logo
China downplayed nuclear-capable missile test, classified New Zealand gov't papers show

China downplayed nuclear-capable missile test, classified New Zealand gov't papers show

HKFP22-06-2025
China tried to mislead foreign governments in 2024 by playing down the importance of a nuclear-capable missile test over the Pacific Ocean, New Zealand diplomats privately warned in documents obtained by AFP.
Beijing sent shivers through the South Pacific in September 2024, when its elite Rocket Force fired a dummy warhead into the high seas near French Polynesia.
A tranche of classified government briefing notes obtained by AFP shows deep concern within the New Zealand government in the wake of the surprise launch, which China shrugged off as 'routine'.
It was China's first long-range missile launch over international waters in more than 40 years, the papers confirmed, serving as a blunt reminder of Beijing's potent nuclear-strike capabilities.
'We are concerned that China is characterising this as a 'routine test',' senior diplomats wrote in a memo to New Zealand's foreign affairs minister.
'It is not routine: China has not conducted this type of long-range missile test in over 40 years.
'We do not want to see this test repeated.'
China's military played down the test as a 'legitimate and routine arrangement for military training'.
Behind the scenes, New Zealand diplomats privately decried China's 'mischaracterisation'.
'As this is the first time that China has undertaken such an action in the Pacific in several decades, it is a significant and concerning development,' they wrote in one of the briefing documents.
AFP applied to access the heavily redacted documents — written between September and October last year — under New Zealand's Official Information Act.
They were classified as 'Restricted', which protects government information with diplomatic or national security implications.
Nuclear scars
China has been seeking to cement its presence in the strategically important South Pacific, showering developing island nations with new hospitals, freshly paved roads, and gleaming sports stadiums.
But rarely has it so obviously flexed its military might in the region, where the United States, Australia and New Zealand have long been the security partners of choice.
'We have again asked China why it conducted the test at this time, and why it chose to terminate the missile test in the South Pacific,' New Zealand diplomats wrote.
China's Rocket Force launched the intercontinental ballistic missile with little warning on September 25, 2024.
Photos released by China showed a projectile streaking into the sky from a secret location atop a billowing plume of smoke.
It appeared to be one of China's advanced Dong Feng-31 missiles, analysts said, a weapon capable of delivering a thermonuclear warhead.
The long-range missile splashed into a patch of ocean long designated a nuclear-free zone under an international treaty.
Pacific island nations remain deeply scarred by the nuclear tests that shook the region in the decades following World War II.
'This is the first time that we are aware of a test of a nuclear-capable missile terminating within the zone since its establishment in 1986,' the New Zealand diplomats wrote.
Forceful reminder
China alerted the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Australia and New Zealand before the test.
But there was only a vague indication of what it would do, according to a separate batch of Australian government documents obtained by AFP.
'Beijing advised us of a planned activity the evening prior to the launch, but specific details were not forthcoming,' Australian defence officials wrote in November last year.
Pacific island nations, however, were not provided with advance notice of the launch, New Zealand diplomats noted.
Following the launch, Japan publicly voiced 'serious concern', Australia said the test risked 'destabilising' the South Pacific, and Fiji urged 'respect for our region'.
Pacific nation Kiribati, one of China's warmest friends in the region, said the South Pacific Ocean should not be a proving ground for jostling big powers.
'The high seas in the Pacific are not isolated pockets of oceans… we appeal to all countries involved in weapon testing to stop these acts to maintain world peace and stability,' read a government statement at the time.
China foreign policy expert Nicholas Khoo said the intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) test was particularly significant because it took place in the South Pacific.
'Since 1980, China's ICBM tests have taken place within Chinese territory,' he told AFP.
'The test is a reminder to regional states that China is a 'full spectrum' power that has economic and military power. It is a peer with the US.'
Harvard University researcher Hui Zhang said it was a forceful reminder of China's nuclear strength.
'The test shows that the Rocket Force has an operational and credible nuclear force that can help ensure China's ability to maintain a strong nuclear deterrent,' he wrote last year for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
'The rare public ICBM test seems to have been specifically aimed at dissuading Washington from using nuclear weapons in a potential conflict across the Taiwan Strait.'
China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the 'facts are clear and no one has been misled'.
'The missile test is a routine part of annual military training, in compliance with international law and international norms,' it said in a statement.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin says will speak with Trump on phone
Putin says will speak with Trump on phone

