logo
How Trump's budget proposals could affect lower-income Americans

How Trump's budget proposals could affect lower-income Americans

Axios03-05-2025
The White House's budget proposes enormous cuts to federal spending — some of which, if enacted, would put millions of the poorest Americans in a bad spot.
Why it matters: The proposal is just a starting point, but it's a dark one, say advocates for the disadvantaged.
The big picture: The budget would cut 10% from last year's level of discretionary spending — things the government does excluding mandatory programs like Social Security and Medicare.
But the White House wants to increase spending for border security and defense, so the bulk of the cuts are on non-defense programs, like health care, education, and housing.
The proposal comes just as recession fears are spiking, and worries are growing that tariffs will raise the prices of everyday goods — a bitter pill to swallow for those living paycheck to paycheck.
By the numbers: The cuts would bring non-defense discretionary spending to its lowest level in modern history — less than 2% of GDP, compared to an average 3.1% over the past 40 years, per an analysis from Bobby Kogan, a senior director of federal budget policy at the liberal Center for American Progress.
"They are calling for something that is extreme, objectively, and even by Trump standards," adds Kogan, who worked at the Office of Management and Budget during the Biden administration.
The other side: The White House says the cuts are a way to move certain programs, particularly education, back to the states, and eliminate "radical gender and racial ideologies that poison the minds of Americans."
Zoom in: Housing advocates were stunned by a nearly $27 billion cut to housing assistance for low-income Americans.
Those cuts come after huge spikes in rents coming out of the pandemic. Their impact will be "inhumane and devastating," said Rachel Fee, Executive Director of the New York Housing Conference, in a statement.
"This plan will drive more people into homelessness."
Another hit: Trimming $4 billion by eliminating the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, or LIHEAP, which assists poor people in paying for heat in the winter and cooling in the summer. It is critical in states with harsh winters — both senators from Maine have pushed for it.
The White House says it duplicates state programs. Instead of providing help with energy bills, low-income individuals will be supported "through energy dominance, lower prices, and an America First economic platform," the budget document says.
An administration official pointed to a 2010 GAO audit that found 9% of households receiving benefits contained invalid identify information — some "likely due to simple errors." The report says its recommended security fixes had been implemented.
"Seniors and low-income [people] also will not go without utilities as states have their own policies to help with utilities, including severe weather no-disconnection policies, lessening the need for this program at a federal level," an administration official tells Axios in an email.
Also cut: $4.5 billion in Title I education assistance, which is money meant for poorer school districts.
Caveats: A president's budget is just a wish list; Congress doesn't simply put it through.
This is just a partial proposal, it doesn't discuss Trump's plans for tax breaks. Some of those, like no taxes on tips, could theoretically help lower earners.
It also doesn't cover Medicaid, the federal health insurance program for lower-income Americans. That's reportedly on House Republicans' chopping block.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump ordered purge of ‘unpatriotic' signage from national parks. How one California spot complied
Trump ordered purge of ‘unpatriotic' signage from national parks. How one California spot complied

Los Angeles Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Trump ordered purge of ‘unpatriotic' signage from national parks. How one California spot complied

Four years ago, National Park Service employees seeking to provide a more robust look at the history of Muir Woods National Monument in Marin County began the 'History Under Construction' exhibit. The concept of the work was to expand an existing sign featuring a timeline detailing the preservation of Muir Woods. Employees placed caution tape on the sign within Founder's Grove and used yellow sticky notes to add facts and dates that were missing from the original timeline. Among the information added were the efforts of Indigenous people who originally maintained the land, as well as the role of women in creating the national monument. A letter on the plaque assured passersby that 'everything on this sign is accurate, but incomplete. The facts are not under construction, but the way we tell history is.' But, as of this month, the yellow notes are no more. The expanded exhibit became the first in the nation to be altered following an executive order by President Trump in March to rid park signage of any language he would deem unpatriotic. The president's aim was to restore federal sites that he said had been changed since 2020 to perpetuate a 'false reconstruction of American history' including 'improper partisan ideology.' The Muir Woods change was first reported by SF Gate. Elizabeth Villano, a former park ranger who helped create the new version of the sign, criticized the move, writing in a post on Medium that the Trump administration 'is actively censoring American history from the public.' She said the goal of the project was to make sure nothing on the original sign was erased, but to add details so people could see the difference in how history was told and how it could be expanded to include more voices. 'We wanted to tell the true story of the woods in a way that helped people learn from the past, and apply those lessons towards a brighter future,' she wrote. 'Despite this care not to erase history, here I am, watching history be erased.' A spokesperson for the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, which includes Muir Woods, could not immediately be reached for comment on Wednesday. Before the notes were added in 2021, the first date included in the sign's timeline, called 'Path to Preservation,' was the establishment of the first national park in the United States, Yellowstone, in 1872. The next was 1892 when the Sierra Club was founded in San Francisco with John Muir as the first president. But staff at the time found that some key information was missing from the timeline, namely the work of the Coast Miwok and Southern Pomo people who tended to the land before Europeans arrived in North America. They also included the first campaign to save the region launched by a women's club in 1904. Of course, not all the information added to the timeline was positive. Staff detailed Spanish missionaries exploiting the work of Indigenous people in the Bay Area to build California missions and congressional actions stripping Coast Miwok people of title to their ancestral lands, including Muir Woods. The revised timeline didn't shy away from pointing out the complex legacies of key figures who helped spearhead the creation of the national monument. It noted that John Muir referred to Indigenous people using racist language in his diary, which was published years before his death, and pointed out William Kent's vote in Congress to prevent non-citizens from owning or leasing land. The rangers didn't cast blame for the omissions, saying that the expanded narratives were reflective of increasing diversity among park service employees in the years since the timeline was first unveiled. 'From redwood conservation to the legacy of the country's founders, American stories are enriched by complexity, dimension, and challenge. It's not our job to judge these stories or promote a singular narrative. As national park rangers, it is our mandate to tell complete stories that reflect who we are as a society. And as Americans, it's important that we hear them,' according to a National Park Service post about the changes. Trump's executive order directed the Department of the Interior to identify any public monuments, memorials, statues or markers that had been removed or changed since 2020 to 'perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history,' minimize the value of historical events or figures or include 'improper partisan ideology' and to reinstate prior monuments. The order also directed officials to ensure that monuments do not contain content that disparages Americans. Instead, the monuments should focus on 'the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people or, with respect to natural features, the beauty, abundance, and grandeur of the American landscape,' the order states. Critics have said Trump's directive demands a rose-colored view of more complex events that make up American history. Villano, the former park ranger, wrote in the Medium essay that it's disparaging to Americans to take away people's ability to think critically and have a better understanding of history. 'Why doesn't the White House want you to see a more complete version of history? Maybe it's because, when we see ourselves in history, we realize that we can reshape it,' she wrote. 'For a government like this, that must feel like a threat. It doesn't benefit people in power to understand that anyone can be a part of history.'

