Iran says it 'remains committed' to nuclear non-proliferation treaty
'Our co-operation with the IAEA will be channelled through Iran's Supreme National Security Council for obvious safety and security reasons,' Abbas Araghchi said in a post on X.
Mr Pezeshkian, who also chairs Iran's Supreme National Security Council, on Wednesday approved a law to suspend co-operation with the IAEA, which had been passed by parliament and approved by the Guardian Council, the country's constitutional watchdog.
Iranian leaders have accused the UN agency of providing Israel with grounds for attacking its nuclear facilities after its board censured Iran last month for not complying with its obligations under the non-proliferation treaty, which is intended to stop the spread of nuclear weapons.
The IAEA has monitored Iran's nuclear energy programme for years. Tehran claims the programme is for peaceful, civilian purposes, but western powers suspect Iran is seeking to build a bomb. Israel launched air strikes aimed at crippling Iran's nuclear infrastructure on June 13, hours after the IAEA board passed the censure resolution.
The US entered the conflict on June 22 by sending B-2 bombers to drop 'bunker-buster' bombs on three Iranian nuclear sites. Israel's attacks and Iran's retaliatory missile strikes ended two days later after US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire.
An IAEA spokesman told The National on Wednesday that they were aware of reports on suspension co-operation with the agency and were 'awaiting further official information from Iran'.
The US State Department condemned Iran's move to stop co-operating with the IAEA, while the UN said the decision was 'obviously concerning'. Secretary General Antonio Guterres 'has been very consistent in his call for Iran to co-operate with the IAEA', his spokesman Stephane Dujarric said.
Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called on Germany, France and Britain 'to reinstate all sanctions against Iran' under an earlier nuclear deal. Germany said Iran's decision to suspend co-operation with the IAEA sends a 'devastating message'.
The extent of damage to Iran's nuclear facilities from the Israeli and US attacks is not fully known. Mr Araghchi told US broadcaster CBS in an interview, part of which was released on Tuesday, that the Fordow nuclear plant had been 'seriously and heavily damaged' by the US bombing, adding that the full picture was still unclear.
Fordow was the stronghold of Iran's nuclear energy programme and came to be seen as a symbol of defiance by the ruling regime against the international community, as well as a bargaining chip in diplomacy.
The site's extreme fortification made it nearly impossible to attack without advanced bunker-busting weaponry, something only the US possesses.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Best photos of July 5: Fourth of July celebrations to Syria's new emblem
A Syrian woman takes a picture of the new national emblem of Syria, depicting an eagle inspired by ancient motifs at Palmyra carrying 14 feathers symbolising the country's 14 governorates and surmounted by three stars from the national flag, during a drone show at Ummayad Square in Damascus. AFP
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US consultancy firm involved in GHF aid scheme modelled plans to 'relocate' Palestinians
A consulting firm involved in the scandal-plagued Gaza Humanitarian Foundation entered into a multimillion-dollar contract to develop the initiative and modelled a plan to "relocate" Palestinians from Gaza as part of its work, a Financial Times investigation has revealed. The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) helped design and run the US and Israeli-backed scheme which aimed to supplant United Nations-led aid coordination mechanisms in Gaza. The chaotic roll out of the programme has seen 600 Palestinians killed and another 4,000 wounded by Israeli forces while attempting to access aid. The firm has disavowed its involvement in the project, claiming in a statement in June that it had initially provided "pro bono support" for the project, but two senior partners that led the work "failed to disclose" its full nature and had subsequently carried out "unauthorised work" on the project. It said that the partners have since been fired and an investigation has been launched into the firm's involvement in the scheme. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters But according to sources familiar with the project who spoke to the Financial Times, the BCG were more enmeshed with the scheme than the firm has publicly acknowledged, with the company contracted to perform $4m worth of work over a period of seven months. Over a dozen BCG staff worked directly on the project, dubbed "Aurora", between October and late May. Senior figures at the firm were reported to have discussed the initiative, but the BCG said they were misled about the scope and nature of the work by the partners helming the project. 'My journey to get aid in Gaza was like Squid Game' Read More » "The lead partner was categorically told no, and he violated this directive. We disavow this work," the BCG said. The work included financial modelling for the post-war reconstruction of Gaza, commissioned by Israeli backers, with one scenario envisioning the "voluntary relocation" of Palestinians from the enclave. This would have involved paying out "relocation packages" to 500,000 people worth $9,000 per person to induce people to leave the territory. The model assumed a quarter of Palestinians would opt to leave Gaza, with three-quarters of them unlikely to return. It estimated the cost of forced expulsion of Palestinians to be $23,000 cheaper, per Palestinian, than the costs of providing support to them in Gaza during reconstruction. According to BCG, this side of the operation was conducted without the knowledge of senior management and against their instructions. Involvement in security operations The revelations also raise questions about BCG's involvement in developing the security aspect of the initiative. According to sources familiar with the early stages of BCG's work on the initiative, the firm was initially contracted by Washington-based security contractor Orbis to develop a feasibility study for a new aid operation on behalf of the Tachlith Institute, an Israeli think tank. BCG was chosen for the project because of its connections with Phil Reilly, a 29-year veteran of the CIA who worked at Orbis. He was a senior adviser to BCG's defence practice where the two fired partners, Matt Schlueter and Ryan Ordway, worked. Middle East Eye previously reported that Reilly served as a senior adviser at BCG for eight years, and began discussing Gaza aid with Israeli civilians while still in his advisory role in early 2024. The BCG did not answer MEE's questions regarding its involvement in the security operations to support GHF, what role it had played with the foundation and who had asked the firm to get involved initially. Reilly dropped his advisory role with BCG and went on to found Safe Reach Solutions (SRS), a private military company which became the main security provider for the GHF. According to the report, half