Superstar LIV Golf ace reveals unification stance after fresh PGA Tour chief talks
Past bond between the new CEO of PGA Tour and LIV supremo can help
Superstar Jon Rahm is taking a positive view on the relationship between LIV chief Scott O'Neil and new PGA Tour CEO Brian Rolapp in terms of golf's future unity.
But the Spanish star remains cautious as he admits final decisions are likely to involve more than just the two individuals.
Rolapp's announcement as successor to Jay Monihan on the PGA Tour is seen a positive step for the coming together and as he met with LIV boss O'Neil during their days together at Harvard Business School.
However, when asked if their connection could help smooth the pathway to unification, Rahm gave a thoughtful response as he said: 'I feel like that's a question for obviously both the CEOs, right.
"Whatever I say is speculation. It's not what they know. I would hope that them having a close relationship from the past should help facilitate at least the dialogue between them two, but, at the end of the day, it's not just up to them.
"There's also people behind them and higher up than them that would ultimately make the decision. Things are never as simple as they seem. But I would like to be positive about it and think that that would help it out.'
Rahm's focus is the course as he prepares for the LIV Dallas event and continues the build towards the Open Championship at Royal Portrush.
The Ryder Cup star has enjoyed past success in Irish Opens and is looking forward to the challenge of another Claret Jug chase.
Rahm said: 'I like Royal Portrush. Last Open there I did well. I played a British Am there and had nothing but a good experience.
"It's a bit of a unique links because you don't usually have elevation changes in links golf, and it's not that it's massive, but that first hole you have anywhere between a wedge to a seven-iron with a massive upslope and massive crosswinds. That's not something you usually see.
'The fifth hole is severely downhill, even the seventh is not something you usually see. And then 16, 17, 18, with having to go over cliffs and falloffs and elevation changes, it's not something you usually get to practice in links golf.
"Usually it's perfectly flat, and there's other elements to worry about. So that's what makes Portrush to me a little bit more special.
'It's a fantastic golf course where, like every other major, you have to do everything well. I've been lucky enough to play in Ireland and Northern Ireland, so I'm hoping that can carry on over into a major championship, as well.'
Rahm gave another strong Major showing at the recent US Open and added: 'I mean, it was nothing but a good week. Extremely difficult golf course. Extremely penalising anytime you make a mistake. Finishing top 10 is always going to be a good week. Very happy to shoot under par twice. It's just too bad Friday cost me a little bit too much.
'As far as the week goes or the ending, I would say score doesn't always reflect the truth. I played Sunday with barely any pressure, so I could afford to take some risks and posted a score and never had to deal with the nerves or intensity that Tyrrell [Hatton] had.
"So playing that golf course under those circumstances is much different than if you go five hours before. I would say it's not comparable.
'He played fantastic golf, and honestly, it was pretty apparent to me I wasn't going to win it. There was too many good players and somebody was going to post a lower score.
"But it's one of those things you have to stick around just in case and also I was staying around hoping Tyrrell would win it.
'It is unfortunate such a good week for him came down to arguably one of the unluckiest breaks I've seen in golf.
"For his drive on 17 to land on such a severe downslope in the rough and not even move two feet forward in the bunker, it's a big difference.
