logo
‘Vacation-style' beaches may have existed on ancient Mars

‘Vacation-style' beaches may have existed on ancient Mars

CNN28-02-2025
Mars may have once hosted an ocean with waves that lapped against sandy beaches 3.6 billion years ago, according to new research. China's Zhurong rover and its ground-penetrating radar detected the ancient shorelines when it operated from May 2021 to May 2022.
The rover landed in Utopia Planitia, a plain within the largest known impact basin on Mars, near a series of ridges in the planet's northern hemisphere. Scientists have long questioned whether the ridges might represent the remnants of a shoreline, so Zhurong set out in search of evidence of ancient water.
The study, based on data collected by Zhurong as its radar instrument peered beneath the surface to examine hidden rock layers, was published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
'We're finding places on Mars that used to look like ancient beaches and ancient river deltas,' said study coauthor Benjamin Cardenas, assistant professor of geology in the department of geosciences at Penn State, in a statement. 'We found evidence for wind, waves, no shortage of sand — a proper, vacation-style beach.'
What's more, it's possible the Martian environment was warmer and wetter for tens of millions of years longer than previously suspected, the study authors wrote.
The revelations add to the increasing evidence that the red planet once had a warmer, wetter climate as well as an ocean that covered one-third of the Martian surface — conditions that might have created a hospitable environment for life.
The search for Mars' ancient ocean
In the 1970s, NASA's Mariner 9 and Viking 2 were the first missions to spy features that suggested the presence of an ancient ocean on Mars.
Utopia Planitia dates to the Hesperian Period, or 3.7 billion to 3 billion years ago, and it lacks abundant evidence for standing water, unlike more ancient regions of Mars, said Aaron Cavosie, a planetary scientist and senior lecturer at the Space Science and Technology Centre at Curtin University in Perth, Australia. Cavosie was not involved in the new study.
'The Mariner 9 orbiter first imaged giant canyons on Hesperian surfaces of Mars in the 1970s, but they are generally viewed as representing catastrophic bursts of groundwater to the surface, rather than evidence for standing water,' Cavosie said. 'The idea is that Mars' climate cooled down by this time and the surface dried up.'
Multiple spacecraft have captured observations that suggest much of Mars' water escaped to space as the planet's atmosphere disappeared — astronomers are still investigating what caused this dramatic transformation. As the planet cooled, some of the water likely moved underground in the form of ice or combined with rocks to create minerals.
Viking's images showcased what appeared to be a shoreline in the northern hemisphere. But in stark contrast to the level shorelines on Earth, the Martian feature was jaggedly irregular, with height differences of up to 6.2 miles (10 kilometers).
Study coauthor Michael Manga, a professor of Earth and planetary science at the University of California, Berkeley, and his colleagues previously suggested that volcanic activity in the region, as well as a change in Mars' rotation, altered the shoreline and caused it to be uneven over time.
'Because the spin axis of Mars has changed, the shape of Mars has changed. And so what used to be flat is no longer flat,' Manga said.
But what scientists needed most to answer their questions were observations made from 'boots on the ground,' or in this case, rover tracks, Cavosie said. Zhurong would be able to see whether the rock layers buried in Utopia Planitia were volcanic or if they contained sediments consistent with those of an ocean.
The dip of a shoreline
When Zhurong landed, it traveled along Utopia Planitia's ridges, collecting data up to 260 feet (80 meters) beneath the surface with radar.
Between 32.8 and 114.8 feet (10 and 35 meters) down, the rover's radar detected sedimentary structures similar to layered beaches on Earth that dipped at a 14.5-degree angle. The radar also measured the size of the particles, which matched that of sand grains.
'The structures don't look like sand dunes,' Manga said. 'They don't look like an impact crater. They don't look like lava flows. That's when we started thinking about oceans. The orientation of these features (is) parallel to what the old shoreline would have been.'
The structures strongly resembled coastal sediment deposits on Earth, such as those found in the Bay of Bengal, formed by the presence of a long-term stable ocean, the study authors said.
The team said it believes the rover found 'foreshore deposits,' which take millions of years to form as sediments carried by tides and waves slope downward toward an ocean.
'This stood out to us immediately because it suggests there were waves, which means there was a dynamic interface of air and water,' Cardenas said. 'When we look back at where the earliest life on Earth developed, it was in the interaction between oceans and land, so this is painting a picture of ancient habitable environments, capable of harboring conditions friendly toward microbial life.'
Rivers likely helped dump sediment into the oceans, which was then distributed by waves to create beaches. Sedimentary rocks, carved channels and even the remains of an ancient river delta, studied by NASA's Perseverance rover, have shown how water once shaped the Martian landscape.
After the ocean dried up, the beaches were likely blanketed by volcanic eruptions and material from dust storms, effectively preserving the shoreline, Cardenas said.
'It's always a challenge to know how the last 3.5 billion years of erosion on Mars might have altered or completely erased evidence of an ocean,' he said. 'But not with these deposits. This is a very unique dataset.'
Now, the team wants to determine the height of the waves and tides within the ocean, how long the ocean persisted, and whether it provided a potentially hospitable environment, Magna said.
François Forget, senior research scientist and research director at the French National Centre for Scientific Research, said he isn't entirely convinced by the hypothesis presented in the study that only ocean shorelines can explain the radar data. Forget was not involved in the new research.
'I do not think that we can be certain that the observations could not be explained by dune processes,' or the formation of sand dunes, which Forget said he believes to be more likely on Mars.
Meanwhile, Dr. Joe McNeil, a planetary scientist and postdoctoral researcher at London's Natural History Museum, believes the findings add weight to the hypothesis of an ancient northern ocean on Mars by providing crucial subsurface evidence. McNeil was not involved in the new study.
'If these coastal deposits truly represent deposition of sediments at the edge of an ancient ocean, it suggests a prolonged period of stable liquid water, which has major implications for Mars' climate history,' McNeil said. 'It would mean Mars had conditions that could have supported a hydrological system with potential habitable environments for substantial amounts of time.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Support for NASA returning to the moon and going to Mars is surging
Support for NASA returning to the moon and going to Mars is surging

