The Indian ecological disaster that inspired new Australian play, The Wrong Gods
The river runs west, all the way to the Arabian Sea. By the water's edge, eagles and hornbills flit across the immense jungle canopy comprising countless tree species that are found nowhere else on the subcontinent. The river's vast banks are a refuge for wildlife as grand and diverse as tigers, bears and wolves.
It's also a home for humans, and a holy place. Mentioned in classic texts like the Mahabharata and the Ramayana, it's not hard to imagine Hindu gods taking a stroll along its rapids.
But, after centuries of being home to not just intricate ecosystems but countless villages and farmers, the Narmada River now represents human-made ecological disaster and powerful protest.
The iconic grassroots movement that sprung up around the river has rippled far and wide — including here to Australia, where a new work by award-winning playwright S. Shakthidharan uses it as inspiration. Called The Wrong Gods, the play's central question is: what stops us from acting in the best interest of nature?
The Narmada Valley Project, or the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) is one of the world's biggest hydropower infrastructure projects — including 30 major, 135 medium and 3,000 small dams.
Proposed in the 60s, the national building goal was noble: capture the river's huge flow to irrigate farmland and provide drinking water and power for three Indian states.
Instead, it has been described as India's "greatest planned environmental disaster".
While no environmental impact research was done prior to its construction, the dam has led to widespread deforestation, loss of habitat and loss of wildlife, both aquatic and mammal.
Almost immediately, Indigenous Indian villagers (Adivasis) were displaced by the rising river banks or, as famed writer Arundhati Roy put it, "chased off their ancestral lands as though they were intruders".
The total count of the farmers, farm workers and fisherfolk who would be made homeless is somewhere between 250,000 and 500,000 and encompasses hundreds of villages. Most of these people have been forced to move to slums surrounding major cities.
Ten years ago, Australian playwright S. Shakthidharan visited one such farming family, who were part of the resistance to the dam project, and it was there the seed for his new play was planted.
"I'll never forget those few nights," he tells ABC Arts.
"It takes a long time to get there, it's very remote, and so we hadn't eaten much for a very long time. And when we got there, they killed a chicken for us.
"I was vegetarian at the time, which I didn't tell them, and I helped them clean and prepare the chicken. We spent the whole night doing that, cooking and eating it. And then I slept next to the farmer on a rattan bed, over the chickens."
According to Nadini K Oza, a former activist and current archivist of the movement, it was a true grassroots operation.
"For more than half a century, the people of the Narmada Valley who were affected by the project have been conducting small and big struggles against the SSP," she says.
"In the mid-1980s and late 1980s, many of these groups, organisations and struggles came together and ultimately evolved into the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA)."
The NBA was hugely successful with its protests. It forced the World Bank to withdraw its $US450 million loan from the dam project and later was able to halt construction for several years through the Supreme Court. The movement fought for and won "better rehabilitation and resettlement of the people" displaced from their villages too.
Despite these successes, dam construction has continued and is due for completion in 2025 — making the conservation and Indigenous-rights debates a continuing part of India's political landscape.
It may seem half a world away but, for S. Shakthidharan, the story of the Narmada River has much to offer us in Australia today.
"I was really grappling with the reasons that we aren't acting on climate change," he says.
"I think our biggest issue is actually a cultural one, which is that we are locked into systems of consumption that we don't know how to get out of, and we're locked to it, to a way of relating to the natural worlds that we don't know how to get out of.
"How do we acknowledge the incredible things progress has given us, and still find a way forward to cultural change, to bend the power of progress in a different way?"
That's when he came up with the idea for The Wrong Gods — reflecting that perhaps the most successful religion of all time was that of progress.
"We pray to it and believe in it regardless of political beliefs about it. It's a religion that, even if you're against it, you're still a part of."
Finally, the playwright realised he had already visited the perfect setting for all this — the Narmada Valley.
"I tried to write a plan which kind of took inspiration from that setting and that struggle, but could turn it into a parable for all of us."
