
Starmer retreats on key element of PIP reform legislation
Scottish Labour MPs Irene Campbell, Tracy Gilbert, Brian Leishman, Euan Stainbank were among the 49 backbench rebels who voted against the legislation.
The four also backed an unsuccessful amendment to halt the legislation.
READ MORE
The decision to effectively scrap the central element of the legislation that ministers have spent weeks defending as necessary came after Labour whips realised defeat was possible.
Details of the eleventh-hour concessions were announced in the Commons just 90 minutes before MPs were due to vote.
It was the second u-turn on the welfare reforms in a matter of days.
Last week, 126 Labour MPs backed an amendment that would have effectively derailed the Bill.
No 10 saw that off by promising to apply the new stricter regime for PIP only to new claimants from November 2026.
However, that promise — made last Thursday — led to confusion and claims of a two-tier system, where the level of benefit changed depending on someone's date of birth.
The latest concession abandons that plan entirely. The Government will now wait for the conclusions of a review into how people are assessed for PIP, led by Sir Stephen Timms, the Minister for Social Security and Disability.
That review will be "co-produced" with disabled people.
Currently, the assessment judges an applicant's level of illness or disability by 'scoring' them on their ability to perform certain tasks.
The higher the total score, the more disabled they are considered to be — which affects whether they receive a payment and, if so, at what level.
Under the Government's initial proposals, new applicants would have had to score four points in one category, as well as reaching eight points across all categories.
Previously, they needed to score two points in each of four categories.
There were fears this would mean, for example, that people unable to wash or dress below the waist could lose their benefits.
Sir Stephen told MPs: 'We have heard those concerns, and that is why I can announce that we are going to remove the clause five from the bill at committee, that we will move straight to the wider review, sometimes referred to as the Timms review, and only make changes to PIP eligibility activities and descriptors following that review.
'The Government is committed to concluding the review by the autumn of next year.'
Rebel ringleader Rachael Maskell said the Bill was now 'a complete farce'.
The chaos in the Commons comes just days before the first anniversary of Labour's victory in last year's general election.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall insisted the party was '100%' behind the Prime Minister, but acknowledged there were 'lessons to be learned' after the rebellion.
'Welfare reform is always really difficult, perhaps especially for Labour governments.
'It's something we care passionately about.'
But she added that MPs had shown significant support for 'the principle of the welfare state' that those who can work should do so, while those who were unable should be protected.
SNP Westminster Leader, Stephen Flynn said Labour owed an apology to disabled people.
"Their daily lives have been subjected to a cruel Westminster political game.
"The final u-turn they deserve tonight is an apology from the Prime Minister and for this shambolic bill to be scrapped.
"The only option left for the Labour Party is to stop their attack on disabled people, remove the threat of a two-tier disability system and for them to finally scrap this bill."
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch accused the Government of 'utter capitulation'.
She said: 'They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.'
The legislation was unveiled by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall as part of a package aimed at saving up to £4.8 billion a year.
This was reduced to £2.3bn when the Bill was first watered down last week.
It is not yet clear what difference the latest changes will make, but the proposed tightening of eligibility was the main cost-saving measure in the package.
The IFS suggested removing Clause 5 could make no savings and even cost £100 million.
PIP has mostly been devolved to the Scottish Government, which began replacing it with Adult Disability Payment (ADP) in 2022. While the SNP had ruled out copying the reforms, any change in PIP spending would have had an impact on the block grant.
READ MORE
Charlotte Gill, head of campaigns and public affairs at the MS Society, said the changes did not go far enough: 'We thought last week's so-called concessions were last minute. But these panicked 11th hour changes still don't fix a rushed, poorly thought-out Bill.'
Jon Sparkes, chief executive of learning disability charity Mencap, welcomed the concession: 'The last-minute change relating to the review Sir Stephen Timms is leading sounds positive and we are pleased that the Government has listened.'
