Convenience store M&A activity suggests more consolidation is coming
Majority of recent transactions involve smaller operators, but major moves among larger entities could be coming in 2025
DENVER, June 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The pace of merger and acquisition activity in the U.S. convenience store sector is accelerating with recent trends suggesting the nation's c-store landscape is ripe for more change. While most of the transactions in 2024 involved smaller chains or single-store operators, several larger operators inked deals to significantly expand their footprints into new regions.
According to a new research brief from CoBank's Knowledge Exchange, c-store consolidation stands to disproportionally affect rural communities, many of which lack a grocery store or access to major food delivery services. Convenience stores often fill an important need in rural areas, providing local access to food, grocery items, fuel and even household staples.
'Mass merchandisers like Walmart are unevenly spread among states through various regions of the country,' said Billy Roberts, food and beverage economist with CoBank. 'Convenience stores are found in towns large or small. Food insecurity affects roughly 1 in 10 Americans and nearly 90% of U.S. counties with the highest rates of food insecurity are rural. Consequently, c-store consolidation trends can have a significant impact on food accessibility in rural areas.'
The convenience store market remains heavily fragmented and widely dispersed, which lends itself to additional consolidation. The U.S. had 152,396 convenience stores in 2024, a 1.5% year-over-year increase, according to data from the National Association of Convenience Stores. Only 22 c-store chains in the U.S. have more than 400 locations, while roughly 96,000 have 10 or fewer. The majority of the sector – 63% – is comprised of single-store operators. 'The vast number of single-unit operators alone points to opportunities for larger chains to expand their relationships or acquire new properties to maximize efficiencies across supply chains and distribution networks,' Roberts added.
Acquisitions of smaller operators have been commonplace in recent years. Data from Capstone Partners indicates 80% of deals completed in 2023 were for target companies of less than 50 stores. Through September of 2024, 74% of the transactions involved smaller c-store entities.
However, several major moves involving some of the largest operators have occurred in recent years. Notable examples in 2023 include Maverik purchasing Kum & Go's 400 c-stores, RaceTrac's purchase of Gulf Oil and its 1,000 branded sites, and BP's $1.3 billion acquisition of TravelCenters of America.
Similar activity in 2024 was largely driven by major chains looking to expand their geographical footprint. FEMSA purchased 249-unit Delek US Holdings. Casey's acquired 198 CEFCO c-stores for $1.15 billion, pushing the chain to over 2,900 locations. And Sunoco sold 200 stores to 7-Eleven in a $1 billion deal.
The biggest potential deal that could shake up the market even further puts 7-Eleven's 13,000 U.S. locations on the table, along with its market-leading position. While 7-Eleven recently announced plans to open 1,300 new stores in North America through 2030, it has been an acquisition target itself lately. Canada-based Alimentation Couche-Tard recently attempted to purchase 7-Eleven owner Seven & i Holdings for nearly $40 billion.
In a saga that began in August 2024, the Canadian c-store chain and 7-Eleven are reportedly working on a potential divestiture package to address regulatory concerns considered a major hurdle to the merger. Alimentation Touche-Card is well represented in the c-store sector with over 7,000 Circle K locations. Under a merger, the combined 7-Eleven/Circle K would be nearly 10 times the size of their next-closest competitor and own more than 13% of all c-stores in the US.
Roberts said regardless of how things play out with 7-Eleven, major acquisitions within the c-store space generally require significant capital expenditure investments. 'Rebranding acquired units can demand upwards of $1 million per store, mostly for upgrading or building out kitchens to support foodservice aspirations. The evolution of c-stores as food destinations is playing a significant role in all these acquisition moves.'
Read the research brief, C-store M&A Activity Signals Consolidation Era.
About CoBank
CoBank is a cooperative bank serving vital industries across rural America. The bank provides loans, leases, export financing and other financial services to agribusinesses and rural power, water and communications providers in all 50 states. The bank also provides wholesale loans and other financial services to affiliated Farm Credit associations serving more than 78,000 farmers, ranchers and other rural borrowers in 23 states around the country. CoBank is a member of the Farm Credit System, a nationwide network of banks and retail lending associations chartered to support the borrowing needs of U.S. agriculture, rural infrastructure and rural communities. Headquartered outside Denver, Colorado, CoBank serves customers from regional banking centers across the U.S. and also maintains an international representative office in Singapore.