Shakthidharan has also intentionally incorporated one of the most striking aspects of the anti-dam movement — the prominent role of women.
Women have led many direct actions, including long fasts and have faced the brunt of state retaliation including police beatings and jail.
The Wrong Gods centres on Nirmala, a very traditional village woman, and her daughter Isha, who has dreams of leaving their remote valley to study and become a scientist.
"The characters ended up becoming all women in the play, and the relationship between individual liberation and collective liberation felt so potent in that context," Shakthidharan says.
He soon realised the benefits of co-directing with a woman — Hannah Goodwin, the resident director of Belvoir.
"I realised that it would be great to use this opportunity to build a team where as many women are at the forefront as possible: so the set was built by women, we have women costume designers, stage managers and actors.
"The room and the process has been different for that and I'm so proud of that."
The Wrong Gods is currently showing at Arts Centre Melbourne until June 12.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
14 hours ago
- ABC News
British lawyer says families received wrong remains of Air India crash victims
Relatives of a British victim killed in last month's Air India crash received a casket that contained mixed remains, a lawyer representing several families says. The family of a separate victim received the remains of another person, according to James Healy-Pratt, who is representing 20 British families who lost loved ones in the disaster. A total of 241 people on board the London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner died when the plane crashed shortly after take-off from Ahmedabad in western India on June 12. The toll included 169 Indian passengers and 52 British nationals. Several people on the ground also died while only one passenger, British citizen Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, survived the crash. Mr Healy-Pratt told the Press Association news agency that the return of victims' remains had been marred by serious errors, which had been identified following a probe by a British coroner. "In the first two caskets that were repatriated, in one of the caskets, there was co-mingling of DNA which did not relate to the deceased in that casket or the casket that accompanied it," he said. The lawyer added the coroner was then "able to determine that one particular loved one was not at all who the family thought they were". Miten Patel, whose mother, Shobhana Patel, died along with her husband in the disaster, told the BBC that "other remains" were found in her casket after her body was returned to Britain. "People were tired and there was a lot of pressure. But there has to be a level of responsibility that you're sending the right bodies to the UK," he told the BBC. The Daily Mail newspaper first reported two cases in which the wrong remains were apparently returned to families in Britain. India's foreign ministry said all remains "were handled with utmost professionalism and with due regard for the dignity of the deceased". "We are continuing to work with the UK authorities on addressing any concerns related to this issue," the statement added. AFP

News.com.au
4 days ago
- News.com.au
‘Take care': Pilot's last words before doomed Air India flight
The lead pilot in the Air India plane disaster said he would 'be back soon' as he left for work on the day flight 171 crashed, killing 260 people. Speculation has mounted about Captain Sumeet Sabharwal after the probe into the June 12 crash indicated switches controlling fuel flow to the plane's engines were turned off shortly after takeoff. Some experts who have reviewed the initial report from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) believe a pilot on board moved the switches. Fingers have been pointed at Captain Sabharwal because his younger co-pilot, Clive Kunder, would have had his 'hands full' while flying the plane. It has led to claims the tragedy was a case of 'suicide by captain', with Sky News aviation expert Captain Byron Bailey saying the switches were turned off at the 'perfect time' to cause a crash. But a new report from The Telegraph has revealed Captain Sabharwal's last words to a security guard at his apartment complex suggested no hint of the looming disaster. 'Please, take care of papa. I will be back soon,' he reportedly said. The security guard, Sunil Lokhande, told the UK newspaper: 'He smiled and went away. You'd never guess he carried any sadness inside.' Friends have also revealed Captain Sabharwal was considering an early retirement from flying in order to care of his elderly father, who lived at the same apartment block. 'His father is very old, and he was going to look after him full time. That was the plan,' former colleague Neil Pais said. Mr Pais said Captain Sabharwal had absolutely 'no airs about himself' and 'always (wore) a smile when he spoke to you'. 'I never once saw him raise his voice or lose his temper. And yet he never compromised on work or safety,' he said. 