
Complaint alleges OPD detective seized juvenile's phone without warrant
Five witnesses, three of whom are unrelated to the juvenile or his court case, gave nearly identical accounts of the incident, which occurred outside courtrooms on the judicial center's third floor Thursday afternoon.
The juvenile's public defender, Colin O'Brien, filed a complaint against OPD Sgt. John Preston with OPD's Professional Standards Unit Thursday.
'He literally snatched that phone out of that boy's hand,' said Stephanie Green, who witnessed the incident.
'Even the child said, 'Do you have a warrant?' and his grandmother said, 'Do you have a warrant?' ' Green said. 'He (Preston) was walking away and waving it in the air like, 'ha ha.' '
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against 'unreasonable search and seizure,' and requires law enforcement to have a search warrant to search homes and seize property under most circumstances.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2014 a cellphone can't be searched without a warrant when a person has been arrested.
O'Brien said the juvenile was appearing in juvenile court on a 'status offense,' which is an offense only someone under the age of 18 could face. Examples of status offenses are truancy from school, being a runaway or possession of tobacco products by a minor.
The juvenile was not in court for any criminal charges, O'Brien said.
O'Brien said the juvenile was in the hallway with his grandmother when two detectives, Preston and a second detective, approached and said they wanted to ask the juvenile some questions. The juvenile declined to speak to them, O'Brien said.
'As soon as the first detective asked him if he wanted to talk and (the juvenile) said 'no,' he (Preston) said, 'we are going to be getting a warrant' for the phone, O'brien said.
'Sgt. Preston came up and said, 'We are going to be getting a warrant,' and forcibly took (the phone) out of his hand,' O'Brien said.
O'Brien said it appeared that 'Sgt. Preston (was) getting (angry) when the kid said he wouldn't talk to them.'
O'Brien said Preston gave his name when asked.
Liz Webb, who is not related to the juvenile or his case, said she heard several people question Preston about whether he had a warrant to take the phone.
When the juvenile refused to talk to the two detectives, Webb said the first detective started walking away, and that Preston took the phone from the juvenile.
'When he was walking down the hall, he lifted it up and said, 'I'm seizing it without' (a warrant,)' Webb said.
Kyle Webb, who also saw the incident, said the unnamed detective was 'very professional,' but that Preston was 'very aggressive.'
'The juvenile had the phone in his hand. He was trying to call somebody,' Kyle Webb said. 'The detective overpowered him.'
Kyle Webb said he heard Preston say detectives were going to get a warrant to seize the phone before Preston took it from the juvenile.
The detective identified as Preston was 'kind of 'in your face, I've got your stuff now,' ' Kyle Webb said.
Patti Cox-Young, the juvenile's grandmother, was with the juvenile, and said his status case was dismissed by the court.
The detectives said they wanted 'to talk to him concerning something his name had come up in, and he said, 'I don't want to talk,' ' Cox-Young said.
'He was cooperating, but he just didn't want to talk,' Cox-Young said. After taking the phone away, Preston left with the phone, Cox-Young said.
'I'm a very firm believer in the Constitution,' Cox-Young said and that, 'They trampled' on the juvenile's rights.
JD Winkler, deputy chief of police, said a professional standards unit complaint had been filed with OPD in relation to the incident, but that he could not comment further.
The Professional Standards Unit investigates complaints made against officers, and sends substantiated complaints to Police Chief Art Ealum for possible disciplinary action.
Preston told the Messenger-Inquirer Friday morning, 'We're actively investigating a juvenile crime. I can't speak on that.'
When the Messenger-Inquirer clarified that Preston wasn't being asked about any specific investigation but about the seizure of the cell phone, Preston referred comment to Mark Hammonds, OPD's public information officer.
The department would not be discussing the incident, Hammonds said.
'I spoke to the major above me, and he advised me there is an ongoing investigation, so OPD will not be giving out any details or making any statements in regard to that investigation,' Hammonds said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
3 days ago
- UPI
DOJ recommends one day in jail for ex-cop in Breonna Taylor raid
In 2020, protesters in Los Angeles march with an effigy of Breonna Taylor during a demonstration held to demand justice for her death after the results of a grand jury indictment of former Louisville police officer Brett Hankison. Today, the Department of Justice filed a memo requesting a sentence of one day in jail for Hankison, who was convicted of violating Taylor's civil rights. File Photo by Kyle Grillot/EPA July 17 (UPI) -- The U.S. Department of Justice filed a memo on Thursday recommending one day in jail for former Louisville, Ky., police detective Brett Hankison, who shot into Breonna Taylor's apartment 10 times but didn't injure anyone. Breonna Taylor, an emergency room technician, was awakened from sleep March 13, 2020, by police with a falsified "no-knock warrant." Her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, thought the officers were intruders and shot at them. The police opened fire, and another officer shot and killed Taylor. Hankison was outside the apartment and shot into the window 10 times. Hankison was convicted of deprivation of rights under color of law in November. He faces up to life in prison. Prosecutors wrote in the filing they were unaware of another case "in which a police officer has been charged with depriving the rights of another person under the Fourth Amendment for returning fire and not injuring anyone." A pre-sentence report from the U.S. Probation Office recommended a sentence between 11.25 and 14 years, USA Today reported. The DOJ says that range was incorrectly calculated and "excessive." It recommends the court "grant a significant downward departure." The memo was signed by Robert J. Keenum, senior counsel for the DOJ's civil rights division, and Harmeet Dhillon, an assistant attorney general for the department. Neither was involved with the case. The memo prompted a strong response. "The fact that Donald Trump's DOJ thinks Breonna Taylor's life is worth just a one-day jail sentence is morally reprehensible and deeply insulting. This is a dark day for our entire city," Rep. Morgan McGarvey, D-Ky., said in a statement. McGarvey represents Louisville. Former Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron said the police did knock and announce themselves. But Taylor's neighbors and her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, said they heard no knock or announcement. Walker has since gotten a $2 million settlement against the city. Hankison is white, and he was the first convicted in the case. The other officers were not convicted. Hankison was previously acquitted on a state charge. The memo said that Hankison's suffered enough. "Here, multiple prosecutions against defendant Hankison were brought, and only one of three juries -- the last one -- found him guilty on these facts, and then only on one charge," the memo says. "The government respects the jury's verdict, which will almost certainly ensure that defendant Hankison never serves as a law enforcement officer again and will also likely ensure that he never legally possesses a firearm again." But others disagreed with DOJ's request. Hankison's shots "missed a sleeping baby by about two feet," said former Justice Department Civil Rights Division official Samatha Trepel on LinkedIn. She believes the court will see the request as "transparent, last minute political interference into a case that was tried by non-political, longtime career prosecutors who obtained this conviction in front of an all-white jury of Kentucky citizens before a Trump-appointed judge."


