Russia walks out of ballistic missile treaty with US as Medvedev warns nemesis Donald Trump & Europe ‘expect more'
In his latest online clash with Donald Trump, the ex-Russian president ominously warned the West to 'expect further steps'.
5
5
5
Medvedev's comments came shortly after Russia's Foreign Ministry said the country no longer regarded itself bound by the moratorium on the deployment of short- and medium-range nuclear missiles.
The ex-president wrote on X on Monday: "The Russian Foreign Ministry's statement on the withdrawal of the moratorium on the deployment of medium- and short-range missiles is the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy.
"This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps."
The deputy head of Russia's powerful Security Council did not elaborate on the nature of the "further steps".
The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty was signed in December 1987 by US President Ronald Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev.
But the US withdrew from the treaty in 2019, accusing Russia of breaking the rules.
Moscow has since said it will not deploy the missiles - with ranges of 311 to 3,418 miles - unless Washington does first.
But Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned last December that Moscow would have to respond to what he called the US and NATO's "destabilising actions".
The ministry said: "Since the situation is developing towards the actual deployment of U.S.-made land-based medium- and short-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, the Russian Foreign Ministry notes that the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons have disappeared."
It comes as Trump said on Friday that he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned to "the appropriate regions".
Russia and China begin war games in Sea of Japan after Trump nuclear threat
Trump and Medvedev have been locked in a war of words after the ex-Russian president accused Trump of 'playing the ultimatum game' over the White House's push to end the war in Ukraine.
Trump first gave Putin 50 days to end the war - but slashed the deadline to just 10 days from July 29 due to a lack of progress on Moscow's part.
The US president also vowed to impose secondary tariffs on Russia if a ceasefire agreement is not reached by August 8.
Medvedev ominously warned Trump that Russia "isn't Israel or even Iran".
5
5
"Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war," he wrote on a post on X.
Trump blasted Medvedev's comments as 'foolish and inflammatory' before ordering nuclear submarines to be deployed near Russian waters.
"Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions," Trump wrote on Truth Social.
The US has the world's largest fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, led by the USS Virginia - a 377-foot vessel armed with cruise missiles.
Trump v Medvedev: War of words
July 2025: Donald Trump announced a 50-day deadline for Russia to move toward ending the war in Ukraine or face "severe" tariffs.
Dmitry Medvedev, the Deputy Chairman of Russia's Security Council, dismissed this as a "theatrical ultimatum" that Russia "didn't care" about.
Late July 2025: President Trump reduced his deadline for Russia to secure a peace deal to just "10 or 12 days," threatening sanctions and secondary tariffs on countries that do business with Russia.
In response, Medvedev wrote on X that Trump was "playing the ultimatum game" and warned that each new ultimatum was a step toward war, not between Russia and Ukraine, but with the United States.
July 30, 2025: In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump publicly targeted Medvedev, calling him a "failed former President of Russia" who was "entering very dangerous territory" with his remarks.
This statement came as Trump also announced a 25% tariff on India, criticizing its "dead economy" and continued defense and energy ties with Moscow.
July 31, 2025: Medvedev retaliated on social media by referencing the "Dead Hand," a Cold War-era Soviet nuclear retaliation system, in a veiled threat to the US.
He also stated that Trump's "jittery reaction" proved Russia was "completely in the right" and would continue on its own path.
August 1, 2025: In a further escalation, President Trump announced he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned near Russia in response to Medvedev's "foolish and inflammatory statements."
This move highlights the dangerous rhetorical turn the conflict has taken, now including nuclear threats from both sides.
August 4, 2025: Medvedev blamed NATO countries for Russia's abandonment of a moratorium on short- and medium-range nuclear missiles.