'There's no guarantee anytime of winning, but if that ball would have been in the bunker, there definitely would have been a much better chance of giving it a go. Happy for him. Happy he played great. I think if he's playing this good in majors, it's just a matter of time of one coming. Hoping that happens.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Live
2 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
Emma Raducanu breaks silence on Carlos Alcaraz romance rumours with four-word response
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Emma Raducanu has chuckled at the chatter of a budding romance with Carlos Alcaraz as Wimbledon looms. The British starlet is set to partner with Alcaraz for mixed doubles at the US Open this year, sparking whispers of a love link-up. The UK's leading lady is gearing up to take on teen wildcard Mimi Xu in Wimbledon's first round come Monday. Currently ranked 38th globally, she's homing in on the clash following her stint at Eastbourne. Still, she found herself fielding speculation about Alcaraz during her pre-tournament press briefing in SW19. Having been chums with the Spanish sensation for a good four years, Raducanu was seen hitting balls with him at Wimbledon on Friday. When quizzed about whether tactics for the US Open came up, she said: "No, it was fun yesterday. We were both on court with (water brand) Evian. "Yeah, we were just getting some volley practicing ahead of New York. Yeah, I'm really happy obviously to be playing with him. Yeah, we had a good time yesterday.", reports the Mirror. Predictably, the press conference turned to the topic she likely anticipated. On probing whether there's any truth to the romantic links, Raducanu responded with a beam, asserting: "We're just good friends." With that, the interview moderator intervened, closing down the query session, to which Raducanu mirthfully remarked: "Way to wrap up!". Raducanu and Alcaraz, both 22 years old, have formed a friendship over the years. Raducanu recently shared the story of how they became close, saying: "I've known him for years and actually in Wimbledon 2021, it was like kind of the first time I started getting to know him, and I had a good run there and then also again in the US Open in 2021." She recalled how Alcaraz's victories would motivate her to win her own matches, which often took place a day later. "And I remember he was always playing the day before me and I was playing like the second day of the round. And I would see him win and then I would have motivation to win and get myself into that position too." Raducanu also remembered Alcaraz's breakthrough win against Stefanos Tsitsipas in the third round, calling it a "And I remember he beat Stef [Tsitsipas] in the third round and it was like a big win, his breakout kind of win on a big stage and it was really cool to kind of, I guess, go through that tournament together and then I kept going through the US Open, but we were staying in touch for the whole time and yeah, it's nice." on a major stage. She cherished the experience of going through the US Open together and staying in touch throughout the tournament. Their friendship has endured despite Alcaraz's rapid rise to success. Raducanu said: "We have a good relationship still. He's obviously overtaken me a lot, but it's nice that we have that from a while ago." She emphasized the value of connections made at a young age, especially as fame and success can lead to new, but less genuine, relationships. "I think for all of us, we really kind of value those connections that we had from when we were young because when you become a bit more known or a bit more successful, you just find yourself reverting back to people you knew from a young age because you're like, that's a real genuine connection, because it becomes very busy and you have a lot more friends but the ones that you've known for a long time mean a lot more to you."
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Man Utd and Arsenal given Viktor Gyokeres boost as £65m-rated striker comes to new transfer agreement with Sporting
VIK CLOCK Man Utd and Arsenal given Viktor Gyokeres boost as £65m-rated striker comes to new transfer agreement with Sporting Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) VIKTOR GYOKERES has been given more time off as Sporting try to resolve his future. The Manchester United, Liverpool and Arsenal target has had a standoff with the Portuguese side over his selling price. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Viktor Gyokeres has been given more time off as Sporting try to resolve his future Credit: Getty Sweden striker Gyokeres is at war with president Frederico Varandas and warned he will not return for the start of pre-season training on Tuesday. But Sporting have told Gyokeres he can come back on July 7, giving Prem suitors the chance to make a move. Gyokeres, 27, claims Sporting have gone back on a gentleman's agreement to sell him at a price well below his £85million release clause. Sporting, who have lined up Colombia star Luis Suarez of Almeria as Gyokeres' replacement, want at least £65million for their lethal No 9. READ MORE FOOTBALL NEWS REST IN PEACE Spanish football in mourning as star, 23, dies after horror car crash And Arsenal's opening gambit was a good £10million below that — leaving the door open for others. Gyokeres favours a move to the Gunners and their lack of progress with supposed No 1 target Benjamin Sesko, 22, offers him hope. RB Leipzig are yet to receive any bid for Sesko, who scored 21 goals across 45 games in all competitions last season. Liverpool are unlikely to make a big move for a new striker without offloading Darwin Nunez. CASINO SPECIAL - BEST CASINO BONUSES FROM £10 DEPOSITS 3 And that relies on Serie A champions Napoli resurrecting the sale of Victor Osimhen to Al-Hilal. Chelsea are also interested in Osimhen. But Napoli know no other club is likely to match the £63.5m they hoped to bank from the Saudis. Viktor Gyokeres to Liverpool LATEST as Reds sweat on Alexander Isak | Transfers Exposed 3 TRANSFER NEWS LIVE - KEEP UP WITH ALL THE LATEST FROM A BUSY SUMMER WINDOW
