Richa Chadha recalls how her Nani warned her about marriage as a child: 'No one would want to marry you'
is one of Bollywood's most outspoken and versatile actors. Known for her powerful roles in films like 'Masaan', 'Gangs of Wasseypur', and the popular 'Fukrey' series, she's also admired for voicing strong opinions on social issues.
Richa recently opened up about facing gender bias as a young girl, not from the outside world, but from her own family. Speaking to Lily Singh in a new interview, she shared a moment from her childhood that stayed with her.
'I was a kid just jumping on the bed, and my
Nani
, who was visiting us, said, 'If you keep jumping like this, no one would want to marry you. You can't do this in your in-laws' house. I didn't even understand what she was saying.
I must have been seven or eight. And I was like, is she crazy?' Richa recalled.
Her grandmother's words came from a different time
Richa said she didn't understand what her grandmother meant back then. But later, her mother helped her understand where those words were coming from. Her grandmother was not trying to be mean, she was simply speaking from her own life experience.
'She was born in 1920 and got married at the age of 13. So, she was coming from that context,' Richa explained.
'Focus on the sons' – Richa's strong message on
gender equality
In the same interview, Richa was asked what we can do to make the world a better place for girls. Her answer was simple and powerful: we need to raise better boys.
'Just focus on the sons. You have to focus on the sons. That's it. It's not the daughters doing it to other daughters. The son needs to have a strong bond with his father. The son needs to understand consent from the mother. The son needs to see that the father treats the mother and sister well. The sister has to be fed the same as the son and sent to school. Women are the backbone of our country. We can't be happy if 50% of the population is watching who is following them, stalking them,' she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
11 hours ago
- News18
Gajraj Rao Compares Raanjhanaa AI Ending To Sholay: ‘We Got Lucky Back Then'
While reacting to Varun Grover's take on the AI-altered ending of Raanjhanaa, Gajraj Rao expressed relief that AI didn't exist during Sholay. In the wake of the ongoing dispute about the AI-altered re-release of Aanand L Rai's 2013 film Raanjahanaa, actor Gajraj Rao voiced his concerns over the impact of AI (Artificial Intelligence) on storytelling. He reacted to Varun Grover's video criticising the AI-edited ending of Raanjhanaa, in which he recalled his uncle suggesting a change to the ending of Masaan. Reacting to this, Gajraj Rao humorously remarked that he was glad Ramesh Sippy's uncle didn't have similar thoughts while making Sholay. He further expressed relief that AI was not available back then, or it might have altered the film's memorable moments including Amitabh Bachchan's emotional farewell. He pointed out that AI-generated approach could have ruined some of the best cinematic moments in Bollywood. Soon after Varun Grover shared the reel criticizing Raanjhanaa's AI-altered ending on Instagram, Gajraj Rao shared it to his Instagram stories and wrote, 'Shukr hai, Ramesh Sippy (director of Sholay) saab ke mama ji ke khayalat aise nahi they, aur AI to khair paida hi nahi hua tha, varna Gabbar ka nishaana chook jaata aur Amit ji ka kirdar, duniya ko alvida na kehta…Bach gaye hum log (Thank God, Ramesh Sippy's uncle didn't have such thoughts, and AI didn't exist. Otherwise, Gabbar's aim would've missed, and Amitabh Bachchan's character wouldn't have been able to say 'Alvida' to the world… We got lucky back then)." Check out his Instagram story below! What Did Varun Grover Say About Raanjhanaa's AI-Edited Ending? In the video, Grover humorously recounts his uncle's reaction to the first showing of Masaan. His uncle praised the film but suggested altering the ending to ensure its success. Grover amusingly describes how he had to invent logistical reasons to avoid making such a change, citing a lack of budget, time, and actor availability. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Varun Grover (@vidushak) He then wryly notes that someone else's uncle seemed to have the resources to use AI to edit Raanjhanaa, giving it a happy ending and re-releasing it. 'But apparently, someone else's uncle has enough to AI-edit Raanjhanaa, make it a happy ending, and re-release it. So, whoever's uncle it is, namaste to them," he said. Raanjhanaa AI-Altered Ending Dispute Twelve years after its original release, Aanand L Rai's Raanjhanaa is set to return to theatres in Tamil Nadu as Ambikapathy on August 1, 2025. Promotional posters for Ambikapathy suggest that the film now features an 'AI-powered" alternate ending in which Dhanush's character does not die, deviating dramatically from the original tragic conclusion. Director Aanand L Rai also expressed his disappointment, and said that the film did not need a new climax. He also raised serious concerns about the legal, ethical, and creative consequences of using AI to tamper with films and performances without consulting their original creators or actors. Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
NDTV
12 hours ago
- NDTV
After Aanand L Rai, Varun Grover Slams AI-Powered Ending In Raanjhanaa's Re-Released Tamil Version