Where to get free food, deals for National Drive-Thru Day 2025
Where to get free food, deals for National Drive-Thru Day 2025

USA Today

time9 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Where to get free food, deals for National Drive-Thru Day 2025

National Drive-Thru Day, on Thursday, July 24, celebrates a food service trend we take for granted these days, but first gained momentum thanks to the growing car culture in 1950s. The first drive-thru is thought to have been Red's Giant Hamburg on Route 66 in Springfield, Missouri in 1947, according to the National Today site. In-N-Out Burger in California began offering drive-through services in 1948 in the Los Angeles area, and Jack in the Box joined the move to cater to car customers in 1951. (Jack in the Box also came up with the idea for National Drive-Thru Day, according to the National Day Calendar site.) Drive-thru lanes really kicked into gear after McDonald's adopted the practice in opening its first take-out window in Arizona in 1975, according to Smithsonian magazine. 'Stranger' snacks: Chips Ahoy! releasing 'Stranger Things' cookies with surprise ingredient Now there's more than 8,100 U.S. restaurants with drive-through lanes and that's expected to surpass 9,000 in 2026, according to Polaris Market Research. "Drive-thru culture isn't just a trend – it's core to how Americans eat," said Polaris Market Research senior analyst Apurva Agarwal in a statement to USA TODAY. "Even as delivery apps surge, the drive-thru remains the fastest, most dependable way to grab a meal. Major chains are doubling down on technology to keep lines moving and customers loyal." If you're in the mood for a mobile meal, here are some deals. Remember, check the social media accounts of your favorite local restaurants with drive-thru lanes for additional deals. National Drive-Thru Day deals Mike Snider is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, X and email him at mikegsnider & @ & @mikesnider & msnider@ What's everyone talking about? Sign up for our trending newsletter to get the latest news of the day

Exclusive: Massie leans into Trump defiance in first TV ad
Exclusive: Massie leans into Trump defiance in first TV ad

Axios

time9 minutes ago

  • Axios

Exclusive: Massie leans into Trump defiance in first TV ad

Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie is using his first TV ad to highlight his call for the release of documents related to the investigation of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Why it matters: Massie is showing that he plans to lean into his defiance of President Trump, who is backing a primary challenge to the Republican congressman. What they're saying: "Look, it's simple: They're attacking me because I'm holding the Washington machine accountable," Massie says in the 30-second spot. In the ad, Massie points to his vote against the Trump-backed COVID relief package in 2020, and to his opposition to Trump's "big, beautiful bill." "Now, I'm leading the charge to force a vote on the complete Epstein files," he also says. Massie is one of 11 House Republicans to call for the release of Epstein-related files, though the Trump administration has said it opposes further disclosures related to the investigation. Zoom in: Trump has vowed to campaign against Massie, and his political operation has aired two ads targeting the congressman. The president's team is also recruiting a primary challenger to Massie, and has spoken with state Sen. Aaron Reed about running. It has also conducted polling indicating that Massie would be vulnerable to a Trump-backed challenge. Between the lines: Massie, who occupies a Trump-friendly central Kentucky district, does not say Trump's name in the spot.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store