The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
DOJ asks for 1-day sentence for ex-officer in Breonna Taylor shooting
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is seeking a one-day prison sentence, already served, for a Louisville police officer convicted in connection with the raid that resulted in Breonna Taylor's death. Ex-Louisville Metro Police Department Detective Brett Hankison was convicted last year of violating Taylor's civil rights by blindly firing shots into a window and door during the haywire raid. In an atypical sentencing memorandum, submitted Thursday by DOJ civil rights chief Harmeet Dhillon and a senior counselor in the division, the government said that, but for the jury verdict, it 'might proceed differently' in the case. 'Indeed, reasonable minds might disagree as to whether defendant Hankison's conduct constituted a seizure under the Fourth Amendment in the first place,' said Dhillon and senior counsel Robert Keenan, neither of whom is part of the initial prosecution team. 'And reasonable minds certainly might disagree whether, even if Defendant Hankison's conduct did constitute a seizure, a prosecution under this statute should have been brought under these circumstances at all.' Though Hankison faces a maximum sentence of life in prison, the government suggested a sentence of time served — the day he spent being booked and making his initial appearance before a judge — and three years of supervised release would suffice. His sentencing is scheduled for next week. It marks a stunning departure from the Biden administration's efforts to force accountability for the role of racial discrimination in police misconduct. Taylor, who was shot and killed by other officers during the raid, became a face of the Black Lives Matter movement that ignited in 2020 following her death and the police killing of George Floyd. At trial, prosecutors said Hankison acted recklessly and 'violated one of the most fundamental rules of deadly force: If they cannot see the person they're shooting at, they cannot pull the trigger.' The Justice Department argued in its memorandum that federal sentencing guidelines do not fairly apply to Hankison's conviction given the 'unique facts and circumstances' of the case, namely that the ex-detective was convicted on just one count following two other trials. Hankison was acquitted on all three counts he faced during a 2022 trial in Kentucky state court. The first federal trial he faced, in 2023, resulted in a mistrial on both charges against him. And he was convicted on one of those two counts in the subsequent retrial in 2024.


Axios
3 days ago
- Axios
DOJ says ex-officer convicted in Breonna Taylor raid should get one day in jail
A former Louisville police detective convicted of violating Breonna Taylor's rights by using excessive force when he fired 10 shots at her apartment should serve one day in jail, Justice Department officials said in court filings. Why it matters: The recommendation signals the dramatic shift the Trump administration is making from the Biden administration on police misconduct cases that helped spark the now-defunct racial reckoning. Driving the news: DOJ attorneys said in filings on Wednesday that although Brett Hankison "was part of the team executing the warrant," he "did not shoot Ms. Taylor and is not otherwise responsible for her death." Prosecutors wrote that they were unaware of another case "in which a police officer has been charged with depriving the rights of another person under the Fourth Amendment for returning fire and not injuring anyone." They are asking a federal judge to sentence Hankison to one day behind bars, meaning a sentence of time served and not returning to jail. Hankison faces a maximum of life in prison. Context: Hankison, who is white, became the first Louisville police officer on Friday convicted in the deadly raid that was a flash point in the Black Lives Matter movement. Along with the murder of George Floyd, the police encounter that killed Taylor, a Black woman, generated racial injustice protests nationwide in 2020. Caveat: None of the shots Hankison fired in 2020 hit Taylor, a 26-year-old emergency room technician. In 2023, a federal judge declared a mistrial in the first federal case involving Hankison, whose lawyers argued that he was acting properly "in a very tense, very chaotic environment." Flashback: The U.S. Justice Department under the Biden administration said Hankison and other Louisville police officers broke into Taylor's home with a falsified "no-knock" search warrant as part of a drug investigation. Former Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron said the police did knock and announce their presence, though neighbors and Taylor's boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, said they heard no announcement or knock. Walker, who believed that intruders were entering the home, fired one shot from a handgun, striking one officer. The police responded by opening fire and striking Taylor multiple times. Taylor was alive for at least 20 minutes after police shot her but did not receive any medical attention, according to Walker and police dispatch logs. Federal prosecutors previously accused Hankison of violating Taylor's civil rights by firing his weapon into her apartment through a covered window and covered glass door and using excessive force. Hankison faced the federal charges after he was acquitted last year by a state jury of three felony wanton endangerment charges stemming from the raid. Between the lines: Not only is the Trump administration no longer seeking harsh penalties for officers already convicted of excessive force, it's no longer pursuing federal consent decrees that hold police departments accountable.