
Residents in some parts oppose Corporation's new vending zones
'Prevent notification'
Ranganathan Garden resident Sridhar has demanded that the ward councillor prevent the notification of Fifteenth Main Road as a vending zone. 'There is a Siva temple in the locality. We do not want vending zones on the stretch that has been peaceful and calm,' he says.
After the resolution was passed by the Corporation Council, the civic body has not sent the proposal to the Tamil Nadu government for gazette notification of the vending and non-vending zones. Once the list of vending and non-vending zones is notified by the government, the civic body will allocate space for vendors.
The Corporation has started receiving letters from residents' associations, objecting to the list of vending zones in many areas. 'The town vending committee will consider the objections and make a decision. We will remove the roads from the list of vending zones if the residents object,' says an official of the Corporation.
The Corporation's designation of 150 vending and 188 non-vending zones, a year after its vending committee was constituted, has drawn criticism for lack of clarity in the zoning norms, interference of political party members, and delays in issuing corrected identity cards to vendors.
'No clarity on unlisted areas'
Sandhya Vedullapalli, a civic activist, says that the vending zone list lacks clarity on unlisted areas. Further, in Ward 103, designated vending streets appear insufficient for Anna Nagar's vendors, raising the question whether the process aligns with guidelines under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, she says.
G. Selva of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) points out that in 2021, more than 900 vending zones were identified, but now it is 150. 'In the name of organising, vending zones must not be reduced. Small vendors provide low-income individuals with increased purchasing power, playing a vital role in driving the economic growth. Regional and sub-vending committees must be formed to check on issues related to vending.'
Gopalakannan, a vendor on Anna Salai, received a text message that read: 'The Greater Chennai Corporation has requested that street vendors who require any correction in the details on the identity card issued to them take a copy of the issued identity card, mark the required corrections on it, sign it, and submit it along with supporting documents at the respective zonal or divisional office during the special camp to be held from October 19 to 23, 2024.'
'No new cards yet'
'Many submitted the copies for corrections. But I have not received any update on new cards. When we made enquiries, Corporation officials said the cards had not been printed yet,' Gopalakannan adds. S. Kumar, a vendor for 24 years, says the zonal officials have been saying for three months that new cards will be issued in May at the Royapuram Zonal Office. 'Those who were issued new cards were instructed to hand over their old cards. If we received new cards, why would we still have the old ones? We were not informed of the new rules. We continue to use plastic for distributing beverages. The wastewater is discarded down the drain through silt traps,' he says.
Some vendors say that moving to another location would be tough as there may be competition and lack of space. P. Karunanidhi, general secretary of the Chennai Street Vendors' Association and a member of the Corporation's vending committee, acknowledges that there is lack of clarity in the norms.
Political interference
'The vending committee and the Corporation have the powers with regard to vending zones and the number of permissible traders who can be issued identity cards. But some councillors and ruling party members interfere in these matters. When higher authorities were informed, instead of rectifying the issues, they asked us to coordinate with the politicians,' another vendor claims.
Denying these allegations, an official of the Corporation's Revenue and Finance Department says that more than 32,000 cards were issued at camps held in February. 'There were roughly 2,500 vendors who requested for changes in the name, the address, and the date of birth in the cards. The changes were made and new cards were issued,' he says.
