Tax season opens with expanded auto assessments, faster refunds
This year marks a significant expansion of SARS' auto assessment process, with 5.8 million taxpayers receiving automated assessments – up from 5 million in 2024.
Of these, 99.6% have not been changed by taxpayers, reflecting accuracy and trust in the system. SARS has already paid out R10.6b in refunds within 72 hours of assessment.
ALSO READ: SARS 2025 Tax Season: What's new on eFiling
The auto assessment process uses third-party data to evaluate taxpayer returns without requiring further input from most individuals.
Taxpayers only need to take action if their information is incomplete, which they can correct via eFiling or the SARS MobiApp.
SARS commissioner Edward Kieswetter praised the ongoing digital transformation of SARS, calling the auto assessment process 'a game changer' that aligns with the vision to 'make tax just happen'.
ALSO READ: Get ready: SARS tax season starts July 7
He added that the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning and data science continues to reduce the need for in-person visits to SARS service centres.
Following the auto assessment period, which ran from July 7 to 20, the broader tax filing season is now underway.
Most online submissions receive an assessment outcome in less than five seconds, with SARS using advanced AI to detect risks and prevent fraudulent refunds.
Digital engagement with SARS continues to rise. More than 10.2 million unique users accessed the SARS eFiling platform or the MobiApp since July 4.
SARS handled over 2.1m queries digitally – 1.1 million via the SARS Online Query System, 707 000 through WhatsApp, and 290 000 with the Lwazi Chatbot.
To ensure a smooth filing season, SARS urges taxpayers to file accurate information promptly.
ALSO READ: EMPD brokers peace between taxi drivers and scholar transport operators
Only refunds over R100 will be automatically paid into taxpayers' verified bank accounts within 72 hours of assessment.
Taxpayers who owe SARS should pay promptly or make arrangements to avoid penalties.
SARS also warned the public to remain vigilant against scams. SARS reminds taxpayers that it will never send clickable links via SMS or email to request sensitive information.
Report suspicious messages to [email protected], and the latest scam alerts are available at www.sars.gov.za
Kieswetter emphasised the convenience of digital platforms and advised taxpayers to avoid unnecessary visits to service centres.
He encouraged all taxpayers to use eFiling and other digital services for quicker and more secure compliance.
For more information, visit www.sars.gov.za or contact SARS via WhatsApp on 0800 117 277, or dial 1347277#.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
High Court confirms preservation order against Amalgamated Tobacco Manufacturing in tax evasion case
TAX Justice South Africa (TJSA) in a statement on Tuesday welcomed a High Court judgment confirming a preservation order against Amalgamated Tobacco Manufacturing and 19 other entities, who are accused of a sophisticated multi-million-rand tax evasion racket. . Image: Courtney Africa/Independent Newspapers TAX Justice South Africa (TJSA) in a statement on Tuesday welcomed a High Court judgment confirming a preservation order against Amalgamated Tobacco Manufacturing and 19 other entities, who are accused of a sophisticated multi-million-rand tax evasion racket. The Fair-Trade Independent Tobacco Association (FITA), who represents independent cigarette manufacturers, respects the judicial process and the role of the courts in upholding the rule of law. In the judgment, the High Court of South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Local Division, Durban ruled that the provisional preservation order granted on February 27, 2025 against the ninth and tenth respondents (South African Revenue Service v Kajee and Others) is confirmed. TJSA said that the KwaZulu-Natal High Court has dismissed challenges to the South African Revenue Service's preservation order, allowing Sars to continue securing assets while investigating more than R96 million in suspicious financial transfers involving the Pietermaritzburg-based cigarette maker. TJSA founder Yusuf Abramjee said that this case demonstrates exactly why Sars needs robust investigative powers and why the illicit tobacco trade continues to devastate our fiscus. 'When a court finds a tobacco manufacturer has a case to answer over millions in under-declared income, it confirms what we've been saying for years – the industry is riddled with tax dodgers who are bleeding our country dry.' TJSA said that Amalgamated Tobacco – as well as local industry body the Fair-Trade Independent Tobacco Association (FITA) – is fighting Sars's legal right to install surveillance cameras in cigarette factories. Abramjee said that while legitimate manufacturers should welcome transparency measures, those opposing surveillance systems clearly have something to conceal. 'If the allegations in this case are true, then it will vindicate Sars's approach to enhance monitoring of the tobacco sector. The illicit cigarette trade now commands more than 70% of the South African cigarette market, robbing the country of approximately R30 billion in tax revenue annually. This massive revenue loss undermines public health initiatives, education funding, and essential government services.