He added the West should "expect further steps".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Conor McGregor invites Donald Trump to try 'the best Coke in Ireland'
Troubled ex-UFC star bizarrely invited Donald Trump to visit his Dublin pub to try the 'best Coke in Ireland.' McGregor, who has recently been embroiled in a string of scandals, including a civil rape case, was invited to the White House earlier this year and now he wants to return the favor and give the president a 'unique, true, IRISH EXPERIENCE!' at the Black Forge Inn. On X the fighter wrote: 'See you in November Donald, at Irelands greatest public house, the multi time award winning, @blackforgeinn!' McGregor wrote on X. SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO See you in November Donald, at Irelands greatest public house, the multi time award winning, @blackforgeinn! We look very forward! 🥘🥤 Ireland's friend @realDonaldTrump, we have the best Coke in all Ireland for you to try! Sparkly fizzy, and on the rocks. With Irish lemon… — Conor McGregor (@TheNotoriousMMA) August 4, 2025 Conor continued: 'We look very forward! Ireland's friend @realDonaldTrump, we have the best Coke in all Ireland for you to try! Sparkly fizzy, and on the rocks. With Irish lemon and lime, also! For adding. ICE COLD! 'Our Coca Cola factory is just 5 minutes away on the long mile road, walking distance, from the black forge inn! ''GIVE THAT BOY A CAN OF COKE!' You are going to LOVE IT! The unique, true, IRISH EXPERIENCE!' Alongside the social media message, Conor included an AI image of himself and Trump dressed as medieval knights around a table of meat and potatoes. In the image, Trump is drinking a can of Coca Cola. The fighter's pub was recently set on fire, with authorities treating the blaze as criminal damage. Meanwhile last week the ex-MMA star lost his attempt to overturn a jury's order that he compensate a woman who accused him of raping her. The court rejected the appeal in its entirety. Nikita Hand alleged that Conor sexually assaulted her on December 9, 2018. He was found liable in November and three Dublin judges rejected all five grounds of the MMA fighter's appeal. Conor was ordered to pay nearly €250,000 ($290,000), plus costs after Hand accused him of raping her at a hotel in Dublin in 2018. He denied the allegation and said he had 'fully consensual sex'. He also denied causing bruising to the plaintiff. Conor was not present for last week's decision, with Hand claiming she had been 'retraumatized' by the appeal. She said: 'To every survivor out there, I know how hard it is but please don't be silenced. You deserve to be heard. You also deserve justice.' Trump hosted the Irish MMA star and his family in the Oval Office on St Patrick's Day, with McGregor even vowing to raise concerns over immigration in Ireland with the president. The star, who also attended Trump's inauguration in January, praised the president's 'inspiring' work ethic.
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Yvette Cooper says ‘crammed' small boats using shallow water launches behind rise in arrival numbers
Update: Date: 2025-08-05T08:43:24.000Z Title: Yvette Cooper Content: Good morning. Keir Starmer has invested a lot of effort in measures that will 'smash the gangs' and today the government is announcing the start of one of his big achievements in this area – a returns agreement, of sorts, with France. It is only a pilot, and the numbers are likely to be small, but the Conservatives never negotiated a deal of this kind when they were trying to stop small boat arrivals. (In fact, as a result of Brexit, they achieved the opposite.) Here is Jessica Elgot's story about the 'one in, one out' returns deal with France. And here is the Home Office news release. , the home secretary, has been giving interviews this morning. In media interviews, some politicians are keen to go on the offensive, by opening up new arguments or lines of attack. Cooper is the ultimate defensive player, smothering all awkward questions with splurge of officious, technocratic reasonableness. Journalists find it frustrating, because she tends to be a bit boring, but government spin doctors are happy because she never messes up. When Starmer and Emmanuel Macron announced the 'one in, one out' pilot last month, details about how it would work were sketchy. In her interviews this morning, Cooper did not reveal anything new about how the scheme would operate, arguing that, if she were to release this information, that might help the people smugglers evade the new regime. It has been widely reported that the scheme will start with about 50 people being removed per week, but Cooper would not even confirm this. On numbers, she told the Today programme: We are not putting an overall figure on this programme. Of course, it will start will lower numbers and then build, but we want to be able to expand it. We want to be able to increase the number of people returned through this programme. But Cooper did try to counter the key charge being thrown against the government – that all the 'smash the gangs' measures it is announcing are failing, because small boat arrivals are at record numbers. On the Today programme, when she was asked why arrival numbers have been soaring over the past year, Cooper cited two reasons. She said: What we've seen in the course of this year has been the change in tactics by the criminal gangs, and they've been doing two things. First of all, exploiting the French maritime rules, which have meant up until this summer, that the French authorities just could not intervene in French waters. That's why we've seen these disgraceful scenes of the loading of people into small boats in shallow waters, and then the French police unable to intervene according to their rules. And that's why it's so important that, as part of this agreement with France, France is changing their maritime rules, and that will be starting later this summer. The second reason is we're seeing [a] big increase in the overcrowding of the boats, so far more people being crammed into the boats. That is why we are seeking to change the law. We have the new border security bill going through parliament at the moment, bringing in the new offence of endangerment, so that people who are getting on overcrowded boats who are frankly putting other people's lives at risks, can themselves be prosecuted for getting on these overcrowded boats. Because it's those two factors that are particularly driving this. By citing these two factors as the explanation, and stressing that the government is addressing them, Cooper was implying that the government will be able to reduce arrival numbers. The Conservatives claim that she is wrong because only a Rwanda-style deterrent policy would work. In an overnight press notice, the party descibed the UK-France deal as the 'migrant surrender treaty' (using Boris Johnson's inflammatory Brexit rhetoric) and Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: Returning just 50 illegal immigrants a week, and probably