RTHK

timea day ago

  • RTHK

Putin says will speak with Trump on phone

Putin says will speak with Trump on phone Vladimir Putin has not said what the two would discuss in Thursday's call. File photo: Reuters Russian President Vladimir Putin said that he would speak with US counterpart Donald Trump on the phone on Thursday, their first publicly announced call in over two weeks. The two have been in regular contact since Trump took office in January and have discussed issues like the Ukraine conflict and economic cooperation. Putin did not say what the two would discuss in Thursday's call. "I will talk to the US president today," the Russian leader told media during a visit to an exhibition centre in Moscow. Trump confirmed the call on Truth Social. The two leaders have praised each other in recent weeks, despite Moscow's ongoing assault on Ukraine. Putin said last week that he had "great respect" for Trump and that US ties were improving. Trump said Putin's statements were "very nice". (AFP)

Ukraine calls for clarify after US weapons pause
Ukraine calls for clarify after US weapons pause

RTHK

time2 days ago

  • RTHK

Ukraine calls for clarify after US weapons pause

Ukraine calls for clarify after US weapons pause Ukraine said Washington's move would weaken its ability to defend against intensifying airstrikes and battlefield advances. File photo: AFP Ukraine appealed to the United States for clarity on Wednesday after it was caught off guard by a White House announcement that Washington was halting some arms shipments to the war-battered country. The Ukrainian defence ministry, which is deeply dependent on US arms, said it had not been notified about the reduction in aid announced one day earlier. Moscow revelled in the decision, saying it could bring the end of the war closer. Any slowdown in US support could harm Kyiv's ability to fend off escalating Russian aerial bombardments or frontline gains. Kyiv has long feared halts to US aid after Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, having criticised the tens of billions of dollars in support and weapons sent by his predecessor, Joe Biden. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in an evening address that Kyiv and Washington were clarifying details on supplies. "Continued American support for Ukraine, for our defence, for our people is in our common interest," he said. John Ginkel, the deputy chief of mission at the US embassy in Kyiv, was summoned by the foreign ministry – a rare diplomatic move usually reserved for foes and rivals, not vital allies – given uncertainty about what the cuts would mean for Kyiv. "Now is not the time for weak decisions," Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga wrote on X. "We need more interceptors and systems. We are also ready to purchase or rent them," he added. US officials downplayed the move. "The Department of Defense continues to provide the president with robust options regarding military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end," Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell told journalists. "The department is rigorously examining and adapting its approach towards achieving this objective while also preserving US military readiness and defense priorities," he said. In Moscow, the Kremlin said that reducing weapons deliveries to Kyiv would help end the conflict. "The fewer the number of weapons that are delivered to Ukraine, the closer the end of the special military operation," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters in response to a question by AFP, using Russia's term for its more than three-year-long offensive. (AFP)

Hamas studies ceasefire deal amid Netanyahu threats
Hamas studies ceasefire deal amid Netanyahu threats

RTHK

time2 days ago

  • RTHK

Hamas studies ceasefire deal amid Netanyahu threats

Hamas studies ceasefire deal amid Netanyahu threats Smoke billows after an Israeli strike in Gaza City in the central Gaza Strip on Wednesday. Photo: AFP Hamas said on Wednesday it was studying what US President Donald Trump called a "final" ceasefire proposal for Gaza but that Israel must pull out of the enclave, while Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu insisted that Hamas would be eliminated. Trump said on Tuesday Israel had agreed to the conditions needed to finalise a 60-day ceasefire with Hamas after a meeting between his representatives and Israeli officials. In a statement, the Palestinian militant group said it was studying new ceasefire offers received from mediators Egypt and Qatar but that it aimed to reach an agreement that would ensure an end to the war and an Israeli pullout from Gaza. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called for the elimination of Hamas in his first public remarks since Trump's announcement. "There will not be a Hamas. There will not be a 'Hamastan'. We're not going back to that. It's over," Netanyahu told a meeting hosted by the Trans-Israel pipeline. The two sides' statements reiterated long-held positions, giving no clues as to whether or how a compromise agreement could be reached. "I hope it would work this time, even if for two months, it would save thousands of innocent lives," Kamal, a resident of Gaza City, said by phone. Others questioned whether Trump's statements would deliver long-term peace. "We hope he is serious like he was serious during the Israeli-Iranian war when he said the war should stop, and it stopped," said Adnan Al-Assar, a resident of Khan Younis in Gaza's south. There is growing public pressure on Netanyahu to reach a permanent ceasefire and end the nearly two-year-long war, a move opposed by hardline members of his right-wing ruling coalition. At the same time, US and Israeli strikes on nuclear sites in Iran and ceasefire agreed on in last month's 12-day Israel-Iran air war have put pressure on Hamas, which is backed by Tehran. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said his country was "serious in our will" to reach a hostage deal and ceasefire. "There are some positive signs. I don't want to say more than that right now. But our goal is to begin proximity talks as soon as possible," he said while visiting Estonia. A source close to Hamas said its leaders were expected to debate the proposal and seek clarifications from mediators before giving an official response. (Reuters)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store