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Support for NASA returning to the moon and going to Mars is surging

A recent poll conducted by CBS News provides an encouraging look into public support for the Artemis program to return astronauts to the moon and eventually send humans to Mars. Sixty-seven percent of respondents favor a return to the moon and just 33 percent oppose one. On Mars, sixty-five percent favor sending astronauts to the red planet with 35 percent in opposition. Support for sending astronauts back to the moon tracks favorably among all age groups, with 71 percent of 18 to 29-year-olds in favor. The current favorable view of the Artemis program contrasts with what people thought of the Apollo program to land men on the moon while it was ongoing. As space historian Roger Launius pointed out, most Americans, with the exception of one poll taken in July 1969, took a dim view of going to the moon. 'Consistently throughout the decade, 45-60 percent of Americans believed that the government was spending too much on space, indicative of a lack of commitment to the spaceflight agenda,' Launius wrote. Incidentally, the CBS News poll shows that now Americans believe that the Apollo program was worth the effort, 77 to 23 percent. The findings were consistent with those taken on the 50th and 40th anniversaries of the first moon landing. The fact that support for going back to the moon and on to Mars is uniform across all age groups jumps out. In times past, some have suggested that supporters for sending astronauts beyond low Earth orbit mainly consisted of boomers nostalgic for the glories of the Apollo program. If that was ever the case, it isn't any longer. Laura Seward Forczyk, a space career consultant, video blogger and author of ' Rise of the Space Age Millennials,' likely spoke for a lot of younger people on X when she posted, 'I hope to live to see humans walking on another world again. Artemis III can't come soon enough.' Her sentiment expresses a desire for something beautiful and glorious in a world often ugly and dispiriting. Come to think of it, that was the Apollo 11 moon landing in the midst of the turmoil of the 1960s. A lot of famous space influencers, such as former NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine, billionaire private space traveler Jared Isaacman, video blogger Eliana Sheriff and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk were not alive when men first walked on the moon. One word of caution should be made about how poll results can often be influenced by question-wording. In 2023, the Pew organization released a poll suggesting that returning to the moon and on to Mars were of lower priority than things like asteroid detection and measuring climate change. Nevertheless, when combining the answers 'top priority' and 'important but lower priority' space exploration still enjoyed healthy support, with 57 percent favoring a return to the moon and 56 percent going to Mars. People are looking forward to witnessing the first footsteps on the moon in over 50 years and the first ever on Mars. Donald Trump was the latest president of the United States to make that promise when he started the Artemis program during his first term. Now, he has to deliver. Unfortunately, President Trump is in serious danger of blowing it. Over six months into his second administration, America still does not have a permanent NASA administrator, thanks to Trump's capricious, last-minute withdrawal of Isaacman's nomination. The White House and the Congress are wrangling over NASA science funding and how long the space agency should retain the Orion Space Launch System architecture for returning to the moon. Trump needs to move quickly to nominate a permanent head of NASA. He could change his mind again about Isaacman, though he may be loath to admit to making a mistake. The White House also needs to reestablish the National Space Council as a center for the formulation of space policy. The council performed great service during the first Trump administration. It can do so again. Finally, Trump and Musk should resolve their feud. The most powerful man in the world and the world's richest man work better together than at cross purposes. Trump has won some great domestic and foreign policy victories. It will be a pity if his legacy is one of letting China get back to the moon before we do. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled ' Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon? ' as well as ' The Moon, Mars and Beyond ' and, most recently, ' Why is America Going Back to the Moon? ' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.

