxically, the US has announced that it does not plan to attend the UN meeting on the two-state solution. The reasons remain unclear. One possibility is that Washington is reacting to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's fiery rhetoric. After Macron's announcement, Netanyahu claimed that recognizing Palestine would endanger Israeli security. 'A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel,' he said. 'Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel.' Nothing could be further from the truth. If any side is attempting to negate the other, it is Israel seeking to erase Palestine, not the other way round. The current Palestinian leadership, based in Ramallah and led by President Mahmoud Abbas, has consistently opposed the Oct. 7 attacks and Hamas' militaristic approach. This leadership favors diplomacy and has long supported the two-state vision, as outlined in the 1988 Palestinian Declaration of Independence. That declaration explicitly envisioned a Palestinian state next to Israel. If any side is attempting to negate the other, it is Israel seeking to erase Palestine, not the other way round. Daoud Kuttab It is important to recall that Netanyahu himself has historically enabled Hamas, seeing it as a tool to divide and weaken the secular Palestinian national movement. The world now recognizes this cynical strategy for what it is. But Western leaders too often ignore this reality. Recognition of Palestine at the UN is not a 'reward for terror.' It is a recognition of an inalienable right: the right of self-determination. That principle is foundational to the very idea of the UN and the international order it represents. If Washington continues to pay lip service to a two-state solution while boycotting discussions intended to realize it, the implications will be stark. The current position suggests that American leaders — whether consciously or not — are aligning themselves with a vision of Jewish supremacy in the Middle East. That is a dangerous path. It will only prolong the conflict and isolate the US from the global consensus, which is increasingly united against apartheid, occupation and permanent discrimination. Palestinians and Israelis have two — and only two — realistic options: two states for two peoples or one democratic state with equal rights for all. All other ideas mean that America (and any other holdouts on Palestinian recognition) support apartheid by not opposing the current situation. As leading Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem stated in a report back in 2011, Israel has been conducting 'a regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea: This is apartheid.' In 1948, Israel expelled 750,000 Palestinians and has refused to allow them to return ever since. Many of those refugees ended up in Gaza and we have seen what the absence of justice for Palestinians has produced. Continuing on this path of ignoring the Palestinian reality and denying the political rights of Palestinians under whatever religious or domestic political consideration will never work. Neither will the fantasy of permanently expelling or suppressing the 7 million Palestinians living between the river and the sea ever succeed. On May 15, 1948, within minutes of its declaration as a state, the US recognized Israel. It is high time that America recognized the other half of the two-state solution. The sooner Washington genuinely embraces the two-state solution and joins the world in recognizing the state of Palestine — including the principle of it being an independent, democratic nation living peacefully alongside Israel — the sooner peace in the Middle East can become a reality.
Arab News
10 hours ago
- Arab News
Syria expected to hold parliamentary election in September, official says
DAMASCUS: Syria is expected to hold its first parliamentary election under the new administration in September, the head of the electoral process told state news agency SANA on Sunday. Voting for the People's Assembly is expected to take place from September 15 to 20, added the official, Mohammed Taha.
Leaders
10 hours ago
- Leaders
Hamas Slams Israeli Aid as 'Deceptive Starvation Tactics'
Hamas on Sunday condemned Israel's humanitarian aid airdrops and limited corridor operations in Gaza, calling these efforts 'deceptive tactics' aimed at hiding Israel's deeper intentions to impose starvation and control the population. In a strong statement, Hamas accused Israel of using airdrops and so-called safe corridors as tools to manage famine, coercion, and civilian suffering, arguing that delivering food and medicine is a fundamental right, not a favor, and essential to end the ongoing catastrophe. Additionally, Hamas insists the only solution to the humanitarian crisis involves ending the violence, breaking the blockade, and reopening all border crossings. The group blamed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for orchestrating policies that have caused widespread civilian casualties and suffering. Furthermore, Hamas labeled the aid operations and starvation as 'war crimes,' urging the international community to increase diplomatic and grassroots pressure, demanding a full end to the siege and the preventable suffering of Palestinians. Continued Aid Efforts Amid Escalating Violence Despite Israel's aid airdrops and temporary ceasefires, violence persists as the Israeli forces have repeatedly opened fire on Palestinians near distribution centers, causing many casualties. Since October 7, 2023, Israel's military campaign has resulted in over 59,700 Palestinian deaths, according to local health authorities. The relentless attacks have devastated Gaza, leading to critical food shortages and widespread suffering. In November, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, as both figures face charges related to war crimes and crimes against humanity. Meanwhile, Israel launched an alternative aid distribution through the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, with critics arguing that this move bypasses international organizations and hampers coordinated relief efforts. As tensions continue, the international community debates Israel's tactics and the growing humanitarian crisis, with many call for urgent action to end the conflict and address the dire needs of Gaza's civilians. Short link : Post Views: 6