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Abramjee added that this R96 million case is just the tip of the iceberg. 'The Government must ensure that Sars has the resources to expand these investigations to other major players in the illicit tobacco trade.' FITA chairperson Sinenhlanhla Mnguni said that they note the recent judgment delivered by the High Court of South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Local Division, Durban, in the matter of Commissioner for South African Revenue Service v Kajee and Others (Case No. D1514/2025). 'FITA respects the judicial process and the role of the courts in upholding the rule of law. FITA has consistently and unequivocally supported all legitimate efforts by the state, regulatory authorities, and industry stakeholders to combat smuggling and the illicit trade in cigarettes. These illicit activities undermine the integrity of the market, deprive the fiscus of vital revenue, and harm legitimate businesses across the sector.' Mnguni added that they commend any actions that promote transparency, accountability, and fair competition, and stand ready to collaborate with Sars and other entities to eradicate these threats. 'Compliance in the tobacco industry must be approached holistically, taking into account the full spectrum of challenges and dynamics at play. It is concerning when enforcement appears to be selectively focused on isolated aspects, potentially overlooking broader systemic issues that contribute to non-compliance. This narrow lens risks distorting the true picture of the industry, which is far more complex.' Mnguni said that they urge all stakeholders, including Sars, to adopt a comprehensive and equitable strategy that addresses root causes such as economic disparities, regulatory gaps, and unfair trade practices affecting smaller, independent players. 'Only through such a balanced approach can we achieve sustainable compliance and a level playing field for all participants in the South African tobacco market.' Professor Corné van Walbeek, the director of the Research Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products, from the University of Cape, said that illicit trade in South Africa is a very serious matter. 'The illicit trade in cigarettes accounts for more than 50% of the total market. A large proportion of illicit cigarettes in South Africa are under-declared local production. The fact that Amalgamated Tobacco Manufacturing Company has been charged for tax evasion by Sars is long overdue.' BUSINESS REPORT TAX Justice South Africa (TJSA) in a statement on Tuesday welcomed a High Court judgment confirming a preservation order against Amalgamated Tobacco Manufacturing and 19 other entities, who are accused of a sophisticated multi-million-rand tax evasion racket. . Image: Courtney Africa/Independent Newspapers TAX Justice South Africa (TJSA) in a statement on Tuesday welcomed a High Court judgment confirming a preservation order against Amalgamated Tobacco Manufacturing and 19 other entities, who are accused of a sophisticated multi-million-rand tax evasion racket. . Image: Courtney Africa/Independent Newspapers
Mail & Guardian
4 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
How Trump's tariffs exposed South Africa's strategic trade failures
The Trump' administration's trade tariffs have shaken the rand. Photo: File The United States' 30% tariff on South Africa — set to take effect on 1 August 2025 but pushed back seven days — is a grave blow for those diligently modelling costs, yet a distant abstraction for many South Africans who are yet to grasp its economic gravity. Regrettably, in South Africa global economic shocks typically register as background noise, their causes unexamined, their consequences only recognised when unavoidable. Before dissecting our strategic missteps, let's make these abstract forces tangible. Consider first how US President Donald Trump's threats of tariffs shook the rand's foundations in July alone. The currency exhibited heightened volatility, opening at R17.59 before plunging 2.6% to R18.04 by month-end, as markets priced in the impending tariffs. Three distinct phases can be identified: the initial 7 July drop to R17.74 (-1%) on Trump's Brics surcharge threat, a mid-month slump to R17.89 as exemption hopes faded and the final 1.5% 24 to 31 July drop when tariff implementation became certain. Let's also appreciate trade and industry in this context. The South African Revenue Service's Cumulative Trade Report for January to June 2025 revealed that SA exported R68.8 billion worth of goods to the US. Trump's tariffs will probably disproportionately target critical sectors like vehicles and transport equipment (R11.4 billion); machinery (R3.8 billion); iron and steel products (R10.9 billion); chemicals (R4.8 billion) and plastics (R644 million). Despite exempt categories, such as precious metals and iron ores, several mineral categories will suffer, including processed steel, machinery components and industrial chemicals, risking R31.5 billion in vulnerable exports. If these impacts remain abstract, consider the tangible