The Corporation has proposed regional committees for vending and sent the proposal to the government. Once the government approves it, the civic body will start regularising the operations of the vending and non-vending zones and monitor them, the official says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Adoor Gopalakrishnan's remarks on Kerala govt project for SC/ST filmmakers kick up a storm, complaint filed against him
Veteran filmmaker Adoor Gopalakrishnan's controversial statements at the Kerala Film Policy Conclave on the Kerala government's project to promote filmmakers from Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (SC/ST) communities and the one for women filmmakers, kicked up a storm on Monday (August 4, 2025), with Ministers, Dalit activists and filmmakers criticising him for his stand. Dalit activist Dinu Veyil filed a complaint under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act with the Museum Police in Thiruvananthapuram and with the Kerala State SC/ST Commission against the filmmaker. Mr. Gopalakrishnan had said the government's project under which ₹1.5 crore is provided to aspiring women filmmakers and those from the SC/ST communities will pave the way for corruption. The intent behind the project is good, but they should be given at least three months of intensive training to make films, he had said, calling for a reduction in the amount to ₹50 lakh. Minister for Cultural Affairs Saji Cherian had disagreed with him on stage and said 'even ₹1.5 crore is insufficient to make quality films in these times.' He also stressed upon the need to support filmmakers from these communities as they 'have not got any mainstream opportunities in the almost 100-year old history of Malayalam cinema.' In a Facebook post on Sunday seemingly referring to his comments, Higher Education Minister R. Bindu wrote that 'it doesn't matter if all the time spent in the global film platforms does not lead to a broadening of the mind and turn you into a better human'. Speaking to the media on Monday, she said it is the responsibility of democratic institutions to ensure justice for communities who have been denied the same for thousands of years. 'It is the government's responsibility to aid not just the creative expression of women and those from the SC/ST communities, but to bring them to the mainstream leadership roles in all spheres of life. This project is one of the best interventions that the Culture department has taken up,' she said. Filmmaker Bijukumar Damodaran, who said he is a filmmaker from an SC community who has made 15 award-winning films without any training, accused Mr. Gopalakrishnan of insisting on intensive training only in the case of SC/ST and women filmmakers 'because he is using separate lens to look at them.' Adoor doubles down on his criticism Meanwhile, in an interaction with the media, Mr. Gopalakrishnan doubled down on his criticism and said he was 'not against providing financial assistance to anyone, but the beneficiaries should be provided adequate training and orientation before the disbursal of funds.' He also reiterated his demand that the amount of ₹1.5 crore for each filmmaker should be reduced to ₹50 lakh and divided among three filmmakers from these communities, thus giving opportunities to more people. 'I have not insulted anyone. If anyone can prove from the recorded visuals that I have, I can apologise. I am not responsible for the interpretations of my speech. My intention was that they should be provided a proper understanding of the cinema medium. Without that, they will end up not going any further than this one film. They shouldn't disappear after making one film. I am speaking for them, not against them. Many of those who made films through the project had complaints because they lacked knowledge about filmmaking and the processes involved. The Culture Minister does not know that filmmaking is a specialist job that requires years of experience because he is not a specialist in cinema. He shouldn't have defended the project,' he said. Criticises singer Mr. Gopalakrishnan also criticised singer Pushpavathy who raised voices of protest against him during his speech at the conclave and questioned those, including the Ministers, present 'for not stopping her.'


India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
How Young Is Too Young? India Debates Legal Age For Sexual Consent
New Delhi: Senior Advocate Indira Jaising stood before the Supreme Court of India in the last week on July and made a request that reignited an old and uncomfortable question: should consensual sex between teenagers still be considered a crime? At the center of this storm is one number: 18. That is the age set by Indian law for legally consenting to sex. Jaising argued this threshold may be punishing teenagers instead of protecting them. In her written submission, she urged the court to reconsider how the law treats consensual relationships between adolescents aged 16 to 18. Such relationships, she said, do not fit the definitions of exploitation or abuse. The government disagreed. It fears that lowering the bar could leave minors, those legally not adult, below 18, vulnerable to coercion, manipulation or worse. It argued making room for exceptions could lead to loopholes that might be exploited by traffickers or abusers. But the law, especially the 2012 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, draws no lines between love and violation when it comes to minors. It sees all sexual activity under the age of 18 as criminal, even when both parties consent. This hard line has come under scrutiny from activists, judges and rights groups who believe the law is outdated or at least too rigid. In some cases, they say, parents have used the law to intervene in relationships they disapprove of, especially when caste, religion or class are involved. Many experts say the law has become a tool of control more than protection. The Global Picture and India's Long Trail Consent laws around the world are not the same. In countries like the United Kingdom and Canada, the age is 16. In the United States, it varies state to state. But in India, it is fixed, one rule for all. Back in 1860, when India first codified its criminal laws, the age was 10. In 1940, it was raised to 16. Then came POCSO, which made 18 the new standard. That was over a decade ago. Since then, the conversation has shifted, slowly, painfully but noticeably. The Courts Speak, Then Pause In 2022, the Karnataka High Court stepped in. It suggested that the Law Commission revisit the consent age under POCSO. The court pointed to several cases where teenage couples, a girl just over 16 and a boy barely out of adolescence, had