He added: 'Disabled people should not have to pay to fix black holes in the public finances.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
25 minutes ago
- The National
SNP have morphed into a shadow of the party they should be
I say 'repeat' as in the immediate post-World War Two period the then Labour secretary of state for Scotland, the commendable Tom Johnston, had a vision to build hydro dams in both the Highlands and south-west Scotland to provide cheap local energy which could be harnessed to create industrial activities and well-paid jobs in both regions, addressing the scourge of depopulation. The dams were built but the promise of cheap local electricity was never delivered. Once his plan was known to London, he was told 'oh no dear boy, it must all go into the National Grid'. No competitive advantage could be delivered to these areas of Scotland – what a naive plan. Scots – well nearly 50% of them, as yet – have still not woken up to the new post-Brexit regime in Westminster. It matters not whether that regime is Labour, Tory, Liberal or very soon likely Reform UK. There is no 'UK' in any of their thinking. This is the new 'Little England' post-Brexit nation. Starmer, when he agreed – well I should say 'accepted' – the recent trade terms with 'The Donald', announced on camera 'this is an important agreement for both our countries, England and America'. This was no slip of the tongue, that is their collective thinking, post-Brexit. They, meaning our southern neighbour, didn't just vote to leave Europe, their utopia is in the green and pleasant lands of England where, if Scotland exists at all, she is their colony to be exploited for all her resources and 'free gratis'. At the end of her informative article 'Why have the SNP consistently missed an opportunity with zonal energy pricing' (Jul 10), Lesley Riddoch asks: 'Who is making this political argument? Not the SNP, why the heck not?' The answer is surely 'ineptitude'. The SNP leadership appear to be ignorant of the benefits that zonal pricing would bring, not just to domestic users, but in helping Scotland rebuild an industrial capability. This, with zonal pricing, could be implemented now under devolution. Similarly, where was the outcry over Grangemouth? Why did the SNP not walk out of Westminster en masse after Brexit? Our friends in Europe expected us to, but no, and then the long list of unpopular English prime ministers, from the liar Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, 'now is not the time' Theresa May, Sunak, Sir Keir Starmer and waiting in the wings Nigel Farage. No opportunities were developed during these periods of great opportunity for the independence movement; the leadership of the SNP wasted every one of them. It is perhaps summed up best by Edwin Morgan, our great poet laureate who wrote, on the opening of the Scottish Parliament with such great promise, on October 9 2004: 'What do the people want of this place? They want it to be filled with thinking persons as open and adventurous as its architecture. 'A nest of fearties is what they do not want. 'A symposium of procrastinators is what they do not want. 'A phalanx of forelock-tuggers is what they do not want. And perhaps above all the droopy mantra of 'it wizny me' is what they do not want.' Well Lesley, there is your answer. It is exactly where we are with the current SNP leadership, exactly what Edwin cautioned us and our parliament to avoid, with John Swinney as the Chief Feartie in charge. Congratulations, John. A leadership with no vision for independence, no ambition to get us there, and not even a whimper at the ongoing, and deliberate, deindustrialisation of Scotland. 'Grangemouth no more, Falkirk no more!' The SNP have morphed into a shadow of the party they should be. People see through it. Shameful. We need radicalism, outrage, passion, and most of all new leadership. Ian Stewart Uig, Isle of Skye I AGREE with a lot of what Nick Cole said in his letter on Thursday, July 10, but he had at least two major omissions. Alex Salmond was in fact stitched up by SNP, so had a right to speak out against them. The SNP pushing gender recognition reform when they knew fine well it would split the indy vote was deliberate, as proven by them getting rid of those who would push for independence. Tim Rideout and Joanna Cherry spring to mind, but there were others. So the current version of SNP did nothing for a decade, and still does nothing except get rid of indy folk. The fact the party doesn't support the case at UN or adopting the UN charter on self-determination says it all. The real SNP that wanted independence has been hijacked by devolutionists. They likely supported indy at some point, but the salary and perks are too good to risk now. So although I'm desperate for independence, I'm not going to vote for the SNP to do nowt for another decade. If they don't get concrete plans on the board to go ahead without Westminster agreement if necessary, many Scots won't vote for them. Nick would do better for cause and party if he focused on why the SNP are not keen to proceed, and helped get them out of the party. A new NEC, and out with those who never mention independence. That's the cure for all SNP's woes, so what's stopping them? Grangemouth shows the long game is no longer a viable option so the best way to secure the party's future is to push ahead with indy. Voters who trusted them to act won't let them just be a devolution party. The biggest dividers of the indy vote in my opinion are gender recognition reform and SNP inaction on the supposed main goal. Heartbreaking, so it is. Bill Robertson via email


