More than 1,500 Sellafield construction workers to ballot for strike action over pay dispute
Members of Unite employed by 36 contractors at the Sellafield nuclear site, in Cumbria, will vote in the coming weeks on whether to launch a campaign of industrial action.
Unite said the dispute is over demands for better work conditions, involving workers such as electricians, joiners, pipefitters, riggers, groundworkers, welders and painters.
Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: "Our members are highly skilled and operate in an extremely challenging and hazardous environment.
"Despite this, construction employers are refusing to pay an allowance for our members' skills and dedication."
Unite regional officer Ryan Armstrong added: "There is still time to avoid strike action but the employers must return to the table with a viable offer."
A Sellafield spokesperson said: 'We are aware of a dispute involving contractors working at Sellafield employed under the NAECI and CIJC Working Rule Agreements.
'The affected individuals are not employees of Sellafield Ltd and we are therefore not directly involved in this dispute.
'As always, the safety and security of the Sellafield site, our workforce, and the local community will be our priority during any industrial action.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
11 hours ago
- Times
Gaps in Len McCluskey's memory must be filled one way or another
Len McCluskey has questions to answer RAY MCMANUS/SPORTSFILE In his last major investigation for The Times before his untimely death, Andrew Norfolk, the reporter whose work exposed the grooming gangs scandal, turned his forensic eye to the Unite trade union. In a series of reports for this newspaper, Mr Norfolk revealed that a company owned by a friend of the union's then general secretary, Len McCluskey, was paid at least £95 million for the construction of a hotel and conference centre in Birmingham initially meant to cost £7 million. This week an independent report commissioned by Sharon Graham, Mr McCluskey's successor at Unite, showed the situation to be even worse. Ms Graham had asked Martin Bowdery KC, a barrister specialising in construction, to investigate the hotel project, for which Mr McCluskey was a vocal advocate. The inquiry concluded that the cost of the hotel had in fact ballooned to £112 million. That was £74.5 million more than its market value. As a result, Unite has had to wipe £66 million from its accounts. An audit accompanying the KC's report concluded that under Mr McCluskey's leadership there was a 'pervasive fraud environment' at Unite. The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) is pursuing its own investigation. Mr McCluskey, an avowed socialist and admirer of Jeremy Corbyn, never shy of voicing his opinions on Labour politics, clearly has serious questions to answer. Mr Bowdery's report claims that the union leader was flown to watch his beloved Liverpool FC in two Champions League finals, in Kyiv and Madrid, by the Flanagan Group, the construction firm alleged to have overcharged Unite by at least £30 million when building the hotel. The report also lists five other occasions on which the union leader was taken to watch Liverpool, enjoying matchday hospitality courtesy of the Flanagans, whom he described as 'good friends'. Mr McCluskey said that as far as he could recall he paid his own way. Unite officials and lawyers were uneasy about Flanagan, which the report said had a history of 'poor performance, delays [and] cost overruns'. Mr McCluskey is said to have overruled them. He denies doing so, and through his lawyers has denounced Ms Graham's inquiry as 'inaccurate, selective and highly misleading'. The ultimate judgment will be made by the SFO but Ms Graham believes there is enough evidence to support criminal action against two 'very senior' former Unite officials. South Wales police are undertaking an investigation involving alleged bribery, fraud, money laundering and tax evasion. It is not often that The Times agrees with Ms Graham but she is to be commended for her courage in taking on vested interests within a vast and powerful union of some 1.2 million members straddling the private and public sectors. She told this newspaper of the 'horrendous' attacks she endured from supporters of Mr McCluskey after promising to investigate the hotel project. She has described being 'followed home' and subjected to 'despicable online abuse'. There is much to criticise about Unite's positioning under Ms Graham's leadership, not least its intransigence over refuse collection strikes in Birmingham, but whatever her politics, she is at least committed to uncovering the truth. As Ms Graham says, multiple investigations suggest 'rank incompetence … or something else' during Mr McCluskey's reign. It now falls to the SFO to establish what that 'something else' might have been. It should expedite its inquiry as swiftly as possible. Unite pays £1.5 million a year to affiliate to the Labour Party and contributes significant sums to individual Labour MPs. It is too significant a political player to remain under a cloud of suspicion about its past integrity. The facts as they pertain to Mr McCluskey must be established, even if recalling some of them appears to be beyond our Len.