been pulled into criminal trials under the law, even when there was no allegation of force. The Law Commission reviewed the matter but did not recommend lowering the age. Instead, it proposed something else: allowing courts to use 'judicial discretion' in cases involving teenagers. This means judges could consider the nature of the relationship, the age gap and whether coercion was involved before passing judgment. Even without formal legislation, some courts across India have started doing that. They have granted bail, overturned convictions or dismissed charges in cases where evidence showed mutual consent and emotional connection between teenagers. But not every bench agrees. In April, the Madras High Court overturned an acquittal in a case where a 17-year-old girl left home to be with a 23-year-old man. Her family had arranged her marriage elsewhere. The court sentenced the man to 10 years in prison under POCSO. Process as Punishment For Advocate Jaising, this is part of the problem. She said simply giving judges the discretion is not enough. Trials can be long, traumatic and carry the weight of stigma. 'For many people, the process itself becomes the punishment,' she stated. A report from the India Child Protection Fund shows just how overloaded the system is. As of January 2023, nearly 250,000 POCSO cases were pending in special courts created to handle them. Jaising argued for consistency and for a system that does not criminalise teenagers for being teenagers. 'Leaving everything to judicial discretion can result in unequal outcomes,' she warned. A Society in Conflict With Itself This is where India finds itself today caught between the need to protect and the need to understand, the fear of abuse and the reality of young love and between a law that seeks clarity and a society that lives in shades of grey. Lawyer and child rights advocate Bhuvan Ribhu said exceptions cannot be unconditional. He worries about misuse in cases of trafficking or child marriage. He supports discretion, but also faster trials, better rehabilitation of survivors and greater awareness. Not everyone is cautious. Ananashi Ganguly, co-founder of HAQ: Centre for Child Rights, stands with Jaising. 'We cannot avoid reform only because we are afraid of misuse,' she said. According to her, society is changing. The law needs to change with it. As this debate continues, India faces another question: what does protection mean when it becomes punishment? Where does responsibility lie in a law written for children or in a society still learning to talk to them about sex, safety and consent?


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
'Would you worship Bhagwa terrorist?': Shankaracharya Avimukteshwaranand says 'don't link terrorism with colour'; questions failure to find Malegaon blast culprits
Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand NEW DELHI: The debate over the use of the term 'Saffron Terror', that resumed after the July 31 verdict in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, has refused to die down. Commenting on the term, Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati Maharaj said that colour should not be linked with terrorism. He said those who associate a colour with terrorism are supporting terrorism. The Shankaracharya said, "A terrorist is a does colour mean with the word terrorism? Terrorism is terrorism, and a zero-tolerance policy should be adopted against it... The Malegaon blast happened, but you could not find the person who committed who look for colours in terrorism are supporters of terrorism." The term 'Bhagwa Aatank' or 'saffron terrorism' was first used after the 2002 Gujarat riots, as per a report by the news agency ANI. It was later used again after the 2008 Malegaon blasts. Some political leaders and parties used the term in their statements. The term was also mentioned by then home minister P Chidambaram in an official meeting with police officials. Congress leader Digvijay Singh also used the term in reference to the blasts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo The Hindu pontiff also raised questions as to why the government is still unable to catch the culprits of the Malegaon blast case. "We do not wish to comment on the court's proceedings; whatever was done in court, we believe, must have been correct. If these people were found innocent in the court's view, then it is right they were acquitted. But the bigger problem is that the blast did not happen on its own — someone must have done it. Who was it? Where is the Government of India, the state government failing, that someone comes, carries out a blast, and leaves, and despite having vast resources and plenty of time, we are still unable to catch the culprit? This is a big slap on our capability that we cannot apprehend the guilty," he said. On July 31, a special NIA court in Mumbai acquitted all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case. The court said that the prosecution could not prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court also directed the Maharashtra government to pay Rs 2 lakh compensation to the families of the people who died in the blast, and Rs 50,000 to those who were injured. The seven accused were former MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, retired Major Ramesh Upadhyay, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhankar Dhar Dwivedi (also known as Shankaracharya), and Sameer Kulkarni. "All bail bonds of the accused are cancelled and sureties are discharged," the court said. The court examined 323 witnesses from the prosecution and eight from the defence before giving the verdict. All seven were acquitted of charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, the Arms Act, and other related charges. The blast occurred on September 29, 2008, near a mosque in Bhikku Chowk area of Malegaon. An explosive device placed on a motorcycle went off, killing six people and injuring 95 others. Initially, 11 people were named as accused, but charges were framed against seven. The lawyer representing the victims' families has said that he will challenge the acquittal in the high court. Earlier, on the eve of the judgment in the Malegaon blast case, Union home minister Amit Shah had said in Parliament that no Hindu can ever be a terrorist. "I am proud to say, no Hindu can ever be a terrorist," Shah had said in Rajya Sabha. Meanwhile, after the NIA court judgment, former Maharashtra CM Prithviraj Chavan also spoke on the matter last week and said that he does not support the use of the term "saffron terror." "Don't use the term 'Saffron terrorism'. If you want to describe such acts, use 'Hindu fundamentalist' or 'Hindu terrorism' instead."