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Pompous Europe take note: no fans are more real than fervent Brazilians
Aside from his natural gifts, there was a reason Seve Ballesteros was such a great Ryder Cup golfer. He had a thing about America. Genuinely disliked the place. Resented that he was tagged the car-park champion, bristled at the lack of respect suggested by the title. Ballesteros could never see the affection, the celebration of the unconventional. And when the wider continent of Europe was invited to join Great Britain and Ireland in 1979, he made it his mission to make America pay. Some have wondered why Brazilian clubs, in particular, thrived early on at the Club World Cup. Was it the heat, a greater love for the competition, the timing that places this in South America's mid-season, after the European campaign has reached its exhausting conclusion? Yes, some of all that, probably; but something else, too. It's very possible that Brazil, indeed the rest of the world, feels about Europe the way Ballesteros did America. That it feels belittled, patronised, treated with contempt. And it thinks Europe has a cheek. Plundering its best players, while disregarding the football cultures creating them. The world has a point. How many times, since the Club World Cup started, have we been told that 'real' fans do not care for it; that 'ordinary' fans will not be watching, as if ours are the only eyeballs that matter. Who is 'real' in this debate, who has the right to speak for 'ordinary'? How presumptuous to consider our affiliations and preferences any more genuine than those of thousands of fans from Rio De Janeiro or Buenos Aires that have descended on this tournament. Our pomposity is staggering. If you're not interested, fair enough. But don't consider your view, your voice, all that counts. In 2005, trying to get Palestinians to vote in an upcoming election, the actor Richard Gere recorded a television message. 'Hi, I'm Richard Gere,' he began, 'and I'm speaking for the entire world'. There are a few back home who appear to believe they do the same. If fans from South America, Africa, and Asia are not real, if their football is so insignificant, try this simple test. Remove every player from those continents from the Premier League champions of the past 20 years. Take Alisson, Mohamed Salah, Luis Díaz and Alexis Mac Allister from Liverpool this season; take the entire forward line of Salah, Sadio Mané and Roberto Firmino, plus Alisson and Fabinho from the 2019-20 side. Then extract Ederson, Sergio Agüero, Yaya Touré, Fernandinho, Pablo Zabaleta, Riyad Mahrez and Carlos Tevez from the various teams built at Manchester City. See how Chelsea fare without Michael Essien, Willian, Diego Costa, Didier Drogba, Oscar, John Obi Mikel or Hernán Crespo. Even Manchester United's most recent title-winning team of 2012-23 contained Javier Hernández, Shinji Kagawa, Rafael and Antonio Valencia, from precisely the type of supposed backwaters being diminished here. So if these are grudge matches, that much is understandable. Europe are football's colonialists, taking the good stuff then wondering why the locals are poor, untrusting and unruly. There was no point in having a Club World Cup, it was said, because it would just be dominated by the big European teams; and no one thought it ironic that the reason those European teams are so dominant is that they are stuffed to the gills with the plunder of far continents. That Jorginho plays for Flamengo and Thiago Silva for Fluminese only now Europe have had their use of them. Look at the players propping up Uefa's contingent: Federico Valverde, Vinícius Júnior and Rodrygo for Real Madrid, Lautaro Martínez for Inter Milan, Enzo Fernández, Moisés Caicedo and Nicolas Jackson for Chelsea. And then, having sequestered the world's product, Europe decries the prospect of there being a competition and haughtily suggests those who wish for one are not real fans. So it is rather delightful that far from the last 16 being almost exclusively European, the remaining teams are spread across four confederations with Uefa involvement amounting to nine clubs from its initial rump of 12. By contrast, every Brazilian entrant made the knockout stage and at least one will be in the last eight. Actually, it would be great if a Brazilian club won this. Unlikely, given that the country's best footballers are all in Europe, but it would be one in the eye for those that run down the thousands who have imbued this competition with life, as if they are in some way inferior to an English fan, sitting on his sofa, sneering. They are real fans here. As real as you, as real as anyone. Never think it means more at Anfield. Never believe devotion is made more special because your team is lousy and in League