Times
19 hours ago
- Times
‘I was followed home', says Unite boss as fraud inquiry deepens
The boss of Unite said that she was harassed and 'followed home' for trying to uncover the truth about Unite under the leadership of Len McCluskey. Sharon Graham, who took over in 2021 on a pledge to 'leave no stone unturned to get to the truth', said that she had endured 'horrendous personal attacks' as the process got 'ugly'. On Tuesday, a report about a scandal-hit hotel complex in Birmingham found that the union, which is funded by workers' fees, was overcharged by £30 million. The main contractor, the Flanagan Group, owned by men whom McCluskey called his 'good friends', paid for the former union boss to fly out to watch the Champions League final two years running, including in a private jet, the report found. The report said that the union believes that there is evidence to support criminal investigations into two 'very senior' former Unite officials. The case was passed to the Serious Fraud Office last year but no arrests have been made. Unite said that the 'reports are with the police'. The union's auditors found that there was a 'pervasive fraud environment' at Unite and that 'former members of senior management appear to have been motivated to commit fraud'. Ten suspects have also been identified in a separate investigation by South Wales police into bribery, money laundering and fraud relating to contracts for affiliated services offered by the union. Graham, who has struggled to pull the union from the shadow of its past, said that 'to get here has been an extremely difficult process and quite frankly an ugly one'. 'Those with much to lose, and their supporters inside and outside the union, have done all in their power to attack me,' she said in a foreword to the report. 'I have had to endure horrendous personal attacks over three years, both from vested interests and those with blind loyalty to factions. 'I expected turbulence of course, but even I was shocked at the lengths being gone to: despicable online abuse and being followed home.' She claims that her opponents operated a 'scorched earth strategy that was adopted by some supporters of a faction tied to the past' to 'lie' about Unite. • Unite leader Sharon Graham defends strategy of targeting bosses' families The union ultimately paid £112 million for a hotel and conference complex in Birmingham, £74.5 million more than it was worth. On Tuesday, Unite announced that it had wiped £66 million from its accounts as an 'impairment'. The profit mark-up was double the industry norm and the contracts were signed by McCluskey against the advice of lawyers, the report found. The Flanagan Group, a Liverpool-based construction firm, later arranged football tickets, hospitality and flights, including at least one private jet flight, for McCluskey, the report said. Two of the matches were the 2018 and 2019 Champions League finals in Kyiv and Madrid, the latter of which he travelled to by private jet. The owners of the Flanagan Group 'consistently organised and paid for' his tickets, and there is 'no indication' McCluskey reimbursed them. Lawyers for McCluskey have previously told the BBC that he paid for his own travel in full and did not recall attending all of the domestic matches in the Unite report. • Unite left fearing fraud squad's might A statement issued to The Times this week by Carter-Ruck, McCluskey's lawyers, said: 'Our client is deeply disappointed by the statements and report published today by Unite, which were issued without any prior reference to him, and he is considering his legal rights in this regard. 'As this matter is understood to remain the subject of ongoing police investigation, it would be inappropriate of McCluskey to comment in detail on it at this time. Suffice to say that such allegations as have been published regarding our client are categorically rejected by him as inaccurate, selective and highly misleading.' In interviews with a KC leading Unite's investigation, McCluskey denied that he overruled staff or lawyers over the contract, and instead said that he had delegated many key aspects of the project to Ed Sabisky, Unite's former finance director, who died in 2020. The Times called the Flanagan Group for comment on Tuesday. Their representative declined to answer questions or give an email address.
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Is it time the BrewDog beer empire went flat?
