logo
Precious water: Nevada lawmakers have decisions ahead on conservation bills

Precious water: Nevada lawmakers have decisions ahead on conservation bills

Yahoo22-02-2025
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Why should some mining companies and geothermal energy projects get a pass on rules surrounding groundwater extraction? That's the basic question behind a bill in the Nevada Legislature, one of several proposed laws surrounding water issues this session.
Assembly Bill 109 (AB109), dubbed the 'water application fairness bill,' challenges a loophole that allows some companies to escape regulatory reviews that come in the permitting process. 'Consumptive use' of water gets a fresh look in AB109. The bill doesn't go along with the thinking that nothing has really changed if the water is returned to where it was removed.
'Yes, you can return water to the source after it's pumped. But that pumping throws off aquifers. And it unstabilizes and unbalances aquifers. And so even if you return ever drop, you can still have major impacts on an aquifer and water can go in different directions and go to different places,' according to Kyle Roerink, executive director of the conservation-minded Great Basin Water Network.
'And so then you're harming springs, which are surface expressions of groundwater and you're harming the overall stability when you pump large quantities, even if it's returned,' Roerink said.
He said AB109 fixes that, simply by requiring the permit and ensuring no one is exempt.
Union workers written up, fired for using sick days; Nevada lawmaker moves to close loophole
Democratic Assem. Selena La Rue Hatch is sponsoring AB109.
'During my work with the Interim Natural Resources committee it came to my attention that there was a loophole in Nevada law that may need closing. As we all know, as the driest state in the nation, our water is precious and limited. Therefore, under our current laws, all water used in the state must be put to beneficial use,' La Rue Hatch said Friday.
'To ensure this, all water uses must be reviewed by the State Engineer to ensure water is available, existing water rights will not be harmed, and the water will indeed be put to beneficial use while protecting the public interest. Unfortunately, there are some select industries who are not subject to this review and are able to use the waters of Nevada without this critical oversight,' she said.
'My intention with this bill is to ensure that all industries go through this same process and that our water is protected. This bill brings clarity to a confusing section of statute and ensures parity for all water users while protecting the water that we all hold so dear,' La Rue Hatch said.
Farmers and companies involved in hard-rock mining have to apply for groundwater permits, and this bill would remove exceptions for geothermal projects and new mining methods — including some lithium mining techniques.
Groundwater is serious business in Nevada. A number of endemic species live in springs that could dry up with overpumping, and 10% of the Las Vegas valley's water comes from wells, even if all you ever hear about is the 90% that comes from Lake Mead.
A fiscal note for the bill indicates there are about 450 active geothermal projects across the state.
Albemarle, the company that operates the only active lithium mine in the U.S. at Silver Peak, west of Tonopah, states on its website: 'We carefully measure water withdrawals and continuously monitor groundwater systems, both freshwater and brine, to confirm there are no adverse impacts to the nearby water resources.'
Roerink calls it 'the most important water bill that we can pass this session' and points out that it protects wildlife, property rights, due process, the public interest, and even mining companies by ensuring their competition has to follow the same law.
Another piece of legislation is the first proposal of its kind in Nevada.
WATER CONSERVATION PLANS: AB134 would create a beneficial use that is a 'non-use' — a strictly conservational use, Roerink said. The bill goes beyond protecting springs for wildlife, and it's about more than fallowing fields to save water temporarily. He's concerned about the risks if water 'profiteering' takes hold in Nevada.
'We're an organization that's really cautious about true-blue, dyed-in-the-wool Nevadans who make a living off their water. We want to make sure that we're protecting those interests as well as being conscious that there's going to be less and less water to go around in the years to come,' Roerink said.
He sees AB134 as a way to limit conflict over water in communities. The Great Basin Water Network sets out these concepts for what the bill would do:
Protect the conserved or saved portion of their right from use-it-or-lose-it provisions in the law for entities that make demonstrable investments in water conservation practices.
Prohibits entities from 'conserving' the entire amount of a permitted, certificated, or vested water right. This prevents abuse from speculators.
Offers alternatives to buy-and-dry proposals that take water and people off the land, invite invasive weeds, and upend rural community dynamics.
Makes provisions voluntary and limited for up to 10 years. Renewals would be allowed after the terms of the Water Conservation Plan expire.
After a Water Conservation Plan expires, a water user could resume putting that water to use again for non-conservation purposes.
The proposal respects the principle of 'enlargement,' which means another water user couldn't use the 'conserved' or 'saved' water that's flowing downstream.
EXPANDING EXISTING WATER CONSERVATION INITIATIVES: Based on an existing program from 2007, AB9 could provide a way to expand conservation programs while putting safeguards in place to prevent speculative uses of water rights. Roerink sees it as a 'halfway' step that might be more acceptable to lawmakers. The bill is still in its formative stages, but it's expected to get a bill hearing next week.
WATER OMNIBUS AND CLEANUP: AB104 renews the effort to retire water rights, buying back those rights from individual users across the state. That was happening with the use of COVID money, Roerink said, but it was completely through administrative channels with no framework under state law. This bill would set up that framework, but it does not request any funding for buybacks. This bill is also scheduled for a hearing next week.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Courting chaos
Courting chaos