Two. Anyone who has encountered the fanaticism around River Plate or Boca Juniors knows better than to patronise. In 2000, I stood by the side of the roads around the Maracana as coaches arrived from São Paulo carrying supporters of Corinthians to their Club World Cup final with Vasco da Gama. It was beautiful and terrifying in equal measure. It is six hours, close to 300 miles, between the cities and those that made the journey appeared stimulated by potions unknown. If the coaches had windows, they streamed with sweaty condensation, the product of a ferocious fanaticism. Most inside were stripped to the waist, screaming, broiling, banging on the glass, hanging out of broken panes, flying the skull and crossbones that is the unofficial flag of Corinthians. I would have enjoyed seeing some of the Club World Cup naysayers telling them they were not real, that their fervour was somehow inferior because they weren't on social media tweeting about sportswashing or there being too much football. It is not about money to those fans. It is not about Gianni Infantino, or who is propping up DAZN. This is about their team trying to become the world champions. And if they can do that, they can stare down Europe, too. Think back to when Argentina beat France in the 2022 World Cup final. There seemed a lot of pent-up anger released that day. A lot of players who cared not only about what they had won, but who they had defeated to get there. Looking back, it was almost as if they had something they wanted to say to us. Increase to 48 teams would hurt game. Over to you, Gianni . . . I was wrong about one key aspect of this Club World Cup. I thought it should have been 16 teams. Continental champions only. Tight, clean. No coefficient placeholders. It would have been shorter, streamlined, perhaps less controversial. But it wouldn't have worked. Too small, too many exclusions. If Fifa had just allowed Champions League winners from around the globe, there would have been no teams from Argentina, none from France, Italy or Portugal. Some of the continental champions from Asia, Africa and the Americas would have had to play-off. It would have been too limited in its appeal. This feels right, at 32. Big enough to be widely welcoming, small enough to maintain an elite standard. Almost inevitably it will expand to 48 team, or more, in the future; but that will create its own problems. Just as there is a risk of Fifa money making a single club — such as Auckland City — unstoppable in its own region, so an expanded tournament would create powerful cabals in even the strongest leagues. There does not seem such great danger to competition in the Premier League from the money earned by Chelsea and Manchester City this time around, because it is unlikely to be the same pair in 2029. England having two Champions League winners between 2021 and 2024 shut out any other Premier League qualifiers. Yet Liverpool would almost certainly have featured had Uefa coefficients come into play. Yet what if, with expansion, the limit of two clubs per country — barring continental champions, which is why Brazil have four here — was lifted? Liverpool, City, Chelsea and Arsenal could become a permanent Champions League/Club World Cup bloc, pulling away from their rivals financially. The next stage of the development has to be handled very carefully, then. Do we trust Infantino, the Fifa president, with that? Do we buffalo. Class of 2021 prove form doesn't matter One of the criticisms of the Club World Cup is that the qualification period is too long and there should be more recency bias. How are the present champions of England, Italy and Spain not present, yet Chelsea, the winners of the 2021 Champions League final and subsequently third, 12th, sixth and fourth in the Premier League, are? Put simply, if the competition is to take place every four years, it is right that the four Champions League winners are here. Yet beyond an argument for straightforward meritocracy, the results have also been interesting. With the exception of Al-Ahly, winners of the African Champions League in 2021 who joined the rest of the continent's teams in going out, every champion team from that distant year qualified for the round of 16. Al-Hilal, champions from 2021, are Asia's only representatives in the knockout stage, Monterrey one of only two from CONCACAF, Palmeiras, the Copa Libertadores winners in 2021, made it through, as did Chelsea. By contrast, of the 16 teams going home, nine qualified via coefficient or play-off, which would appear the most up to date assessment of club form. Of the five European and South American clubs to exit at the group stage — River Plate, Boca Juniors, Atletico Madrid, Porto and RB Salzburg — none of them arrived victorious. Keep Club World Cup in USA? It makes some sense… Having written that the next Club World Cup should be in Brazil, a friend made a very strong argument for keeping it here in the United States. Yes, the heat, the travel, the timings, local apathy, the stadiums selected are too big, all well-aired arguments. But, he said, there is no country with the make-up of America. All human life is here, meaning every team has its following. How many of what seemed thousands turning out for ES Tunis from Tunisia were actually Tunisians living in the US? Did Al-Ahly fans really travel in such numbers from Cairo, or were the majority the Egyptian diaspora already here? Brazil cannot deliver like that, and nor can