The Herald Scotland
32 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Glasgow legal dispute fear as 700 homeless refused housing
Figures obtained by freedom of information (FOI) from the Scottish Tenants' Organisation showed that 8,383 people - including 3,154 children - were living in temporary accommodation on June 9, 2025. That is 4,126 households, with 2,117 homeless people living in a hotel of bed and breakfast (B&B). However, it can also be revealed that 753 homeless people were refused accommodation by Glasgow City Council between April 1 and June 1. Officials in Glasgow spent a total of £7,740,778 on housing the homeless in hotels and B&Bs. Glasgow City Council has also admitted it breached the unsuitable accommodation order 1,465 times between January 1 and June 9 this year, with all of these concerning the 'unsuitable' use of hotels and B&Bs. In the first six months of this year, 567 reported rough sleeping the night before, or three month prior to seeking help from Glasgow City Council. It is likely to be higher as it relies on self-reporting. Read more: Simon Community Scotland (SCS), a charity engaging with rough sleepers in the city, reported another 119 people on the streets this year. Sean Clerkin, campaign co-ordinator for the Scottish Tenants' Organisation, told The Herald: 'The disastrous state of homelessness in Glasgow is laid bare for all to see in these figures which should shame Glasgow City Council and the Scottish Government. 'The fact that Glasgow City Council breaks the law wantonly refusing to give emergency accommodation to 753 homeless people, while 686 have slept rough on the streets of Scotland's largest city this year shows the extent of human misery being caused during this housing emergency. 'Glasgow's social housing budget of just over £115 million for 2025-26 is lower than the same housing budget in 2021-22. This is unacceptable.' Read more: The Scottish Government declared a national housing emergency, following a dozen councils including Glasgow and Edinburgh, in May last year. Mr Clerkin added: 'The Scottish Government led by the new housing secretary Mairi McAllan has got to make Glasgow a special case and give a massive cash injection now to Glasgow City Council to build thousands of new social rented homes in the city to remove the shame of record numbers of homeless people being left in Dickensian destitution." Alison Watson, director of Shelter Scotland, said: "This is the devastating reality of the housing emergency in Scotland and these figures expose the grim reality of Glasgow. "With prevention services being cut, thousands of children are being forced into the homelessness system and a large amount of taxpayer's money is being spent to cover B&B and hotel accommodation – all while Glasgow City Council continue to break the law. This cannot carry on. 'With a sheer lack of social housing, the Council does face an impossible task without serious support from both the Scottish and UK governments. "Everyone deserves a safe, secure and affordable place to call home. 'That's why we need bold, radical action: more investment from the Scottish Government in social housing, the purchase of larger homes for larger families, and stronger backing from the UK Government must all be part of the plan.' In January, it was revealed that Glasgow City Council receives around 200 legal threats each month for refusing emergency accommodation or providing unsuitable temporary homes. A Glasgow City Council spokeswoman said: 'We're duty bound to find and provide emergency accommodation to those affected by homelessness. Unfortunately, the increasing demand for homeless accommodation in Glasgow means there are times when we haven't been able to do so. This happens when there is no accommodation available despite using more than 50 hotels to accommodate those who we have a duty for. 'We purchase a high number of hotel and bed & breakfast accommodation as we attempt to meet the extraordinarily high demand for accommodation to avoid people having to sleep rough. We also use in excess of 2600 places of emergency accommodation within temporary furnished flats and supported accommodation. 'There is no quick alternative. We are in continual dialogue with both Governments about these challenges and to seek the additional resources necessary to address the challenges we are facing.' A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: 'Having a safe, warm and affordable place to call home is critical to a life of dignity and opportunity. We are determined that everyone in Scotland should have that and so are focussed on tackling the housing emergency head on. This is essential to ensure everyone, and in particular our children, have the opportunity to thrive and we are focussed on delivering that real change. 'We are making available £115.565 million in Glasgow to support the delivery of more social and affordable homes, which includes more than £11.9 million targeted for acquisitions and voids. This takes our investment in affordable housing to £768 million across Scotland. 'We recognise that Glasgow has come under additional and unique housing pressure following the previous UK Government's decision to streamline asylum process over a short period of time with no additional resource. This has shifted an unreasonable burden onto local authorities and the Home Office must urgently provide financial support.'