a dozen staff shifted to "more detailed business planning" for the SRS and GHF. This work was helmed by the US defence practice, while the initial pro-bono phase was billed to BCG's social impact practice helmed by Rich Hutchinson. Ex-CIA officer running Gaza aid security advised Boston Consulting Group Read More » By January, the BCG was contracted by McNally Capital, a Chicago-based private equity firm which owns Orbis, to plan GHF's ground operations from Tel Aviv. The SRS signed an initial contract with the group worth over $1m to cover eight weeks of work to develop SRS's operations in Gaza, with travel approvals given by officials in BGC's risk management operation. The group told the Financial Times that it was "pleased to have supported the establishment of SRS as an important step toward meeting the full scope of the humanitarian need in Gaza". Funding sources for both GHF and SRS remain unclear. Both are registered in US tax havens, with scant details available in public records. A source previously told the Financial Times that the GHF had been pledged $100m from a country they refused to name. Reuters reported on Friday that UBS and Goldman Sachs declined to open bank accounts for the GHF, with the foundation's lack of transparency over its funding cited as being one of the main stumbling blocks in the discussions with the banks. A GHF spokesperson said it has "spoken about initial funding from Europe, but we don't disclose donors for their privacy". GHF's scheme has seen 400 aid distribution points across the enclave replaced by four militarised distribution sites, where millions are forced to risk death in the hope of receiving aid. Israeli troops have admitted to deliberately shooting and killing unarmed Palestinians waiting for aid in the Gaza Strip, following direct orders from their superiors.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Hamas wants guarantees from Trump and 'not anyone else' on Gaza ceasefire
Hamas is seeking personal guarantees from US President Donald Trump that the war in Gaza will come to a complete end as the main condition for a ceasefire with Israel, a senior official said on Saturday. 'We submitted our positive response to the mediators yesterday. A new round of negotiations is expected to begin, focusing on the core issues: Israeli withdrawal and an end to the war,' the Hamas official explained. 'The guarantees we are seeking must come from the Americans — President Trump personally, not anyone else,' he added. The US, Egypt and Qatar have proposed a 60-day ceasefire during which some Israeli hostages would be released. Hamas on Friday said it had given a 'positive response' to the proposal, four months after the previous agreement collapsed. The Hamas official said the deal currently on the table would see the group releasing 10 living Israeli hostages and returning the bodies of 18 others. Mr Trump had called it a "final proposal" and said he expected Hamas to answer within 24 hours. When told about the Hamas response by reporters aboard Air Force One he replied: "That's good. They haven't briefed me on it. We have to get it over with. We have to do something about Gaza." He said there "could be a Gaza deal" next week and that he was optimistic, although the situation "changes day to day". Points of contention The response by Hamas appeared not to signal an immediate end to hostilities, though. The group is seeking assurances from mediators that some additional demands will be met, sources told The National on Friday. The sources confirmed Hamas would convey its acceptance of the proposed deal along with a request for assurances from US, Egyptian and Qatari mediators about the implementation of some of its 'unpublicised' clauses. These include the return by Israel of the bodies of some of the group's leaders killed during the Gaza war, including Yahya Sinwar and his brother Mohammed. The Hamas official pointed out several remaining points of contention that still need to be resolved. "For example, the Israelis don't want to withdraw; they want to talk about a redeployment. That's unacceptable. The wording needs to be clear on this point," he explained. 'Regarding aid distribution, the original text assigns the task to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, but we requested it be amended to specify recognised UN agencies, such as UNRWA and others.' Other clauses cover the laying down and storing of the group's arms and the guaranteed return to Gaza of wounded Palestinians, who will be allowed under the deal to leave the strip for treatment abroad, sources close to the negotiations said. The clauses also include the creation of a 1km-deep safe zone on the Palestinian side of the entire Gaza-Israel border, which will be free of human habitation or any economic activity, including farming. According to these clauses, an unnamed Arab nation will supervise the storage of Hamas's weapons, and Israel will be prevented from excluding any area of Gaza from the distribution of badly needed humanitarian resistance. According to a two-page draft text obtained by The National on Friday, the handover of hostages and bodies will start on the first day of the truce and end on the final day. In return, Israel will release more than 1,000 Palestinians held in Israeli prisons, including scores serving long terms. On the 10th day of the truce, Hamas is expected to provide 'comprehensive information' on the remaining hostages. In return, Israel will provide information on Palestinians it has detained since October 7, 2023, the day the Gaza war began with an attack on southern Israel communities by Hamas and its allies. Ramped up strikes The Hamas-led attacks prompted a devastating military assault by Israel that has so far killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to health authorities in Gaza. The war has displaced the majority of the enclave's estimated two million population, with many having to flee more than once, and destroyed swathes of built-up areas. On Saturday, hours after Hamas said it delivered its "positive" response, Israel ramped up its assault on Gaza despite the ceasefire momentum. Medical sources and eyewitnesses reported heavy shelling and airstrikes targeting Rafah and Khan Younis in the south, Gaza city in the north, and central refugee camps. In Rafah, eight people were killed and more than 40 injured when Israeli forces opened fire near an aid distribution site linked to the US-Israel Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). To the east, in Bani Suheila near Khan Younis, four more Palestinians were killed in an airstrike. Another strike on tents sheltering displaced families in Al-Mawasi, west of the city, killed seven and injured over ten. Gaza city also came under sustained attack. Artillery fire in the Zarqa area killed one person, while an Israeli strike on Al Shafii School in Zaytoun killed five and wounded several more. Rescue workers later recovered the bodies of two people killed in the Shujaiyya neighbourhood, and strikes on residential buildings caused further casualties. In central Gaza, Israeli drones targeted homes in Al-Bureij and Al-Maghazi refugee camps, killing at least four and injuring others.