When it launched in 2007, craft beer BrewDog was a 'punk' brand. It's a word that featured on many of the cans of its IPA sold at the Fontaines DC show at Finsbury Park earlier this month, and at summer festivals across the land. It's a sign of something young, cool, edgy. What's not so cool is abruptly closing 10 bars, including BrewDog's flagship outlet in Aberdeen, some within a matter of days. 'Morally repugnant,' said the union Unite, which represents some of the workers whose livelihoods have been affected by the closures. True, companies sometimes have to close outlets when they're losing money, especially if the wider group is in the red and really can't afford to be subsidising places that aren't washing their faces financially. That's the harsh reality. But while that sort of decision is always going to hurt the workers on the receiving end, there are ways and means of handling these things. Unite has raised questions about the firm's tactics, telling the BBC that this is: 'Yet another example of a company that doesn't have the slightest regard for basic employment law, let alone the welfare of their workers.' It says it is working with the affected workers to challenge the decision, legally if necessary. BrewDog was an entertaining and innovative start-up that became a big success, planting its flag overseas and tweaking the nose of the establishment along the way. It had an original way of garnering finance by creating 'equity punks' through crowdfunding. These supporters turned up at sometimes raucous AGMs. The group also had a keen eye for PR stunts. Its critics obligingly went into meltdown when the company launched nuclear-strength beers. In recent years, however, the brand has acquired a coat of tarnish. In 2021, former workers wrote an open letter highlighting what they claimed was a "culture of fear" within the business while alleging "toxic attitudes" towards junior employees. The following year, a BBC investigation aired allegations of inappropriate behaviour on the part of co-founder and now-former CEO James Watt. These were denied. But Ofcom rejected a complaint made by Watt and the company against BBC Scotland on the grounds of 'fairness and privacy'. It said: 'Ofcom's decision is that material facts were not presented, disregarded or omitted in a way that was unfair to the complainants, that they had an appropriate and timely opportunity to respond to the allegations made in the programme, and that their response was fairly reflected in the programme.' Then last April, Watt – who publicly opposed Brexit – was pictured at Nigel Farage's 60th birthday party. Now, I want to be clear here: I really couldn't care less who his friends are, or whose parties he chooses to go to. Business leaders need to engage with all sides for the health of their companies. That's lobbying. It's silly to huff and puff when they do that. But partying with a polarising figure that a large chunk of your customer base reviles is different. The optics are not good. It's a poor business decision. And it was only a few weeks after Farage's party that Watt stepped down from the top job at BrewDog, 17 years after he co-founded the Scottish brewer. The company also decided to cease paying the real living wage, based on the cost of living, in favour of the lower rate mandated by the government, citing the need to return to profitability in a tough climate for the hospitality industry. For his own part, Watt has previously decried those who seek a "work-life balance", rather than what he called "work-life integration", suggesting that if you love you work, you don't need to separate it from your personal life. Much of the hospitality sector has been swimming upstream, it is true. Its businesses have been grappling with higher taxes and costs while consumer confidence is at a low ebb. The country's economic challenges have also hit young people particularly hard. If your rent is gobbling up half your take-home pay, you're going to have to limit what you spend on going out. It's a lot cheaper to buy beer from Tesco and invite friends round than it is to meet up at BrewDog. But one also wonders whether at least some of the company's problems are down to the damage the brand has taken. Brands matter. Companies pour vast sums into building them up. History also teaches us how easy it is to blow them up. If customers stop buying into yours because you've been shooting yourself in the foot and causing them to question your authenticity, then you have a problem. No one would bat an eyelid if, say, Brexit-backing Wetherspoon's boss Tim Martin was spotted out on the town with Farage. Martin is who he is, and doesn't much care who knows it. He's authentically Tim. Is that true of Watt and, by extension, BrewDog, which he is still closely involved with even if he's no longer the CEO? How much are you willing to pay for 'punk' beer that isn't really so punk? A beer that is, in reality, part of the establishment but expects you to pay a premium price that the local Wetherspoon's doesn't demand (far from it). I suspect the answer isn't to BrewDog's taste.