Politico

time3 hours ago

  • Politico

Courting chaos

STANDOFF — Gov. Maura Healey is urging so-called bar advocates to get back to work while continuing to hash out a deal over their pay rate with the Legislature, as defendants without representation start to have their cases dismissed. It won't be so easy. While the Legislature 'is actively working on this,' Healey said Wednesday, 'they're not there yet in terms of a resolution.' Bar advocates, the private attorneys who represent most of the defendants in Massachusetts who can't afford one on their own, stopped taking cases in late May. Now, thanks to a 2004 court rule, many of those defendants are starting to see their cases dismissed as they wait without representation. 'My hope is that we see a resolution very, very quickly, and in the meantime, I'd like to see lawyers back in court representing defendants,' the governor told reporters. Don't expect that to happen any time soon. Several bar advocates gathered on Zoom to vent their frustration and talk about their next steps on Wednesday evening. The verdict: 'I think the consensus is, why should we?' Jen O'Brien, a bar advocate in Middlesex County, told Playbook. The attorneys are looking for a raise that would put their hourly rate for most cases at $100 an hour, a $35 increase from what they currently make, but one that would still leave them behind states like New Hampshire (where it's $125 an hour) and Maine (where it's $150). Healey said Wednesday that the attorneys didn't bring the issue to her before she filed her budget in January. They say they've been flagging it for lawmakers for months. 'We would like to resolve this, but nobody will sit at the table with us,' O'Brien said. 'Why should we go back and lose our leverage and trust that we can still get the increase?' In the meantime, some lawyers are moving on — picking up immigration cases, or defending indigent defendants in other nearby states. 'If this goes on, I think people aren't even going to be interested in going back,' O'Brien said. GOOD THURSDAY MORNING, MASSACHUSETTS. The MassGOP used the dispute to take a shot at Healey on X for allowing pay raises for officials in her office while the work stoppage continues. TODAY — Gov. Maura Healey has no public events. Lt. Gov. Kim Driscoll speaks at a National Guard ceremony at 10 a.m. in Salem. Have a tip, story, suggestion, birthday, anniversary, new job, or any other nugget for the Playbook? Drop me a line: kgarrity@ MORNING MONEY: CAPITAL RISK — POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are adapting. Want to know how health care regulation, tariffs, or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here. DATELINE BEACON HILL — Police searching for State House vandal by Alison Kuznitz, Colin A. Young and Ella Adams, State House News Service: 'Overnight vandalism at the State House prompted a large police presence Wednesday, including from federal officials, as a stretch of sidewalk in front of the building remained closed to the public for hours. White paint was splattered on the largely decorative front gate and the steps leading up to it, and black spray paint was also visible on the stone structures that form the entryway. Graffiti scrawled on the Bulfinch Entrance pillar appeared to say 'divest.'' FROM THE HUB — With Michelle Wu on vacation, Boston's acting mayor duties are split between two officials by Gayla Cawley, Boston Herald: 'The Boston City Council president and city clerk are splitting acting mayor duties this week while Mayor Michelle Wu takes a family vacation in Maine. City Clerk Alex Geourntas assumed acting mayor duties for the first half of the week because both the city's mayor and Council president, Ruthzee Louijeune, were out of town, Geourntas told the Herald Wednesday. — Fenway Park workers set to go on strike for series against Los Angeles Dodgers by Esteban Bustillos, GBH News: 'Fenway Park has seen a lot go down in its time. But even America's Most Beloved Ballpark could be in for a first this weekend. Hospitality workers at the ballpark and MGM Music Hall, represented by UNITE HERE Local 26, are poised to strike during the upcoming Red Sox home stand against the Los Angeles Dodgers if negotiations with food service and facilities management company Aramark fail to reach an agreement. The union announced their strike plan on Wednesday.' — Boston will begin fining Republic Services over lack of trash pickup amid worker strike, Wu says by Niki Griswold, The Boston Globe: 'As trash workers enter their fourth week of a strike, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu said the city will begin fining waste management company Republic Services for failing to pick up trash. Wu made the announcement in a letter sent to the president of Republic Services Wednesday, in which she said the service disruption as a result of the labor dispute 'is taking an unacceptable toll on Boston's residents, businesses, and neighborhoods.'' YAHD SIGNS AND BUMPAH STICKAHS COMING SOON — Former President Barack Obama is headlining an August fundraiser in Martha's Vineyard for a Democratic redistricting group that's fighting the GOP-led efforts in Texas and Ohio, POLITICO's Andrew Howard reports. The dinner is in response to Texas Republicans looking to redraw their state's map to tip it in their favor ahead of the midterms. Also attending the event: NDRC chair and former Attorney General Eric Holder and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. MIGRANTS IN MASSACHUSETTS — Immigration policy shifts are