consequences — currency depreciation and trade disruptions will send prices of basic goods soaring, devastate jobs in the auto and mining industries, deepen inequality, shutter factories at an alarming rate, fuel inflationary fires and ignite political instability as economic hardship erodes public trust. Clearly, these repercussions span economic, political and social spheres, raising pressing questions about whether the state could have taken stronger measures to mitigate the coming storm. The evidence suggests decisive action was both possible and necessary. While competent trade negotiation reflects able governance, truly strategic trade diplomacy remains an elusive art — one whose absence we feel acutely in these turbulent economic waters. A few months back, while Washington's theatrics over South Africa's land reform policies dominated headlines, the real tragedy unfolded quietly – that is, the country's mineral baiting approach to trade talks which ultimately ought to have been seen by our government as doomed from inception. Why so? Because Trump's global trade warfare primarily stems from geopolitical anxiety over dwindling US hegemony, not sound economic logic. In such a context, no mineral concessions could sway Washington. Rather than this futile approach, we should have been aggressively pursuing market diversification, accelerating regional industrial partnerships and building shock-absorbent trade architectures. Far from wishful thinking, this has been a deliberate strategic pivot by pragmatic emerging economies. For example, shortly after Trump announced reciprocal tariffs, Southeast Asian states like Cambodia aggressively diversified trade partners through South-South cooperation and the 'China+1' strategy, transforming tariff threats into opportunities. These nations retain their edge as export manufacturing hubs, where labour cost advantages outweigh protectionist headwinds. Regrettably, this was a storm we might have weathered — had we possessed the strategic foresight to act early. Instead, we'll spend the coming quarters, perhaps years, paying for missed opportunities, while our trade and diplomatic machinery scrambles merely to recover lost ground. Siseko Maposa is the director of Surgetower Associates Management Consultancy. The views expressed are his own.
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
How to handle a SARS letter of demand before it's too late
South Africans who receive a SARS Letter of Demand are being urged to act fast Image: GCIS South Africans who receive a SARS Letter of Demand are being urged to act, as ignoring it could lead to frozen bank accounts, garnished salaries, or even court judgments. A letter of demand is a formal legal notice issued when SARS believes you owe outstanding tax. This could be due to incorrect IRP5s, unreported income, penalties, or reversed refunds following an audit. Tax experts warn that many individuals only become aware of these legal notices once enforcement has already begun, often because the letters are uploaded quietly to eFiling and easily missed. They urge taxpayers to ensure their contact information is updated to receive timely notifications. 'Unfortunately, many taxpayers only realise they've received this when their bank account is already frozen or their salary garnished. At that stage, it's very serious, but you can still solve the problem by acting immediately," Razael Manikus, COO at Latita Africa, said. According to Manikus, even in these critical moments, taxpayers still have options. "Log into your SARS eFiling profile to check the date when the letter of demand was issued (under 'Correspondence'). That's the start of your 10-business-day response window". Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He advises taxpayers to 'review your statement of account to identify the source of your debt and the tax period involved. If the amount is correct and you're able to pay, do this immediately. Use the payment reference number on the letter to pay SARS.' However, Manikus also warned taxpayers against ignoring the revenue service's letter, saying that "SARS can, without further warning, deduct money from your income via garnishee orders to your employer or clients". "The Revenue Service can also attach your bank funds, withhold tax clearances and refunds, and get a court judgment that will blemish your credit record. In cases of repeat non-compliance, SARS can even refer you to the National Prosecuting Authority" If immediate payment isn't possible, Manikus says taxpayers can apply for a suspension of payment through eFiling. This pauses SARS's ability to collect while the matter is being resolved. "If you accept your debt but can't pay in full, SARS may agree to a deferred payment plan with instalments. Or you could negotiate a compromise of tax debt, where SARS reduces your debt if the full payment would cause you financial hardship. "You believe the assessment is wrong, lodge a formal notice of objection on eFiling. You have 30 business days from the original assessment. Clearly explain the reason for your objection, and attach supporting documentation (such as invoices, proof of payments, or bank statements)". IOL Business Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel