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Pubs in Scotland continue to struggle despite heatwave boost for businesses
EXCLUSIVE: Hospitality chiefs have called on the SNP Government to reform the business rates system which puts bars north of the Border at a "competitive disadvantage" to those in England. Pubs across Scotland are continuing to struggle due to rising costs despite enjoying a bumper weekend as a heatwave grips the country. Hospitality chiefs have today called on the SNP Government to reform the business rates system which puts bars north of the Border at a "competitive disadvantage" compared to those in England. UKHospitality Scotland, which represents members of the licensed trade, said the industry was being squeezed by sky-high energy bills and the impact of employer National Insurance contributions (NICs) being hiked by the UK Government. The trade body warned pubs and bars were now shedding jobs as a result of the NIC hike and is demanding a rethink ahead of the autumn Budget. Pubs are currently closing across Britain at a rate of one a day. The Record previously revealed how 56 bars closed for good in Scotland last year, compared to 42 that shut down in 2023. Around 1,000 pubs have closed north of the border over the last 20 years, with the total dropping from the more than 5,000 operating in 2004. In a letter to Keir Starmer, the trade body warned the 2024 Budget had directly contributed to a reversal in hospitality's ability to create jobs. Between October 2024 and May 2025, the sector lost 69,000 jobs across the UK. In the same period the previous year, hospitality created an additional 18,000 jobs. Leon Thompson, Executive Director of UKHospitality Scotland, said: "The damaging impact of increasing employer National Insurance contributions (NICs) is being felt by businesses and teams across Scotland, with thousands of Scottish hospitality jobs undoubtedly lost since the Budget. "While the damage caused by employer NICs was a decision made in Westminster, we still need Holyrood to step up and back our businesses with vital support. "The Scottish Government needs to speed up in delivering its promise to reform the broken business rates system, before it's too late and Scottish businesses are put at a further competitive disadvantage to those in England. "It's also critical that the Scottish Government maintains and extends business rates relief for the sector at the Scottish Budget later this year - this is the lifeline our venues need." Kate Nicholls, chair of UKHospitality, said: "In the years following the financial crisis we created one in five net new jobs and today employ 3.5 million people. The Government needs sectors like hospitality to create jobs and meet their ambition to get more people back into work. "We have a proven track record of being able to deliver those jobs in every part of the country and for people from all backgrounds. "The NICs change was socially regressive and had a disproportionate effect on entry level jobs." Shona Robison, the Finance Secretary, said: "Businesses are being hit by the impact of the UK Government's decision to raise employers' National Insurance contributions and rising energy costs continue to bite hard. "While many levers to grow Scotland's economy lie with the UK Government, we are providing a package of non-domestic rates reliefs worth an estimated £733 million in 2025-26, including 40% relief – capped at £110,000 per business – for hospitality premises liable for the Basic Property Rate. "Around half of properties in the retail, hospitality and leisure sectors also continue to be eligible for 100% Small Business Bonus Scheme relief – the most generous small business rates relief in the UK.'