already costing health workers their jobs in Massachusetts by Sarah Betancourt, GBH News: 'Some health and home care providers in Massachusetts have recently laid off staff because of the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration, according to advocates and employer associations. One service provider reached out to Home Care Alliance of Massachusetts after receiving a Department of Homeland Security notice asking it to verify the employment documents of hundreds of its aides in the United States under a parole program for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans, who recently lost their legal status during an ongoing court battle.' — Fired immigration judges say court system is under attack by Stephanie Brown and Lisa Mullins, WBUR: 'Two judges fired from a Massachusetts immigration court say they see their terminations as part of President Trump's broader attack on the nation's court system. 'The very institutions that glue our society together are melting in front of our eyes. Our institutions are under attack,' said George Pappas, a judge who was fired this month from the Chelmsford Immigration Court.' THE RACE FOR CITY HALL — Quincy changed two polling locations. A candidate for city council is raising concerns by Peter Blandino, The Patriot Ledger: 'Changes to polling locations for the 2025 municipal elections have led a city council candidate to raise concerns over the neutrality of one of the new locations, as well as what she described as lingering community trauma associated with a tragic death that occurred there in 2019. Precinct 5 of Quincy's Ward 6 will now vote at the American Legion's Nickerson Post at 20 Moon Island Road due to construction at the previously designated polling location, the Squantum Elementary School, according to City Clerk Nicole Crispo. … Ward 6 candidate Deborah Riley told The Patriot Ledger that incumbent Ward 6 Councilor Bill Harris, who is a member of the Nickerson Post and works there part-time as a bartender, could benefit on election day from his affiliation with the site.' PLANES, TRAINS AND AUTOMOBILES — Free shuttle will connect business district with MBTA station by Fred Thys, Plymouth Independent: 'Tourists and others will soon be able to catch a free ride on a Ride Circuit vehicle from the Kingston MBTA commuter rail station to Plymouth's downtown and waterfront district – and back – thanks to a $30,000 state grant. The funding will allow the tourism organization See Plymouth to operate a five-passenger electric vehicle to greet passengers at every train arrival and departure from Thursday to Sunday and bring them to the See Plymouth Waterfront Visitor Center on Water Street. Return trips to the T station will depart from Water Street as well.' FROM HARVARD YARD — State Department launches new investigation into Harvard by Nicole Markus, POLITICO: 'The State Department will investigate Harvard University's eligibility to sponsor international students and researchers, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Wednesday, the latest attempt by the Trump administration to pressure the Ivy League university.' IT'S NOT EASY BEING GREEN — Vineyard Wind nears 30% power production by Anastasia E. Lennon, The New Bedford Light: 'As Vineyard Wind has ramped up construction this summer, the project is now sending power from 17 turbines to the Massachusetts grid, up from four in May, according to a quarterly investors report released on Wednesday. It amounts to about 220 megawatts of the 800-megawatt project, or 27% power production, with enough energy to power more than 100,000 Massachusetts homes. Iberdrola, the parent company of Avangrid, one of the project's developers, also said in its new report that the project expects to reach 30% power by the end of July — and 'full COD,' meaning full commercial operation date, by the end of this year.' — Environmental group to challenge waste transfer facilit in New Bedford by Kevin G. Andrade, The New Bedford Light: 'The Conservation Law Foundation announced Wednesday that it intends to file an appeal on the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection's site suitability decision with the agency's Office of Appeals and Dispute Resolution by July 28. It argued that the Board should thus delay the hearing until that process plays out.' FROM THE 413 — Parents decry possible return of Amherst school counselor fired over anti-trans actions by Scott Merzbach, Daily Hampshire Gazette: 'Parents, students and community members are calling on administrators for the Amherst-Pelham Regional Schools and the Regional School Committee to ensure that a middle school counselor, fired in 2023 following alleged anti-trans actions that included repeatedly misgendering students and promoting her religious beliefs, have no contact with children if and when she is reinstated to her role.' THE LOCAL ANGLE — Supporters cheer Worcester councilor at arraignment on charges of interfering with police by Toni Caushi, Telegram & Gazette: 'Supporters cheered outside the Worcester Courthouse for District 5 Councilor Etel Haxhiaj Wednesday, July 23 as the councilor proclaimed her innocence to counts of assault and battery on a police officer and interfering with police in connection with a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement action in May.' HEARD 'ROUND THE BUBBLAH TRANSITIONS — Benchmark Strategies President Patrick Bench has been named to the Board of Advisers of the International Innovation Hub of Boston. HAPPY BIRTHDAY — to Stacey Monahan.

NM lawmakers' addresses removed from website as precaution amid security concerns
NM lawmakers' addresses removed from website as precaution amid security concerns

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

NM lawmakers' addresses removed from website as precaution amid security concerns

Jul. 23—SANTA FE — The New Mexico Legislature has removed lawmakers' home addresses from the legislative website, following the shooting of two Minnesota lawmakers at their homes last month. The decision to do so was made "in an abundance of caution" by the Legislature's administrative arm, the Legislative Council Service, in consultation with top-ranking Democratic lawmakers, said LCS Director Shawna Casebier. She said legislators are encouraged to use a post office box or nonresidential mailing address for posting to the legislative website, while describing the question of whether home addresses will be returned to the public website as an "ongoing discussion." Other states have taken similar steps since the June shootings in Minnesota, in which state Rep. Melissa Hartman and her husband were killed. Another Democratic legislator, state Sen. John Hoffman, was also shot in his home but survived. New Mexico lawmakers have grappled with security concerns even before the Minnesota assassination, including after a string of drive-by shootings targeting Democratic elected officials' homes took place following the 2022 general election. No one was injured in those shootings, but Solomon Peña, a former Republican state House candidate, was convicted in March of all counts he was charged with in connection to the shootings. He faces a mandatory 60 years in prison when sentenced next month. After those shootings, legislators' addresses were removed from the legislative website but some were later reposted at the request of individual lawmakers, Casebier said. Senate President Pro Tem Mimi Stewart, D-Albuquerque, said she and House Speaker Javier Martínez, D-Albuquerque, were in quick agreement on the decision to remove lawmakers' addresses from the website after last month's shootings in Minnesota. She also said Senate Democrats recently held a caucus meeting on security issues, during which legislators were urged to look into home security technology and were provided with additional information. "It's just sort of basic security precautions that we're trying to think about," Stewart told the Journal. "We have to pay attention and we're doing it." But she also acknowledged that political violence targeting elected officials has already discouraged some potential candidates from running. She also said it could prompt some legislators to step down. "It's a scary time we live in," Stewart said Wednesday. "We're trying to allay those fears and keep people safe." The recent actions come after previous steps to address security concerns. In 2021, top-ranking New Mexico lawmakers voted to ban guns and other weapons from the Roundhouse, with certain limited exceptions. That vote led to metal detectors being installed at the public entrances to the building. Meanwhile, a 2023 elections bill included a provision that allows elected officials in New Mexico to keep their home addresses confidential in certain mandatory filings with the Secretary of State's Office. Stewart said the security-motivated policies would not make the Legislature less transparent, citing the webcasting of all interim committee hearings and other initiatives. Many legislators also have the names and phone numbers of their district legislative assistants posted on the Legislature's website. "We don't intend to lock the public out of anything," said Stewart. Solve the daily Crossword

Eaton fire could wipe out California's $21-billion wildfire fund, documents show
Eaton fire could wipe out California's $21-billion wildfire fund, documents show

Los Angeles Times

timea day ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Eaton fire could wipe out California's $21-billion wildfire fund, documents show