Fifa charge anywhere near as much for tickets. We all know which argument swings it for Infantino, but it is not just American money that makes sense. World Cup win masks failures of Argentina's domestic game Of the top five all-time winners of the Copa Libertadores, four are from Argentina. River Plate and Estudiantes have four titles each, Boca Juniors six and Independiente seven. The only club in that company not from Argentina is Peñarol, of Uruguay, with five. No Brazilian club has been South American champions more than three times. Yet the past six years have brought a clean sweep of Brazilian winners, and four all-Brazilian finals, too. Since 2019, six different clubs from Brazil have reached the final, and only two from Argentina. A spread of seven different Argentinian finalists would require a countback to 1992. Winning a World Cup papers over some pretty big cracks. So does having Lionel Messi. Leaving Qatar in 2022, it was possible to think not much was wrong with Argentinian football. And in many ways, not much is. Even at 38, Messi's allure remains, as has been proven here. Argentinian talent is central to many of the best clubs in Europe, including Premier League champions, Liverpool. Yet its club football is weak, compared to Brazil. While a quartet of Brazilian clubs sailed into the round of 16 at the Club World Cup, both of Argentina's went home, Boca Juniors embarrassed having failed to beat Auckland City, while River Plate missed out to Monterrey of Mexico. Argentina no longer makes the sponsorship deals the Brazilians attract, no longer competes consistently for the biggest club prize. The money here will be a welcome bonus, but it is still swamped by what Brazil's quartet will reap. So Brazil will continue attracting the best of South America that does not go to Europe, Argentina will continue feeding off past glories, and one very present one. Both, however, hide a troubling reality for Argentina's clubs. Werner's reminder of Kaufman's inspired, unruly genius My colleague Matt Lawton's excellent interview with the Liverpool chairman Tom Werner found him telling stories of the comedian Andy Kaufman, who played Latka Gravas in Taxi. Werner, whose credits as a producer also include Roseanne and Third Rock From The Sun, had contracted Kaufman to perform Latka in the style of his character Foreign Man. But Kaufman, having accepted the role, hated Taxi, hated conventional sitcom and hated what the show did with his talent, too. He hated it so much, in fact, that he would stop his shows if anyone starting calling for Latka. He would warn that, if it happened again, he would educate by reading The Great Gatsby aloud for the remainder of the performance. Inevitably, someone in the crowd would test his patience. At which point Kaufman would stop and open the book. He often read the entire first chapter, before asking the audience if they wanted him to continue or to play a record. Kaufman had a lot of very funny routines involving the playing of records. The audience would cry out for the record. At which point, Kaufman would walk over and very slowly and methodically put on a recording — of him reading The Great Gatsby from exactly the point at which he had just stopped. For inspired, unruly genius, Mario Balotelli had nothing on that man. You've changed, Andy According to the Wimbledon chairwoman Debbie Jevans, Sir Andy Murray will help with the design of the statue to be built in his honour at the All England Club. If true, that is the least Andy Murray thing the man has ever done in his life. Unfairly treated, but Ruud should have put Leicester's needs before his own reputation Ruud Van Nistelrooy was not treated well by Leicester City, left hanging until long after the season ended. Some of his players seemed a poor lot, too, and much of the uncertainty around Leicester was a combination of dismal management and the continued vindictiveness of modern football administrators, folk who will not be satisfied until they have pushed a struggling club over a cliff. However, from the start, Van Nistelrooy did not look a good fit. Leicester were hardly thriving under Steve Cooper but he was working with significant limitations and had kept them out of the bottom three. They needed hands-on management, instead Van Nistelrooy watched his first game, away to Brentford, from the stands. Ostensibly, this was to learn more about the team. Yet Van Nistelrooy had taken four games in charge of Manchester United, and two were against Leicester. He probably knew more about them than any manager bar Cooper. It smacked of shielding his reputation. Brentford, at the time, had the best form of any home team in the country, including Liverpool — and duly beat Leicester 4-1. It meant, however, that Van Nistelrooy's first game was at home to West Ham United who were in equally pitiful form. He won that match, and then one other, before Leicester were relegated. So, yes, Van Nistelrooy was poorly served by Leicester; but it cuts both ways. Shattered players? Don't be so sure The prevalent wisdom is that the two English clubs at the Club World Cup will be shattered come the middle of the domestic campaign, having moved from here to pre-season training with barely a break. Do not be so sure. Both seem to be using this as pre-season, and will probably give the players extended time off when the tournament concludes. New signings will have bedded in, too. Not saying it works. But not saying it won't.