less, will make no difference whatsoever. This amounts to just 6 per cent of illegal arrivals. Allowing 94% to stay in the UK will be no deterrent at all. This is a gimmick which won't work. The Rwanda removals deterrent, under which 100 per cent of illegal arrivals would be removed, was ready to go last summer but Labour cancelled it just days before it was due to start with no proper replacement plan. As a result, this year so far has been the worst ever for illegal immigrants crossing the channel. Only removing all illegal immigrants upon arrival will provide the necessary deterrent to stop the crossings. This is the Conservative plan, but Labour is too weak to implement it and as a result they have lost control of our borders. It's August, parliament is in recess, and there is almost nothing in the diary for today. This morning the Home Office will publish the text of the 'one in, one out' returns treaty with France. And Kemi Badenoch is doing a visit in her North West Essex constituency, where she will be restating the Tories' opposition to what they call Labour's 'family farm tax'. If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @ The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper refuses to say how many Channel migrants will be returned to France under new 'one in one out' deal because it 'could help smuggling gangs'
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper today refused to say how many migrants will be returned to France as part of Labour's new 'one in, one out' deal with President Macron. Migrants who arrive by small boat from tomorrow could face being selected for the scheme and placed in detention instead of being sent to taxpayer-funded hotels. The Home Office will then work with French counterparts to return the migrants in return for Britain accepting others still in France with stronger asylum claims. However, the much-trumpeted deal has come under fresh scrutiny after it emerged the agreement will expire in just 11 months. And this morning, Ms Cooper declined to say how many migrants she expects to be able to send back. Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, she said: 'We are not putting an overall figure on this programme. 'Of course, it will start to lower numbers and then build, but we want to be able to expand it. 'We want to be able to increase the number of people returned through this programme.' She added: 'We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people are being detained, how many people are being returned, and it is right that we should be transparent around that. 'But we're not setting the numbers in advance, firstly because there is no fixed number in terms of the overall number of people to come through this system, and secondly because we're not going to provide (gangs) with that operational information.' The arrangement with Emmanuel Macron's government will lapse at the end of June next year – just 47 weeks away – unless it is renewed. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said the 'meagre' and 'short-term' deal would splutter to a halt even before the start of next year's peak small boats season. Meanwhile, pro-migrant groups have already indicated they are poised to bring legal challenges – just as they did against the previous Conservative government's Rwanda asylum deal. There was no mention of an expiry date for the new treaty when it was first announced by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Mr Macron last month. A Home Office spokesman said: 'Over this period both countries have committed to continually review and improve the process and effectiveness of this innovative approach, pending decisions on the long-term future of the arrangements after June 2026.' Last month it was suggested the scheme would see 50 migrants a week sent back to France. At that rate, just 2,350 would be returned before the agreement expires. By comparison, a record 25,436 migrants have reached Britain by small boat since the start of this year. The spokesman refused to reveal how many migrants will be targeted for removal, but said the Government had 'an ambition to scale up' the numbers. Last night the PM said: 'Today we send a clear message – if you come here illegally on a small boat you will face being sent back to France. This is the product of months of grown-up diplomacy delivering real results for British people as we broker deals no government has been able to achieve and strike at the heart of these vile gangs' business model.' Mr Philp said: 'This is a short-term arrangement that will only last a few months and will expire before next year's peak crossing season. This meagre arrangement will be no more effective than the Government's previous gimmick, which was claiming to 'smash the gangs'. 'The Rwanda removals deterrent, under which 100 per cent of illegal arrivals would be removed, was ready to go last summer but Labour cancelled it just days before it was due to start with no proper replacement plan. As a result, this year so far has been the worst ever for illegal immigrants crossing the Channel.' Today, Ms Cooper accepted that the deal would not end Channel crossings on its own, but pointed to a similar accord between Greece and Turkey in 2016 which she said brought down numbers of migrants to Greece. Speaking to BBC Breakfast, Ms Cooper said: 'We never claimed that there is a single silver bullet on this. So this goes alongside the 28% increase in returns of failed asylum seekers that we have brought in. 'It goes alongside the change to those French maritime rules that I referred to which means France taking action in French waters to prevent boat crossings in the first place, and the much stronger law enforcement that we announced earlier this week with the additional National Crime Agency investigators and police to be able to go after the criminal gangs. We have to do all of these things.' From tomorrow, any new Channel arrivals will be taken to the Home Office's processing centre at Manston, near Ramsgate, Kent, and assessed by Border Force officials. Any selected for the returns scheme will be transferred to short-term immigration holding facilities operated by the Home Office, such as those at Heathrow and Gatwick airports. After further assessment, they could be sent to an immigration removal centre to await return to France. It is hoped the first migrants will be returned by the end of August and detention space has already been set aside for the launch of the scheme. However, it is likely to face legal challenges – possibly as early as this week. A spokesman for the charity which helped blocked the Tories' Rwanda scheme, Care4Calais, said last night: 'We will consider all options open to us to oppose any plans that will put more lives at risk and involve governments trading humans.' The Home Office spokesman said: 'The UK government is prepared to robustly defend any legal challenges to removal within the initial trial phase, as we look to ramp up both the pace and scale of returns over the course of the pilot scheme.'