CONTACT: Corporate Communications CoBank 800-542-8072 news@cobank.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


American Military News
24 minutes ago
- American Military News
Gas prices at 4-year low under Trump admin
Following President Donald Trump's military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities and his announcement of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, gas prices have dropped to a four-year low. As of Friday, the national average price for a gallon of gasoline was $3.20, according to Fox Business. The outlet noted that oil prices remain at the same level they were at prior to a temporary spike in prices amid concerns that conflict between Iran and Israel could disrupt the supply of oil in the Middle East. According to CNBC, Patrick De Haan, the head of GasBuddy's petroleum analysis, recently suggested that Americans could see the lowest gas prices in years over the upcoming summer months. De Haan also indicated that the national average price of gas could drop under $3 per gallon by September. 'It's going to be the cheapest summer since 2021, when the economy was heavily influenced by Covid,' De Haan told the outlet. According to Fox Business, oil temporarily spiked to $78 per barrel following Trump's military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in June; however, the outlet noted that the temporary spike in oil prices quickly dropped just two days after the U.S. military strikes. READ MORE: Gas prices soar to eight-month high Addressing the temporary spike in oil prices, De Haan said, 'Obviously the Middle East situation is an exception, but now that this is, seemingly for now, in de-escalation, gas prices should resume their slow decline over the course of the summer.' De Haan explained that gas prices are close to the lowest level observed over the last two decades when prices are adjusted for inflation. De Haan added, 'Americans are actually spending far less of their income on energy than they have in quite some time.' According to Fox Business, Lipow Oil Associates President Andy Lipow explained oil prices are expected to remain at their current level due to an abundant supply of oil and increased production from OPEC+. Lipow suggested that gas prices could drop between three and five cents over the week ahead of the July 4 holiday weekend. Phil Flynn, an energy market analyst, told Fox News that the reduction of geopolitical concerns following the destruction of Iran's nuclear program has 'shown up in the gas prices.' The energy market analyst also highlighted the Trump administration's favorable energy regulations, saying, 'This is going to be a big win for consumers as inflation continues to come down.'


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
‘Big beautiful' AI rule means feds must act NOW to stop Big Tech's abuses
Deep within President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act — the major spending legislation he wants to see by July 4 — is a rule that holds enormous implications for the rapidly developing artificial intelligence sector. The Senate is debating a provision that would prevent state governments from regulating the AI industry for years. Supporters claim this moratorium would stop a patchwork of conflicting state laws from slowing AI's rocketing development. But without subsequent federal action, a moratorium on state regulation risks making the AI industry a law-free zone, where Big Tech companies can essentially do whatever they want with an untested, sometimes exploitative new technology. We've needed federal regulation on AI companies for some time, but if this new moratorium passes, it will become even more urgent for Congress to act. If the AI industry is going to grow sustainably and responsibly, we need legislation to provide guardrails and clear rules about how to protect the creators of content that AI tools use — publishers, authors, journalists, artists, musicians and creatives of all types. Right now, those content creators are AI's victims. Big Tech and AI companies scrape vast amounts of content to build and operate their generative AI products, which turn content into GenAI outputs for users. Sometimes they just reproduce content creators' passages word for word — without credit or compensation. AI companies admit these unfair and un-American tactics are fundamental to their businesses, but they refuse to pay because it's cheaper to steal. Even worse, this predatory behavior lets AI models act as information gatekeepers. If Big Tech is left to its own devices, Americans will have less access to accurate information, and certainly no one to hold accountable for errors and mistakes. Reporting on stories that Americans need to know will dwindle as the AI companies undermine the business models of publishers, opening the door to viewpoint suppression and creating opportunities for foreign propagandists. How dire these problems will become is a matter of guesswork — because AI development is currently a black box. Developers do not share information on whether or how they are obtaining consent for using publisher content. (News reports suggest that when they do share information about these methods, it is sometimes misleading.) Publishers must hire experts to reverse-engineer how their content has been taken, a costly process that overburdens small publishers and can't always identify all works that were used in training the models. This lack of transparency hinders the enforcement of intellectual property rights and distorts regulatory decisions, business development and more. Federal legislation could address these issues by requiring recordkeeping and full disclosure. AI companies must let publishers know whether a generative AI model was trained on their work — and must also explain whether certain publications have been specifically excluded from AI models, so that the public can judge any bias. Further, AI companies must disclose the sources they use to keep their models' responses current. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Simple rules such as these will prompt commercial GenAI developers to enter agreements with publishers to use their content — agreements that will likely block AI companies and foreign actors from distorting the news that the public receives. The benefits will be widespread. These rules would strengthen America's position in the AI race by making its products more trustworthy and preserving the journalism that lies at its foundation. Protecting intellectual property and homegrown content is what gives American AI companies an international competitive edge. Strong federal rules will also keep many small media businesses viable, and protecting thousands of workers and their communities. The White House blueprint for AI wisely recognizes that AI development must be responsible and aligned with American values, including respect for intellectual property and the rule of law. If Congress is going to act, as it appears it might, to limit the ability of states to enact these important regulations, then it's up to the House and Senate to fill that gap — and set this growing but potentially dangerous industry on a solid foundation. Danielle Coffey is president and CEO of the News/Media Alliance, which represents more than 2,200 publishers nationwide.


UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
Feds uncover remote tech workers scheme to benefit North Korea
June 30 (UPI) -- The U.S. Department of Justice on Monday announced a crackdown on North Korea using people to pose as tech workers to earn money and steal sensitive information for the regime. In two unsealed charging indictments in Massachusetts and Atlanta, schemes were outlined to trick U.S. companies into hiring people who funneled their paychecks to the government and stole sensitive information and cryptocurrency. The FBI and Justice Department have investigated in 16 states since 2021 with most searches conducted earlier this month. The targeted companies were not announced. U.S. companies were warned to carefully screen their remote employees to avoid falling victim to similar ruses. "The FBI will do everything in our power to defend the homeland and protect Americans from being victimized by the North Korean government," Roman Rozhavsky, assistant director of the FBI's Counterintelligence Division, said in a statement. The phony North Korean workers were assisted by individuals in the United States, China, the United Arab Emirates and Taiwan, DOJ said. They successfully obtained employment with more than 100 U.S. companies, including Fortune 500 ones. "These schemes target and steal from U.S. companies and are designed to evade sanctions and fund the North Korean regime's illicit programs, including its weapons programs," Assistant Attorney General John A. Eisenberg of the Department's National Security Division said. "The Justice Department, along with our law enforcement, private sector, and international partners, will persistently pursue and dismantle these cyber-enabled revenue generation networks." DOJ announced searches of 29 known or suspected "laptop farms" across 16 states, and the seizure of 29 financial accounts used to launder illicit funds and 21 fraudulent websites from October 2024 to June. From June 10-17, the FBI executed searches of 21 premises across 14 states. In total, the FBI seized approximately 137 laptops. "North Korean IT workers defraud American companies and steal the identities of private citizens, all in support of the North Korean regime," Brett Leatherman, assistant director of the FBI's Cyber Division, said. "That is why the FBI and our partners continue to work together to disrupt infrastructure, seize revenue, indict overseas IT workers and arrest their enablers in the United States. Let the actions announced today serve as a warning: if you host laptop farms for the benefit of North Korean actors, law enforcement will be waiting for you." Obtained were salary payments, and in some cases, sensitive employer information such as export-controlled U.S. military technology and virtual currency. In one scheme, they allegedly created front companies and fraudulent websites. They received access to company-provided laptop computers. Obtained were salary payments. U.S. national Zhenxing "Danny" Wang of New Jersey was arrested in a 50-page, five-count indictment in Massachussets. The document details a multi-year fraud scheme by Wang and his co-conspirators to obtain remote IT work with U.S. companies that generated more than $5 million in revenue. Several Chinese and Taiwanese nationals were charged but haven't been arrested. From approximately 2021 until October 2024, the defendants and other co-conspirators compromised the identities of more than 80 U.S. people to obtain remote jobs at more than 100 U.S. companies. They cost the companies at least $3 million for legal fees, computer network remediation costs, and other damages and losses. In another scheme, people used false or fraudulently obtained identities to gain employment with an Atlanta-based blockchain research and development company where they stole virtual currency worth approximately $900,000. The five-count wire fraud and money laundering indictment charged four North Korean nationals. The defendants remain at large and are wanted by the FBI. These remote works were assisted by individuals in the United States, China, United Arab Emirates and Taiwan. The U.S. Department of State has offered potential rewards for up to $5 million to disrupt the North Korean illicit financial activities, including for cybercrimes, money laundering and sanctions evasion.