Building solar-powered rovers, making slime part of NASA Astro Camp experience
Building solar-powered rovers, making slime part of NASA Astro Camp experience

American Press

time3 hours ago

  • American Press

Building solar-powered rovers, making slime part of NASA Astro Camp experience

Youth in Allen Parish are currently immersed in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) learning at NASA Astro Camp, engaging in experiments and hands-on activities that are inspiring their curiosity. Students in grades 4-8 have been working to build solar-powered rovers, create a heliometer, grow plants in space and make slime in bags as part of the weeklong NASA Astro Camp at the district's new Pathway learning center in Oberlin. Oakdale High School biology teacher Chiara Crawford said the program incorporates real-world applications of science, technology, engineering and mathematics, as well as problem-solving skills. It also focuses on developing critical thinking, collaboration and communication skills. 'They are learning about space, but they are also learning engineering type skills, how to deal with screws, wires, motors and making circuits,' Crawford said. 'These are skills they can use in science and everyday life.' She also stressed the importance of problem-solving, noting that it is crucial for students to understand that setbacks are not insurmountable and that they can develop the skills to overcome challenges without becoming frustrated. Crawford also hopes the camp will open the students' eyes to space and science and get them excited about science in the classroom. Instructional Support Supervisor LaDeisha George hopes the camp will inspire the students to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. 'Hopefully if nothing else there is an awareness and that they are excited about the possibilities, opportunities and fields of study that exist with STEM,' George said, adding that programs like the Astro Camp help raise an awareness and understanding of the skills that can lead to future careers. George noted that Allen Parish is within driving distance of NASA facilities in Houston, Mississippi and Florida. 'A lot of them don't know what they can do and what's out there for them,' George said. Twelve-year-old Bentley Sweat, a seventh grader, who likes to build things, said he is having a blast at the camp. 'My favorite thing was building the solar-powered rover because I like to see how things move using very simple things,' Sweat said. Sweat increased the power to his rover by taking the motor from a remote control car. Harley Perkins, 13, an eighth grader at Oberlin High School, said the camp was perfect because she likes figuring out how things work and how to build things. 'I like science because it's interesting to learn different things,' she said, adding that she wants to be a teacher. Ten-year-old Hoyt Davis, a sixth grader at Oberlin Elementary School, said the camp is helping him learn about engineering and how to build a solar-powered rover. Classmate Brayden Martin, 12, has been enjoying learning how astronauts grow plants in space For 12-year-old Lennox All, a sixth grader at Kinder Middle School, making the slime was the best part because it was messy.

Warning — Next Week's Perseid Meteor Shower To Be ‘Severely Compromised'
Warning — Next Week's Perseid Meteor Shower To Be ‘Severely Compromised'

Forbes

time4 hours ago

  • Forbes

Warning — Next Week's Perseid Meteor Shower To Be ‘Severely Compromised'

The Perseid meteor shower, the most popular "shooting star" display of the year, will be far from its best because of the presence of a near-full moon in the sky, experts have warned. When Is The Perseid Meteor Shower? The most prolific meteor shower of the year under ideal conditions, the Perseids are active right now, having started on July 14. The show will extend through Sept. 1, but come to a narrow peak overnight on Tuesday-Wednesday, Aug. 12-13. However, although the sturgeon moon will turn full on Saturday, Aug. 9, it will still be very bright come the Perseids peak — and rise into the sky just as it gets dark. The Truth About The Perseid Meteor Shower In 2025 According to the American Meteor Society, this is interrupting the Perseids' 'strong maximum' and playing havoc with the 50-75 'shooting stars' per hour normally expected to be seen on the peak night. 'In 2025, the waning gibbous moon will severely compromise this shower at the time of maximum activity,' says the AMS. 'Such conditions will reduce activity by at least 75 percent as only the brighter meteors will be visible.' That means a maximum of only about 12-18 'shooting stars' per hour will likely be seen on the peak night of the Perseids this year. What NASA Says About The Perseid Meteor Shower NASA agrees that one of the best annual meteor showers, the Perseids, will this year disappoint. 'Unfortunately, this year the moon is nearly full on the peak night, and its glare will wash out all but the brightest meteors,' states NASA in its latest skywatching tips for August 2025. However, there is some positive news. 'While that's not so great for Perseid watchers, the good news is that another favorite annual meteor shower, the Geminids, is poised for Moon-free viewing in December,' writes NASA. When Is The Geminids Meteor Shower? Of all the major meteor showers in 2025, it's the Geminids that are poised to be the most impressive. Active from Dec. 1-21, the Geminid meteor shower can produce up to 150 'shooting stars' per hour during the peak — at least, in theory — with the peak overnight on Saturday/Sunday, Dec. 13/14. This time, the moon will not get in the way until a few hours after midnight, rising as a crescent in the eastern sky as the peak comes to an end. So while 2025's Perseids peak may be a letdown, the December's Geminids promise to deliver a dazzling consolation prize under much darker skies later this year. Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store