Damage claims from the Eaton wildfire in Altadena could wipe out the $21-billion fund California created to shield utilities and their customers from the cost of wildfires sparked by electric lines, according to newly released state documents. Investigators are seeking to determine whether Southern California Edison's equipment sparked the Jan. 7 inferno, which killed 19 people and destroyed 9,000 homes. If Edison is found responsible, 'the resulting claims may be substantial enough to fully exhaust the Fund,' state officials who administer the wildfire fund wrote in a draft annual report to the Legislature. The seven-member state Catastrophe Response Council, which oversees the fund, is scheduled to meet Thursday to discuss how potential damage claims from the Eaton fire could affect it. Concerns are already emerging that, should Edison be found liable, it would have little incentive to keep damage claims from becoming excessive since the utility itself would be spared from covering most of the costs. 'Are we impressing on the utilities that they need to settle claims with diligence?' wrote one of the council members, according to meeting materials released ahead of Thursday's meeting. 'Since the claims they settle are just passed on to us, they don't have much incentive to keep claims low.' Asked for comment on that statement, Edison spokeswoman Kathleen Dunleavy said that officials 'need to be wise and cautious about how this money is spent.' 'We agree that the wildfire fund should go to those directly affected by wildfires,' she said. The council member who raised the concern wasn't identified by name. Wade Crowfoot, California's secretary of Natural Resources, holds one of the nine council seats. His spokesman, Tony Andersen, said Crowfoot is 'engaged very closely' on the wildfire fund issue, but had no additional comment at this time. Other council members include Gov. Gavin Newsom, other state leaders and their appointees. According to the state documents, the insured property losses alone could amount to as much as $15.2 billion, according to materials released ahead of a Thursday meeting. That amount does not include uninsured losses or damages beyond those to property, such as wrongful-death claims. An earlier study by UCLA estimated losses from the fire at $24 billion to $45 billion. Newsom and legislative leaders are now talking about how to shore up the fund. The Times reported last month that one option under discussion behind closed doors is to have electricity customers pay billions of dollars more into the fund. Newsom and lawmakers created the wildfire fund in 2019, saying it was needed to protect the state's three biggest for-profit utilities from bankruptcy if their equipment sparked a catastrophic fire. Newsom said at the time that the legislation, known as Assembly Bill 1054, would 'move our state toward a safer, affordable and reliable energy future.' Six years later, however, utilities' electricity lines continue to be a top cause of wildfires in California. And in 2024, the state had the second highest electric rates in the country after Hawaii. Edison said in April that a leading theory of the cause of the Eaton fire is that one of its decades-old transmission lines, last used in 1971, somehow became reenergized and sparked the fire. The investigation into the cause of the fire is continuing. Already lawyers have filed dozens of lawsuits against Edison on behalf of families who lost their homes, nearby residents who say they were harmed by toxins in the smoke and governments that lost buildings and equipment. Under the 2019 law, Edison would be allowed to settle those lawsuits. Then the state fund would reimburse the company for all or most of those costs. The Palisades fire, which also ignited Jan. 7, isn't covered by the wildfire fund because Pacific Palisades is served by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, a municipal utility. Newsom's staff didn't respond to questions about how the fund's life could be extended and whether he believed AB 1054 should be amended so that excessive settlements or attorney fees aren't allowed to deplete the fund. One idea being debated is to have the 30 million Californians served by Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric, and San Diego Gas & Electric pay billions of dollars more into the fund. That plan could involve extending a monthly surcharge of about $3 on electricity bills beyond its planned expiration in 2035. Officials at the California Earthquake Authority, which serves as administrator of the wildfire fund, say they are also worried that attorney fees could eat up a large portion of the money. Attorneys can receive 30% to 40% of the victim settlements, according to a 2024 study. An additional 10% to 15% can go to lawyers defending the utility from fire claims, the study said. That means as much as 50% of settlement amounts could go to legal fees, the paper said. The consolidated lawsuit against Edison in Los Angeles County Superior Court lists more than 50 law firms involved in the litigation. Officials at the Earthquake Authority say the Legislature may have to change the 2019 law to limit attorney fees or give priority to some settlements over others. For example, Wall Street hedge funds have been offering to buy claims that insurance companies have against Edison. The funds are gambling that they can get more from the state's wildfire fund in the future than they are paying insurers for the claims now. Council members discussed in May whether AB 1054 should be amended so that claims from Californians who lost their homes be given precedence over those owned by Wall Street investors trying to profit from the fire.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store