'If there was an issue, he'd point it out, but always in the nicest possible way.' The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner flying from Ahmedabad in western India to London plummeted shortly after takeoff, killing all but one of the 242 people on board as well as 19 people on the ground. The AAIB's report found that both engine fuel 'cut off' switches flipped to the off position almost simultaneously, starving the engines of fuel and causing the plane to lose thrust and crash. It also suggested microchip malfunction caused the issue, not human error. The first was moved three seconds after lift off and the other one second later, the AAIB report found, before being turned back on a further 10 seconds later. But an assessment by US officials of the AAIB report and black-box material, according to the Wall Street Journal, pointed the finger at a pilot. Captain Bailey told Sky News the co-pilot Mr Kunder would have been occupied flying the plane, leaving the senior pilot monitoring the flight – Captain Sabharwal – as the only one capable of moving the mechanical switches. 'They require absolute physical effort to lift the switch up, raise it over … and back down. So it had to be done by one of the pilots,' he said. 'What is very obvious to pilots is, three seconds after lift off is the perfect time to have done this.' Campbell Wilson, chief executive of Air India, last week told staff in a memo the investigation was 'far from over'. Mr Wilson said 'over the past 30 days, we've seen an ongoing cycle of theories, allegations, rumours and sensational headlines, many of which have later been disproven'. The Indian Commercial Pilots Association said on Sunday it was 'deeply disturbed by speculative narratives' surrounding the Air India crash 'particularly the reckless and unfounded insinuation of pilot suicide'. 'There is absolutely no basis for such a claim at this stage,' it said in a statement, adding, 'it is deeply insensitive to the individuals and families involved.' 'To casually suggest pilot suicide without verified evidence is a gross violation of ethical reporting and a disservice to the dignity of the profession,' it said.

News.com.au
6 days ago
- News.com.au
‘In your hands': Exchange moments before Air India crash
The captain of the doomed Air India flight that killed more than 200 people last month, gave control of the plane to his first officer before takeoff, according to sources citing cockpit recordings from the recovered black boxes. Initial findings from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) reported that fuel control switches to the engines were moved from the "run" to the "cut-off" position moments before impact. It also included an exchange in which one of the pilots asked the other why the fuel switches had been moved, without identifying the speakers. Two sources familiar with the matter claim that earlier in the recording, Captain Sumeet Sabharwal told First Officer Clive Kunder, 'the plane is in your hands,' Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera reports. It isn't unusual for a First Officer to fly the plane at various points, including take off. But US pilots who have read the initial findings from the AAIB into the crash were cited in The Wall Street Journal on Thursday as saying Mr Kunder would likely have had his hands full flying the plane when the fuel switches were turned off. That meant Captain Sabharwal, who was monitoring, would be more likely to have moved the switches. Captain Sabharwal was a veteran in the industry while Mr Kunder was in his early thirties and still building his career. Air India flight 171 bound for London's Gatwick Airport, crashed in Ahmedabad just 30 seconds into the flight, killing all but one of the 242 people on board and an additional 19 on the ground. India's aviation regulator ordered the country's airlines this week to investigate the locking feature on the fuel control switches of several Boeing models. Air India's inspection of the locking feature on the switches of its existing Boeing 787 aircraft found no issues, an internal communication circulated within the airline said. The order to investigate came after Boeing notified operators that the fuel switch locks on its jets were safe. 'Over the weekend, our engineering team initiated precautionary inspections on the locking mechanism of Fuel Control Switch (FCS) on all our Boeing 787 aircraft,' the airline's flight operations department said in a communication to its pilots. 'The inspections have been completed and no issues were found,' the communication said, noting that it had complied with the regulator's directives. It said all of its Boeing 787-8 aircraft had also undergone 'Throttle Control Module (TCM) replacement as per the Boeing maintenance schedule', adding that the FCS was part of this module. India's AAIB said it was still 'too early to reach any definite conclusions'. It said the investigation's final report would come out with 'root causes and recommendations'. 'We urge the public and the media to refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process,' it said in a statement. – With AFP