New Delhi: Twelve years after its original release, Aanand L Rai's Raanjhanaa is returning to theatres in Tamil Nadu as Ambikapathy on August 1, 2025. But instead of celebration, the re-release has stirred a major controversy. One that involves Artificial Intelligence, a happy ending, and what writer-lyricist Varun Grover calls a dystopian experiment wrapped in comedy. According to promotional posters, the re-release features an "AI-powered" new ending where Dhanush's character doesn't die marking a significant departure from the tragic climax that originally defined the film's emotional punch. While fans are baffled, Raanjhanaa's director Aanand L Rai is deeply disappointed. In an exclusive conversation with NDTV, Rai said, "Raanjhanaa didn't need a new climax. It had heart and honesty... To see its ending altered without a word of discussion is a gross violation not just of the film, but of the trust of the fans who've carried the film in their hearts for 12 years." He raised serious concerns about the ethical, legal, and creative implications of using AI to manipulate films and performances without the consent of creators or actors. Amid this heated debate, writer and Masaan co-creator Varun Grover weighed in with his signature sarcasm through a reel that is quickly gaining traction online. In the video, Grover narrates a tongue-in-cheek anecdote about how his uncle reacted to the first screening of Masaan. "The film is good," his uncle had said, "but just change the ending and it'll be a hit." Grover humorously explains how he had to offer logistical excuses to avoid such a change-claiming they didn't have enough budget, time, or actor availability. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Varun Grover (@vidushak) "But apparently," he adds with a smile, "someone else's uncle has enough to AI-edit Raanjhanaa, make it a happy ending, and re-release it. So, whoever's uncle it is, namaste to them." While the reel is laced with wit, Grover's satire speaks directly to the unease many artists feel about the growing use of AI in storytelling. The idea that a studio can override the creative intent of a film for short-term gains is what both Grover and Rai are implicitly warning against-albeit in very different tones. With the Ambikapathy AI-ending debate heating up and creators speaking out, this re-release may ultimately spark a broader conversation around consent, creativity, and control in the age of artificial intelligence.
News18
13 hours ago
- News18
Varun Grover Reacts To AI-Edited Raanjhanaa Ending: 'Namaste To Whoever's Uncle Did This'
Raanjhanaa's AI-powered Tamil re-release, Ambikapathy, stirs controversy as director Aanand L Rai and writer Varun Grover criticize the altered ending. Twelve years after its original release, Aanand L Rai's Raanjhanaa is set to return to theatres in Tamil Nadu as Ambikapathy on August 1, 2025. But instead of celebration, the re-release has ignited a heated controversy—one that involves Artificial Intelligence, a reimagined climax, and what writer-lyricist Varun Grover has called a 'dystopian experiment wrapped in comedy." Promotional posters for Ambikapathy suggest that the film now features an 'AI-powered" alternate ending in which Dhanush's character does not die, deviating dramatically from the tragic conclusion that originally defined the film's emotional gravitas. While fans are left stunned by the twist, director Aanand L Rai is deeply disappointed. In a conversation with NDTV, Rai shared, 'Raanjhanaa didn't need a new climax. It had heart and honesty… To see its ending altered without a word of discussion is a gross violation not just of the film, but of the trust of the fans who've carried the film in their hearts for 12 years." He also raised serious concerns about the legal, ethical, and creative consequences of using AI to tamper with films and performances without consulting their original creators or actors. Amid the uproar, Varun Grover weighed in with biting satire in a reel that's now gaining momentum online. Recounting a conversation with his uncle after the release of Masaan, Grover said, 'The film is good," his uncle told him, 'but just change the ending and it'll be a hit." Grover then explained, tongue firmly in cheek, how he avoided making the change by citing budget and logistical constraints. 'But apparently," he added with a smirk, 'someone else's uncle has enough to AI-edit Raanjhanaa, make it a happy ending, and re-release it. So, whoever's uncle it is, namaste to them." Despite the humor, Grover's message underlines a growing unease within the creative community about the use of AI to revise narratives without the consent of their originators. The idea that a beloved story could be altered—its heartbreak replaced with convenience, its soul diluted by software—has struck a nerve. For Rai, it's not just about artistic intent, but about integrity. 'Raanjhanaa had heart," he said, 'and the ending was integral to that." As audiences await Ambikapathy's re-release, it may well become a flashpoint in a larger conversation about authorship, autonomy, and the future of cinema in the AI era. Whether the re-edit wins over viewers or not, one thing is certain—this isn't just about how a story ends, but who gets to write that ending in the first place. Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
